スキル一覧に戻る

decommission-validated-system

pjt222
更新日 2 days ago
4 閲覧
17
2
17
GitHubで表示
テストworddata

について

このスキルは、開発者が検証済みシステムの管理された廃止手順を進められるよう導き、データ保持規制への準拠を確保します。データ移行の検証、アーカイブ戦略、アクセス権限の取り消しといった主要なステップを扱います。システムのライフサイクル終了、サポート終了、規制変更に伴うシステムの置き換えまたは廃止時にご利用ください。

クイックインストール

Claude Code

推奨
メイン
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
プラグインコマンド代替
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git クローン代替
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/decommission-validated-system

このコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします

ドキュメント

Decommission Validated System

Controlled retirement of validated sys + preserve data integrity + meet retention reqs.

Use When

  • Validated sys replaced
  • EOL no replacement (biz proc eliminated)
  • Vendor discontinues support
  • Consolidation → single platform
  • Reg / biz changes → obsolete

In

  • Required: Sys (name, ver, valid status)
  • Required: Retention reqs (21 CFR Part 11, GLP, GCP)
  • Required: Replacement sys (if applic) + migration scope
  • Optional: Current valid doc pkg
  • Optional: Data vol + fmt inventory
  • Optional: Biz owner + stakeholders

Do

Step 1: Retention Reqs

How long + what form:

# Data Retention Assessment
## Document ID: DRA-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Regulatory Retention Requirements
| Regulation | Data Type | Retention Period | Format Requirements |
|-----------|-----------|-----------------|-------------------|
| 21 CFR 211 (GMP) | Batch records, test results | 1 year past product expiry or 3 years after distribution | Readable, retrievable |
| 21 CFR 58 (GLP) | Study data and records | Duration of study + retention agreement | Original or certified copy |
| ICH E6 (GCP) | Clinical trial records | 2 years after last marketing approval or formal discontinuation | Accessible for inspection |
| 21 CFR Part 11 | Electronic records | Per predicate rule | Original format or validated migration |
| EU Annex 11 | Computerized system records | Per applicable GxP | Readable and available |
| Tax/financial | Financial records | 7-10 years (jurisdiction-dependent) | Readable |

### System Data Inventory
| Data Category | Volume | Format | Retention Required Until | Disposition |
|---------------|--------|--------|------------------------|-------------|
| [e.g., Batch records] | [e.g., 50,000 records] | [e.g., Database + PDF reports] | [Date] | Migrate / Archive / Destroy |
| [e.g., Audit trail] | [e.g., 2M entries] | [e.g., Database] | [Same as parent records] | Archive |
| [e.g., User data] | [e.g., 200 profiles] | [e.g., LDAP/Database] | [Employment + 2 years] | Anonymise and archive |

Got: Every cat has retention + fmt + disposition.

If err: Unclear reqs → consult regulatory + legal. Default longest applic.

Step 2: Migration Plan (If Applic)

Data → replacement:

# Data Migration Plan
## Document ID: DMP-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Migration Scope
| Source | Target | Data Category | Records | Migration Method |
|--------|--------|---------------|---------|-----------------|
| [Old system] | [New system] | [Category] | [Count] | ETL / Manual / API |

### Data Mapping
| Source Field | Source Format | Target Field | Target Format | Transformation |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|---------------|---------------|
| [e.g., test_result] | FLOAT(8,2) | [e.g., result_value] | DECIMAL(10,3) | Precision conversion |
| [e.g., operator_id] | VARCHAR(20) | [e.g., user_id] | UUID | Lookup table mapping |

### Validation Approach
| Check | Method | Acceptance Criteria |
|-------|--------|-------------------|
| Record count reconciliation | Source count vs target count | 100% match |
| Field-level comparison | Sample 5% of records, all fields | 100% match after transformation |
| Checksum verification | Hash source vs target for key fields | Checksums match |
| Business rule validation | Verify key calculations in target | Results match source |
| Audit trail continuity | Verify historical audit trail migrated | All entries present with original timestamps |

Got: Plan w/ mapping + transforms + validation → proves integrity.

If err: Migration valid fails → do NOT decommission. Fix + re-validate.

Step 3: Archival Strategy

Data → archive (not migrate):

# Archival Strategy

### Archive Format
| Consideration | Decision | Rationale |
|--------------|----------|-----------|
| Format | [PDF/A, CSV, XML, database backup] | [Why this format survives the retention period] |
| Medium | [Network storage, cloud archive, tape, optical] | [Durability and accessibility] |
| Encryption | [Yes/No — method if yes] | [Security vs long-term accessibility trade-off] |
| Integrity verification | [SHA-256 checksums, periodic verification schedule] | [Prove archive is uncorrupted] |

### Archive Verification
- [ ] Archived data is readable without the source system
- [ ] All required data categories are included in the archive
- [ ] Checksums recorded at time of archival
- [ ] Archive can be searched and retrieved within [defined SLA, e.g., 5 business days]
- [ ] Periodic integrity checks scheduled (annually)

### Archive Access
| Role | Access Level | Authorisation |
|------|-------------|--------------|
| QA Director | Read access to all archived data | Standing authorisation |
| Regulatory Affairs | Read access for inspection support | Standing authorisation |
| System Owner (former) | Read access for business queries | Request-based |
| External auditors | Read access, supervised | Per audit plan |

Got: Archive readable + searchable + verifiable w/o orig sys.

If err: Can't read indep of src sys → not compliant. Export → open std fmt (PDF/A, CSV) pre-decomm.

Step 4: Execute

# Decommission Checklist
## Document ID: DC-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Pre-Decommission
- [ ] All stakeholders notified of decommission date and data disposition
- [ ] Data migration completed and validated (if applicable)
- [ ] Data archive created and verified (if applicable)
- [ ] Final backup of complete system taken and stored separately
- [ ] All open change requests resolved or transferred
- [ ] All open CAPAs resolved or transferred to successor system
- [ ] All active users informed and redirected to replacement system (if applicable)

### Decommission Execution
- [ ] User access revoked for all accounts
- [ ] System removed from production environment
- [ ] Network connections disconnected
- [ ] Licenses returned or terminated
- [ ] System entry removed from active system inventory
- [ ] System moved to "Decommissioned" status in compliance architecture

### Post-Decommission
- [ ] Validation documentation archived (URS, VP, IQ/OQ/PQ, TM, VSR)
- [ ] SOPs retired or updated to remove references to decommissioned system
- [ ] Training records archived
- [ ] Change control records archived
- [ ] Audit trail archived
- [ ] Decommission report completed and approved

### Decommission Report
| Section | Content |
|---------|---------|
| System description | Name, version, purpose, GxP classification |
| Decommission rationale | Why the system is being retired |
| Data disposition summary | What data went where (migrated, archived, destroyed) |
| Validation evidence | Migration validation results, archive verification |
| Residual risk | Any ongoing data retention obligations |
| Approval | System owner, QA, IT signatures |

Got: Decomm = controlled + documented + approved. Not "turn it off".

If err: Any item incomplete → doc exception + QA approval before proceeding.

Check

  • Retention reqs assessed all cats
  • Migration validated w/ counts + sampling + checksums (if applic)
  • Archive in fmt readable w/o src sys
  • Archive integrity verified w/ checksums
  • All user access revoked
  • Valid docs archived w/ retention period
  • SOPs updated to remove decomm sys refs
  • Decomm report approved: sys owner + QA + IT

Traps

  • Premature decomm: Turn off pre-migration valid → permanent data loss. Complete valid first.
  • Unreadable archives: Proprietary fmt needs orig sys → defeats purpose. Use open fmts.
  • Forgotten audit trails: Archive data but not audit trail → no provenance. Always archive trails w/ parent records.
  • Orphaned SOPs: SOPs still ref decomm sys → user confusion + compliance gaps. Update / retire all.
  • No periodic archive verify: Archives degrade. No integrity checks → loss undetected until inspection.

  • design-compliance-architecture — update sys inventory post-decomm
  • manage-change-control — decomm = major change → change control
  • write-validation-documentation — migration valid follows same IQ/OQ
  • write-standard-operating-procedure — retire/update SOPs
  • prepare-inspection-readiness — archived data accessible for inspections

GitHub リポジトリ

pjt222/agent-almanac
パス: i18n/caveman-ultra/skills/decommission-validated-system
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

関連スキル

evaluating-llms-harness

テスト

このClaudeスキルは、lm-evaluation-harnessを実行し、MMLUやGSM8Kなど60以上の標準化学術タスクでLLMをベンチマークします。開発者がモデルの品質を比較し、トレーニングの進捗を追跡し、学術的な結果を報告するために設計されています。このツールはHuggingFaceやvLLMモデルを含む様々なバックエンドをサポートしています。

スキルを見る

cloudflare-cron-triggers

テスト

このスキルは、cron式を使用してWorkersをスケジュールするためのCloudflare Cron Triggersの実装に関する包括的な知識を提供します。定期的なタスクの設定、メンテナンスジョブ、自動化されたワークフローの構築を網羅し、無効なcron式やタイムゾーン問題といった一般的な課題への対処法も含みます。開発者はこれを使用して、スケジュールされたハンドラーの設定、cronトリガーのテスト、WorkflowsやGreen Computeとの連携を構成できます。

スキルを見る

webapp-testing

テスト

このClaude Skillは、Playwrightベースのツールキットを提供し、Pythonスクリプトを通じてローカルWebアプリケーションのテストを可能にします。フロントエンドの検証、UIデバッグ、スクリーンショット撮影、ログ表示を実現し、サーバーライフサイクルを管理します。ブラウザ自動化タスクにご利用いただけますが、コンテキストの汚染を避けるため、スクリプトのソースコードを読むのではなく直接実行してください。

スキルを見る

finishing-a-development-branch

テスト

このスキルは、開発者がテストの合格を確認し、構造化された統合オプションを提示することで、完成した作業を仕上げることを支援します。実装が完了した後のマージ、PR作成、ブランチの整理といったワークフローを案内します。コードが準備できてテスト済みの際に使用し、開発プロセスを体系的に完了させましょう。

スキルを見る