write-validation-documentation
について
このスキルは、規制環境下におけるコンピュータ化システムの包括的なIQ/OQ/PQバリデーション文書を生成します。ソフトウェアバリデーションおよび規制監査に対応するプロトコル、報告書、テストスクリプトの作成、ならびに逸脱ワークフローの処理を行います。GxP準拠のためのRまたはその他ソフトウェアの適格性評価時、あるいは新規システムまたは再適格評価システムのバリデーション文書作成時にご利用ください。
クイックインストール
Claude Code
推奨npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/write-validation-documentationこのコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします
ドキュメント
Write Validation Documentation
Create complete IQ/OQ/PQ validation documentation for computerized systems.
When Use
- Validating R or other software for regulated use
- Preparing for regulatory audit
- Documenting qualification of computing environments
- Creating or updating validation protocols and reports
Inputs
- Required: System/software to validate (name, version, purpose)
- Required: Validation plan defining scope and strategy
- Required: User requirements specification
- Optional: Existing SOP templates
- Optional: Previous validation documentation (for re-qualification)
Steps
Step 1: Write Installation Qualification (IQ) Protocol
# Installation Qualification Protocol
**System**: R Statistical Computing Environment
**Version**: 4.5.0
**Document ID**: IQ-PROJ-001
**Prepared by**: [Name] | **Date**: [Date]
**Reviewed by**: [Name] | **Date**: [Date]
**Approved by**: [Name] | **Date**: [Date]
## 1. Objective
Verify that R and required packages are correctly installed per specifications.
## 2. Prerequisites
- [ ] Server/workstation meets hardware requirements
- [ ] Operating system qualified
- [ ] Network access available (for package downloads)
## 3. Test Cases
### IQ-001: R Installation
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | R version 4.5.0 correctly installed |
| Procedure | Open R console, execute `R.version.string` |
| Expected Result | "R version 4.5.0 (2025-04-11)" |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |
| Pass/Fail | [ ] |
| Executed by | ____________ Date: ________ |
### IQ-002: Package Inventory
| Package | Required Version | Installed Version | Pass/Fail |
|---------|-----------------|-------------------|-----------|
| dplyr | 1.1.4 | | [ ] |
| ggplot2 | 3.5.0 | | [ ] |
| survival | 3.7-0 | | [ ] |
## 4. Deviations
[Document any deviations from expected results and their resolution]
## 5. Conclusion
[ ] All IQ tests PASSED - system installation verified
[ ] IQ tests FAILED - see deviation section
Got: validation/iq/iq_protocol.md complete with unique document ID, objective, prerequisites checklist, test cases for R installation and every required package, deviation section, approval fields.
If err: Organization requires different document format? Adapt template to match existing SOP. Key fields (requirement, procedure, expected result, actual result, pass/fail) must be preserved regardless of format.
Step 2: Write Operational Qualification (OQ) Protocol
# Operational Qualification Protocol
**Document ID**: OQ-PROJ-001
## 1. Objective
Verify that the system operates correctly under normal conditions.
## 2. Test Cases
### OQ-001: Data Import Functionality
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | System correctly imports CSV files |
| Test Data | validation/test_data/import_test.csv (MD5: abc123) |
| Procedure | Execute `read.csv("import_test.csv")` |
| Expected | Data frame with 100 rows, 5 columns |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |
| Evidence | Screenshot/log file reference |
### OQ-002: Statistical Calculations
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | t-test produces correct results |
| Test Data | Known dataset: x = c(2.1, 2.5, 2.3), y = c(3.1, 3.5, 3.3) |
| Procedure | Execute `t.test(x, y)` |
| Expected | t = -5.000, df = 4, p = 0.00753 |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |
| Tolerance | ±0.001 |
### OQ-003: Error Handling
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | System handles invalid input gracefully |
| Procedure | Execute `analysis_function(invalid_input)` |
| Expected | Informative error message, no crash |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |
Got: validation/oq/oq_protocol.md contains test cases for data import, statistical calculations, error handling. Each with specific test data, expected results (with tolerances where applicable), evidence requirements.
If err: Test data not yet available? Create synthetic test datasets with known properties. Document data generation method so results can be independently verified.
Step 3: Write Performance Qualification (PQ) Protocol
# Performance Qualification Protocol
**Document ID**: PQ-PROJ-001
## 1. Objective
Verify the system performs as intended with real-world data and workflows.
## 2. Test Cases
### PQ-001: End-to-End Primary Analysis
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | Primary endpoint analysis matches reference |
| Test Data | Blinded test dataset (hash: sha256:abc...) |
| Reference | Independent SAS calculation (report ref: SAS-001) |
| Procedure | Execute full analysis pipeline |
| Expected | Estimate within ±0.001 of reference |
| Actual Result | ______________________ |
### PQ-002: Report Generation
| Field | Value |
|-------|-------|
| Requirement | Generated report contains all required sections |
| Procedure | Execute report generation script |
| Checklist | |
| | [ ] Title page with study information |
| | [ ] Table of contents |
| | [ ] Demographic summary table |
| | [ ] Primary analysis results |
| | [ ] Appendix with session info |
Got: validation/pq/pq_protocol.md contains end-to-end test cases using real-world (or representative) data. Results compared against independent reference calculation (e.g., SAS output). Tolerances explicitly defined.
If err: Independent reference results not available? Document gap. Use dual-programming (two independent R implementations) as alternative verification method. Flag PQ as provisional until independent verification complete.
Step 4: Write Qualification Reports
After executing protocols, document results:
# Installation Qualification Report
**Document ID**: IQ-RPT-001
**Protocol Reference**: IQ-PROJ-001
## 1. Summary
All IQ test cases were executed on [date] by [name].
## 2. Results Summary
| Test ID | Description | Result |
|---------|-------------|--------|
| IQ-001 | R Installation | PASS |
| IQ-002 | Package Inventory | PASS |
## 3. Deviations
None observed.
## 4. Conclusion
The installation of R 4.5.0 and associated packages has been verified
and meets all specified requirements.
## 5. Approvals
| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
|------|------|-----------|------|
| Executor | | | |
| Reviewer | | | |
| Approver | | | |
Got: Qualification reports (IQ, OQ, PQ) complete with all test results filled in, deviations documented (or "None observed"), conclusions stated, approval signature fields ready for sign-off.
If err: Test failures occurred during execution? Document each failure as deviation with root cause analysis and resolution. Do not leave deviation sections blank when failures observed.
Step 5: Automate Where Possible
Create automated test scripts that generate evidence:
# validation/scripts/run_iq.R
sink("validation/iq/iq_evidence.txt")
cat("IQ Execution Date:", format(Sys.time()), "\n\n")
cat("IQ-001: R Version\n")
cat("Result:", R.version.string, "\n")
cat("Status:", ifelse(R.version$major == "4" && R.version$minor == "5.0",
"PASS", "FAIL"), "\n\n")
cat("IQ-002: Package Versions\n")
required <- renv::dependencies()
installed <- installed.packages()
# ... comparison logic
sink()
Got: Automated scripts in validation/scripts/ generate evidence files (e.g., iq_evidence.txt) with timestamped results for each test case. Reduces manual data entry, ensures reproducibility.
If err: Automated scripts fail due to environment differences? Run manually and capture output with sink(). Document any differences between automated and manual execution in qualification report.
Check
- All protocols have unique document IDs
- Protocols reference validation plan
- Test cases have clear pass/fail criteria
- Reports include all executed test results
- Deviations documented with resolutions
- Approval signatures obtained
- Documents follow organization's SOP templates
Pitfalls
- Vague acceptance criteria: "System works correctly" not testable. Specify exact expected values.
- Missing evidence: Every test result needs supporting evidence (screenshots, logs, output files)
- Incomplete deviation handling: All failures must be documented, investigated, resolved
- No version control for documents: Validation docs need change control just like code
- Skip re-qualification: System updates (R version, package updates) need re-qualification assessment
See Also
setup-gxp-r-project- project structure for validated environmentsimplement-audit-trail- electronic records trackingvalidate-statistical-output- output validation methodology
GitHub リポジトリ
関連スキル
content-collections
メタこのスキルは、Content Collections(Markdown/MDXファイルを型安全なデータコレクションに変換するTypeScriptファーストのツール)の本番環境でテストされた設定を提供します。Zodバリデーションによる型安全性を実現し、ブログ、ドキュメントサイト、コンテンツ重視のVite + Reactアプリケーション構築時にご利用ください。Viteプラグインの設定、MDXコンパイルから、デプロイ最適化、スキーマバリデーションまで、すべてを網羅しています。
polymarket
メタこのスキルは、開発者がPolymarket予測市場プラットフォームを活用したアプリケーション構築を可能にします。API統合による取引や市場データの取得に加え、WebSocketを介したリアルタイムデータストリーミングにより、ライブ取引や市場活動を監視できます。取引戦略の実装や、ライブ市場更新を処理するツールの作成にご利用ください。
creating-opencode-plugins
メタこのスキルは、開発者がコマンド、ファイル、LSP操作など25種類以上のイベントタイプにフックするOpenCodeプラグインを作成することを支援します。JavaScript/TypeScriptモジュール向けに、プラグイン構造、イベントAPI仕様、および実装パターンを提供します。カスタムイベント駆動ロジックでOpenCode AIアシスタントのライフサイクルをインターセプト、監視、または拡張する必要がある場合にご利用ください。
sglang
メタSGLangは、高性能なLLMサービングフレームワークであり、RadixAttentionプレフィックスキャッシュを活用したJSON、正規表現、エージェントワークフロー向けの高速で構造化された生成を特長とします。特にプレフィックスが繰り返されるタスクにおいて、大幅に高速な推論を実現し、複雑な構造化出力やマルチターン対話に最適です。制約付きデコードが必要な場合や、広範なプレフィックス共有を伴うアプリケーションを構築する場合は、vLLMなどの代替案ではなくSGLangを選択してください。
