draft-project-charter
について
このClaude Skillは、包括的なプロジェクト憲章を作成し、範囲、ステークホルダー、成功基準、初期リスク登録を定義します。問題提起、RACIマトリックス、アジャイルおよび古典的手法の両方に対応したマイルストーン計画など、主要要素を生成します。プロジェクトを正式に立ち上げる、ステークホルダーの合意形成を行う、あるいは発見フェーズから実作業への移行にご活用ください。
クイックインストール
Claude Code
推奨npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/draft-project-charterこのコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします
ドキュメント
Draft a Project Charter
Structured charter → project bounds + stakeholder agreement + success criteria before detailed planning. Doc: scope + RACI + milestones + initial risk register. Agile/classic/hybrid.
Use When
- New project kickoff
- Formalize scope after informal start
- Align stakeholders before detailed planning
- Reference doc for scope decisions during execution
- Transition from discovery/ideation → active work
In
- Required: Project name + brief desc
- Required: Primary stakeholder/sponsor
- Optional: Existing docs (proposals, briefs, emails)
- Optional: Known constraints (budget, deadline, team size)
- Optional: Methodology pref (agile, classic, hybrid)
Do
Step 1: Gather Context + Template
Read existing docs (proposals, emails, briefs) → understand background. ID core problem/opportunity. Create charter file w/ structured template → populate subsequent steps.
File: PROJECT-CHARTER-[PROJECT-NAME].md:
# Project Charter: [Project Name]
## Document ID: PC-[PROJECT]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### 1. Problem Statement
[2-3 sentences describing the problem or opportunity this project addresses]
### 2. Project Purpose
[What the project will achieve and why it matters]
### 3. Scope
#### In Scope
- [Deliverable 1]
- [Deliverable 2]
#### Out of Scope
- [Exclusion 1]
- [Exclusion 2]
### 4. Deliverables
| # | Deliverable | Acceptance Criteria | Target Date |
|---|------------|---------------------|-------------|
| 1 | | | |
### 5. Stakeholders & RACI
| Stakeholder | Role | D1 | D2 | D3 |
|-------------|------|----|----|-----|
| | | | | |
*R=Responsible, A=Accountable, C=Consulted, I=Informed*
### 6. Success Criteria
| # | Criterion | Measure | Target |
|---|-----------|---------|--------|
| 1 | | | |
### 7. Milestones
| Milestone | Target Date | Dependencies |
|-----------|-------------|--------------|
| | | |
### 8. Risk Register
| ID | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Severity | Mitigation | Owner |
|----|------|------------|--------|----------|------------|-------|
| R1 | | | | | | |
*Likelihood/Impact: Low, Medium, High*
*Severity = Likelihood × Impact*
### 9. Assumptions and Constraints
#### Assumptions
- [Key assumption 1]
#### Constraints
- [Key constraint 1]
### 10. Approval
| Role | Name | Date |
|------|------|------|
| Sponsor | | |
| Project Lead | | |
Fill doc ID → PC-[PROJECT]-[YYYY]-[NNN] (e.g., PC-WEBSITE-2026-001). Problem statement (2-3 sentences): current situation + gap + impact. Purpose (1 para): what will be achieved.
→ Charter file: doc ID + problem + purpose filled. Problem specific + measurable gap.
If err: context unclear → QUESTIONS section at top for sponsor. Existing docs conflict → OPEN ISSUES + flag for stakeholder resolution.
Step 2: Scope Boundaries
Explicit in-scope + out-of-scope. Write 3-5 in-scope deliverables + specific acceptance criteria each. Write 3-5 out-of-scope → prevent creep. Populate Deliverables table: deliverable + criteria + target date.
→ Scope balanced. Deliverables 3-5 w/ specific testable criteria. Dates realistic + sequenced.
If err: vague deliverables → break into sub-deliverables w/ concrete outputs. Criteria missing → ask "How would we demonstrate this is complete?". No dates → TBD, flag for milestone session.
Step 3: Stakeholders + RACI
List all affected/contributing/decision-authority individuals + org role. RACI matrix per stakeholder × deliverable:
- R (Responsible): does work
- A (Accountable): final decision authority (one A per deliverable)
- C (Consulted): input before decisions
- I (Informed): updated on progress
Each deliverable → exactly one A + ≥ one R.
→ Stakeholders 5-10 + roles. One A per deliverable column. No missing R / multiple As. Sponsor = A for final approval.
If err: list incomplete → cross-ref org chart + discovery meeting attendees. Multiple As → escalate to sponsor for clarification. No R → flag unassigned + resource allocation.
Step 4: Success Criteria + Milestones
3-5 measurable criteria SMART (Specific + Measurable + Achievable + Relevant + Time-bound). Each → quantifiable measure + target. 4-6 key milestones = major stages/completions + target dates + deps on prior milestones.
→ Criteria 3-5 w/ specific measures (e.g., "Uptime" = "% availability" target "99.5%"). Milestones logical + realistic. Deps clear.
If err: criteria vague ("improve quality") → rewrite as measurable outcomes + baseline + target. Dates unrealistic → work backward from final deadline w/ durations + buffers. Circular deps → restructure sequence or split conflicting.
Step 5: Initial Risk Register
5-10 risks. Per risk: likelihood (L/M/H) + impact (L/M/H) → severity. Specific mitigation + assigned owner. ≥1 per category: scope, schedule, resource, technical, external.
→ Register 5-10 across scope + schedule + resource + technical + external. Each w/ L + I + severity. Mitigations actionable + specific. Each has owner.
If err: incomplete → review scope + deps + stakeholders + assumptions for failure points. Generic mitigations ("monitor closely") → specify: what monitored, how often, what triggers action. No owner → assign project lead temp + escalate to sponsor.
Check
- Charter file created w/ doc ID
- Problem specific + measurable
- Scope has in + out-of-scope
- RACI covers all deliverables
- Criteria SMART
- ≥5 risks w/ mitigations
- Milestones w/ target dates
- Approval section included
Traps
- Scope w/o bounds: In-scope w/o out-of-scope → creep. Always define what NOT doing.
- Vague criteria: "Improve perf" unmeasurable. Tie each to number + baseline + target.
- Missing stakeholders: Overlooked ones surface late + derail. Cross-ref org charts + prior comms.
- Risk register as checkbox: Risks w/o actionable mitigations = false confidence. Each needs specific response.
- Over-detailed charter: Charter = compass, not map. 2-4 pages. Detailed planning later.
→
create-work-breakdown-structure— decompose deliverables → work packagesmanage-backlog— charter scope → prioritized backlogplan-sprint— first sprint from deliverablesgenerate-status-report— report vs milestonesconduct-retrospective— review assumptions after execution
GitHub リポジトリ
関連スキル
executing-plans
デザインexecuting-plansスキルは、完全な実装計画があり、それを管理されたバッチでレビューチェックポイントを設けながら実行する場合に使用します。このスキルは計画を読み込んで批判的にレビューした後、小さなバッチ(デフォルトは3タスク)でタスクを実行し、各バッチの間に進捗状況を報告してアーキテクトのレビューを受けます。これにより、品質管理チェックポイントが組み込まれた体系的な実装が保証されます。
requesting-code-review
デザインこのスキルは、コードレビュアーサブエージェントを起動し、処理を進める前に要件に対してコード変更を分析します。タスク完了後、主要な機能の実装後、またはmainブランチへのマージ前などに使用すべきです。このレビューは、現在の実装と元の計画を比較することで、問題を早期に発見するのに役立ちます。
connect-mcp-server
デザインこのスキルは、開発者がHTTP、stdio、またはSSEトランスポートを使用してMCPサーバーをClaude Codeに接続するための包括的なガイドを提供します。GitHub、Notion、カスタムAPIなどの外部サービスを統合するためのインストール、設定、認証、セキュリティについて解説しています。MCP統合のセットアップ、外部ツールの設定、またはClaudeのModel Context Protocolを扱う際にご利用ください。
web-cli-teleport
デザインこのスキルは、タスク分析に基づいて開発者がClaude Code WebとCLIインターフェースの選択を支援し、これらの環境間でのシームレスなセッションテレポーテーションを可能にします。Web、CLI、モバイル環境を切り替える際のセッション状態とコンテキストを管理することで、ワークフローを最適化します。様々な段階で異なるツールを必要とする複雑なプロジェクトにご活用ください。
