スキル一覧に戻る

design-on-call-rotation

pjt222
更新日 2 days ago
1 閲覧
17
2
17
GitHubで表示
デザインaidesign

について

このClaudeスキルは、開発者が持続可能なオンコールローテーションスケジュールを作成するのを支援し、バランスの取れたカバレッジとウェルビーイングの保護策を提供します。エスカレーションポリシー、疲労管理、引継ぎ手順に関するガイダンスを提供し、バーンアウトを最小限に抑えます。新しいローテーションの設定、チームのスケーリング、またはアラート疲労とインシデント対応の問題に対処する際にご利用ください。

クイックインストール

Claude Code

推奨
メイン
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
プラグインコマンド代替
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git クローン代替
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/design-on-call-rotation

このコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします

ドキュメント

Design On-Call Rotation

Make sustainable on-call schedule. Balance coverage with engineer well-being.

When Use

  • Set up on-call first time
  • Scale team from 2-3 to 5+ engineers
  • Fight on-call burnout or alert fatigue
  • Speed up incident response
  • After post-mortem finds handoff issue

Inputs

  • Required: Team size + time zones
  • Required: Service SLA needs (response time, coverage hours)
  • Optional: Past incident volume + timing
  • Optional: Budget for on-call pay
  • Optional: Existing on-call tool (PagerDuty, Opsgenie)

Steps

Step 1: Pick Rotation Schedule

Pick rotation length by team size:

## Rotation Models

### Weekly Rotation (5+ person team)
- **Length**: 7 days (Monday 09:00 to Monday 09:00)
- **Pros**: Predictable, easy to plan around
- **Cons**: Whole week disrupted if alerts are frequent

### 12-Hour Split (3-4 person team)
- **Day shift**: 08:00-20:00 local time
- **Night shift**: 20:00-08:00 local time
- **Pros**: Shared burden, night coverage paid differently
- **Cons**: More handoffs, coordination needed

### Follow-the-Sun (Global team)
- **APAC**: 00:00-08:00 UTC
- **EMEA**: 08:00-16:00 UTC
- **Americas**: 16:00-00:00 UTC
- **Pros**: No night shifts, timezone-aligned
- **Cons**: Requires distributed team

### Two-Tier (Senior/Junior split)
- **Primary**: Junior engineers (first responder)
- **Secondary**: Senior engineers (escalation)
- **Pros**: Training opportunity, lighter senior load
- **Cons**: Risk of junior burnout

Example 5-person team schedule:

Week 1: Alice (Primary), Bob (Secondary)
Week 2: Charlie (Primary), Diana (Secondary)
Week 3: Eve (Primary), Alice (Secondary)
Week 4: Bob (Primary), Charlie (Secondary)
Week 5: Diana (Primary), Eve (Secondary)

Got: Schedule rotates fairly. 24/7 coverage.

If fail: Coverage gaps? Add engineers or drop SLA to business hours only.

Step 2: Config Escalation Policy

Set up tiered escalation in PagerDuty/Opsgenie:

# PagerDuty escalation policy (YAML representation)
escalation_policy:
  name: "Production Services"
  repeat_enabled: true
  num_loops: 3

  escalation_rules:
    - id: primary
      escalation_delay_in_minutes: 0
      targets:
        - type: schedule
          id: primary_on_call_schedule

    - id: secondary
      escalation_delay_in_minutes: 15
      targets:
        - type: schedule
          id: secondary_on_call_schedule

    - id: manager
      escalation_delay_in_minutes: 30
      targets:
        - type: user
          id: engineering_manager

Escalation flowchart:

Alert Fires
    ↓
Primary On-Call Paged
    ↓
Wait 15 minutes (no ack)
    ↓
Secondary On-Call Paged
    ↓
Wait 15 minutes (no ack)
    ↓
Manager Paged
    ↓
Repeat cycle (max 3 times)

Got: Clear escalation path. Reasonable delays.

If fail: Escalations fire too often? Shorten ack windows or check alert quality.

Step 3: Define Handoff

Make structured handoff checklist:

## On-Call Handoff Checklist

### Outgoing On-Call
- [ ] Update incident log with any ongoing issues
- [ ] Document any workarounds or known issues
- [ ] Share any alerts that are "noisy but safe to ignore" temporarily
- [ ] Note any upcoming deploys or maintenance windows
- [ ] Provide context on any flapping alerts

### Incoming On-Call
- [ ] Review incident log from previous shift
- [ ] Check for any ongoing incidents
- [ ] Verify PagerDuty/Opsgenie has correct contact info
- [ ] Test alert delivery (send test page to yourself)
- [ ] Review recent deploys and release notes
- [ ] Check capacity metrics for any concerning trends

### Handoff Meeting (15 min)
- Review any incidents from past week
- Discuss any changes to systems or runbooks
- Questions and clarifications

Automate handoff reminders:

# Slack reminder script
curl -X POST https://slack.com/api/chat.postMessage \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $SLACK_BOT_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "channel": "#on-call",
    "text": "On-call handoff in 1 hour. Outgoing: @alice, Incoming: @bob. Please use the handoff checklist: https://wiki.company.com/oncall-handoff"
  }'

Got: Smooth knowledge transfer. No info loss between shifts.

If fail: Incidents recur because incoming engineer missed workarounds? Make handoff mandatory.

Step 4: Fatigue Management

Rules to stop burnout:

## Fatigue Prevention Rules

### Alert Volume Limits
- **Threshold**: Max 5 pages per night (22:00-06:00)
- **Action**: If exceeded, trigger incident review next day
- **Goal**: Reduce noisy alerts that disrupt sleep

### Time Off After Major Incident
- **Rule**: If on-call handles P1 incident >2 hours overnight, they get comp time
- **Amount**: Equal to incident duration (e.g., 3-hour incident = 3 hours off)
- **Scheduling**: Must be taken within 2 weeks

### Maximum Consecutive Weeks
- **Limit**: No more than 2 consecutive weeks on-call
- **Reason**: Prevents exhaustion from extended coverage

### Minimum Rest Between Rotations
- **Cooldown**: At least 2 weeks between primary rotations
- **Exception**: Emergency coverage (requires manager approval)

### Vacation Protection
- **Rule**: No on-call during scheduled vacation
- **Process**: Mark as "Out of Office" in PagerDuty 2 weeks in advance
- **Swap**: Coordinate swap with team, update schedule

Track alert fatigue metrics:

# Alerts per on-call engineer per week
count(ALERTS{alertstate="firing"}) by (oncall_engineer)

# Nighttime pages (22:00-06:00 local)
count(ALERTS{alertstate="firing", hour_of_day>=22 or hour_of_day<6})

# Time to acknowledge (should be <5 min during business hours)
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(alert_ack_duration_seconds_bucket[7d]))

Got: On-call load sustainable. Engineers not chronically exhausted.

If fail: Burnout despite rules? Cut alert volume or hire more engineers.

Step 5: Document Runbooks + Contacts

Make on-call reference guide:

# On-Call Quick Reference

## Emergency Contacts
- **Engineering Manager**: Alice Smith, +1-555-0100
- **CTO**: Bob Johnson, +1-555-0200
- **Security Team**: [email protected], +1-555-0300
- **Cloud Provider Support**: AWS Support Case Portal

## Common Runbooks
- [Database Connection Pool Exhaustion](https://wiki/runbook-db-pool)
- [High API Latency](https://wiki/runbook-api-latency)
- [Disk Space Full](https://wiki/runbook-disk-full)
- [SSL Certificate Expiration](https://wiki/runbook-ssl-renewal)

## Access & Credentials
- **Production AWS**: SSO via company.okta.com
- **Kubernetes**: `kubectl --context production`
- **Database**: Read-only access via Bastion host
- **Secrets**: 1Password vault "On-Call Production"

## Escalation Decision Tree
- **P1 (Service Down)**: Immediate response, escalate to manager after 30min
- **P2 (Degraded)**: Response within 15min, escalate if not resolved in 1 hour
- **P3 (Warning)**: Acknowledge, resolve during business hours
- **Security Incident**: Immediately escalate to Security Team, don't investigate alone

Got: On-call engineer finds any needed info in <2 min.

If fail: Engineers keep asking "where is X?"? Centralize docs.

Step 6: Schedule On-Call Retros

Review on-call experience monthly:

## On-Call Retrospective Agenda (Monthly)

### Metrics Review (15 min)
- Total alerts: [X] (target: <50/week)
- Nighttime pages: [Y] (target: <5/week)
- Mean time to acknowledge: [Z] (target: <5 min)
- Incidents by severity: P1: [A], P2: [B], P3: [C]

### Qualitative Feedback (20 min)
- What was the most challenging incident?
- Which alerts were noisy/low-value?
- Were runbooks helpful? Which need updates?
- Any gaps in monitoring or alerting?

### Action Items (10 min)
- Fix noisy alerts identified
- Update runbooks that were incomplete
- Adjust rotation schedule if needed
- Plan alert tuning work

### Recognition (5 min)
- Shout-outs for excellent incident response
- Share learnings from interesting incidents

Track improvement over time:

# Generate monthly on-call report
cat > oncall_report_2025-02.md <<EOF
# On-Call Report: February 2025

## Key Metrics
- **Total Alerts**: 38 (down from 52 in January)
- **Nighttime Pages**: 4 (within target)
- **P1 Incidents**: 1 (database outage, 45min MTTR)
- **P2 Incidents**: 3 (all resolved <1 hour)

## Improvements Made
- Tuned CPU alert threshold (reduced false positives by 40%)
- Added runbook for Redis cache failures
- Implemented log rotation (prevented disk full alerts)

## Upcoming Changes
- Migrate to follow-the-sun rotation (Q2)
- Add Slack alert integration (in progress)
EOF

Got: On-call experience improves month-over-month. Alert volume drops.

If fail: Metrics don't improve? Escalate to leadership. May need to pause feature work, fix operational debt.

Checks

  • Rotation schedule covers all hours (24/7 or business hours)
  • Escalation policy tested (send test alerts)
  • Handoff procedure documented + shared with team
  • Fatigue rules codified
  • On-call reference guide complete + accessible
  • Monthly retros scheduled
  • On-call comp approved (if applicable)

Pitfalls

  • Too few engineers: 3 or fewer = on-call every 2-3 weeks, unsustainable. Min 5 for weekly rotation.
  • No escalation delays: Instant manager escalation wastes senior time. Give primary 15 min to respond.
  • Skipping handoffs: No context transfer = repeated mistakes. Make handoffs mandatory.
  • Ignoring alert fatigue: Engineers ignore alerts from noise → critical issues missed. Tune aggressively.
  • No comp: On-call with no pay/time off = resentment. Budget for it.

See Also

  • configure-alerting-rules - cut alert noise causing fatigue
  • write-incident-runbook - runbooks referenced during on-call shifts

GitHub リポジトリ

pjt222/agent-almanac
パス: i18n/caveman/skills/design-on-call-rotation
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

関連スキル

executing-plans

デザイン

executing-plansスキルは、完全な実装計画があり、それを管理されたバッチでレビューチェックポイントを設けながら実行する場合に使用します。このスキルは計画を読み込んで批判的にレビューした後、小さなバッチ(デフォルトは3タスク)でタスクを実行し、各バッチの間に進捗状況を報告してアーキテクトのレビューを受けます。これにより、品質管理チェックポイントが組み込まれた体系的な実装が保証されます。

スキルを見る

requesting-code-review

デザイン

このスキルは、コードレビュアーサブエージェントを起動し、処理を進める前に要件に対してコード変更を分析します。タスク完了後、主要な機能の実装後、またはmainブランチへのマージ前などに使用すべきです。このレビューは、現在の実装と元の計画を比較することで、問題を早期に発見するのに役立ちます。

スキルを見る

connect-mcp-server

デザイン

このスキルは、開発者がHTTP、stdio、またはSSEトランスポートを使用してMCPサーバーをClaude Codeに接続するための包括的なガイドを提供します。GitHub、Notion、カスタムAPIなどの外部サービスを統合するためのインストール、設定、認証、セキュリティについて解説しています。MCP統合のセットアップ、外部ツールの設定、またはClaudeのModel Context Protocolを扱う際にご利用ください。

スキルを見る

web-cli-teleport

デザイン

このスキルは、タスク分析に基づいて開発者がClaude Code WebとCLIインターフェースの選択を支援し、これらの環境間でのシームレスなセッションテレポーテーションを可能にします。Web、CLI、モバイル環境を切り替える際のセッション状態とコンテキストを管理することで、ワークフローを最適化します。様々な段階で異なるツールを必要とする複雑なプロジェクトにご活用ください。

スキルを見る