formulate-quantum-problem
정보
이 스킬은 힐베르트 공간, 연산자, 경계 조건을 포함한 수학적 프레임워크를 정의함으로써 개발자들이 양자 역학이나 화학 문제를 공식화하는 데 도움을 줍니다. 물리적 시나리오를 슈뢰딩거 방정식 같은 형식주의로 변환하고, 섭동 이론이나 DFT(밀도 범함수 이론) 같은 적절한 해법 방법을 선택하는 것을 지원합니다. 양자 문제를 해석적 또는 수치적 해법을 위해 설정할 때 사용하세요.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/formulate-quantum-problemClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Formulate Quantum Problem
Physical system → well-posed QM problem: ID DOFs → build H + Hilbert space → BCs → pick approx method → validate vs known limits.
Use When
- Set up QM problem for analytic/numerical solution
- QChem calc (MOs, electronic structure)
- Physical scenario → Dirac/Schrödinger
- Choose perturbation / variational / DFT / exact diag
- Theoretical model for spectroscopic/scattering comparison
In
- Required: system desc (atom, molecule, solid, field)
- Required: target observable (spectrum, rates, ground state)
- Optional: experimental constraints
- Optional: accuracy / compute budget
- Optional: formalism (wave mech, matrix mech, 2nd quant, path int)
Do
Step 1: ID system + DOFs
- Particles: list (electrons, nuclei, photons, phonons) + quantum nums (spin, charge, mass)
- Symmetries: spatial (sph/cyl/trans/crystal), internal (spin/gauge), discrete (P, T)
- Energy scales: which DOFs active vs frozen/adiabatic
- Reduction: Born-Oppenheimer if nuclear/electronic timescales separate; collective coords for many-body
## System Characterization
- **Particles**: [list with quantum numbers]
- **Active degrees of freedom**: [coordinates, spins, fields]
- **Frozen degrees of freedom**: [and justification for freezing]
- **Symmetry group**: [continuous and discrete]
- **Energy scale hierarchy**: [e.g., electronic >> vibrational >> rotational]
→ Complete inventory: particles, QNs, symmetries, active vs frozen justified.
If err: hierarchy unclear → keep all DOFs, flag for scale analysis. Premature truncation → wrong physics.
Step 2: Build H + Hilbert space
- Hilbert space: finite-dim → basis (|↑>, |↓>). Infinite → function space (L²(R³) for 3D single particle).
- Kinetic: each particle. Position rep: T = -ℏ²/(2m) nabla².
- Potential: all interactions (Coulomb, harmonic, spin-orbit, external). Explicit form + coupling.
- Composite H: H = T + V, group by type. Multi-particle: exchange/correlation or note via approx.
- Operator algebra: H Hermitian? Constants of motion ([H,O]=0) → block-diagonalize.
## Hamiltonian Structure
- **Hilbert space**: [definition and basis]
- **H = T + V decomposition**:
- T = [kinetic terms]
- V = [potential terms, grouped by type]
- **Constants of motion**: [operators commuting with H]
- **Symmetry-adapted basis**: [if block diagonalization is possible]
→ Complete Hermitian H w/ all terms, Hilbert space defined, constants of motion ID'd.
If err: not Hermitian → missing conjugate / gauge phase. Ambiguous Hilbert space (relativistic) → specify formalism.
Step 3: BCs + initial conditions
- BCs: bound → normalizability (psi→0 at ∞). Scattering → incoming wave. Periodic → Bloch / Born-von Karman.
- Domain: spatial. Box walls. H atom: radial + angular. Lattice + topology.
- Initial state (time-dep): t=0 expansion in eigenbasis or wave packet w/ center + width.
- Constraints: indistinguishable → sym (bosons) / antisym (fermions). Gauge → gauge-fixing.
## Boundary and Initial Conditions
- **Spatial domain**: [definition]
- **Boundary type**: [Dirichlet / Neumann / periodic / scattering]
- **Normalization**: [condition]
- **Particle statistics**: [bosonic / fermionic / distinguishable]
- **Initial state** (if time-dependent): [specification]
→ BCs physically motivated, consistent w/ H domain, unique solution (or scattering matrix).
If err: over/under-determined → check self-adjointness on domain. Non-self-adjoint → handle deficiency indices.
Step 4: Pick approx method
-
Exact solvable: matches known model (HO, H atom, Ising)? → exact + perturbation corrections.
-
Perturbation (weak coupling):
- H = H0 + lambda V, H0 solvable
- lambda V small vs H0 level spacing
- Degeneracy? → degenerate perturbation
- Fits: weak interaction, few-body, analytic needed
-
Variational (ground state):
- Trial wf w/ params
- Satisfies BCs + symmetry
- Fits: ground state energy primary, many-body
-
DFT (many-electron):
- XC functional (LDA, GGA, hybrid)
- Basis (plane waves, Gaussian, NAOs)
- Fits: many-electron, ground state density + energy
-
Numerical exact (small/benchmark):
- Exact diag for small Hilbert
- QMC for ground state sampling
- DMRG for 1D/quasi-1D
- Fits: high accuracy, small system
## Approximation Method Selection
- **Method chosen**: [name]
- **Justification**: [why this method fits the problem structure]
- **Expected accuracy**: [order of perturbation, variational bound quality, DFT functional accuracy]
- **Computational cost**: [scaling with system size]
- **Alternatives considered**: [and why they were rejected]
→ Justified method + expected accuracy + compute cost + alternatives.
If err: no single method fits → formulate for 2 + compare. Disagreement reveals difficulty.
Step 5: Validate vs limits
- Classical (ℏ→0 or large QNs): H reduces to classical mech.
- Non-interacting: couplings → 0 → product of single-particle states.
- Symmetry: respects all symmetries. H transforms correctly under group.
- Dimensional: every H term = energy. Length/energy/time scales reasonable.
- Known exact: special cases (H atom Z=1, HO quadratic) → reproduced.
## Validation Checks
| Check | Expected Result | Status |
|-------|----------------|--------|
| Classical limit (hbar -> 0) | [classical Hamiltonian] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Non-interacting limit | [product states] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Symmetry transformation | [correct representation] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Dimensional analysis | [all terms in energy units] | [Pass/Fail] |
| Known exact case | [reproduced result] | [Pass/Fail] |
→ All pass. Self-consistent, ready to solve.
If err: fail → err in H construction or BCs. Trace to specific term/condition, fix before solving.
Check
- Particles + QNs listed
- Hilbert space + basis
- H Hermitian + correct units
- Constants of motion used
- BCs physically + mathematically sufficient
- Statistics (bos/ferm) enforced
- Method justified + accuracy stated
- Classical, non-interacting, symmetry limits checked
- Known exact reproduced
- Reproducible
Traps
- Premature DOF drop: freeze w/o energy scale arg → wrong physics. Justify every reduction.
- Non-Hermitian H: missing conjugate in spin-orbit / complex V. Verify H=H† explicitly.
- Wrong scattering BCs: bound-state BCs for scattering → discards continuum. Match to question.
- Degeneracy in perturbation: non-deg perturbation on deg level → divergent. Check first.
- Single-method reliance: variational → upper bound but misses excited; perturbation diverges at strong coupling. Cross-validate.
- Unit inconsistency: mixing natural (ℏ=1) + SI. Pick consistent system, state explicitly.
→
derive-theoretical-result— analytic from formulated problemsurvey-theoretical-literature— prior work on similar QM systems
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
llamaguard
기타LlamaGuard는 폭력 및 혐오 발언 등 6가지 안전 범주에서 LLM 입력과 출력을 조정하기 위한 Meta의 70-80억 파라미터 모델입니다. 94-95% 정확도를 제공하며 vLLM, Hugging Face 또는 Amazon SageMaker를 사용해 배포할 수 있습니다. 이 기술을 사용하여 AI 애플리케이션에 콘텐츠 필터링 및 안전 가드레일을 손쉽게 통합하세요.
cost-optimization
기타이 Claude Skill은 리소스 적정화, 태깅 전략, 지출 분석을 통해 개발자들이 클라우드 비용을 최적화할 수 있도록 지원합니다. AWS, Azure, GCP에서 클라우드 비용을 절감하고 비용 거버넌스를 구현하기 위한 프레임워크를 제공합니다. 인프라 비용을 분석하거나, 리소스를 적정화하거나, 예산 제약을 충족해야 할 때 사용하세요.
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
기타이 스킬은 bitsandbytes를 사용하여 LLM을 8비트 또는 4비트 정밀도로 양자화하며, 최소한의 정확도 손실로 50-75%의 메모리 감소를 달성합니다. 제한된 GPU 메모리에서 더 큰 모델을 실행하거나 추론을 가속화하는 데 이상적이며, INT8, NF4, FP4와 같은 형식을 지원합니다. 이 스킬은 HuggingFace Transformers와 통합되어 QLoRA 학습 및 8비트 옵티마이저를 가능하게 합니다.
dispatching-parallel-agents
기타이 Claude Skill은 3개 이상의 독립적인 문제를 동시에 조사하고 해결하기 위해 다중 에이전트를 배치합니다. 공유 상태나 의존성 없이 해결 가능한 무관련 장애 시나리오에 맞게 설계되었습니다. 핵심 기능은 병렬 문제 해결로, 각 독립 문제 영역마다 하나의 에이전트를 할당하여 효율성을 극대화합니다.
