について
このスキルは、廃止決定が下された後、段階的に実施する終了運用チェックリストを、状況に合わせて生成します。計画の規模を、単純な作業リストから完全なプレイブックまで、廃止の複雑さに応じて適切に調整し、すべてのアクション項目に担当者を明確に割り当てます。機能エリアを体系的に網羅し、データや契約の取り残しなどの問題を防止するためにご利用ください。
クイックインストール
Claude Code
推奨npx skills add deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skillsgit clone https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills.git ~/.claude/skills/eol-checklistこのコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします
ドキュメント
EOL Checklist
Purpose
Turn a sunset decision into a phase-gated operational plan: what must happen, in which lifecycle phase, and who owns it. The output is a working checklist — sticky-note-sized items, each with a verb and a named function — not a strategy document.
The checklist is sized to the sunset. A deprecated internal tool gets a dozen items across three phases. A regulated hardware line gets a cross-functional playbook across six phases with gate criteria between them. Both are correct; using the wrong one is the failure.
Input
Works best with: The product being sunset and any dates you're already committed to.
Also useful: Customer and revenue scale, whether a replacement exists and how ready it is, contract or regulatory obligations, and whether hardware, inventory, or channel partners are in play.
Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or
an appended ARGUMENTS: line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it
covers; don't re-ask.
Arriving empty-handed? That works too. The skill asks up to three questions — what's being sunset and at what scale, whether there's a replacement, and what hard deadlines exist — then picks a level and builds. Unknowns become labeled assumptions rather than blockers.
Example invocations:
EOL checklist for our legacy reporting module, shutting down Dec 31, ~400 accounts.Build the heavy checklist for a hardware retirement — service contracts, 8 resellers, UL certified.
Key Concepts
Right-Size Before You Build
Not all EOLs play out the same. Most land in the middle. Pick the level deliberately:
| Level 1 — Light | Level 2 — Standard | Level 3 — Heavy | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Typical scope | Feature, internal tool, unversioned API | Commercial product, active customers | Revenue-critical, hardware, regulated |
| Phases used | 2-3 (NSC, EOS, EOL) | 4-5 (NSC, EOS, EOE, EOM, EOL) | All 6 (NSC through EOSRV) |
| Functional areas | 4 | 11 | 15 |
| Gate criteria | Not needed | Between major phases | Between every phase, with approvers |
| Output feel | Punch list | Working checklist with owners and dates | Cross-functional playbook |
Level 2 is the default. Recommend a level, say why in one line, and let the user move it. If they go lighter, name the specific area that drops out so the choice is informed. Never default to Level 3 — a heavy checklist applied to a light sunset teaches teams that EOL process is ceremony, and they'll skip it next time when it matters.
The level is yours to change mid-build. "Actually make this heavier" is a normal thing to hear after the Legal row surfaces something.
The Lifecycle Gates
- GA (General Availability): Actively sold and fully supported
- NSC (Notice of Status Change): The decision is communicated; planning begins
- EOS (End of Sale): No new customers can purchase
- EOE (End of Expansion): Existing customers cannot add capacity or seats
- EOR (End of Renewal): Existing contracts will not be renewed
- EOM (End of Maintenance): Bug fixes and patches stop
- EOL (End of Life): The product is retired
- EOSRV (End of Service): All support and service obligations end
Which of these become checklist phases: GA is a state, not a phase of work — nothing is checklisted there. EOR is contract-driven and only appears when renewals are in play. So working checklists usually span the six actionable phases: NSC, EOS, EOE, EOM, EOL, EOSRV, with EOR inserted when subscription or service contracts run past EOS.
Naming the gates you're not using is as useful as naming the ones you are. A Level 1 checklist should say "EOE and EOSRV don't apply — nothing to expand, nothing to service."
The Fifteen Functional Areas
Filtered by level. The parenthetical marks the lowest level where each appears:
| Area | Level |
|---|---|
| Product and Strategy | 1 |
| Engineering and Technical | 1 |
| Support | 1 |
| Documentation and Training | 1 |
| Legal and Contractual | 2 |
| Financial Planning | 2 |
| Sales | 2 |
| Marketing | 2 |
| Customer Success | 2 |
| IT Systems | 2 |
| Data Management | 2 |
| Inventory and Supply Chain | 3 |
| Channel and Partner Management | 3 |
| Regulatory and Compliance | 3 |
| Internal Organizational Alignment | 3 |
The Sticky-Note Rule
Every item is 4 to 8 words, names a verb, and carries a named owner (a function, not a person's calendar). "Legal reviews contracts" is an item. "Ensure appropriate review of all relevant contractual obligations across the customer base" is a paragraph wearing a checkbox.
Why the owner is mandatory: an unowned item is a wish. Forcing a function onto every line surfaces cross-functional gaps early — when you can't name who owns "notify channel partners," you have just discovered that nobody does.
Phase Gates Are Commitments, Not Dates
A phase gate is what must be true before you advance, with an approver. "EOS to EOE: last-time-buy orders closed — Approver: Sales VP." This is what stops an EOL from being one announcement followed six months later by somebody quietly pulling a plug.
Anti-Patterns (what this is NOT)
- Not a project plan. No Gantt, no dependencies graph, no resource loading.
- Not exhaustive by default. Coverage proportional to risk, not maximum ceremony.
- Not the decision. If the sunset itself is still in question, this is premature.
- Not a substitute for the conversations. A checklist item saying "align with Legal" is not alignment with Legal.
Application
Step 1: Set the level
Recommend from blast radius — customers, revenue, contracts, hardware, partners — then present all three and let the user choose. If the level is genuinely unclear, ask:
"How complex is this sunset?
- Light — a feature, internal tool, or unversioned API. Few users, all reachable.
- Standard — a commercial product with paying customers and contracts.
- Heavy — revenue-critical, hardware in the field, channel partners, or regulated.
Most sunsets are Standard. Which sounds like yours?"
Step 2: Select phases in scope
Map the level to phases, then check for the two overrides:
- Contracts running past EOS? Insert EOR.
- No service obligations at all? Drop EOSRV and say so.
If a date is genuinely unknown, write TBD — and if a date shouldn't be set yet (no migration
path exists), write Not scheduled and add an item naming the precondition. An invented EOL date
is a promise you will break in public.
Step 3: Build items per phase, per area
For each phase in scope, walk the functional areas warranted by the level. Each item:
- Starts with a verb
- Is 4 to 8 words
- Names an owning function
- Belongs to exactly one phase — the phase where the work happens, not where it's announced
Cover, at minimum, the four things sunsets most often strand:
- Data — export format, availability window, deletion schedule
- Contracts — renewal language, SLA terms, refunds or credits owed
- Access — API keys, integrations, SSO, downstream systems that read from it
- Money — forecast adjustment, revenue recognition, cost of the sunset itself
Step 4: Write gate criteria (Level 2+)
For each phase transition, list what must be true and who signs. Three to five criteria per gate is plenty. If you can't name an approver, the gate isn't real.
Step 5: Post-EOL actions and assumptions
Always include a short post-EOL block — archival, final report, and a lessons-learned review. The review is the item teams cut first and regret most; the next sunset is always easier when someone wrote down what surprised you in this one.
Close with assumptions to validate — every unknown from Step 1, stated plainly.
Final Step: Offer what comes next
"Where next?
- Map the stakeholder conversations — who to talk to, in what order (Recommended)
- Draft the customer announcement — see
eol-message - Build the internal enablement pack — support FAQ, sales talking points, objections
- Convert this to a dated timeline — calendar dates against each phase
Reply with a number, a combination ('1 & 3'), or your own path."
Examples
examples/sample.md— Fieldlight Classic Dispatch (SaaS, Level 2, five phases)examples/sample-industrial.md— NFA-200 controller line (industrial, Level 3, six phases with a deliberately undated EOL)
Common Pitfalls
Pitfall 1: Ceremony Inflation
Symptom: Every sunset gets the 15-area, six-phase playbook because it's "more thorough."
Consequence: Teams learn EOL process is theater, skip it entirely on the next one — and the next one is the one with the contracts.
Fix: Right-size deliberately. A Level 1 checklist that gets used beats a Level 3 that gets ignored.
Pitfall 2: Unowned Items
Symptom: "Ensure customer data is exported." Owner: blank, or "the team."
Consequence: Everyone assumes someone else has it. On shutdown day, nobody did.
Fix: Every item names a function. If you can't name one, that's the finding — escalate it rather than papering over it.
Pitfall 3: The Invented Date
Symptom: An EOL date gets written down because the checklist template had a blank for it.
Consequence: You announce a date, discover the migration path doesn't exist, and move it. Customers who planned around the first date stop believing the second.
Fix: Not scheduled is a legitimate entry. Pair it with the precondition that would let you
schedule it.
Pitfall 4: Phase Collapse
Symptom: Everything lands in one phase called "EOL."
Consequence: You stop sales, stop support, and shut down on the same day. Customers experience it as an outage with advance notice.
Fix: Separate the gates. Stopping sales is cheap and early; stopping service is expensive and last.
Pitfall 5: Forgetting the Downstream Readers
Symptom: The checklist covers the product and its customers, but not the four internal systems that quietly query its API.
Consequence: The product retires on schedule and three dashboards, a billing job, and a partner integration break the next morning.
Fix: The IT Systems and Data Management areas exist for this. At Level 1, still ask once: what reads from this?
References
Related Skills
These stand on their own — none is a prerequisite for this skill, and this skill isn't a prerequisite for them. If you already picked a level elsewhere, just say "Level 2" and this skill will build to it; there's no handoff artifact to carry.
eol-readiness-advisor— if the decision itself still needs a case, or you want the level recommended for youeol-stakeholder-sequence— who to talk to and wheneol-internal-enablement— readying customer-facing teamseol-message— the customer-facing announcement
External Frameworks
- Industry EOL lifecycle practice (GA/NSC/EOS/EOE/EOM/EOL/EOSRV)
- RACI — for assigning the owner on each item
Provenance
- Adapted from
prompts/eol-checklist.mdin thehttps://github.com/deanpeters/product-manager-promptsrepo.
GitHub リポジトリ
よくある質問
eol-checklist Skillとは何ですか?
eol-checklist はdeanpeters が作成した Claude Skillです。Skillは、Claudeが必要に応じて読み込む指示とリソースをまとめ、追加の指示なしで eol-checklist に関連するタスクを実行できるようにします。
eol-checklist をインストールするには?
このページのインストールコマンドを使用してください。eol-checklist をプラグインとして Claude Code に追加するか、リポジトリを skills ディレクトリにクローンし、Claudeを再起動してSkillを読み込みます。
eol-checklist はどのカテゴリに属しますか?
eol-checklist は メタ カテゴリに属します。
eol-checklist は無料で利用できますか?
はい。eol-checklist は AIMCP に掲載されており、無料でインストールできます。
関連スキル
このスキルは、Content Collections(Markdown/MDXファイルを型安全なデータコレクションに変換するTypeScriptファーストのツール)の本番環境でテストされた設定を提供します。Zodバリデーションによる型安全性を実現し、ブログ、ドキュメントサイト、コンテンツ重視のVite + Reactアプリケーション構築時にご利用ください。Viteプラグインの設定、MDXコンパイルから、デプロイ最適化、スキーマバリデーションまで、すべてを網羅しています。
このスキルは、開発者がPolymarket予測市場プラットフォームを活用したアプリケーション構築を可能にします。API統合による取引や市場データの取得に加え、WebSocketを介したリアルタイムデータストリーミングにより、ライブ取引や市場活動を監視できます。取引戦略の実装や、ライブ市場更新を処理するツールの作成にご利用ください。
このスキルは、開発者がコマンド、ファイル、LSP操作など25種類以上のイベントタイプにフックするOpenCodeプラグインを作成することを支援します。JavaScript/TypeScriptモジュール向けに、プラグイン構造、イベントAPI仕様、および実装パターンを提供します。カスタムイベント駆動ロジックでOpenCode AIアシスタントのライフサイクルをインターセプト、監視、または拡張する必要がある場合にご利用ください。
SGLangは、高性能なLLMサービングフレームワークであり、RadixAttentionプレフィックスキャッシュを活用したJSON、正規表現、エージェントワークフロー向けの高速で構造化された生成を特長とします。特にプレフィックスが繰り返されるタスクにおいて、大幅に高速な推論を実現し、複雑な構造化出力やマルチターン対話に最適です。制約付きデコードが必要な場合や、広範なプレフィックス共有を伴うアプリケーションを構築する場合は、vLLMなどの代替案ではなくSGLangを選択してください。
