prepare-print-model
정보
이 스킬은 3D 모델을 FDM/SLA 프린팅에 적합하도록 내보내기, 메쉬 수리, 출력 적합성 검사를 처리합니다. CAD 변환, 슬라이싱 실패 문제 해결, 제조를 위한 부품 배향 최적화 시 사용됩니다. 주요 기능으로는 STL/3MF 내보내기, 벽 두께 검증, 서포트 구조 생성이 포함됩니다.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/prepare-print-modelClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Prepare Print Model
Export and optimize 3D models for additive manufacturing. Cover full workflow from CAD/modeling software export through mesh repair, printability analysis, support generation, slicer configuration. Ensures models are manifold, have adequate wall thickness, properly oriented for strength and print quality.
When Use
- Exporting models from CAD software (Fusion 360, SolidWorks, Onshape) or 3D modeling tools (Blender, Maya) for 3D printing
- Verifying existing STL/3MF files printable before sending to slicer
- Troubleshooting models that fail to slice or print correctly
- Optimizing part orientation for strength, surface finish, or minimal support material
- Preparing mechanical parts with specific strength or tolerance requirements
- Converting between model formats (STL, 3MF, OBJ) while preserving printability
Inputs
- source_model: Path to CAD file or 3D model file (STEP, F3D, STL, OBJ, 3MF)
- target_process: Printing process type (
fdm,sla,sls) - material: Intended print material (e.g.
pla,petg,abs,standard-resin) - functional_requirements: Load direction, tolerance requirements, surface finish needs
- printer_specs: Build volume, nozzle diameter (FDM), layer height capabilities
- slicer_tool: Target slicer (
cura,prusaslicer,orcaslicer,chitubox)
Steps
1. Export Model from Source Software
Export 3D model in suitable format for printing:
For FDM/SLA:
# If starting from CAD (Fusion 360, SolidWorks)
# Export as: STL (binary) or 3MF
# Resolution: High (triangle count sufficient for detail)
# Units: mm (verify scale)
# Example export settings:
# STL: Binary format, refinement 0.1mm
# 3MF: Include color/material data if using multi-material printer
Got: Model file exported with appropriate resolution (0.1mm chord tolerance for mechanical parts, 0.05mm for organic shapes).
If fail: Check model fully defined (no construction geometry), no missing faces, all components visible.
2. Verify Mesh Integrity
Check mesh is manifold and printable:
# Install mesh repair tools if needed
# sudo apt install meshlab admesh
# Check STL file for errors
admesh --check model.stl
# Look for:
# - Non-manifold edges: 0 (every edge connects exactly 2 faces)
# - Holes: 0
# - Backwards/inverted normals: 0
# - Degenerate facets: 0
Common issues:
- Non-manifold edges: Multiple faces share an edge, or edge has only one face
- Holes: Gaps in mesh surface
- Inverted normals: Inside/outside of model reversed
- Intersecting faces: Self-intersecting geometry
Got: Report shows 0 errors, or errors are repairable.
If fail: Repair mesh automatically or manually:
# Automatic repair with admesh
admesh --write-binary-stl=model_fixed.stl \
--exact \
--nearby \
--remove-unconnected \
--fill-holes \
--normal-directions \
model.stl
# Or use meshlab GUI for manual inspection/repair
meshlab model.stl
# Filters → Cleaning and Repairing → Remove Duplicate Vertices
# Filters → Cleaning and Repairing → Remove Duplicate Faces
# Filters → Normals → Re-Orient all faces coherently
Automatic repair fails? Return to source software. Fix modeling errors (coincident vertices, open edges, overlapping bodies).
3. Check Wall Thickness
Verify minimum wall thickness for chosen process:
Minimum wall thickness by process:
| Process | Min Wall | Recommended Min | Structural Parts |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDM (0.4mm nozzle) | 0.8mm | 1.2mm | 2.4mm+ |
| FDM (0.6mm nozzle) | 1.2mm | 1.8mm | 3.6mm+ |
| SLA (standard) | 0.4mm | 0.8mm | 2.0mm+ |
| SLA (engineering) | 0.6mm | 1.2mm | 2.5mm+ |
| SLS (nylon) | 0.7mm | 1.0mm | 2.0mm+ |
# Check wall thickness visually in slicer:
# - Import model
# - Enable "Thin walls" detection
# - Slice with 0 infill to see wall structure
# For precise measurement, use CAD software:
# - Measure distance between parallel surfaces
# - Check in critical load-bearing areas
Got: All walls meet minimum thickness for chosen process. Thin walls flagged for review.
If fail: Return to CAD and thicken walls, or:
- Switch to smaller nozzle (FDM)
- Use "detect thin walls" slicer setting
- Accept reduced strength for prototypes
4. Determine Print Orientation
Pick orientation to optimize strength, surface finish, support usage:
Orientation decision matrix:
For strength:
- Orient so layer lines run perpendicular to primary load direction
- Example: Bracket under tension → print vertically so layers stack along load axis
For surface finish:
- Orient largest/most visible surface flat on bed (minimal stair-stepping)
- Critical dimensions aligned with X/Y plane (higher precision than Z)
For minimal supports:
- Minimize overhangs >45° (FDM) or >30° (SLA)
- Place flat surfaces on bed when possible
Load direction analysis:
If part experiences:
- Tensile load along axis → print with layers perpendicular to axis
- Compressive load → layers can be parallel (less critical)
- Bending moment → layers perpendicular to neutral axis
- Shear → avoid layer interfaces parallel to shear direction
Got: Orientation chosen with explicit reason for strength, finish, or support tradeoffs.
If fail: No orientation satisfies all requirements? Prioritize in order: functional strength → dimensional accuracy → surface finish → support minimization.
5. Generate Support Structures
Configure automatic or manual supports for overhangs:
Support angle thresholds:
- FDM: 45° from vertical (some bridging up to 60° possible)
- SLA: 30° from vertical (less bridging capability)
- SLS: No supports needed (powder bed support)
Support types:
Tree supports (FDM, recommended):
- Fewer contact points with model
- Easier removal
- Better for organic shapes
- Configure: Branch angle 40-50°, branch density medium
Linear supports (FDM, traditional):
- More stable for large overhangs
- More contact points (harder removal)
- Configure: Pattern grid, density 15-20%, interface layers 2-3
Heavy supports (SLA):
- Thicker contact points for heavy parts
- Risk of marks on surface
- Configure: Contact diameter 0.5-0.8mm, density based on part weight
Interface layers:
- Add 2-3 interface layers between support and model
- Reduces surface marks
- Slightly easier removal
# In slicer (PrusaSlicer example):
# Print Settings → Support material
# - Generate support material: Yes
# - Overhang threshold: 45° (FDM) / 30° (SLA)
# - Pattern: Rectilinear / Tree (auto)
# - Interface layers: 3
# - Interface pattern spacing: 0.2mm
Got: Supports generated for all overhangs exceeding threshold angle. Preview shows no floating geometry.
If fail: Automatic supports inadequate?
- Add manual support enforcers in critical areas
- Increase support density near thin overhangs
- Split model and print in sections if supports infeasible
6. Configure Slicer Profile
Set process-appropriate parameters:
FDM layer heights:
- Draft: 0.28-0.32mm (fast, visible layers)
- Standard: 0.16-0.20mm (balanced quality/speed)
- Fine: 0.08-0.12mm (smooth, slow)
- Rule: Layer height = 25-75% of nozzle diameter
SLA layer heights:
- Standard: 0.05mm (balanced)
- Fine: 0.025mm (miniatures, high detail)
- Fast: 0.1mm (prototypes)
Key parameters by process:
FDM:
layer_height: 0.2mm
line_width: 0.4mm (= nozzle diameter)
perimeters: 3-4 (structural), 2 (cosmetic)
top_bottom_layers: 5 (0.2mm layers = 1mm solid)
infill_percentage: 20% (cosmetic), 40-60% (functional)
infill_pattern: gyroid (FDM), grid (basic)
print_speed: 50mm/s perimeter, 80mm/s infill
temperature: material-specific (see select-print-material skill)
SLA:
layer_height: 0.05mm
bottom_layers: 6-8 (strong bed adhesion)
exposure_time: material-specific (2-8s per layer)
bottom_exposure_time: 30-60s
lift_speed: 60-80mm/min
retract_speed: 150-180mm/min
Got: Profile configured with process-appropriate defaults. Modified for specific material/model requirements.
If fail: Unsure about parameters? Start with slicer's default "Standard Quality" profile for chosen material. Iterate.
7. Preview Slice Layer-by-Layer
Inspect sliced G-code for issues:
# In slicer:
# - Slice model
# - Use layer preview slider to inspect each layer
# - Check for:
# * Gaps in perimeters (indicates thin walls)
# * Floating regions (missing supports)
# * Excessive stringing paths (reduce travel)
# * First layer: proper squish and adhesion
# * Top layers: sufficient solid infill
Red flags in preview:
- White gaps in solid regions: Walls too thin for current line width
- Travels over large distances: Increase retraction or add z-hop
- First layer not squishing: Adjust Z-offset down by 0.05mm
- Sparse top layers: Increase top solid layers to 5+
Got: Preview shows continuous perimeters, proper infill, clean travels, no obvious defects.
If fail: Adjust slicer settings and re-slice. Common fixes:
- Thin wall gaps → Enable "Detect thin walls" or reduce line width
- Poor bridging → Reduce bridge speed to 30mm/s, increase cooling
- Stringing → Increase retraction distance +1mm, reduce temperature -5°C
8. Export G-code and Verify
Save sliced G-code with descriptive name:
# Naming convention:
# <part_name>_<material>_<layer_height>_<profile>.gcode
# Example: bracket_petg_0.2mm_standard.gcode
# Verify G-code:
grep "^;PRINT_TIME:" model.gcode # Check estimated time
grep "^;Filament used:" model.gcode # Check material usage
head -n 50 model.gcode | grep "^M104\|^M140" # Verify temperatures
# Expected first layer temp:
# M140 S85 (bed temp for PETG)
# M104 S245 (hotend temp for PETG)
Pre-print checklist:
- Bed leveled and clean
- Correct material loaded and dry
- Temperatures match material requirements
- First layer Z-offset calibrated
- Adequate filament/resin remaining
- Print time acceptable for monitoring plan
Got: G-code file saved with embedded metadata. Temperatures verified. Print time/material estimate reasonable.
If fail: Print time excessive (>12 hours)?
- Increase layer height (0.2 → 0.28mm saves ~30% time)
- Reduce perimeters (4 → 3)
- Reduce infill (40% → 20% for non-structural)
- Scale model down if size not critical
Checks
- Model exported from source software with correct units (mm) and scale
- Mesh integrity verified: manifold, no holes, normals correct
- Wall thickness meets minimum for chosen process (≥0.8mm FDM, ≥0.4mm SLA)
- Print orientation optimized for strength, finish, or support tradeoffs
- Supports generated for all overhangs >45° (FDM) or >30° (SLA)
- Slicer profile configured with appropriate layer height and parameters
- Layer-by-layer preview inspected, no gaps or floating regions
- G-code exported with verified temperatures and reasonable print time
- Pre-print checklist completed (bed leveled, material loaded, etc.)
Pitfalls
- Skip mesh repair: Non-manifold meshes can slice but fail to print correctly with gaps or malformed layers
- Ignore wall thickness: Thin walls (< minimum) will have gaps. Drastically reduces strength
- Wrong orientation for strength: Printing tensile parts with layers parallel to load direction creates weak delamination plane
- Insufficient supports: Underestimating overhang angle leads to sagging, stringing, complete failure
- First layer neglect: 90% of print failures occur in first layer — Z-offset and bed adhesion are critical
- Temperature from Internet: Every printer/material combination unique. Always calibrate temperature with tower tests
- Excessive detail for layer height: Fine features smaller than 2× layer height won't resolve properly
- Not previewing slice: Slicers can make unexpected decisions (thin wall gaps, weird infill). Always preview before printing
- Material hygroscopy: Wet filament (especially Nylon, TPU, PETG) causes poor layer adhesion, stringing, brittleness
- Overconfidence in supports: Heavy parts with large overhangs can still sag even with supports. Test on smaller models first
See Also
- select-print-material: Pick appropriate material based on mechanical, thermal, chemical requirements
- troubleshoot-print-issues: Diagnose and fix print failures if prepared model still fails
- Model with Blender (future skill): Create 3D models optimized for printing from scratch
- Calibrate 3D Printer (future skill): E-steps, flow rate, temperature towers, retraction tuning
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
content-collections
메타이 스킬은 콘텐츠 콜렉션(Content Collections)을 위한 프로덕션 검증된 설정을 제공합니다. 콘텐츠 콜렉션은 Markdown/MDX 파일을 Zod 검증이 포함된 타입 안전한 데이터 콜렉션으로 변환해주는 TypeScript 최우선 도구입니다. 블로그, 문서 사이트 또는 콘텐츠 중심의 Vite + React 애플리케이션을 구축할 때 타입 안전성과 자동 콘텐츠 검증을 보장하기 위해 사용하세요. Vite 플러그인 구성과 MDX 컴파일부터 배포 최적화 및 스키마 검증에 이르기까지 모든 것을 다룹니다.
polymarket
메타이 스킬은 개발자들이 Polymarket 예측 시장 플랫폼을 활용한 애플리케이션을 구축할 수 있도록 지원하며, 거래 및 시장 데이터를 위한 API 통합 기능을 포함합니다. 또한 WebSocket을 통한 실시간 데이터 스트리밍을 제공하여 실시간 거래와 시장 활동을 모니터링할 수 있습니다. 이를 통해 거래 전략을 구현하거나 실시간 시장 업데이트를 처리하는 도구를 생성하는 데 활용할 수 있습니다.
creating-opencode-plugins
메타이 스킬은 개발자들이 명령어, 파일, LSP 작업 등 25개 이상의 이벤트 유형에 연결되는 OpenCode 플러그인을 만들 수 있도록 돕습니다. JavaScript/TypeScript 모듈을 위한 플러그인 구조, 이벤트 API 명세, 구현 패턴을 제공합니다. OpenCode AI 어시스턴트의 라이프사이클을 사용자 정의 이벤트 기반 로직으로 가로채거나, 모니터링하거나, 확장해야 할 때 사용하세요.
sglang
메타SGLang은 RadixAttention 프리픽스 캐싱을 활용하여 JSON, 정규식, 에이전트 워크플로우를 위한 고속 구조화 생성에 특화된 고성능 LLM 서빙 프레임워크입니다. 특히 반복되는 프리픽스가 있는 작업에서 상당히 빠른 추론 속도를 제공하여 복잡한 구조화 출력 및 다중 턴 대화에 이상적입니다. 제약 디코딩이 필요하거나 광범위한 프리픽스 공유가 있는 애플리케이션을 구축할 때는 vLLM과 같은 대안보다 SGLang을 선택하십시오.
