design-on-call-rotation
정보
이 스킬은 균형 잡힌 일정, 명확한 에스컬레이션 정책, 효과적인 업무 인수 절차를 설계하여 개발자들이 지속 가능한 온콜 로테이션을 구축하도록 지원합니다. 온콜 담당 범위를 설정하거나 확장할 때, 번아웃 문제를 해결할 때, 또는 문제를 식별한 후 사고 대응을 개선할 때 사용됩니다.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/design-on-call-rotationClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Design On-Call Rotation
Create a sustainable on-call schedule that balances coverage with engineer well-being.
When to Use
- Setting up on-call for the first time
- Scaling team from 2-3 to 5+ engineers
- Addressing on-call burnout or alert fatigue
- Improving incident response times
- After post-mortem identifies handoff issues
Inputs
- Required: Team size and time zones
- Required: Service SLA requirements (response time, coverage hours)
- Optional: Historical incident volume and timing
- Optional: Budget for on-call compensation
- Optional: Existing on-call tool (PagerDuty, Opsgenie)
Procedure
Step 1: Define Rotation Schedule
Choose rotation length based on team size:
## Rotation Models
### Weekly Rotation (5+ person team)
- **Length**: 7 days (Monday 09:00 to Monday 09:00)
- **Pros**: Predictable, easy to plan around
- **Cons**: Whole week disrupted if alerts are frequent
### 12-Hour Split (3-4 person team)
- **Day shift**: 08:00-20:00 local time
- **Night shift**: 20:00-08:00 local time
- **Pros**: Shared burden, night coverage paid differently
- **Cons**: More handoffs, coordination needed
### Follow-the-Sun (Global team)
- **APAC**: 00:00-08:00 UTC
- **EMEA**: 08:00-16:00 UTC
- **Americas**: 16:00-00:00 UTC
- **Pros**: No night shifts, timezone-aligned
- **Cons**: Requires distributed team
### Two-Tier (Senior/Junior split)
- **Primary**: Junior engineers (first responder)
- **Secondary**: Senior engineers (escalation)
- **Pros**: Training opportunity, lighter senior load
- **Cons**: Risk of junior burnout
Example schedule for 5-person team:
Week 1: Alice (Primary), Bob (Secondary)
Week 2: Charlie (Primary), Diana (Secondary)
Week 3: Eve (Primary), Alice (Secondary)
Week 4: Bob (Primary), Charlie (Secondary)
Week 5: Diana (Primary), Eve (Secondary)
Got: Schedule that rotates fairly and provides 24/7 coverage.
If fail: If coverage gaps exist, add more engineers or reduce SLA to business hours only.
Step 2: Configure Escalation Policy
Set up tiered escalation in PagerDuty/Opsgenie:
# PagerDuty escalation policy (YAML representation)
escalation_policy:
name: "Production Services"
repeat_enabled: true
num_loops: 3
escalation_rules:
- id: primary
escalation_delay_in_minutes: 0
targets:
- type: schedule
id: primary_on_call_schedule
- id: secondary
escalation_delay_in_minutes: 15
targets:
- type: schedule
id: secondary_on_call_schedule
- id: manager
escalation_delay_in_minutes: 30
targets:
- type: user
id: engineering_manager
Create escalation flowchart:
Alert Fires
↓
Primary On-Call Paged
↓
Wait 15 minutes (no ack)
↓
Secondary On-Call Paged
↓
Wait 15 minutes (no ack)
↓
Manager Paged
↓
Repeat cycle (max 3 times)
Got: Clear escalation path with reasonable delays.
If fail: If escalations fire too often, shorten ack windows or check alert quality.
Step 3: Define Handoff Procedure
Create a structured handoff checklist:
## On-Call Handoff Checklist
### Outgoing On-Call
- [ ] Update incident log with any ongoing issues
- [ ] Document any workarounds or known issues
- [ ] Share any alerts that are "noisy but safe to ignore" temporarily
- [ ] Note any upcoming deploys or maintenance windows
- [ ] Provide context on any flapping alerts
### Incoming On-Call
- [ ] Review incident log from previous shift
- [ ] Check for any ongoing incidents
- [ ] Verify PagerDuty/Opsgenie has correct contact info
- [ ] Test alert delivery (send test page to yourself)
- [ ] Review recent deploys and release notes
- [ ] Check capacity metrics for any concerning trends
### Handoff Meeting (15 min)
- Review any incidents from past week
- Discuss any changes to systems or runbooks
- Questions and clarifications
Automate handoff reminders:
# Slack reminder script
curl -X POST https://slack.com/api/chat.postMessage \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SLACK_BOT_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"channel": "#on-call",
"text": "On-call handoff in 1 hour. Outgoing: @alice, Incoming: @bob. Please use the handoff checklist: https://wiki.company.com/oncall-handoff"
}'
Got: Smooth knowledge transfer, no information loss between shifts.
If fail: If incidents recur because incoming engineer didn't know about workarounds, make handoff mandatory.
Step 4: Implement Fatigue Management
Set rules to prevent burnout:
## Fatigue Prevention Rules
### Alert Volume Limits
- **Threshold**: Max 5 pages per night (22:00-06:00)
- **Action**: If exceeded, trigger incident review next day
- **Goal**: Reduce noisy alerts that disrupt sleep
### Time Off After Major Incident
- **Rule**: If on-call handles P1 incident >2 hours overnight, they get comp time
- **Amount**: Equal to incident duration (e.g., 3-hour incident = 3 hours off)
- **Scheduling**: Must be taken within 2 weeks
### Maximum Consecutive Weeks
- **Limit**: No more than 2 consecutive weeks on-call
- **Reason**: Prevents exhaustion from extended coverage
### Minimum Rest Between Rotations
- **Cooldown**: At least 2 weeks between primary rotations
- **Exception**: Emergency coverage (requires manager approval)
### Vacation Protection
- **Rule**: No on-call during scheduled vacation
- **Process**: Mark as "Out of Office" in PagerDuty 2 weeks in advance
- **Swap**: Coordinate swap with team, update schedule
Track alert fatigue metrics:
# Alerts per on-call engineer per week
count(ALERTS{alertstate="firing"}) by (oncall_engineer)
# Nighttime pages (22:00-06:00 local)
count(ALERTS{alertstate="firing", hour_of_day>=22 or hour_of_day<6})
# Time to acknowledge (should be <5 min during business hours)
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(alert_ack_duration_seconds_bucket[7d]))
Got: On-call load is sustainable, engineers not chronically exhausted.
If fail: If burnout occurs despite rules, reduce alert volume or hire more engineers.
Step 5: Document Runbooks and Escalation Contacts
Create an on-call reference guide:
# On-Call Quick Reference
## Emergency Contacts
- **Engineering Manager**: Alice Smith, +1-555-0100
- **CTO**: Bob Johnson, +1-555-0200
- **Security Team**: [email protected], +1-555-0300
- **Cloud Provider Support**: AWS Support Case Portal
## Common Runbooks
- [Database Connection Pool Exhaustion](https://wiki/runbook-db-pool)
- [High API Latency](https://wiki/runbook-api-latency)
- [Disk Space Full](https://wiki/runbook-disk-full)
- [SSL Certificate Expiration](https://wiki/runbook-ssl-renewal)
## Access & Credentials
- **Production AWS**: SSO via company.okta.com
- **Kubernetes**: `kubectl --context production`
- **Database**: Read-only access via Bastion host
- **Secrets**: 1Password vault "On-Call Production"
## Escalation Decision Tree
- **P1 (Service Down)**: Immediate response, escalate to manager after 30min
- **P2 (Degraded)**: Response within 15min, escalate if not resolved in 1 hour
- **P3 (Warning)**: Acknowledge, resolve during business hours
- **Security Incident**: Immediately escalate to Security Team, don't investigate alone
Got: On-call engineer can find any needed information in <2 minutes.
If fail: If engineers repeatedly ask "where is X?", centralize documentation.
Step 6: Schedule Regular On-Call Retrospectives
Review on-call experience monthly:
## On-Call Retrospective Agenda (Monthly)
### Metrics Review (15 min)
- Total alerts: [X] (target: <50/week)
- Nighttime pages: [Y] (target: <5/week)
- Mean time to acknowledge: [Z] (target: <5 min)
- Incidents by severity: P1: [A], P2: [B], P3: [C]
### Qualitative Feedback (20 min)
- What was the most challenging incident?
- Which alerts were noisy/low-value?
- Were runbooks helpful? Which need updates?
- Any gaps in monitoring or alerting?
### Action Items (10 min)
- Fix noisy alerts identified
- Update runbooks that were incomplete
- Adjust rotation schedule if needed
- Plan alert tuning work
### Recognition (5 min)
- Shout-outs for excellent incident response
- Share learnings from interesting incidents
Track improvement over time:
# Generate monthly on-call report
cat > oncall_report_2025-02.md <<EOF
# On-Call Report: February 2025
## Key Metrics
- **Total Alerts**: 38 (down from 52 in January)
- **Nighttime Pages**: 4 (within target)
- **P1 Incidents**: 1 (database outage, 45min MTTR)
- **P2 Incidents**: 3 (all resolved <1 hour)
## Improvements Made
- Tuned CPU alert threshold (reduced false positives by 40%)
- Added runbook for Redis cache failures
- Implemented log rotation (prevented disk full alerts)
## Upcoming Changes
- Migrate to follow-the-sun rotation (Q2)
- Add Slack alert integration (in progress)
EOF
Got: On-call experience improves month-over-month, alert volume decreases.
If fail: If metrics don't improve, escalate to leadership. May need to pause feature work to fix operational issues.
Validation
- Rotation schedule covers all required hours (24/7 or business hours)
- Escalation policy tested (send test alerts)
- Handoff procedure documented and shared with team
- Fatigue management rules codified
- On-call reference guide complete and accessible
- Monthly retrospectives scheduled
- On-call compensation approved (if applicable)
Pitfalls
- Too few engineers: 3 or fewer means on-call every 2-3 weeks, unsustainable. Minimum 5 for weekly rotation.
- No escalation delays: Immediate manager escalation wastes senior time. Give primary 15 minutes to respond.
- Skipping handoffs: Lack of context transfer leads to repeated mistakes. Make handoffs mandatory.
- Ignoring alert fatigue: If engineers ignore alerts due to noise, critical issues get missed. Tune aggressively.
- No compensation: On-call without pay or time off breeds resentment. Budget for it.
Related Skills
configure-alerting-rules- reduce alert noise that causes fatiguewrite-incident-runbook- create runbooks referenced during on-call shifts
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
executing-plans
디자인executing-plans 스킬은 검토 체크포인트가 포함된 통제된 배치로 실행할 완전한 구현 계획이 있을 때 사용합니다. 이 스킬은 계획을 불러와 비판적으로 검토한 후, 소규모 배치(기본값 3개 작업)로 작업을 실행하면서 각 배치 사이에 진행 상황을 아키텍트 검토를 위해 보고합니다. 이를 통해 내재된 품질 관리 체크포인트를 갖춘 체계적인 구현이 보장됩니다.
requesting-code-review
디자인이 스킬은 코드 변경 사항을 요구 사항에 따라 분석하기 위해 코드 리뷰어 하위 에이전트를 호출합니다. 작업 완료 후, 주요 기능 구현 후, 또는 메인 브랜치에 병합하기 전에 사용해야 합니다. 이 리뷰는 현재 구현체와 원래 계획을 비교하여 문제를 조기에 발견하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
connect-mcp-server
디자인이 스킬은 개발자들이 HTTP, stdio 또는 SSE 전송 방식을 통해 MCP 서버를 Claude Code에 연결하는 포괄적인 가이드를 제공합니다. GitHub, Notion 및 사용자 정의 API와 같은 외부 서비스를 통합하기 위한 설치, 구성, 인증 및 보안을 다룹니다. MCP 통합 설정, 외부 도구 구성 또는 Claude의 모델 컨텍스트 프로토콜 작업 시 활용하세요.
web-cli-teleport
디자인이 스킬은 작업 분석을 기반으로 개발자가 Claude Code 웹 인터페이스와 CLI 인터페이스 중 선택할 수 있도록 돕고, 두 환경 간 원활한 세션 텔레포트를 가능하게 합니다. 웹, CLI 또는 모바일 환경 전환 시 세션 상태와 컨텍스트를 관리하여 워크플로를 최적화합니다. 다양한 단계에서 서로 다른 도구가 필요한 복잡한 프로젝트에 사용하세요.
