スキル一覧に戻る

design-electromagnetic-device

pjt222
更新日 2 days ago
5 閲覧
17
2
17
GitHubで表示
メタdesign

について

このClaudeスキルは、理論と応用の橋渡しを行うことで、開発者がモーター、発電機、変圧器などの実用的な電磁気デバイスを設計するのを支援します。目標とする磁界や力に合わせた部品のサイジング、トポロジーの選択、トルクや効率などの性能指標の計算をサポートします。また、銅抵抗、コアヒステリシス、渦電流による主要な損失の分析も行います。

クイックインストール

Claude Code

推奨
メイン
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
プラグインコマンド代替
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git クローン代替
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/design-electromagnetic-device

このコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします

ドキュメント

Design Electromagnetic Device

Spec perf → topology → compute from EM first principles → analyze losses + efficiency → validate vs thermal + saturation.

Use When

  • Size electromagnet (solenoid/toroidal) for B-field, pull, hold force
  • Select motor topology (DC brushed, BLDC, stepper, induction), compute torque + speed + eff
  • Design generator → V, I, freq
  • Design transformer → V ratio, power, freq
  • Analyze + min losses: copper (I^2 R), core (hyst + eddy), stray flux

In

  • Required: Device type (electromagnet, motor, generator, transformer)
  • Required: Perf reqs (B, force, torque, V ratio, power, eff target)
  • Required: Operating (V, I, freq, duty, ambient T)
  • Optional: Core mat (silicon steel, ferrite, powdered iron, air) + B-H
  • Optional: Size/weight
  • Optional: Cost/mfg

Do

Step 1: Reqs + operating

Full targets before topology:

  1. Primary metric:

    • Electromagnet: B (T) at point, or pull force (N) on armature
    • Motor: rated T (N.m) at RPM, or power (W) at RPM
    • Generator: V, I, Hz at mech speed
    • Transformer: V1, V2, VA, freq
  2. Secondary: Eff (%), max T rise above ambient (K), duty (cont, intermittent, pulsed), envelope (max D, L, weight).

  3. Supply: V, I, freq (DC/AC w/ Hz), waveform (sine, PWM, trapezoidal).

  4. Environment: T range, cooling (nat convection, forced air, liquid), altitude, vibration/shock.

## Design Requirements
- **Device type**: [electromagnet / motor / generator / transformer]
- **Primary specification**: [value with units]
- **Efficiency target**: [%]
- **Supply**: [voltage, current, frequency]
- **Thermal limit**: [max temperature rise in K]
- **Size constraint**: [dimensions or weight]
- **Duty cycle**: [continuous / intermittent (on-time/off-time) / pulsed]

→ Complete quantified reqs, no ambiguity. Every req has val + units.

If err: Conflict (high T in tiny vol + high eff) → identify tradeoff explicit. EM scaling: force ~ volume, losses ~ surface area, thermal constrains power density.

Step 2: Topology

Config matches reqs:

  1. Electromagnet:

    • Solenoid (cylindrical): Simple wind, uniform B = mu_0 n I. Uniform-field apps. Air gap for pull.
    • Toroid: No stray field. Min stray. Less uniform for partial.
    • C-core / E-core: High force compact. Air gap concentrates. Relays + hold magnets.
    • Helmholtz pair: 2 coils sep by 1 radius. Uniform center. Calibration + measurement.
  2. Motor:

    • DC brushed: Simple drive, good low-speed T. Brushes limit lifetime + speed. T = k_T * I.
    • BLDC: Electronic commutation, higher speed + lifetime. Trapezoidal/sinusoidal. Modern dominant.
    • Stepper: Precise open-loop (1.8 or 0.9 deg). Lower cont T than BLDC. Positioning w/o feedback.
    • AC induction: Robust, no PM, simple. Speed = supply freq + slip. Industrial power.
  3. Generator: Motors reversed. BLDC motor → BLDC gen (back-EMF = output). Induction above sync. PM gen for small (wind, hydro).

  4. Transformer:

    • Core type: Windings on single leg. Std power.
    • Shell type: Core around windings. Better shielding. High-power.
    • Toroidal: No gap, low stray, compact. Higher winding cost. Audio + sensitive electronics.
    • Planar / PCB: PCB trace windings. Low profile. SMPS at high freq.
## Topology Selection
- **Topology chosen**: [specific configuration]
- **Justification**: [why it matches the requirements]
- **Key advantages**: [for this application]
- **Key limitations**: [and mitigation strategy]
- **Alternatives considered**: [and why rejected]

→ Justified selection tied to Step 1 reqs w/ acknowledged limitations.

If err: No std topology meets all → hybrid (Halbach array) or relax secondary. Doc tradeoff.

Step 3: Design params

Physical dims + elec params from EM principles:

  1. Electromagnet:

    • Turns: N = B * l_core / (mu_0 * mu_r * I), or mag circuit: N * I = Phi * R_total
    • Wire gauge: J (3-6 A/mm^2 cont, 15 A/mm^2 intermittent). A_wire = I / J.
    • Core X-sec: A_core = Phi / B_max (below sat: 1.5-1.8 T silicon steel, 0.3-0.5 T ferrite)
    • Gap force: F = B^2 * A_gap / (2 * mu_0) (Maxwell stress)
    • R winding: R = rho_Cu * N * l_mean_turn / A_wire
  2. Motor:

    • Torque const: k_T = (2 * B * l * r * N) / phases (simplified BLDC)
    • Back-EMF: k_E = k_T (SI)
    • I_rated = T_rated / k_T
    • omega_no_load = V_supply / k_E
    • R from wire gauge + mean turn
  3. Transformer:

    • Turns ratio: N_1 / N_2 = V_1 / V_2
    • Core X-sec: A_core = V_1 / (4.44 * f * N_1 * B_max) (sinusoidal)
    • N_1 = V_1 / (4.44 * f * B_max * A_core)
    • Window area: A_window = (N_1 * A_wire1 + N_2 * A_wire2) / k_fill (k_fill 0.3-0.5)
    • Core vol: V_core = A_core * l_mean_path
  4. Mag circuit (cores + gaps):

    • R_core = l_core / (mu_0 * mu_r * A_core)
    • R_gap = l_gap / (mu_0 * A_gap) (much > R_core for small gaps)
    • R_total = R_core + R_gap (series), 1/R_total = sum(1/R_i) (parallel)
    • Phi = N * I / R_total
## Design Parameters
- **Turns**: N = [value] (primary), N_2 = [value] (if applicable)
- **Wire gauge**: AWG [number] (diameter [mm], area [mm^2])
- **Core dimensions**: A_core = [mm^2], l_core = [mm], l_gap = [mm]
- **Core material**: [type], B_max = [T], mu_r = [value]
- **Winding resistance**: R = [Ohms]
- **Operating current**: I = [A], current density J = [A/mm^2]
- **Key performance**: [B-field / torque / voltage ratio = calculated value]

→ Numerical vals for all dims + elec params from EM equations w/ units at each step.

If err: Turns don't fit → bigger core (more window), finer wire (higher J, more heat), or reduce target. Core above B_max → bigger X-sec or more turns.

Step 4: Losses + eff

Quantify all mechanisms + eff:

  1. Copper (I^2 R):

    • P_Cu = I^2 * R_winding (DC)
    • High freq: skin effect. R_AC / R_DC increases when diam > 2 * delta.
    • Proximity effect in multi-layer → more AC R.
    • Mitigate: Litz wire for >~10 kHz.
  2. Core (hyst + eddy):

    • Hyst vol per cycle: W_h = area B-H loop
    • P_h = k_h * f * B_max^n * V_core (Steinmetz, n 1.6-2.0, k_h from data)
    • Eddy: P_e = k_e * f^2 * B_max^2 * t^2 * V_core (t = lamination thick)
    • Combined (gen Steinmetz): P_core = k * f^alpha * B_max^beta * V_core
    • Mitigate: laminated (0.25-0.5 mm for 50/60 Hz, thinner higher freq), ferrite for >100 kHz
  3. Eddy in conductors/structure:

    • Stray flux → currents in frame, shields, conductors
    • Big in large transformers + machines
    • Mitigate: non-mag struct mat, mag shields
  4. Mechanical (motors, gens):

    • Bearing friction: P_friction = T_friction * omega
    • Windage (air): P_windage ~ omega^3
    • Brush friction (DC brushed): wear-dependent
  5. Eff calc:

    • Electromagnet: not primary metric → focus P = I^2 R for field/force
    • Motor: eta = P_mech / P_elec = (T * omega) / (V * I)
    • Generator: eta = P_elec / P_mech
    • Transformer: eta = P_out / P_in = P_out / (P_out + P_Cu + P_core)
    • Typ: small motors 60-85%, large 90-97%, transformers 95-99%
## Loss Analysis
| Loss Mechanism | Formula | Value (W) | Fraction of Total |
|---------------|---------|-----------|-------------------|
| Copper (I^2R) | [expression] | [W] | [%] |
| Core hysteresis | [expression] | [W] | [%] |
| Core eddy current | [expression] | [W] | [%] |
| Mechanical (if applicable) | [expression] | [W] | [%] |
| **Total losses** | | [W] | 100% |

- **Efficiency**: eta = [%]
- **Temperature rise estimate**: Delta_T = P_total / (h * A_surface) = [K]

→ Loss breakdown, each quantified, eff, T rise for thermal feas.

If err: Eff below target → ID dominant. Copper → bigger wire or fewer turns. Core → lower-loss mat or reduce B_max. Mech → better bearings. T rise exceeds → more cooling or reduce density.

Step 5: Validate

Meets specs + physically realizable:

  1. Perf verify:

    • Recompute primary from final params
    • Meets/exceeds Step 1
    • Margin: (achieved - required) / required %
  2. Saturation:

    • B_max < sat flux density of mat
    • Every section (legs, yoke, gap fringing)
    • Gap region lowest flux density, smallest X-sec has highest
  3. Thermal:

    • T_surface = T_ambient + P_total / (h * A_surface)
    • Nat convection: h ~ 5-10 W/(m^2.K)
    • Forced air: h ~ 25-100 W/(m^2.K)
    • Insulation class: A (105°C), B (130°C), F (155°C), H (180°C)
    • Core Curie: silicon steel ~770°C (rarely limit), ferrite ~200-300°C (can be limit)
  4. Dims:

    • Fits envelope
    • Winding fits window w/ fill factor
    • Clearance + creepage for HV
  5. Margin + sensitivity:

    • +/-10% var each key param (I, turns, gap, mu_r)
    • ID most sensitive → drives mfg tolerance
    • Air-gap: gap length almost always most sensitive
## Design Validation
| Requirement | Target | Achieved | Margin |
|------------|--------|----------|--------|
| [Primary metric] | [value] | [value] | [%] |
| Efficiency | [%] | [%] | [%] |
| Temperature rise | < [K] | [K] | [K margin] |
| Envelope | [dimensions] | [dimensions] | [fits / exceeds] |

## Sensitivity Analysis
| Parameter | Nominal | +10% Effect on Primary Metric | Most Sensitive? |
|-----------|---------|-------------------------------|----------------|
| Current | [A] | [+/- %] | [Yes/No] |
| Turns | [N] | [+/- %] | [Yes/No] |
| Air gap | [mm] | [+/- %] | [Yes/No] |
| mu_r | [value] | [+/- %] | [Yes/No] |

→ All reqs met w/ docs margins, thermal OK, most sensitive param ID'd.

If err: Req not met → iterate topology (Step 2), params (Step 3), or loss mitigation (Step 4). Thermal infeasible → reduce duty, more size (cooling), higher-T insulation, active cooling. Doc each iter.

Check

  • All reqs quantified w/ vals + units
  • Topology justified + alts docs
  • Mag circuit complete (reluctances, flux, NI)
  • Wire gauge for J (3-6 A/mm^2 cont)
  • Core below sat w/ margin
  • All losses quantified (copper, hyst, eddy, mech)
  • Eff meets target
  • T rise w/in insulation class
  • Fits envelope
  • Sensitivity ID's tightest-tolerance param
  • Complete for prototype build

Traps

  • Ignoring mag circuit reluctance: Gap dominates (1 mm gap > 100 mm silicon steel core reluctance). No mag circuit model → devices far below expectations.
  • Operating above sat: Above B-H knee, incremental mu drops. Doubling I ≠ doubling flux. Appears to "stop working". Always check B_max in narrowest X-sec.
  • Undersize copper for thermal: J limits = thermal in disguise. 10 A/mm^2 free air → overheats in min. Cont-duty < 5-6 A/mm^2 w/o active cooling.
  • Neglect fringing at gaps: Flux spreads → effective gap area bigger. Gaps ~ core dim → fringing 20-50%. Ignoring → underestimate flux + overestimate NI.
  • DC R at high freq: 10 kHz skin depth in Cu ~ 0.66 mm. Magnet wire > 1.3 mm diam → AC R >> DC R. Litz or parallel thin strands.
  • Confuse k_T vs k_E units: k_T (N.m/A) + k_E (V.s/rad) numerically equal SI. BUT k_E in V/kRPM (datasheets) → convert: k_T [N.m/A] = k_E [V/kRPM] * 60 / (2 * pi * 1000).

  • analyze-magnetic-field — B-field from current dist for detailed analysis
  • solve-electromagnetic-induction — induction principles in motors/gens/transformers
  • formulate-maxwell-equations — full EM for high-freq, waveguides, antennas
  • simulate-cpu-architecture — digital ctrl sys driving motor controllers + power electronics
  • analyze-tensegrity-system — tension-compression networks; shares prestress equilibrium

GitHub リポジトリ

pjt222/agent-almanac
パス: i18n/caveman-ultra/skills/design-electromagnetic-device
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

関連スキル

content-collections

メタ

このスキルは、Content Collections(Markdown/MDXファイルを型安全なデータコレクションに変換するTypeScriptファーストのツール)の本番環境でテストされた設定を提供します。Zodバリデーションによる型安全性を実現し、ブログ、ドキュメントサイト、コンテンツ重視のVite + Reactアプリケーション構築時にご利用ください。Viteプラグインの設定、MDXコンパイルから、デプロイ最適化、スキーマバリデーションまで、すべてを網羅しています。

スキルを見る

polymarket

メタ

このスキルは、開発者がPolymarket予測市場プラットフォームを活用したアプリケーション構築を可能にします。API統合による取引や市場データの取得に加え、WebSocketを介したリアルタイムデータストリーミングにより、ライブ取引や市場活動を監視できます。取引戦略の実装や、ライブ市場更新を処理するツールの作成にご利用ください。

スキルを見る

creating-opencode-plugins

メタ

このスキルは、開発者がコマンド、ファイル、LSP操作など25種類以上のイベントタイプにフックするOpenCodeプラグインを作成することを支援します。JavaScript/TypeScriptモジュール向けに、プラグイン構造、イベントAPI仕様、および実装パターンを提供します。カスタムイベント駆動ロジックでOpenCode AIアシスタントのライフサイクルをインターセプト、監視、または拡張する必要がある場合にご利用ください。

スキルを見る

sglang

メタ

SGLangは、高性能なLLMサービングフレームワークであり、RadixAttentionプレフィックスキャッシュを活用したJSON、正規表現、エージェントワークフロー向けの高速で構造化された生成を特長とします。特にプレフィックスが繰り返されるタスクにおいて、大幅に高速な推論を実現し、複雑な構造化出力やマルチターン対話に最適です。制約付きデコードが必要な場合や、広範なプレフィックス共有を伴うアプリケーションを構築する場合は、vLLMなどの代替案ではなくSGLangを選択してください。

スキルを見る