MCP HubMCP Hub
SKILL·9B66DC

provider-resources

hashicorp
更新日 19 days ago
8 閲覧
853
125
853
GitHubで表示
テストaitestingapidesigndata

について

このスキルは、Plugin Frameworkを使用してTerraform Providerのリソースとデータソースを実装する方法を開発者に指南します。CRUD操作、スキーマ設計、バリデータ、インポートサポート、および結果整合性の取り扱いについて網羅しています。リソースの追加や変更を行う際、APIの概念をリソースとして定義すべきか判断する際、または実装を提出前にレビューする際にご活用ください。

クイックインストール

Claude Code

推奨
メイン
npx skills add hashicorp/agent-skills -a claude-code
プラグインコマンド代替
/plugin add https://github.com/hashicorp/agent-skills
Git クローン代替
git clone https://github.com/hashicorp/agent-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/provider-resources

このコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします

ドキュメント

Terraform Provider Resources Implementation Guide

Overview

This guide covers developing Terraform Provider resources and data sources. Resources represent infrastructure objects that Terraform manages through Create, Read, Update, and Delete (CRUD) operations.

Use the Plugin Framework for all net-new resources and data sources. Plugin SDKv2 is for maintaining resources that already exist on it; do not write new code against it. A provider can serve both during migration by muxing (terraform-plugin-mux), so adopting the Framework never requires a big-bang rewrite. To tell which mode an existing provider is in, check go.mod: terraform-plugin-mux present means it serves both SDKv2 and Framework code; only terraform-plugin-sdk/v2 means SDKv2-only; only terraform-plugin-framework means Framework-only. Be cautious about migrating existing SDKv2 resources: the Framework distinguishes null from zero values, so naive migrations change behavior for existing users (use the provider-framework-migration skill, if available).

References (load when needed):

  • references/design-principles.md — what should (and should not) become a resource; data source semantics; relationship and async-task modeling
  • references/retries-and-waiters.md — eventual consistency, retry patterns, and status/wait function structure

File Structure

Most providers keep every resource in a single package:

internal/provider/
├── provider.go                  # Provider schema + Configure
├── widget_resource.go           # Resource implementation
├── widget_resource_test.go      # Acceptance tests
├── widget_data_source.go        # Data source (if applicable)
└── widget_data_source_test.go

Large multi-service providers (e.g. terraform-provider-aws) split into internal/service/<service>/ packages instead, with an idiomatic file taxonomy worth adopting once a package grows: consts.go, find.go (finders), status.go (status functions), wait.go (waiters), sweep.go (test sweepers), exports_test.go.

Documentation lives in docs/ and is generated with tfplugindocs:

docs/
├── resources/<name>.md          # generated; optional <name>.md.tmpl template
└── data-sources/<name>.md

(Hand-written website/docs/r/*.html.markdown trees exist in some older, large providers — follow the target repo's convention when editing one.)

Resource Structure

A Framework resource is a struct holding the API client, with interface assertions making the implemented behaviors explicit:

var (
    _ resource.Resource                = &widgetResource{}
    _ resource.ResourceWithConfigure   = &widgetResource{}
    _ resource.ResourceWithImportState = &widgetResource{}
)

func NewWidgetResource() resource.Resource {
    return &widgetResource{}
}

type widgetResource struct {
    client *examplecloud.Client
}

func (r *widgetResource) Metadata(_ context.Context, req resource.MetadataRequest, resp *resource.MetadataResponse) {
    resp.TypeName = req.ProviderTypeName + "_widget"
}

// Configure receives the client the provider built in its own Configure.
func (r *widgetResource) Configure(_ context.Context, req resource.ConfigureRequest, resp *resource.ConfigureResponse) {
    if req.ProviderData == nil {
        return // provider not yet configured (e.g. validation phase)
    }
    client, ok := req.ProviderData.(*examplecloud.Client)
    if !ok {
        resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
            "Unexpected Resource Configure Type",
            fmt.Sprintf("Expected *examplecloud.Client, got: %T.", req.ProviderData),
        )
        return
    }
    r.client = client
}

func (r *widgetResource) Schema(ctx context.Context, req resource.SchemaRequest, resp *resource.SchemaResponse) {
    resp.Schema = schema.Schema{
        Attributes: map[string]schema.Attribute{
            "name": schema.StringAttribute{
                Required: true,
                PlanModifiers: []planmodifier.String{
                    stringplanmodifier.RequiresReplace(),
                },
                Validators: []validator.String{
                    stringvalidator.LengthBetween(1, 255),
                },
            },
            "id": schema.StringAttribute{
                Computed: true,
                PlanModifiers: []planmodifier.String{
                    stringplanmodifier.UseStateForUnknown(),
                },
            },
        },
    }
}

How the provider's Configure produces that client — schema, credential resolution, validation — is covered by the provider-configuration skill (if available).

On id: SDKv2 required a magic id attribute; the Framework does not. If the API has its own identifier, expose it under its real meaning and do not add a second, redundant id. Only keep id when it is the API's identifier (as above).

CRUD Operations

Create

func (r *widgetResource) Create(ctx context.Context, req resource.CreateRequest, resp *resource.CreateResponse) {
    var data widgetResourceModel
    resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.Plan.Get(ctx, &data)...)
    if resp.Diagnostics.HasError() {
        return
    }

    input := &examplecloud.CreateWidgetInput{
        Name: data.Name.ValueStringPointer(),
    }

    output, err := r.client.CreateWidget(ctx, input)
    if err != nil {
        resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
            "Error creating Widget",
            fmt.Sprintf("creating Widget (%s): %s", data.Name.ValueString(), err),
        )
        return
    }

    data.ID = types.StringPointerValue(output.ID)

    // For eventually consistent APIs, wait for the resource to be usable
    // before returning — see references/retries-and-waiters.md.

    resp.Diagnostics.Append(resp.State.Set(ctx, &data)...)
}

Read

Read must handle out-of-band deletion by removing the resource from state so the next plan recreates it, rather than erroring forever:

func (r *widgetResource) Read(ctx context.Context, req resource.ReadRequest, resp *resource.ReadResponse) {
    var data widgetResourceModel
    resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.State.Get(ctx, &data)...)
    if resp.Diagnostics.HasError() {
        return
    }

    output, err := findWidgetByID(ctx, r.client, data.ID.ValueString())
    if isNotFound(err) {
        tflog.Warn(ctx, "Widget not found, removing from state", map[string]any{"id": data.ID.ValueString()})
        resp.State.RemoveResource(ctx)
        return
    }
    if err != nil {
        resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
            "Error reading Widget",
            fmt.Sprintf("reading Widget (%s): %s", data.ID.ValueString(), err),
        )
        return
    }

    data.Name = types.StringPointerValue(output.Name)

    resp.Diagnostics.Append(resp.State.Set(ctx, &data)...)
}

Update

Only call the API for attributes that actually changed; compare plan against state:

func (r *widgetResource) Update(ctx context.Context, req resource.UpdateRequest, resp *resource.UpdateResponse) {
    var plan, state widgetResourceModel
    resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.Plan.Get(ctx, &plan)...)
    resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.State.Get(ctx, &state)...)
    if resp.Diagnostics.HasError() {
        return
    }

    if !plan.Description.Equal(state.Description) {
        input := &examplecloud.UpdateWidgetInput{
            ID:          plan.ID.ValueStringPointer(),
            Description: plan.Description.ValueStringPointer(),
        }
        if _, err := r.client.UpdateWidget(ctx, input); err != nil {
            resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
                "Error updating Widget",
                fmt.Sprintf("updating Widget (%s): %s", plan.ID.ValueString(), err),
            )
            return
        }
    }

    resp.Diagnostics.Append(resp.State.Set(ctx, &plan)...)
}

Delete

Treat "already gone" as success — the desired end state is reached:

func (r *widgetResource) Delete(ctx context.Context, req resource.DeleteRequest, resp *resource.DeleteResponse) {
    var data widgetResourceModel
    resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.State.Get(ctx, &data)...)
    if resp.Diagnostics.HasError() {
        return
    }

    _, err := r.client.DeleteWidget(ctx, &examplecloud.DeleteWidgetInput{
        ID: data.ID.ValueStringPointer(),
    })
    if isNotFound(err) {
        return
    }
    if err != nil {
        resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
            "Error deleting Widget",
            fmt.Sprintf("deleting Widget (%s): %s", data.ID.ValueString(), err),
        )
        return
    }
}

Import

With ResourceWithImportState asserted, passthrough of the identifier is one line:

func (r *widgetResource) ImportState(ctx context.Context, req resource.ImportStateRequest, resp *resource.ImportStateResponse) {
    resource.ImportStatePassthroughID(ctx, path.Root("id"), req, resp)
}

For multi-part identifiers, parse a delimited import ID (commonly comma-separated) and set each attribute explicitly.

Resource Design Principles

Before implementing, check the shape of the thing being modeled (full treatment in references/design-principles.md):

  • A resource is the smallest useful building block; if the API offers CRUD for it, it likely deserves its own resource.
  • A resource should talk to one API/service only — cross-service resources break permissions, auditing, and endpoint configuration.
  • Data sources are read-only and side-effect free. A singular data source errors on zero or multiple matches; a plural data source (plural noun name) returns zero-or-more as a collection and errors on neither.
  • Attached policies/rules, long-running task invocations, and versioned artifacts usually deserve their own resources rather than attributes on the parent.
  • Start/stop or enable/disable state belongs as an attribute in the resource, not as a separate resource.

Schema Design

Attribute Types

Terraform TypeFramework TypeUse Case
stringschema.StringAttributeNames, identifiers
numberschema.Int64Attribute, schema.Float64AttributeCounts, sizes
boolschema.BoolAttributeFeature flags
listschema.ListAttributeOrdered collections
setschema.SetAttributeUnordered unique items
mapschema.MapAttributeKey-value pairs
objectschema.SingleNestedAttributeComplex nested config

Give every attribute a MarkdownDescriptiontfplugindocs publishes it, and it is the primary user-facing documentation.

Plan Modifiers

// Force replacement when value changes
stringplanmodifier.RequiresReplace()

// Keep a known value during plan instead of (known after apply)
stringplanmodifier.UseStateForUnknown()

Validators

stringvalidator.LengthBetween(1, 255)
stringvalidator.RegexMatches(regexp.MustCompile(`^[a-z0-9-]+$`), "must be lowercase alphanumeric with hyphens")
stringvalidator.OneOf("small", "medium", "large")
int64validator.Between(1, 100)
listvalidator.SizeAtLeast(1)

Sensitive Attributes

"password": schema.StringAttribute{
    Required:  true,
    Sensitive: true,
},

State Management

Finders

Centralize "get one thing or a typed not-found" in a finder so Read, Delete, waiters, and tests all share identical not-found semantics:

func findWidgetByID(ctx context.Context, client *examplecloud.Client, id string) (*examplecloud.Widget, error) {
    output, err := client.GetWidget(ctx, &examplecloud.GetWidgetInput{ID: &id})
    if err != nil {
        var apiErr *examplecloud.NotFoundError
        if errors.As(err, &apiErr) {
            return nil, &retry.NotFoundError{LastError: err}
        }
        return nil, fmt.Errorf("getting Widget (%s): %w", id, err)
    }
    if output == nil || output.Widget == nil {
        return nil, &retry.NotFoundError{Message: "empty result"}
    }
    return output.Widget, nil
}

func isNotFound(err error) bool {
    var nfe *retry.NotFoundError
    return errors.As(err, &nfe)
}

Waiting for Resource States

Many APIs return from Create/Delete before the resource is usable/gone. Use retry.StateChangeConf (from github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2/helper/retry — usable from Framework providers), with a status function built on the finder and timeouts in named constants:

stateConf := &retry.StateChangeConf{
    Pending: []string{"CREATING", "PENDING"},
    Target:  []string{"ACTIVE"},
    Refresh: statusWidget(ctx, r.client, id), // one poll of the finder: (obj, status, err)
    Timeout: widgetCreatedTimeout,
}
outputRaw, err := stateConf.WaitForStateContext(ctx)

The full status/wait function pairs (create and delete waiters, failure-state handling, post-create not-found retries, eventual-consistency patterns) are in references/retries-and-waiters.md — read it whenever the API is asynchronous or eventually consistent.

Testing

Every resource ships with, at minimum:

  • _basic — create with minimal config, assert attributes, then an import step (ImportState: true, ImportStateVerify: true)
  • _disappears — delete the object out-of-band mid-test; the next plan must propose recreation, not error
  • Per-attribute tests — exercise updates for each non-trivial argument

Naming grammar: tests TestAcc{Resource}_{group?}_{description}, helpers testAccCheck{Resource}Exists / testAccCheck{Resource}Destroy, config functions testAcc{Resource}Config_{description}. Keep configs self-contained, randomize real resource names, and never hardcode environment-specific values (account IDs, zones, versions).

func TestAccWidget_basic(t *testing.T) {
    rName := acctest.RandStringFromCharSet(10, acctest.CharSetAlphaNum)
    resourceName := "examplecloud_widget.test"

    resource.ParallelTest(t, resource.TestCase{
        PreCheck:                 func() { testAccPreCheck(t) },
        ProtoV6ProviderFactories: testAccProtoV6ProviderFactories,
        CheckDestroy:             testAccCheckWidgetDestroy,
        Steps: []resource.TestStep{
            {
                Config: testAccWidgetConfig_basic(rName),
                ConfigStateChecks: []statecheck.StateCheck{
                    statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName, tfjsonpath.New("name"), knownvalue.StringExact(rName)),
                    statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName, tfjsonpath.New("id"), knownvalue.NotNull()),
                },
            },
            {
                ResourceName:      resourceName,
                ImportState:       true,
                ImportStateVerify: true,
            },
        },
    })
}

func testAccWidgetConfig_basic(rName string) string {
    return fmt.Sprintf(`
resource "examplecloud_widget" "test" {
  name = %[1]q
}
`, rName)
}

Use the provider-test-patterns skill (if available) for the full testing treatment: config helper style (%[1]q indexed verbs), statecheck/plancheck, CompareValue, custom StateCheck implementations for exists/disappears helpers, sweepers, and ephemeral resource testing. Use the run-acceptance-tests skill for executing and debugging test runs.

Error Handling

Match API errors by type, not message text, and wrap with context:

var notFound *examplecloud.NotFoundError
if errors.As(err, &notFound) {
    // resource doesn't exist
}

// Wrapping inside helpers: preserve the cause with %w
return fmt.Errorf("creating Widget (%s): %w", name, err)

Diagnostics follow a consistent grammar — summary names the operation and type, detail carries identifier and cause:

resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
    "Error creating Widget",
    fmt.Sprintf("creating Widget (%s): %s", name, err),
)

resp.Diagnostics.AddAttributeError(
    path.Root("name"),
    "Invalid name",
    "Name must be lowercase alphanumeric",
)

Documentation

Write attribute MarkdownDescriptions first — they are the source of truth. Then generate Registry documentation with tfplugindocs (go generate ./... where wired up), adding docs/**/*.md.tmpl templates only for prose and examples the generator cannot derive. Use the provider-docs skill (if available) for the full documentation workflow and Registry publication rules.

Pre-Submission Checklist

  • Plugin Framework used (no new SDKv2 code)
  • Resource has all CRUD operations implemented
  • Read removes missing resources from state; Delete tolerates already-deleted
  • No redundant id attribute (real API identifier exposed instead)
  • Import implemented and covered by an ImportStateVerify step
  • _basic, _disappears, and per-attribute tests present
  • Waiters used where the API is eventually consistent
  • Error messages name the operation, type, and identifier
  • Sensitive attributes marked; every attribute has a description
  • Docs generated with tfplugindocs
  • Changelog entry added, if the repo tracks release notes (check CONTRIBUTING)

References

GitHub リポジトリ

hashicorp/agent-skills
パス: plugins/terraform/skills/provider-resources
0
doormat-managed
FAQ

よくある質問

provider-resources Skillとは何ですか?

provider-resources はhashicorp が作成した Claude Skillです。Skillは、Claudeが必要に応じて読み込む指示とリソースをまとめ、追加の指示なしで provider-resources に関連するタスクを実行できるようにします。

provider-resources をインストールするには?

このページのインストールコマンドを使用してください。provider-resources をプラグインとして Claude Code に追加するか、リポジトリを skills ディレクトリにクローンし、Claudeを再起動してSkillを読み込みます。

provider-resources はどのカテゴリに属しますか?

provider-resources は テスト カテゴリに属します。

provider-resources は無料で利用できますか?

はい。provider-resources は AIMCP に掲載されており、無料でインストールできます。

関連スキル

evaluating-llms-harness
テスト

このClaudeスキルは、lm-evaluation-harnessを実行し、MMLUやGSM8Kなど60以上の標準化学術タスクでLLMをベンチマークします。開発者がモデルの品質を比較し、トレーニングの進捗を追跡し、学術的な結果を報告するために設計されています。このツールはHuggingFaceやvLLMモデルを含む様々なバックエンドをサポートしています。

スキルを見る
cloudflare-cron-triggers
テスト

このスキルは、cron式を使用してWorkersをスケジュールするためのCloudflare Cron Triggersの実装に関する包括的な知識を提供します。定期的なタスクの設定、メンテナンスジョブ、自動化されたワークフローの構築を網羅し、無効なcron式やタイムゾーン問題といった一般的な課題への対処法も含みます。開発者はこれを使用して、スケジュールされたハンドラーの設定、cronトリガーのテスト、WorkflowsやGreen Computeとの連携を構成できます。

スキルを見る
webapp-testing
テスト

このClaude Skillは、Playwrightベースのツールキットを提供し、Pythonスクリプトを通じてローカルWebアプリケーションのテストを可能にします。フロントエンドの検証、UIデバッグ、スクリーンショット撮影、ログ表示を実現し、サーバーライフサイクルを管理します。ブラウザ自動化タスクにご利用いただけますが、コンテキストの汚染を避けるため、スクリプトのソースコードを読むのではなく直接実行してください。

スキルを見る
finishing-a-development-branch
テスト

このスキルは、開発者がテストの合格を確認し、構造化された統合オプションを提示することで、完成した作業を仕上げることを支援します。実装が完了した後のマージ、PR作成、ブランチの整理といったワークフローを案内します。コードが準備できてテスト済みの際に使用し、開発プロセスを体系的に完了させましょう。

スキルを見る