MCP HubMCP Hub
스킬 목록으로 돌아가기

foundation-meeting-agenda

product-on-purpose
업데이트됨 Yesterday
4 조회
238
33
238
GitHub에서 보기
디자인aidesign

정보

이 스킬은 스탠드업 미팅부터 임원 브리핑까지 10가지 일반적인 회의 유형에 대해 구조화된 시간 제한 안건을 생성합니다. 공유 가능한 요약본(커뮤니케이션 채널용)과 주제 담당자, 사전 준비 작업, 로지스틱을 포함한 상세 안건을 모두 출력합니다. 개발자들은 이를 통해 목표와 참가자 책임을 명확히 하는 전문적인 회의 프레임워크를 빠르게 작성할 수 있습니다.

빠른 설치

Claude Code

추천
기본
npx skills add product-on-purpose/pm-skills -a claude-code
플러그인 명령대체
/plugin add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills
Git 클론대체
git clone https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/foundation-meeting-agenda

Claude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요

문서

<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->

Meeting Agenda

A meeting agenda is the attendee-facing structural document that sets expectations before a meeting. It answers "what will we discuss, who owns each topic, how will we spend the time, and what does done look like?" Distinct from a meeting brief, which is the user's private strategic prep; the agenda is shared with participants and focused on structure and flow.

This skill belongs to the Meeting Skills Family. It conforms to the Meeting Skills Family Contract, which defines shared frontmatter, file naming, the go-mode behavioral pattern, and universal output requirements across all meeting skills.

When to Use

  • Running or chairing a cross-functional working session, project kickoff, stakeholder review, or decision meeting
  • Any meeting with more than three attendees or more than thirty minutes
  • Recurring meeting where a rolling structure (1-on-1, team sync) needs fresh framing each time
  • Mid-initiative alignment moment where explicit desired outcomes prevent drift

When NOT to Use

  • The user's preparation is private and tactical (positioning, stakeholder reads, asks). Use /meeting-brief instead.
  • The meeting has already happened. Use /meeting-recap for post-meeting summarization.
  • The user wants to communicate outcomes to non-attendees. Use /stakeholder-update after the meeting.

Zero-friction execution

Per the family contract, this skill never blocks on interrogation. Default flow:

  1. Read all provided inputs (topic, any referenced files, attendee list, constraints)
  2. Run inference on missing values (meeting type from topic keywords, duration default, objective from topic phrasing, attendee roles from context)
  3. Present a brief inference summary and accept one-word go or corrections
  4. Produce the agenda

If invoked with --go, skip the inference summary and produce output directly using defaults (duration 30 min, meeting type other, and so on). If the user provides all values upfront, no checkpoint appears.

Blocking questions are used only when inference confidence is actively low on a load-bearing input and no reasonable default exists. This should be rare.

Anti-meeting check

This skill opens with an explicit question: "Does this need to be a meeting, or could it be handled async?"

v1.1.0: the check now requires a positive synchronous-value statement. The meeting passes the check only when at least one of these is named:

  • Tradeoff to discuss. multiple options, uncertain preference
  • Conflict to resolve. named stakeholders disagreeing
  • Co-creation. shared whiteboarding or document-writing in the meeting
  • Relationship-building. first-time stakeholder meeting, mutual calibration
  • Blocker escalation. time-sensitive unblocking

If none apply, the skill recommends the async alternative (written update, doc review, Slack poll) and produces a short one-page "how to handle this async" framing instead of an agenda.

The v1.0.0 version of this check ("single-owner decision with no tradeoffs", "pure information broadcast", "status-only sync with >5 people") was bypassed too easily. users would stay at five attendees or add "decision" to the topic. The stricter v1.1.0 biases toward async; users can still override.

This check is shared with /meeting-brief and not run by the post-meeting skills (recap, synthesize, stakeholder-update).

Instructions

When asked to create a meeting agenda, follow these steps:

  1. Run anti-meeting check Apply the trigger patterns above. If the user's objective matches, propose the async alternative and ask for override. Only proceed to step 2 on explicit override.

  2. Parse and load inputs Read the topic or purpose. Load all @file references provided. Extract any attendee list, time constraints, or linked documents.

  3. Infer missing values Apply these inference rules:

    ValueInferred fromDefault
    Meeting typeTopic keywords, attendee seniority mixother (low confidence)
    DurationExplicit in topic doc (rare); meeting-type-specific default when type is inferred at medium+ confidencev1.1.0: type-specific (see family contract). 30 min only for other, 1-on-1, exec-briefing, customer-call. Kickoff = 60, working-session = 60, decision-making = 45, etc.
    ObjectiveTopic phrasingInfer; surface in summary
    Attendee RACISeniority, topic ownership cuesFlag all inferences
    Desired outcomesObjective plus meeting type heuristicsOffer strawman

    Load-bearing inference gates (v1.1.0): when attendee RACI or desired outcomes are inferred below-high confidence, flag in the go-mode summary with . See family contract "Zero-friction execution" section.

  4. Present go-mode inference summary Show the inferred values with confidence markers. Accept go to proceed, or corrections to revise. Re-run inference after any correction and present the summary again.

  5. Design the time-boxed topic list Apply the meeting-type variant (see below). Size topic times so their sum equals the meeting duration. If the topic list overflows the available time, flag it explicitly and ask for reconciliation (do not silently trim).

    Each topic must have:

    • Type tag: Discussion | Decision | Information | Working
    • Owner (name or team)
    • Goal (what done looks like)
    • Time allocation
    • Pre-read link if any
  6. Specify attendee prep List required prep with links and estimated prep time. Add recommended context for attendees who want deeper background. Add "come ready to" expectations that force clarity on what each attendee contributes.

  7. Add parking lot and logistics placeholders Parking lot is a placeholder for off-topic items raised during the meeting. Logistics covers join link, materials needed, recording ownership.

  8. Render the TEMPLATE.md with filled values Remove all guidance blockquotes from the final artifact.

  9. Validate output

    • Frontmatter shape conforms to the family contract's universal base fields plus agenda-specific fields (meeting_duration_minutes, desired_outcomes)
    • Sum of topic times equals meeting duration (+/- 2 min tolerance)
    • At least one desired outcome is listed
    • Anti-meeting check result is recorded in Generation context

Meeting-type variants

Applied in step 5. Each variant reshapes the topic list to match the meeting's purpose.

  • 1-on-1: Rolling structure. Last time's items, this time's topics, growth or development, blockers. Default 30 min.
  • standup: Status round-robin, escalations, decisions needed. Default 15 min.
  • planning: Commitments focus, capacity check, dependencies. Default 60 min.
  • review: Presentation-first, heavy pre-read, explicit feedback-capture mechanism. Default 60 min.
  • decision-making: Options upfront, decision criteria, explicit decision ask. Pre-read with proposal required. Default 45 min.
  • brainstorm: Minimal agenda, generative prompts, no decision pressure. Default 45 min.
  • stakeholder-review: TL;DR first, business-impact framing, explicit asks upfront. Default 45 min.
  • project-kickoff: Scope, roles, success criteria, risks, communication plan. Default 60 min.
  • working-session: Minimal agenda, pre-work required, explicit deliverable. Default 60 to 90 min.
  • exec-briefing: TL;DR first, supporting detail after. Default 30 min.
  • other: Generic topic structure, default 30 min.

Quality checklist

Before delivering the agenda, verify:

  • Anti-meeting check was applied and recorded
  • Meeting type is set (or explicitly other with low-confidence flag)
  • Duration is set (default 30 min if not provided, flagged as default)
  • Desired outcomes are concrete and verifiable (not "discuss X" but "decide whether to ship X")
  • Every topic has type tag, owner, goal, time
  • Topic times sum to meeting duration
  • Pre-read prep time is listed (attendees skip prep when duration is not stated)
  • Logistics section has join link and materials references
  • Shareable summary is 5-6 lines, Slack-paste-ready
  • Sources and References section includes Generation context with defaults applied and inferences made

See also

GitHub 저장소

product-on-purpose/pm-skills
경로: skills/foundation-meeting-agenda
0
agent-skillsai-skillsclaude-codeclaude-desktopdesign-sprintfoundation-sprint

연관 스킬

executing-plans

디자인

executing-plans 스킬은 검토 체크포인트가 포함된 통제된 배치로 실행할 완전한 구현 계획이 있을 때 사용합니다. 이 스킬은 계획을 불러와 비판적으로 검토한 후, 소규모 배치(기본값 3개 작업)로 작업을 실행하면서 각 배치 사이에 진행 상황을 아키텍트 검토를 위해 보고합니다. 이를 통해 내재된 품질 관리 체크포인트를 갖춘 체계적인 구현이 보장됩니다.

스킬 보기

requesting-code-review

디자인

이 스킬은 코드 변경 사항을 요구 사항에 따라 분석하기 위해 코드 리뷰어 하위 에이전트를 호출합니다. 작업 완료 후, 주요 기능 구현 후, 또는 메인 브랜치에 병합하기 전에 사용해야 합니다. 이 리뷰는 현재 구현체와 원래 계획을 비교하여 문제를 조기에 발견하는 데 도움이 됩니다.

스킬 보기

connect-mcp-server

디자인

이 스킬은 개발자들이 HTTP, stdio 또는 SSE 전송 방식을 통해 MCP 서버를 Claude Code에 연결하는 포괄적인 가이드를 제공합니다. GitHub, Notion 및 사용자 정의 API와 같은 외부 서비스를 통합하기 위한 설치, 구성, 인증 및 보안을 다룹니다. MCP 통합 설정, 외부 도구 구성 또는 Claude의 모델 컨텍스트 프로토콜 작업 시 활용하세요.

스킬 보기

web-cli-teleport

디자인

이 스킬은 작업 분석을 기반으로 개발자가 Claude Code 웹 인터페이스와 CLI 인터페이스 중 선택할 수 있도록 돕고, 두 환경 간 원활한 세션 텔레포트를 가능하게 합니다. 웹, CLI 또는 모바일 환경 전환 시 세션 상태와 컨텍스트를 관리하여 워크플로를 최적화합니다. 다양한 단계에서 서로 다른 도구가 필요한 복잡한 프로젝트에 사용하세요.

스킬 보기