shiva-bhaga
정보
시바 바가 스킬은 개발자들이 오래된 패턴, 구시대적 가정, 데드 코드 노이즈를 식별하고 의도적으로 해체하여 컨텍스트를 정리하는 데 도움을 줍니다. 이 스킬은 누적된 컨텍스트가 복잡해졌거나 주요 방향 전환을 위해 깨끗한 상태가 필요할 때 사용하도록 설계되었습니다. 이러한 통제된 해체는 새롭고 더 효과적인 접근법을 위한 공간을 창출합니다.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/shiva-bhagaClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Shiva Bhaga
Controlled destruction + dissolution → stale patterns, outdated assumptions, accumulated noise. Clears ground for new growth.
Use When
- Ctx accumulated stale assumptions silently distorting reasoning
- Prev approach failed → temptation = patch not discard
- Conv long → earlier decisions don't serve current goal
- Dead code, abandoned plans, zombie tasks → noise + confusion
- Before major pivot → clearing precedes creation
- Attachment to approach blocks alternatives
In
- Required: Current conv state | proj ctx (implicit)
- Optional: Specific dissolution target (e.g., "this approach not working", "clear all DB layer assumptions")
- Optional: Scope boundary — what survives destruction
Do
Step 1: ID What Must End
Survey current state, mark stale, broken, no longer serving.
Dissolution Triage:
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Category | Symptoms | Action |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Stale Assumptions | Decisions made early that | List and re-evaluate |
| | no longer match current | each against current |
| | understanding | reality |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Failed Approaches | Approaches attempted and | Acknowledge failure |
| | abandoned but still | explicitly; release |
| | influencing thinking | the sunk cost |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Accumulated Noise | Context, variables, or | Identify and mark for |
| | plans that are no longer | removal |
| | referenced or relevant | |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Attachment Points | "We already decided..." | Question whether the |
| | beliefs that resist | decision still holds |
| | re-examination | |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
| Zombie Artifacts | Code, tasks, or plans | Delete or archive; |
| | that exist but serve no | do not leave in limbo |
| | current purpose | |
+---------------------+---------------------------+------------------------+
- Scan each category honest — resistance to examining = signal
- Each item: "If starting fresh now, would I create this?"
- No → mark for dissolution
Got: Clear inventory of release targets, specific items per category.
If err: Nothing stale → assess too shallow. Pick oldest decision, justify from scratch — forced justification = dissolution candidate.
Step 2: Preservation Boundary
Not everything destroyed. ID what survives.
- Core reqs: What user actually asked → survives.
- Verified knowledge: Facts confirmed via tools (file reads, test results) → survives.
- User prefs: Explicit prefs + constraints → survive.
- Working components: Demonstrably functioning code/approaches → survive.
Draw boundary: inside = preserved, outside = subject to dissolution.
Got: Clear distinction kept vs released.
If err: Boundary unclear → "What would I need to reconstruct if starting from scratch?" → answer = boundary.
Step 3: Dissolve w/ Intention
Execute dissolution → not abandonment, intentional clearing.
- Each marked item, release explicit:
- Stale assumption: "I assumed X, current evidence shows Y. Releasing X."
- Failed approach: "Approach A attempted, didn't work because Z. Releasing attachment to A."
- Noise: "Variable/plan/ctx Q no longer relevant. Removing."
- Don't justify/defend dissolved → point = release, not analysis
- Large body dissolved → summarize what + why in one sentence
- Clear workspace: close abandoned files, reset mental model, acknowledge clean slate
Got: Lighter, cleaner ctx, stale removed. Remaining feels accurate + current.
If err: Incomplete (released items still influence) → name explicit again. "I notice I'm still reasoning as if X true. X dissolved. Proceeding without X."
Step 4: Sit in Void
After destruction, resist immediate rebuild. Space between destruction + creation has value.
- Acknowledge cleared space: "Following dissolved: [list]"
- Note remains: "Surviving: [list]"
- Resist premature reconstruction → don't immediately propose replacement
- Let cleared space inform what comes next
- Void ≠ emptiness → potential. Next step (creation via
brahma-bhaga| preservation viavishnu-bhaga) emerges.
Got: Moment of clarity old → new. Next direction apparent from what remains, not forced.
If err: Void uncomfortable, strong pull to rebuild → urgency = signal of attachment to dissolved. Sit longer. Right next step emerges.
Check
- Stale assumptions ID'd + explicit released
- Failed approaches acknowledged no defensiveness
- Accumulated noise cleared
- Preservation boundary set before dissolution
- Core reqs + user prefs preserved
- Cleared space acknowledged before creation
Traps
- Destroy too much: No boundary → destroys working w/ stale. Boundary first.
- Destroy too little: Polite "release" while still influencing reasoning. True dissolution = actual letting go.
- Skip void: Rush destruction → creation w/o sitting → recreation of old w/ superficial changes.
- Performing destruction: Going through motions w/o updating internal model. Same assumptions next response = performative.
- Destruction as avoidance: Escape difficulty vs clear staleness. Problem persists after clearing → wasn't stale ctx, was problem itself.
→
brahma-bhaga— creation follows destructionvishnu-bhaga— preservation complements; what survives dissolution sustainedheal— subsystem assess may reveal dissolution needed before healingmeditate— clear ctx noise before → prevents reactive over-destructiondissolve-form— morphic equivalent for architectural dismantling w/ imaginal disc preservation
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
content-collections
메타이 스킬은 콘텐츠 콜렉션(Content Collections)을 위한 프로덕션 검증된 설정을 제공합니다. 콘텐츠 콜렉션은 Markdown/MDX 파일을 Zod 검증이 포함된 타입 안전한 데이터 콜렉션으로 변환해주는 TypeScript 최우선 도구입니다. 블로그, 문서 사이트 또는 콘텐츠 중심의 Vite + React 애플리케이션을 구축할 때 타입 안전성과 자동 콘텐츠 검증을 보장하기 위해 사용하세요. Vite 플러그인 구성과 MDX 컴파일부터 배포 최적화 및 스키마 검증에 이르기까지 모든 것을 다룹니다.
polymarket
메타이 스킬은 개발자들이 Polymarket 예측 시장 플랫폼을 활용한 애플리케이션을 구축할 수 있도록 지원하며, 거래 및 시장 데이터를 위한 API 통합 기능을 포함합니다. 또한 WebSocket을 통한 실시간 데이터 스트리밍을 제공하여 실시간 거래와 시장 활동을 모니터링할 수 있습니다. 이를 통해 거래 전략을 구현하거나 실시간 시장 업데이트를 처리하는 도구를 생성하는 데 활용할 수 있습니다.
creating-opencode-plugins
메타이 스킬은 개발자들이 명령어, 파일, LSP 작업 등 25개 이상의 이벤트 유형에 연결되는 OpenCode 플러그인을 만들 수 있도록 돕습니다. JavaScript/TypeScript 모듈을 위한 플러그인 구조, 이벤트 API 명세, 구현 패턴을 제공합니다. OpenCode AI 어시스턴트의 라이프사이클을 사용자 정의 이벤트 기반 로직으로 가로채거나, 모니터링하거나, 확장해야 할 때 사용하세요.
sglang
메타SGLang은 RadixAttention 프리픽스 캐싱을 활용하여 JSON, 정규식, 에이전트 워크플로우를 위한 고속 구조화 생성에 특화된 고성능 LLM 서빙 프레임워크입니다. 특히 반복되는 프리픽스가 있는 작업에서 상당히 빠른 추론 속도를 제공하여 복잡한 구조화 출력 및 다중 턴 대화에 이상적입니다. 제약 디코딩이 필요하거나 광범위한 프리픽스 공유가 있는 애플리케이션을 구축할 때는 vLLM과 같은 대안보다 SGLang을 선택하십시오.
