plan-sprint
について
`plan-sprint`スキルは、バックログアイテムの洗練、ゴールの設定、チームキャパシティの計算による作業の選定を通じて、開発者がスクラムまたはアジャイルスプリントを構築するのを支援します。選択されたアイテムをタスクに分解し、包括的な`SPRINT-PLAN.md`ファイルを生成します。新規スプリントの開始時、スコープ変更後の再計画時、あるいはアドホックな作業から構造化された開発サイクルへの移行時にご利用ください。
クイックインストール
Claude Code
推奨npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/plan-sprintこのコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします
ドキュメント
Plan a Sprint
Plan time-boxed sprint. Select refined backlog items up to team capacity. Define clear sprint goal. Decompose selected items into actionable tasks. Produces complete sprint plan that guides team work for sprint duration.
When Use
- Starting new sprint in Scrum or agile project
- Re-planning sprint after significant scope change
- Transitioning from ad-hoc work to structured sprint cadence
- After backlog grooming when items ready for sprint inclusion
- Planning first sprint after project charter approval
Inputs
- Required: Product backlog (prioritized, with estimates)
- Required: Sprint duration (usually 1-2 weeks)
- Required: Team members and availability
- Optional: Previous sprint velocity (story points or items completed)
- Optional: Sprint number and date range
- Optional: Carry-over items from previous sprint
Steps
Step 1: Review and Refine Backlog Items
Read current BACKLOG.md. For each candidate item near top, verify it has:
- Clear title and description
- Acceptance criteria (testable conditions)
- Estimate (story points or T-shirt size)
- No unresolved blockers
Refine any items missing these elements. Split items estimated larger than half sprint capacity into smaller, manageable pieces.
Got: Top 10-15 backlog items "sprint-ready" with acceptance criteria and estimates.
If fail: Items lack acceptance criteria? Write them now. Items can't be estimated? Schedule refinement conversation. Select only ready items.
Step 2: Define Sprint Goal
Write single clear sprint goal — one sentence stating what sprint will achieve. Goal should be:
- Achievable within sprint duration
- Valuable to stakeholders
- Testable (can verify it was met at sprint end)
**Sprint Goal**: [One sentence describing the objective]
Example: "Enable users to reset their password through email verification with two-factor authentication."
Got: Sprint goal articulated as one clear, testable sentence.
If fail: No coherent goal emerges? Backlog priorities may be scattered. Consult product owner — focus on single valuable outcome.
Step 3: Calculate Team Capacity
Compute available person-days per team member:
## Team Capacity
| Team Member | Available Days | Overhead (%) | Net Capacity |
|-------------|---------------|-------------|--------------|
| [Name] | [Sprint days - PTO] | 20% | [Available × 0.8] |
| [Name] | [Sprint days - PTO] | 20% | [Available × 0.8] |
| **Total** | | | **[Sum] person-days** |
Overhead accounts for meetings, reviews, ad-hoc requests (usually 15-25%).
Using story points? Use previous sprint velocity as capacity. First sprint? Use 60-70% of theoretical maximum.
Got: Capacity computed in person-days or story points. Assumptions documented.
If fail: No historical velocity? Be conservative — plan to 60% capacity. Adjust after sprint. Better under-commit and deliver than over-commit and fail.
Step 4: Select Items and Compose Sprint Backlog
Select items from top of product backlog until capacity reached. Decompose each selected item into tasks (2-8 hours each):
# Sprint Plan: Sprint [N]
## Document ID: SP-[PROJECT]-S[NNN]
### Sprint Details
- **Sprint Goal**: [From Step 2]
- **Duration**: [Start date] to [End date]
- **Capacity**: [From Step 3] person-days / [N] story points
- **Team**: [List team members]
### Sprint Backlog
| ID | Item | Points | Tasks | Assignee | Status |
|----|------|--------|-------|----------|--------|
| B-001 | [Item title] | 5 | 4 | [Name] | To Do |
| B-002 | [Item title] | 3 | 3 | [Name] | To Do |
| B-003 | [Item title] | 8 | 6 | [Name] | To Do |
| **Total** | | **16** | **13** | | |
### Task Breakdown
#### B-001: [Item title]
**Acceptance Criteria**: [From backlog item]
- [ ] Task 1: [Description] (4h, [Assignee])
- [ ] Task 2: [Description] (2h, [Assignee])
- [ ] Task 3: [Description] (4h, [Assignee])
- [ ] Task 4: [Description] (2h, [Assignee])
#### B-002: [Item title]
**Acceptance Criteria**: [From backlog item]
- [ ] Task 1: [Description] (3h, [Assignee])
- [ ] Task 2: [Description] (4h, [Assignee])
- [ ] Task 3: [Description] (2h, [Assignee])
#### B-003: [Item title]
**Acceptance Criteria**: [From backlog item]
- [ ] Task 1: [Description] (3h, [Assignee])
- [ ] Task 2: [Description] (4h, [Assignee])
- [ ] Task 3: [Description] (2h, [Assignee])
- [ ] Task 4: [Description] (3h, [Assignee])
- [ ] Task 5: [Description] (4h, [Assignee])
- [ ] Task 6: [Description] (2h, [Assignee])
### Risks and Dependencies
| Risk | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|--------|-----------|
| [Risk 1] | [Impact] | [Mitigation] |
| [Risk 2] | [Impact] | [Mitigation] |
### Carry-Over from Previous Sprint
| ID | Item | Reason | Remaining Effort |
|----|------|--------|-----------------|
| B-XXX | [Item] | [Reason] | [Hours/points] |
Got: Sprint backlog with items selected up to capacity. Each decomposed into tasks with time estimates.
If fail: Total points exceed capacity? Remove lowest-priority item. NEVER exceed capacity by more than 10%. Dependencies block sequencing? Re-order or defer items.
Step 5: Document Commitments and Save
Write sprint plan to SPRINT-PLAN.md (or SPRINT-PLAN-S[NNN].md for archival). Confirm:
- Sprint goal achievable with selected items
- No team member overallocated (>100% capacity)
- Dependencies between items sequenced correctly
- Carry-over items accounted for in capacity
- All acceptance criteria copied from backlog items
Run final validation:
# Check that total task hours align with capacity
grep -A 100 "Task Breakdown" SPRINT-PLAN.md | grep -o '([0-9]*h' | sed 's/[^0-9]//g' | awk '{sum+=$1} END {print "Total hours:", sum}'
Got: SPRINT-PLAN.md created with complete sprint backlog and task breakdown. Total hours ≤80% of available person-days × 8 hours.
If fail: Commitments don't align with goal? Revisit item selection in Step 4. Task hours exceed capacity? Remove last item or decompose tasks more granularly.
Checks
- Sprint goal is one clear, testable sentence
- Team capacity computed with documented assumptions (overhead %, PTO accounted)
- Selected items don't exceed capacity (points or person-days)
- Every selected item has acceptance criteria copied into task breakdown
- Every selected item decomposed into tasks (2-8 hours each)
- No team member overallocated beyond 100% capacity
- Carry-over items from previous sprint documented with remaining effort
- Dependencies between items sequenced correctly
- Risks and mitigations documented
- SPRINT-PLAN.md file created and saved
Pitfalls
- No sprint goal: Without goal, sprint just bag of tasks. Goal provides focus and basis for scope decisions mid-sprint.
- Over-commitment: Planning to 100% capacity ignores interruptions, bugs, overhead. Plan to 70-80% to leave buffer for unexpected.
- Tasks too large: Tasks over 8 hours hide complexity. Make progress tracking difficult. Decompose until tasks are 2-8 hours.
- Ignore carry-over: Unfinished items from last sprint consume this sprint's capacity. Account for them explicitly in capacity calculations.
- Sprint goal as item list: "Complete B-001, B-002, B-003" is not a goal. Goal describes outcome: "Users can reset their password through email verification."
- No task ownership: Every task should have assignee at planning time. Surfaces capacity conflicts early.
- Skip acceptance criteria: Tasks without acceptance criteria can't be tested. Copy acceptance criteria from backlog items into task breakdown section.
See Also
manage-backlog— maintain and prioritize product backlog that feeds sprint planningdraft-project-charter— provides project context and initial scope for first sprintgenerate-status-report— report sprint progress and velocity to stakeholdersconduct-retrospective— review sprint execution and improve planning processcreate-work-breakdown-structure— WBS work packages can feed backlog in hybrid agile-waterfall approaches
GitHub リポジトリ
関連スキル
executing-plans
デザインexecuting-plansスキルは、完全な実装計画があり、それを管理されたバッチでレビューチェックポイントを設けながら実行する場合に使用します。このスキルは計画を読み込んで批判的にレビューした後、小さなバッチ(デフォルトは3タスク)でタスクを実行し、各バッチの間に進捗状況を報告してアーキテクトのレビューを受けます。これにより、品質管理チェックポイントが組み込まれた体系的な実装が保証されます。
requesting-code-review
デザインこのスキルは、コードレビュアーサブエージェントを起動し、処理を進める前に要件に対してコード変更を分析します。タスク完了後、主要な機能の実装後、またはmainブランチへのマージ前などに使用すべきです。このレビューは、現在の実装と元の計画を比較することで、問題を早期に発見するのに役立ちます。
connect-mcp-server
デザインこのスキルは、開発者がHTTP、stdio、またはSSEトランスポートを使用してMCPサーバーをClaude Codeに接続するための包括的なガイドを提供します。GitHub、Notion、カスタムAPIなどの外部サービスを統合するためのインストール、設定、認証、セキュリティについて解説しています。MCP統合のセットアップ、外部ツールの設定、またはClaudeのModel Context Protocolを扱う際にご利用ください。
web-cli-teleport
デザインこのスキルは、タスク分析に基づいて開発者がClaude Code WebとCLIインターフェースの選択を支援し、これらの環境間でのシームレスなセッションテレポーテーションを可能にします。Web、CLI、モバイル環境を切り替える際のセッション状態とコンテキストを管理することで、ワークフローを最適化します。様々な段階で異なるツールを必要とする複雑なプロジェクトにご活用ください。
