スキル一覧に戻る

lsp-safe-edit

blackwell-systems
更新日 6 days ago
53
2
53
GitHubで表示
デザインdesign

について

このスキルは、コード編集を安全に適用します。まず変更をプレビューし、LSP診断を比較してからディスクに書き込みます。新しいエラーが導入されない場合にのみ編集をコミットし、問題が発生した場合はクイックフィックスを提示します。開発者は、組み込みの検証機能を備えたリスクフリーなリファクタリングやマルチファイル変更にこれを活用すべきです。

クイックインストール

Claude Code

推奨
メイン
npx skills add blackwell-systems/agent-lsp -a claude-code
プラグインコマンド代替
/plugin add https://github.com/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp
Git クローン代替
git clone https://github.com/blackwell-systems/agent-lsp.git ~/.claude/skills/lsp-safe-edit

このコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします

ドキュメント

Requires the agent-lsp MCP server.

lsp-safe-edit

Wrap any code edit with a before/after diagnostic comparison. Speculatively previews the change in-memory before touching disk, then diffs errors introduced vs. resolved after applying. If errors appear, surfaces code actions to fix them.

Prerequisites

LSP must be running for the target workspace. If not yet initialized, call mcp__lsp__start_lsp with the workspace root before proceeding.

Auto-init note: agent-lsp supports workspace auto-inference from file paths. Explicit start_lsp is only needed when switching workspace roots.

Input

  • target file(s): One or more files to be edited (absolute paths).
  • description of change: What you intend to edit and why.

Workflow

Step 1 — Open target file(s)

Call mcp__lsp__open_document for each file that will be edited:

mcp__lsp__open_document(file_path: "/abs/path/to/file.go", language_id: "go")

Step 2 — Capture baseline diagnostics (BEFORE)

Call mcp__lsp__get_diagnostics for each target file. Store as BEFORE. For multi-file edits, collect diagnostics for all files involved.

BEFORE = mcp__lsp__get_diagnostics(file_path: "/abs/path/to/file.go")

If the server returns an empty list immediately after open, wait briefly and retry — LSP analysis is async.

Step 3 — Speculative preview (preview_edit)

Before touching disk, call mcp__lsp__preview_edit to preview the error delta of the intended change:

mcp__lsp__preview_edit(
  file_path: "/abs/path/to/file.go",
  start_line: <N>,
  start_column: <col>,
  end_line: <N>,
  end_column: <col>,
  new_text: "<replacement text>"
)

Returns net_delta (new errors introduced minus errors resolved) without writing to disk.

Decision:

net_deltaAction
≤ 0Proceed — edit improves or does not worsen error state
> 0Pause. Report introduced errors to user and ask: "Proceed anyway? [y/n]"

If net_delta > 0 and user says "n", stop. Do not apply the edit.

Multi-file edits: preview_edit covers one file at a time. For edits spanning multiple files, run it for each file independently and sum the deltas. If any file shows net_delta > 0, pause before continuing.

When to skip Step 3: If the intended change is a new file (Write), there is no existing file to simulate against. Skip to Step 4.

Step 3b — Refactor preview with simulate_chain (renames and signature changes)

Use this step instead of or after Step 3 when the change is a rename, signature change, or any edit with dependent follow-on edits (e.g., updating all call sites after adding a parameter).

simulate_chain applies a sequence of speculative edits in-memory and reports whether the cumulative change is safe — without touching disk:

mcp__lsp__simulate_chain({
  "workspace_root": "/abs/path/to/workspace",
  "language": "go",
  "edits": [
    {
      "file_path": "/abs/path/to/file.go",
      "start_line": <N>, "start_column": <col>,
      "end_line": <N>,   "end_column": <col>,
      "new_text": "<replacement>"
    },
    // additional dependent edits (e.g. call site updates) ...
  ]
})

Returns:

  • cumulative_delta — net error change across all steps
  • safe_to_apply_through_step — how many steps are safe to apply in sequence

Decision:

cumulative_deltasafe_to_apply_through_stepAction
≤ 0= total stepsAll steps safe. Proceed to Step 4.
≤ 0< total stepsSafe up to that step. Review remaining steps.
> 0anyNet regression. Report to user before proceeding.

When to use Step 3b:

  • Renaming an exported symbol and updating its call sites
  • Adding/removing a parameter and updating all callers
  • Any multi-file refactor where edits are order-dependent

When to skip Step 3b:

  • Simple in-place edits with no dependent follow-on edits (Step 3 is sufficient)
  • New file creation (no existing text to simulate against)

Step 4 — Apply the edit to disk

Apply the change using the Edit or Write tool:

  • Use Edit for targeted replacements in an existing file.
  • Use Write only when creating a new file or doing a full rewrite.
Edit(file_path: "/abs/path/to/file.go", old_string: "...", new_string: "...")

For multi-file edits, apply each file's changes before collecting post-edit diagnostics (Step 5). If any individual edit fails, stop and report before applying remaining files.

Step 5 — Capture post-edit diagnostics (AFTER)

Call mcp__lsp__get_diagnostics again for each edited file. Store as AFTER.

AFTER = mcp__lsp__get_diagnostics(file_path: "/abs/path/to/file.go")

For multi-file edits, collect diagnostics for all files and merge the results.

Step 6 — Compute the diagnostic diff

Compare BEFORE and AFTER:

  • Introduced = diagnostics in AFTER not in BEFORE (new problems).
  • Resolved = diagnostics in BEFORE not in AFTER (fixed problems).

Match by (file, line, message) tuple to handle line-number shifts. Treat error and warning severity separately.

Step 7 — Surface code actions if errors were introduced

If any new error-severity diagnostics appear, call mcp__lsp__suggest_fixes at each error location to surface quick fixes:

mcp__lsp__suggest_fixes(
  file_path: "<file>",
  start_line: <error line>,
  start_column: 1,
  end_line: <error line>,
  end_column: 999
)

Report available code actions to the user:

Errors introduced (2):
  file.go:34 — undefined: MyType
    → Code action: Import "mypackage" (quickfix)
  file.go:51 — cannot use int as string
    → No code actions available

Apply code actions? [y/n/select]

If the user accepts, apply the code action's WorkspaceEdit via mcp__lsp__apply_edit, then re-collect diagnostics and re-diff.

Step 8 — Format (optional)

If the diagnostic diff is clean (net change ≤ 0), offer to format the edited file via the language server:

mcp__lsp__format_document({ "file_path": "/abs/path/to/file" })

Returns TextEdit[]. If non-empty, apply immediately:

mcp__lsp__apply_edit({ "workspace_edit": <TextEdit[]> })

Skip if the user did not ask for formatting, or if there are unresolved errors (fix errors before formatting).

Step 9 — Report using DiagnosticDiffFormat

Output the final summary:

## Edit Summary

Files changed: N
Errors introduced: A  →  Errors resolved: B  (net: A-B)
Warnings introduced: C  →  Warnings resolved: D

### Introduced errors
- file.go:34 — undefined: MyType

### Resolved errors
- file.go:12 — unused variable: x

Decision Guide

Net changeAction
0Safe. No new errors.
NegativeNet improvement — errors resolved. Safe.
Positive (after code actions)Do NOT commit. Offer to revert.

When net change > 0 after code actions:

  1. Show the full list of remaining introduced errors.
  2. Offer to revert using the original old_string in a follow-up Edit call.
  3. Wait for user decision before proceeding.

Do not commit or stage files when net change > 0.


Multi-file workflow

For edits spanning multiple files (e.g., changing a function signature and all its call sites):

  1. Open all files in Step 1.
  2. Collect BEFORE diagnostics for all files.
  3. Simulate each file independently in Step 3 — sum net_delta values.
  4. Apply edits file by file in Step 4 — stop on first failure.
  5. Collect AFTER diagnostics for all files and merge.
  6. Check code actions on any file showing new errors.

Report the combined diagnostic diff across all files in the final summary.

GitHub リポジトリ

blackwell-systems/agent-lsp
パス: skills/lsp-safe-edit
0
agentskillsai-agentsai-toolingclaudeclaude-codecode-intelligence

関連スキル

executing-plans

デザイン

executing-plansスキルは、完全な実装計画があり、それを管理されたバッチでレビューチェックポイントを設けながら実行する場合に使用します。このスキルは計画を読み込んで批判的にレビューした後、小さなバッチ(デフォルトは3タスク)でタスクを実行し、各バッチの間に進捗状況を報告してアーキテクトのレビューを受けます。これにより、品質管理チェックポイントが組み込まれた体系的な実装が保証されます。

スキルを見る

requesting-code-review

デザイン

このスキルは、コードレビュアーサブエージェントを起動し、処理を進める前に要件に対してコード変更を分析します。タスク完了後、主要な機能の実装後、またはmainブランチへのマージ前などに使用すべきです。このレビューは、現在の実装と元の計画を比較することで、問題を早期に発見するのに役立ちます。

スキルを見る

connect-mcp-server

デザイン

このスキルは、開発者がHTTP、stdio、またはSSEトランスポートを使用してMCPサーバーをClaude Codeに接続するための包括的なガイドを提供します。GitHub、Notion、カスタムAPIなどの外部サービスを統合するためのインストール、設定、認証、セキュリティについて解説しています。MCP統合のセットアップ、外部ツールの設定、またはClaudeのModel Context Protocolを扱う際にご利用ください。

スキルを見る

web-cli-teleport

デザイン

このスキルは、タスク分析に基づいて開発者がClaude Code WebとCLIインターフェースの選択を支援し、これらの環境間でのシームレスなセッションテレポーテーションを可能にします。Web、CLI、モバイル環境を切り替える際のセッション状態とコンテキストを管理することで、ワークフローを最適化します。様々な段階で異なるツールを必要とする複雑なプロジェクトにご活用ください。

スキルを見る