plan-capacity
について
このスキルは、predict_linearなどの履歴メトリクスと成長モデルを使用してリソース需要を予測します。制約を特定し、ヘッドルームを計算し、飽和を防ぐためのスケーリングアクションを推奨します。トラフィック急増前、新規リリース時、または四半期レビューで使用率が上昇傾向にある際にご活用ください。
クイックインストール
Claude Code
推奨npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/plan-capacityこのコマンドをClaude Codeにコピー&ペーストしてスキルをインストールします
ドキュメント
Plan Capacity
Forecast resource needs, prevent saturation via data-driven capacity planning.
Use When
- Before seasonal traffic spikes (holidays, sales)
- New feature launches
- Quarterly capacity reviews
- Resource util trends up
- Before budget cycles
In
- Required: Historical metrics (CPU, mem, disk, net, req/s)
- Required: Time range for trend (min 4 weeks)
- Optional: Business growth projections (user growth, launches)
- Optional: Budget constraints
Do
Step 1: Collect Historical Metrics
Query Prometheus for key resources:
# CPU usage trend over 8 weeks
avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m])) by (instance)
# Memory usage trend
avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes - node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) by (instance)
# Disk usage growth
avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes - node_filesystem_free_bytes) by (instance, device)
# Request rate growth
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) by (service)
# Database connection pool usage
avg(db_connection_pool_used / db_connection_pool_max) by (instance)
Export → analyze:
# Export 8 weeks of CPU data
curl -G 'http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query_range' \
--data-urlencode 'query=avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m])) by (instance)' \
--data-urlencode 'start=2024-12-15T00:00:00Z' \
--data-urlencode 'end=2025-02-09T00:00:00Z' \
--data-urlencode 'step=1h' | jq '.data.result' > cpu_8weeks.json
→ Clean time series per resource, no big gaps.
If err: missing data → forecast accuracy down. Check metric retention + scrape intervals.
Step 2: Calc Growth w/ predict_linear
Prometheus predict_linear() → forecast saturation:
# Predict when CPU will hit 80% (4 weeks ahead)
predict_linear(
avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))[8w:],
4*7*24*3600 # 4 weeks in seconds
) > 0.80
# Predict disk full date (8 weeks ahead)
predict_linear(
avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes - node_filesystem_free_bytes)[8w:],
8*7*24*3600
) > 0.95 * avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes)
# Predict memory pressure (2 weeks ahead)
predict_linear(
avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes - node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes)[8w:],
2*7*24*3600
) / avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes) > 0.90
# Predict request rate capacity breach (4 weeks ahead)
predict_linear(
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))[8w:],
4*7*24*3600
) > 10000 # known capacity limit
Forecast dashboard:
{
"dashboard": {
"title": "Capacity Forecast",
"panels": [
{
"title": "CPU Saturation Forecast (4 weeks)",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "predict_linear(avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!=\"idle\"}[5m]))[8w:], 4*7*24*3600)",
"legendFormat": "Predicted CPU"
},
{
"expr": "0.80",
"legendFormat": "Target Threshold (80%)"
}
]
},
{
"title": "Disk Full Date",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "(avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes) - predict_linear(avg(node_filesystem_free_bytes)[8w:], 8*7*24*3600)) / avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes)",
"legendFormat": "Predicted Usage %"
}
]
}
]
}
}
→ Clear viz → when resources breach thresholds.
If err: predictions wrong (negative, wild swings) → check:
- Insufficient history (need 4+ weeks)
- Step spikes (deploys, migrations) distorting trend
- Seasonal patterns not in linear model
Step 3: Calc Current Headroom
Safety margin before saturation:
# CPU headroom (percentage remaining before 80% threshold)
(0.80 - avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))) / 0.80 * 100
# Memory headroom (bytes remaining before 90% usage)
avg(node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) - (avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes) * 0.10)
# Request rate headroom (requests/sec before saturation)
10000 - sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
# Time until saturation (weeks until CPU hits 80%)
(0.80 - avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))) /
deriv(avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))[8w:]) /
(7*24*3600)
Headroom summary report:
cat > capacity_headroom.md <<'EOF'
# Capacity Headroom Report (2025-02-09)
## Current Utilization
- **CPU**: 45% average (target: <80%)
- **Memory**: 62% (target: <90%)
- **Disk**: 71% (target: <95%)
- **Request Rate**: 4,200 req/s (capacity: 10,000)
## Headroom Analysis
- **CPU**: 35% headroom → ~12 weeks until saturation
- **Memory**: 28% headroom → ~16 weeks until saturation
- **Disk**: 24% headroom → ~8 weeks until full
- **Request Rate**: 5,800 req/s headroom → ~20 weeks until capacity
## Priority Actions
1. **Disk**: Implement log rotation or expand volume within 4 weeks
2. **CPU**: Plan horizontal scaling in next quarter
3. **Memory**: Monitor but no immediate action needed
EOF
→ Quantified headroom per resource w/ time-to-saturation.
If err: headroom already negative → reactive mode. Immediate scaling needed.
Step 4: Model Growth Scenarios
Factor in business projections:
# Example Python script for scenario modeling
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
# Load historical data
df = pd.read_json('cpu_8weeks.json')
# Calculate weekly growth rate
growth_rate_weekly = df['value'].pct_change(periods=7).mean()
# Scenario 1: Current trend
weeks_ahead = 12
current_trend = df['value'].iloc[-1] * (1 + growth_rate_weekly) ** weeks_ahead
# Scenario 2: 2x user growth (marketing campaign)
accelerated_trend = df['value'].iloc[-1] * (1 + growth_rate_weekly * 2) ** weeks_ahead
# Scenario 3: New feature launch (+30% baseline)
feature_launch = (df['value'].iloc[-1] * 1.30) * (1 + growth_rate_weekly) ** weeks_ahead
print(f"Current Trend (12 weeks): {current_trend:.1%} CPU")
print(f"2x Growth Scenario: {accelerated_trend:.1%} CPU")
print(f"Feature Launch Scenario: {feature_launch:.1%} CPU")
print(f"Threshold: 80%")
→ Multiple scenarios → impact of business changes on capacity.
If err: scenarios exceed capacity → prioritize scaling before event.
Step 5: Generate Scaling Recommendations
Actionable recs:
## Capacity Scaling Plan
### Immediate Actions (Next 4 Weeks)
1. **Disk Expansion** [Priority: HIGH]
- Current: 500GB, 71% used
- Projected full date: 2025-04-01 (8 weeks)
- Action: Expand to 1TB by 2025-03-15
- Cost: $50/month additional
- Justification: 5 weeks lead time needed
2. **Log Rotation Policy** [Priority: MEDIUM]
- Current: Logs retained 90 days
- Action: Reduce to 30 days, archive to S3
- Savings: ~150GB disk space
- Cost: $5/month S3 storage
### Near-Term Actions (Next Quarter)
3. **Horizontal Scaling - API Tier** [Priority: MEDIUM]
- Current: 4 instances, 45% CPU
- Projected: 65% CPU by 2025-05-01
- Action: Add 2 instances (to 6 total)
- Cost: $400/month
- Trigger: When CPU avg exceeds 60% for 7 days
4. **Database Connection Pool** [Priority: LOW]
- Current: 50 max connections, 40% used
- Projected: 55% by Q3
- Action: Increase to 75 in Q2
- Cost: None (configuration change)
### Long-Term Planning (Next 6 Months)
5. **Migration to Auto-Scaling** [Priority: MEDIUM]
- Current: Manual scaling
- Action: Implement Kubernetes HPA (Horizontal Pod Autoscaler)
- Timeline: Q3 2025
- Benefit: Automatic response to load spikes
→ Prioritized list w/ costs, timelines, trigger conditions.
If err: recs rejected on cost → revisit thresholds or accept risk.
Step 6: Set Up Capacity Alerts
Alerts on low headroom:
# capacity_alerts.yml
groups:
- name: capacity
interval: 1h
rules:
- alert: CPUCapacityLow
expr: |
(0.80 - avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))) / 0.80 < 0.20
for: 24h
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "CPU headroom below 20%"
description: "Current CPU headroom: {{ $value | humanizePercentage }}. Scaling needed within 4 weeks."
- alert: DiskFillForecast
expr: |
predict_linear(avg(node_filesystem_free_bytes)[8w:], 4*7*24*3600) < 0.10 * avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes)
for: 1h
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "Disk projected to fill within 4 weeks"
description: "Expand disk volume soon."
- alert: MemoryCapacityLow
expr: |
avg(node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) < 0.15 * avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes)
for: 6h
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "Memory headroom below 15%"
→ Alerts fire before saturation → time to scale proactively.
If err: alerts fire too often (alert fatigue) or too late (reactive) → tune thresholds.
Check
- Historical metrics ≥ 8 weeks
-
predict_linear()returns sensible forecasts (no negatives) - Headroom calc'd for all critical resources
- Scenarios include business projections
- Scaling recs have costs + timelines
- Capacity alerts configured + tested
- Report reviewed w/ eng leadership + finance
Traps
- Insufficient history: Linear predictions need 4+ weeks. Less → unreliable.
- Ignore step changes: Deploys, migrations, launches → spikes distort trends. Filter or annotate.
- Linear assumption: Not all growth linear. Exponential (viral) needs other models.
- Forget lead time: Cloud provision fast, but procurement, budgets, migrations take weeks. Plan early.
- No budget alignment: Planning w/o budget buy-in → last-min scramble. Involve finance early.
→
setup-prometheus-monitoring— collect metrics used for capacity planningbuild-grafana-dashboards— viz forecasts + headroomoptimize-cloud-costs— balance capacity vs cost
GitHub リポジトリ
関連スキル
executing-plans
デザインexecuting-plansスキルは、完全な実装計画があり、それを管理されたバッチでレビューチェックポイントを設けながら実行する場合に使用します。このスキルは計画を読み込んで批判的にレビューした後、小さなバッチ(デフォルトは3タスク)でタスクを実行し、各バッチの間に進捗状況を報告してアーキテクトのレビューを受けます。これにより、品質管理チェックポイントが組み込まれた体系的な実装が保証されます。
requesting-code-review
デザインこのスキルは、コードレビュアーサブエージェントを起動し、処理を進める前に要件に対してコード変更を分析します。タスク完了後、主要な機能の実装後、またはmainブランチへのマージ前などに使用すべきです。このレビューは、現在の実装と元の計画を比較することで、問題を早期に発見するのに役立ちます。
connect-mcp-server
デザインこのスキルは、開発者がHTTP、stdio、またはSSEトランスポートを使用してMCPサーバーをClaude Codeに接続するための包括的なガイドを提供します。GitHub、Notion、カスタムAPIなどの外部サービスを統合するためのインストール、設定、認証、セキュリティについて解説しています。MCP統合のセットアップ、外部ツールの設定、またはClaudeのModel Context Protocolを扱う際にご利用ください。
web-cli-teleport
デザインこのスキルは、タスク分析に基づいて開発者がClaude Code WebとCLIインターフェースの選択を支援し、これらの環境間でのシームレスなセッションテレポーテーションを可能にします。Web、CLI、モバイル環境を切り替える際のセッション状態とコンテキストを管理することで、ワークフローを最適化します。様々な段階で異なるツールを必要とする複雑なプロジェクトにご活用ください。
