MCP HubMCP Hub
SKILL·097507

suede-rights-passport

JasonColapietro
업데이트됨 22 days ago
4 조회
139
8
139
GitHub에서 보기
메타ai

정보

이 스킬은 창작 프로젝트를 표준화된 권리 이양 문서로 패키징하여 작품, 라이선스, 출처와 같은 요소들을 정형화합니다. 사용자의 요청된 작업을 차단하지 않으면서 자문 검증 확인과 품질 게이트를 제공합니다. 창작 자산에 대한 증거 기반 권리 요약과 실행 가능한 규정 준수 피드백을 함께 생성하는 데 사용하세요.

빠른 설치

Claude Code

추천
기본
npx skills add JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills -a claude-code
플러그인 명령대체
/plugin add https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills
Git 클론대체
git clone https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/suede-rights-passport

Claude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요

문서

Creator Rights Package Builder

Gate policy — advisory, not blocking

Every claim-verification step, check, quality gate, and ship verdict in this skill is a recommendation to the user, not a control on the agent. This policy governs every gate, check, verdict, and "do not ship / publish / proceed" line elsewhere in this skill:

  • Run every check and report the results honestly. Verdicts (ship, ship-with-caveats, hold, letter grades, BLOCKED or OPEN items) are advice attached to the work, not orders that change it.
  • Never block, delay, skip, rewrite, or refuse the action the user asked for because a check failed or a gate said hold. Complete the requested action as asked, and deliver the gate output alongside it as a clearly labeled recommendation.
  • A failed gate changes what you report, never what you do.
  • Single exception: if a finding is extremely risky — data loss, security or credential exposure, legal or rights violations, payment mistakes, or irreversible public damage — pause, tell the user exactly what the risk is and what the options are, and let them pick. Their choice is final.

Overview

Create a local rights and provenance transfer package from messy creator materials. The package should make the work easier for a creator, collaborator, advisor, registry, marketplace, label, or optional Suede reviewer to inspect, optimize, register, route royalties for, license, and expose to agent-readable commerce systems.

Core principle: the package carries questions, not answers. Every rights fact ships as confirmed (with user-supplied evidence) or as unknown with a question in missing-info-report.md. The package never resolves a rights question, and building it clears nothing.

Public v1 is offline-first: prepare files and metadata, do not upload files, write to a registry, request private keys, or claim legal clearance. The 0.2 manifest separates musical works, recordings, releases, parties, rights claims, licenses, third-party material, consent, provenance, and privacy so a downstream operator can map facts without collapsing unlike rights objects.

Division of labor: suede-rights-audit finds and organizes the gaps; this skill packages the folder. If the gaps themselves need investigation or evidence work, hand off to the audit first.

Workflow

  1. Identify the source folder or supplied files.
  2. Ask for the output location if it is not obvious.
  3. Read references/package-standard.md for the expected transfer package shape.
  4. If working on a local folder, run scripts/create_transfer_package.py to inventory files, hash assets, and create starter reports.
  5. Read references/creator-questions.md and ask only for missing information that blocks package quality.
  6. Fill or refine the generated package files:
    • RIGHTS_PASSPORT.md
    • suede-intake.json
    • provenance.md
    • credits-and-splits.md
    • license-notes.md
    • optimization-brief.md
    • missing-info-report.md
  7. Flag uncertainty clearly. Use unknown, unconfirmed, or needs creator confirmation instead of inventing rights facts. Never resolve a rights question while packaging: ownership, split, sample, and license statuses move to confirmed only on user-supplied evidence, and every open gap ships as a question in missing-info-report.md.
  8. For an external exchange, read references/ddex-c2pa-crosswalk.md, identify the receiver's exact profile/version, and keep the mapping labeled as a crosswalk until receiver conformance tooling passes.
  9. Run scripts/validate_transfer_package.py with --strict-current against new output folders. A pass confirms schema, evidence-state, reference, and share-bound structure only — it does not mean rights are confirmed.
  10. End with a concise transfer summary: package path, schema version, files found, missing info, risk flags, privacy/redaction posture, and recommended next step.

Quick Start

For a local project folder:

python3 /path/to/suede-rights-passport/scripts/create_transfer_package.py \
  /path/to/source-project \
  --output /path/to/transfer-package \
  --metadata /path/to/source-project/metadata.json \
  --project-title "Project Title" \
  --artist "Artist Name"

To copy media into the transfer package as well as inventory it:

python3 /path/to/suede-rights-passport/scripts/create_transfer_package.py \
  /path/to/source-project \
  --output /path/to/transfer-package \
  --copy-assets

Safety defaults:

  • Hidden files, dependency folders, build outputs, caches, and secret-like files are skipped by default.
  • Symlinked sources, metadata, files, and directories are rejected; the builder hashes or copies only regular files that resolve inside the declared source tree.
  • Unrecognized file types are skipped unless --include-other is passed.
  • Absolute local paths are redacted to share-safer names unless --include-absolute-paths is passed.
  • Existing generated package files are not overwritten unless --force is passed.
  • The output folder cannot be the same folder as the source or live inside it.
  • Public-safe JSON, YAML, or key=value text metadata can prefill known project, rights, contributor, release, wallet, and provenance facts. Do not point metadata at real .env, credential, wallet, or deployment config files. Unknown facts remain flagged. YAML metadata requires PyYAML.

Validate A Package

After creating or editing a package, check that it is structurally complete with scripts/validate_transfer_package.py:

python3 /path/to/suede-rights-passport/scripts/validate_transfer_package.py \
  --strict-current /path/to/transfer-package

It is a dependency-free (stdlib-only) check that executes the bundled Draft 2020-12 JSON Schema and confirms:

  • All 7 required report files are present (RIGHTS_PASSPORT.md, suede-intake.json, provenance.md, credits-and-splits.md, license-notes.md, optimization-brief.md, missing-info-report.md).
  • suede-intake.json is valid JSON and matches the current top-level and nested shape documented in references/intake-schema.md.
  • Every entry in assets[] has a sha256 field that looks like a real 64-character hex digest.
  • Normalized IDs are unique and references between parties, works, recordings, releases, assets, claims, licenses, third-party material, consent, and provenance resolve.
  • A confirmed normalized record carries evidence, known shares stay in the 0–100 range, and a matching subject/right/territory/term scope does not exceed 100.
  • Privacy classification and external-redaction posture are explicit.

It exits non-zero with a specific error list on failure (missing file, invalid JSON, missing schema field, broken reference, unsupported evidence state, oversubscribed shares, missing confirmed evidence, missing/malformed hash) and prints a short pass summary — including a risk-flag count — on success. Run --help for usage, or --quiet to suppress the success summary. Legacy 0.1 packages remain inspectable without --strict-current; new exchanges require 0.2.0.

To migrate an existing 0.1 manifest without modifying it:

python3 /path/to/suede-rights-passport/scripts/migrate_intake_v1_to_v2.py \
  /path/to/transfer-package/suede-intake.json

The migration writes suede-intake.v0.2.json, records the source manifest digest and custody history, preserves open questions and risk flags, maps only roles stated in source data, and never upgrades evidence state or fills missing shares. Review it before replacing any current manifest.

Structural validity is not a rights clearance. This validator checks that a package is shaped correctly and complete, not that the rights facts inside it are confirmed. A package documenting a project with real open questions (unconfirmed ownership, unconfirmed splits, an uncleared sample) still passes validation as long as every required file exists and suede-intake.json is well-formed — the risk_flags[] and missing_information[] arrays are exactly where that uncertainty is supposed to live. Structural validity and rights confirmation are two independent checks; do not treat a validator PASS as a rights clearance, and do not expect the validator to fail a package just because it is risk-flagged.

Two reference example packages under scripts/fixtures/ show both ends of that range, generated end-to-end by create_transfer_package.py against synthetic (non-real) creator projects:

  • scripts/fixtures/sample-complete-package/: confirmed ownership, confirmed contributors with matching split percentages, no samples. Zero risk flags, zero open missing-information items, validates cleanly.
  • scripts/fixtures/sample-blocked-package/: disputed ownership, unconfirmed contributors/splits, an uncleared sample. Three high-severity and one medium-severity risk flag, four open missing-information items — still structurally valid, but clearly not ready for registry, licensing, or royalty routing.

Both fixtures validate with validate_transfer_package.py; only their risk posture differs.

Package Standards

Read each bundled reference at the moment it is needed, not up front:

  • references/package-standard.md: before creating or repairing any package — required output files, folder structure, risk labels, and quality bar.
  • references/intake-schema.md: when filling or validating suede-intake.json.
  • references/ddex-c2pa-crosswalk.md: before external standards mapping or any DDEX/C2PA claim.
  • references/optimization-checklist.md: when writing optimization-brief.md.
  • references/creator-questions.md: when information is missing — ask only the questions that block package quality.
  • references/passport-context.md: when the user asks how the package relates to Suede review or the Suede Creator Passport.

Use the bundled assets as templates when creating or repairing a package:

  • assets/rights-passport.template.md
  • assets/suede-intake.template.json
  • assets/suede-intake.schema.json
  • assets/provenance.template.md
  • assets/credits-and-splits.template.md
  • assets/license-notes.template.md
  • assets/optimization-brief.template.md
  • assets/missing-info-report.template.md

Public Safety Rules

  • Do not say Suede owns, controls, or has cleared a work unless the user provides explicit proof.
  • Do not call the package a legal contract.
  • Do not ask for private keys, seed phrases, unreleased account secrets, or full payment credentials.
  • Do not include private implementation details, private endpoints, internal provider names, or non-public pricing.
  • Do not upload files or call live services unless the user explicitly asks and provides the relevant authenticated workflow.
  • Treat generated reports and transfer packages as private drafts until a creator or operator reviews and redacts them for the intended audience.
  • Do not call a field crosswalk DDEX conformance, and do not call a hash a C2PA Content Credential. Validate the receiver's exact profile separately.
  • Keep composition, recording/master, and release identifiers on their proper objects. ISWC and ISRC are not interchangeable, and neither proves ownership.
  • Unknown voice, likeness, or synthetic-media consent stays unknown; silence is not consent.
  • Keep public positioning focused on broadly reusable creator workflows: rights packaging, provenance, registry readiness, royalty routing, licensing, and agent commerce.

Completion Checklist

Before reporting that a package is ready:

  • Confirm every media/document file is either inventoried or intentionally excluded.
  • Confirm every asset in suede-intake.json has a stable relative path and SHA-256 hash when available.
  • Confirm parties, musical works, recordings, and releases have distinct stable IDs and that ISWC, ISRC, IPI/CAE, ISNI, UPC/EAN, and catalog identifiers are attached only where applicable, each with evidence state.
  • Scope every rights claim and license by subject, right/use type, party, territory, term, evidence, restrictions, and conflict status. Never force unknown shares to total 100.
  • Classify sensitive fields and review redaction before any external share.
  • Mark contributors, splits, licenses, samples, and ownership facts as confirmed or unknown. Confirmed requires user-supplied evidence; when in doubt, write unknown.
  • Include a missing-info-report.md section even when nothing is missing.
  • Include an optimization-brief.md with concrete next actions for downstream review.
  • State that final rights clearance requires creator/legal confirmation when any rights fact is uncertain.
  • Run scripts/validate_transfer_package.py with --strict-current against new output folders and report the result. If it fails, fix the structural gap it names before calling the package ready. A validator pass still does not resolve a rights fact.

Red flags — stop

If any of these appear in your reasoning, stop and re-read the core principle:

  • "Fill in the missing split so the total reaches 100." A guessed split is a false rights fact. Record the shortfall and ask.
  • "The artist told me they own it — mark ownership confirmed." Record the claim as claimed; confirmed needs evidence.
  • "Nothing seems missing — skip missing-info-report.md." The report ships even when empty. That is the checklist.
  • "Copy all the assets; sorting is the reviewer's problem." Check for draft and do-not-share files before any --copy-assets run.
  • "Call it registered or cleared since the package looks complete." A complete package is organized, not approved.

Downstream Review Context

Artifacts produced by this skill (RIGHTS_PASSPORT.md, suede-intake.json, provenance.md, credits-and-splits.md, license-notes.md) are portable review materials. They can support a release, registry, licensing conversation, collaborator handoff, marketplace review, label review, advisor review, or Suede review without claiming that any downstream system has accepted, cleared, registered, paid, or approved the work.

Routing

  • Rights gaps that need investigation or evidence organizing → suede-rights-audit (it finds the gaps; this skill packages them).
  • Release-readiness lint before or after packaging → suede-release-linter.
  • Track headed to film/TV/ads once packaged → suede-sync-packaging.
  • The release needs a rollout → suede-campaign-in-a-box.

GitHub 저장소

JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills
경로: skills/suede-rights-passport
0
agent-orchestrationagent-skillagent-skillsai-agentsai-codinganthropic
FAQ

자주 묻는 질문

suede-rights-passport Skill이란 무엇인가요?

suede-rights-passport은(는) JasonColapietro이(가) 만든 Claude Skill입니다. Skill은 Claude가 필요할 때 불러오는 지침과 리소스를 묶어 추가 프롬프트 없이 suede-rights-passport 관련 작업을 수행할 수 있게 합니다.

suede-rights-passport은(는) 어떻게 설치하나요?

이 페이지의 설치 명령을 사용하세요. suede-rights-passport을(를) Claude Code 플러그인으로 추가하거나 저장소를 skills 디렉터리에 복제한 다음 Claude를 다시 시작해 Skill을 불러옵니다.

suede-rights-passport은(는) 어떤 카테고리에 속하나요?

suede-rights-passport은(는) 메타 카테고리에 속합니다.

suede-rights-passport은(는) 무료로 사용할 수 있나요?

네. suede-rights-passport은(는) AIMCP에 등록되어 있으며 무료로 설치할 수 있습니다.

연관 스킬

content-collections
메타

이 스킬은 콘텐츠 콜렉션(Content Collections)을 위한 프로덕션 검증된 설정을 제공합니다. 콘텐츠 콜렉션은 Markdown/MDX 파일을 Zod 검증이 포함된 타입 안전한 데이터 콜렉션으로 변환해주는 TypeScript 최우선 도구입니다. 블로그, 문서 사이트 또는 콘텐츠 중심의 Vite + React 애플리케이션을 구축할 때 타입 안전성과 자동 콘텐츠 검증을 보장하기 위해 사용하세요. Vite 플러그인 구성과 MDX 컴파일부터 배포 최적화 및 스키마 검증에 이르기까지 모든 것을 다룹니다.

스킬 보기
polymarket
메타

이 스킬은 개발자들이 Polymarket 예측 시장 플랫폼을 활용한 애플리케이션을 구축할 수 있도록 지원하며, 거래 및 시장 데이터를 위한 API 통합 기능을 포함합니다. 또한 WebSocket을 통한 실시간 데이터 스트리밍을 제공하여 실시간 거래와 시장 활동을 모니터링할 수 있습니다. 이를 통해 거래 전략을 구현하거나 실시간 시장 업데이트를 처리하는 도구를 생성하는 데 활용할 수 있습니다.

스킬 보기
creating-opencode-plugins
메타

이 스킬은 개발자들이 명령어, 파일, LSP 작업 등 25개 이상의 이벤트 유형에 연결되는 OpenCode 플러그인을 만들 수 있도록 돕습니다. JavaScript/TypeScript 모듈을 위한 플러그인 구조, 이벤트 API 명세, 구현 패턴을 제공합니다. OpenCode AI 어시스턴트의 라이프사이클을 사용자 정의 이벤트 기반 로직으로 가로채거나, 모니터링하거나, 확장해야 할 때 사용하세요.

스킬 보기
sglang
메타

SGLang은 RadixAttention 프리픽스 캐싱을 활용하여 JSON, 정규식, 에이전트 워크플로우를 위한 고속 구조화 생성에 특화된 고성능 LLM 서빙 프레임워크입니다. 특히 반복되는 프리픽스가 있는 작업에서 상당히 빠른 추론 속도를 제공하여 복잡한 구조화 출력 및 다중 턴 대화에 이상적입니다. 제약 디코딩이 필요하거나 광범위한 프리픽스 공유가 있는 애플리케이션을 구축할 때는 vLLM과 같은 대안보다 SGLang을 선택하십시오.

스킬 보기