について
このスキルは、Ahrefsとサーチコンソールのデータを分析し、アルゴリズムの更新や競合の変化などの根本原因を特定することで、オーガニックトラフィックの変動を診断します。急激な減少、移行後の問題、または原因不明のトラフィック停滞といったシナリオに対して、実行可能な知見を提供します。出力は明確な診断と改善計画であり、実際のトラフィック問題と計測上の問題を区別します。
クイックインストール
Claude Code
推奨npx skills add rampstackco/claude-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skillsgit clone https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/seo-traffic-diagnosisこのコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします
ドキュメント
SEO Traffic Diagnosis
Diagnose why organic traffic moved (down, flat, or unexpectedly up) using Ahrefs MCP combined with Search Console and analytics data. Stack-agnostic. Produces a root-cause diagnosis and an action plan.
When to use
- Organic traffic dropped sharply
- Organic traffic has been flat for months despite content investment
- After a known Google algorithm update
- After a migration, replatform, or domain change
- After a deploy that touched routing, redirects, or rendering
- When a competitor is visibly taking organic share
- When a single page dropped from a ranked position
- When stakeholders need an explanation, fast
When NOT to use
- Routine performance reporting (use
analytics-strategy) - Pre-emptive content planning (use
seo-content-gap-audit) - Backlink-only investigations (use
seo-backlink-audit) - Technical issue triage outside of traffic concerns (use
seo-site-health-audit)
Required inputs
- Description of the symptom (what changed, when, magnitude)
- Date the change started (best estimate)
- Recent SEO history: deploys, migrations, content changes, link campaigns
- Access to Ahrefs MCP, Search Console, and analytics
- Confirmation the change is real (not a tracking artifact)
The framework: 5 layers of diagnosis
A traffic change has one or more root causes. Move through the layers in order. Stop when you have enough evidence.
Layer 1: Confirm the change is real
Before diagnosing, rule out:
- Tracking gaps (analytics outages, tag manager issues)
- Bot traffic changes
- Reporting comparison errors (different date ranges, wrong segment)
- Seasonality (compare year-over-year, not just month-over-month)
- Holiday or weekday effects
Cross-check Search Console clicks against analytics organic sessions. Significant divergence often points to a tracking issue, not a real traffic change.
Layer 2: Localize the change
Where is the change happening?
Segment by:
- Country and language
- Device (mobile, desktop, tablet)
- Page or section (homepage, blog, product, category)
- Query type (branded vs non-branded)
- Landing page
A change in one segment requires different diagnosis than a change everywhere.
| Pattern | Likely cause |
|---|---|
| One country dropped | Local algorithm update, hreflang issue, geo redirect issue |
| Mobile dropped, desktop flat | Mobile usability or page speed regression |
| One section dropped | Topical algorithm update or section-specific quality issue |
| Branded queries dropped | Brand-level issue: site outage, reputation, manual action |
| Non-branded dropped | Algorithmic ranking issue |
| Single page dropped | Page-level issue: content, technical, or competitive |
| Sitewide dropped | Sitewide issue: penalty, technical, migration, or algorithm |
Layer 3: Page-level analysis
For affected pages, audit:
- Position changes per ranked keyword (Ahrefs Rank Tracker history)
- SERP composition changes (more ads, AI overviews, featured snippets, video)
- Click-through rate changes
- Index status (Search Console coverage)
- Crawl errors and accessibility
- Recent content changes
- Internal link changes
- Backlink changes (lost links, redirect chains)
A page can lose traffic without losing rank if SERP composition changed.
Layer 4: Technical analysis
Did anything break technically?
Check:
- Robots.txt changes
- Canonical tag changes
- Meta robots changes (accidental noindex)
- Redirect chains and loops
- Render issues (especially for JS-heavy frameworks)
- Site speed regressions
- Hreflang errors
- Sitemap freshness
- HTTP status codes (4xx, 5xx spikes)
- Server log evidence of crawl behavior changes
Recent deploys are the prime suspect. Compare deploy dates to traffic change dates.
Layer 5: External analysis
If layers 1-4 do not explain the change, look outward.
- Algorithm update calendar (cross-reference timing)
- Competitor moves (new content, new SERP features they captured)
- Industry trend (declining search demand for the topic)
- Manual action (Search Console security and manual actions)
- Negative SEO (sudden link velocity changes)
External-factor diagnosis benefits from competitive context: did your traffic drop while competitors held steady (suggests an algorithm-specific issue), or did the entire vertical lose ground (suggests a user-behavior shift)? Similarweb shows competitor traffic trends; Ahrefs shows competitor SERP movement; pairing both surfaces whether the issue is yours alone or the category's.
Workflow
- Confirm the symptom. Get exact dates, magnitude, segment if known.
- Validate the data. Layer 1 checks. Rule out tracking and seasonality.
- Localize. Layer 2. Segment until the pattern is clear.
- Page-level dive. Layer 3 on the most affected pages.
- Technical check. Layer 4. Recent deploys, robots, canonicals, redirects.
- External check. Layer 5. Algorithm updates, competitors, industry.
- Build the hypothesis. State the cause as a single sentence.
- Validate the hypothesis. Find the evidence that confirms or refutes it. See
references/diagnosis-checklist.md. - Action plan. Specific fixes mapped to specific evidence.
- Communicate. Write up the diagnosis. Stakeholders want clarity, not exhaustive analysis.
Failure patterns
- Jumping to algorithm update. "It must be the algorithm" is the lazy answer. Eliminate technical and page-level causes first.
- Solving the wrong problem. A drop diagnosed as "content quality" when the real cause was an accidental noindex on a deploy. Validate the hypothesis before fixing.
- No baseline for "normal." Without a baseline, every fluctuation looks alarming. Establish what normal noise looks like before reacting.
- Treating one page as the site. Site-wide and page-level diagnoses are different. Confirm scope first.
- Ignoring branded vs non-branded. A drop in branded queries means a brand-level problem. A drop in non-branded means an SEO problem. Different teams own them.
- Comparing wrong date ranges. Comparing 28 days to the previous 28 days during a holiday distorts the picture. Use year-over-year for seasonal businesses.
- Stopping at correlation. A deploy and a drop on the same day is a strong correlation, not proof. Find the mechanism.
- Single-source diagnosis. Ahrefs sees position. Search Console sees clicks and queries. Analytics sees behavior. Logs see crawl. Use them together.
- Premature reassurance. Telling stakeholders "it is just an algorithm update, will recover" without evidence sets up a worse conversation later.
Output format
A diagnosis document with:
- Summary. What changed, when, magnitude, root cause in one paragraph.
- The symptom. Charts and segment breakdowns.
- Layer-by-layer findings. What each layer ruled in or out.
- Root cause hypothesis. Single statement with evidence.
- Action plan. Ordered fixes with owners and timelines.
- Recovery forecast. Realistic expectations on timeline and ceiling.
- Monitoring plan. What to watch for confirmation of recovery.
Length: 4-10 pages. Stakeholders read this fast.
If required data is unavailable
This skill's output depends on data, measurements, or tool results it cannot generate on its own. When a required input, tool, or data source is unavailable or unverifiable, the sanctioned output is the deliverable with the gap stated: what was needed, what was actually obtained or verified, and which parts of the output are affected. Fabricating, estimating, or interpolating a required number to complete the deliverable is never sanctioned. A stated gap is a complete answer.
Reference files
references/diagnosis-checklist.md- Layer-by-layer diagnostic checklist with the specific data to pull at each layer and how to interpret each signal.
GitHub リポジトリ
よくある質問
seo-traffic-diagnosis Skillとは何ですか?
seo-traffic-diagnosis はrampstackco が作成した Claude Skillです。Skillは、Claudeが必要に応じて読み込む指示とリソースをまとめ、追加の指示なしで seo-traffic-diagnosis に関連するタスクを実行できるようにします。
seo-traffic-diagnosis をインストールするには?
このページのインストールコマンドを使用してください。seo-traffic-diagnosis をプラグインとして Claude Code に追加するか、リポジトリを skills ディレクトリにクローンし、Claudeを再起動してSkillを読み込みます。
seo-traffic-diagnosis はどのカテゴリに属しますか?
seo-traffic-diagnosis は メタ カテゴリに属します。
seo-traffic-diagnosis は無料で利用できますか?
はい。seo-traffic-diagnosis は AIMCP に掲載されており、無料でインストールできます。
関連スキル
このスキルは、Content Collections(Markdown/MDXファイルを型安全なデータコレクションに変換するTypeScriptファーストのツール)の本番環境でテストされた設定を提供します。Zodバリデーションによる型安全性を実現し、ブログ、ドキュメントサイト、コンテンツ重視のVite + Reactアプリケーション構築時にご利用ください。Viteプラグインの設定、MDXコンパイルから、デプロイ最適化、スキーマバリデーションまで、すべてを網羅しています。
このスキルは、開発者がPolymarket予測市場プラットフォームを活用したアプリケーション構築を可能にします。API統合による取引や市場データの取得に加え、WebSocketを介したリアルタイムデータストリーミングにより、ライブ取引や市場活動を監視できます。取引戦略の実装や、ライブ市場更新を処理するツールの作成にご利用ください。
このスキルは、開発者がコマンド、ファイル、LSP操作など25種類以上のイベントタイプにフックするOpenCodeプラグインを作成することを支援します。JavaScript/TypeScriptモジュール向けに、プラグイン構造、イベントAPI仕様、および実装パターンを提供します。カスタムイベント駆動ロジックでOpenCode AIアシスタントのライフサイクルをインターセプト、監視、または拡張する必要がある場合にご利用ください。
SGLangは、高性能なLLMサービングフレームワークであり、RadixAttentionプレフィックスキャッシュを活用したJSON、正規表現、エージェントワークフロー向けの高速で構造化された生成を特長とします。特にプレフィックスが繰り返されるタスクにおいて、大幅に高速な推論を実現し、複雑な構造化出力やマルチターン対話に最適です。制約付きデコードが必要な場合や、広範なプレフィックス共有を伴うアプリケーションを構築する場合は、vLLMなどの代替案ではなくSGLangを選択してください。
