formulate-maxwell-equations
정보
이 스킬은 개발자들이 전자기 시스템을 분석하기 위해 맥스웰 방정식을 적분 형태와 미분 형태 모두로 다룰 수 있게 합니다. 경계값 문제 해결, 파동 방정식 유도, 포인팅 벡터를 통한 에너지 전송 계산, 물질 경계면에서의 필드 처리 등을 위해 설계되었습니다. 정전기학과 정자기학을 연결하거나 가우스 법칙, 패러데이 법칙, 앙페르-맥스웰 법칙과 같은 기본 법칙을 적용할 때 사용하세요.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/formulate-maxwell-equationsClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Formulate Maxwell Equations
Crack EM stuff. State right Maxwell equations (integral or differential). Apply boundary + symmetry to shrink system. Solve PDEs for fields. Compute Poynting vector, radiation pressure, wave impedance. Verify against static + wave limits.
When Use
- Boundary value problem for E + B fields, sources + material interfaces
- Derive EM wave equation from first principles
- Compute energy flow (Poynting vector) + momentum density of EM fields
- Apply boundary conditions at media interfaces (dielectric, conductor, magnetic)
- Analyze displacement current + role in Ampere-Maxwell
- Connect static limits (Coulomb, Biot-Savart) to unified time-dependent framework
Inputs
- Required: Physical setup (geometry, source charges + currents, material props)
- Required: Quantity to solve (E, B, wave solution, energy flux, boundary field)
- Optional: Symmetry (planar, cylindrical, spherical, none)
- Optional: Time dependence (static, harmonic omega, general)
- Optional: Boundary conditions at interfaces or conductor surfaces
Steps
Step 1: State Four Maxwell Equations + Pick Relevant Subset
Write full set, choose which constrain problem:
-
Gauss for E: div(E) = rho / epsilon_0 (diff) or closed_surface_integral(E . dA) = Q_enc / epsilon_0 (int). E divergence to charge density. Use for E from charge with symmetry.
-
Gauss for B: div(B) = 0 (diff) or closed_surface_integral(B . dA) = 0 (int). No magnetic monopoles. Every B line closed loop. Consistency check on B.
-
Faraday: curl(E) = -dB/dt (diff) or contour_integral(E . dl) = -d(Phi_B)/dt (int). Changing B makes curling E. Induction + wave derivation.
-
Ampere-Maxwell: curl(B) = mu_0 J + mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt (diff) or contour_integral(B . dl) = mu_0 I_enc + mu_0 epsilon_0 d(Phi_E)/dt (int). Current + changing E make curling B. Displacement current term mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt essential for wave + current continuity.
-
Form pick: Differential for local fields, wave equations, PDEs. Integral for high-symmetry where field extracts direct.
-
Active equations: Not all four independent every problem. Electrostatics (dB/dt = 0, J = 0) → only Gauss for E + curl(E) = 0 matter. Magnetostatics → Gauss for B + Ampere (no displacement current) enough.
## Maxwell Equations for This Problem
- **Form**: [differential / integral / both]
- **Active equations**: [list which of the four are non-trivial constraints]
- **Source terms**: rho = [charge density], J = [current density]
- **Time dependence**: [static / harmonic / general]
- **Displacement current**: [negligible / essential -- with justification]
Got: Four equations stated. Relevant subset identified with justification. Displacement current included or explicitly argued negligible.
If fail: Unclear if displacement current matters? Estimate |epsilon_0 dE/dt| / |J|. Ratio near 1 or bigger → keep displacement current. Vacuum no free charges → always essential for wave.
Step 2: Apply Boundary Conditions + Symmetry
Shrink system with material interfaces + geometric symmetry:
-
Boundary at material interfaces: Medium 1 + 2, surface charge sigma_f + surface current K_f:
- Normal E: epsilon_1 E_1n - epsilon_2 E_2n = sigma_f
- Tangential E: E_1t = E_2t (continuous)
- Normal B: B_1n = B_2n (continuous)
- Tangential H: n_hat x (H_1 - H_2) = K_f (n_hat from 2 to 1)
-
Conductor boundary: Perfect conductor surface:
- E_tangential = 0 (inside E = 0)
- B_normal = 0 (inside B = 0 for time-varying)
- Surface charge: sigma = epsilon_0 E_normal
- Surface current: K = (1/mu_0) n_hat x B
-
Symmetry shrink: Use symmetries to cut independent variables:
- Planar: fields depend one coord (z), PDEs → ODEs
- Cylindrical: depend (rho, z) or rho only
- Spherical: depend r only
- Translational invariance: Fourier transform invariant direction
-
Gauge choice (using potentials): Pick gauge for scalar phi + vector A:
- Coulomb: div(A) = 0 (splits electrostatic + radiation)
- Lorenz: div(A) + mu_0 epsilon_0 d(phi)/dt = 0 (Lorentz-covariant, decouples wave)
## Boundary Conditions and Symmetry
- **Interfaces**: [list with media properties on each side]
- **Boundary conditions applied**: [normal E, tangential E, normal B, tangential H]
- **Symmetry**: [planar / cylindrical / spherical / none]
- **Reduced coordinates**: [independent variables after symmetry reduction]
- **Gauge** (if using potentials): [Coulomb / Lorenz / other]
Got: Boundary conditions stated every interface. Symmetry cuts dimension. Problem ready for PDE solution.
If fail: Over-determined (more equations than unknowns)? Check field components match conditions. Under-determined? Missed condition — often tangential H or radiation at infinity.
Step 3: Solve PDEs
Solve Maxwell equations or derived forms for field quantities:
-
Wave equation derive: Source-free, linear, homogeneous medium:
- Curl of Faraday: curl(curl(E)) = -d/dt(curl(B))
- Sub Ampere-Maxwell: curl(curl(E)) = -mu epsilon d^2E/dt^2
- Vector identity: curl(curl(E)) = grad(div(E)) - nabla^2(E)
- With div(E) = 0: nabla^2(E) = mu epsilon d^2E/dt^2
- Wave speed: v = 1/sqrt(mu epsilon); vacuum c = 1/sqrt(mu_0 epsilon_0)
- Same for B
-
Plane wave solutions: Wave in z-direction:
- E(z, t) = E_0 exp[i(kz - omega t)], k = omega/v = omega * sqrt(mu epsilon)
- B = (1/v) k_hat x E (perpendicular E + propagation)
- |B| = |E|/v
- Polarization: linear, circular, elliptical by E_0 components
-
Laplace + Poisson (static):
- No time: nabla^2(phi) = -rho/epsilon_0 (Poisson) or nabla^2(phi) = 0 (Laplace)
- Separation of variables in right coordinates
- Match boundary to pin expansion coefficients
-
Guided waves + cavities: Waveguides + resonant cavities:
- Split into TE (transverse electric) + TM (transverse magnetic) modes
- Apply conducting-wall boundary
- Eigenvalue problem → allowed propagation constants + resonant frequencies
- Cutoff: omega_c = v * pi * sqrt((m/a)^2 + (n/b)^2) for rectangular guide a x b
-
Skin depth in conductors: Time-varying fields into conductor conductivity sigma_c:
- delta = sqrt(2 / (omega mu sigma_c))
- Fields decay exp(-z/delta)
- 60 Hz copper: delta ~ 8.5 mm; 1 GHz: delta ~ 2 micrometers
## Field Solution
- **Equation solved**: [wave equation / Laplace / Poisson / eigenvalue]
- **Solution method**: [separation of variables / Fourier transform / Green's function / numerical]
- **Result**: E(r, t) = [expression], B(r, t) = [expression]
- **Dispersion relation**: omega(k) = [if wave solution]
- **Characteristic scales**: [wavelength, skin depth, decay length]
Got: Explicit field expressions satisfying Maxwell + all boundary. Dispersion relation or eigenvalue spectrum if applicable.
If fail: PDE won't separate in chosen coordinates? Try different system or numerical (finite difference, finite element). Solution fails a Maxwell equation on back-sub? Algebraic error — re-check curl + divergence.
Step 4: Compute Derived Quantities
Pull physical quantities from field solution:
-
Poynting vector: S = (1/mu_0) E x B (instantaneous energy flux, W/m^2):
- Plane waves: S = (1/mu_0) |E|^2 / v in propagation direction
- Time-averaged: <S> = (1/2) Re(E x H*) for harmonic
- Intensity: I = |<S>| (power per area)
-
EM energy density:
- u = (1/2)(epsilon_0 |E|^2 + |B|^2/mu_0) in vacuum
- u = (1/2)(E . D + B . H) in linear media
- Energy conservation: du/dt + div(S) = -J . E (Poynting's theorem)
-
Radiation pressure: Plane wave on surface:
- Perfect absorber: P_rad = I/c = <S>/c
- Perfect reflector: P_rad = 2I/c = 2<S>/c
- Momentum flux density of EM field
-
Wave impedance:
- Medium: eta = sqrt(mu/epsilon) = mu * v
- Vacuum: eta_0 = sqrt(mu_0/epsilon_0) ~ 377 Ohms
- E + H amplitudes: |E| = eta |H|
- Reflection at normal: r = (eta_2 - eta_1)/(eta_2 + eta_1)
-
Power dissipation + quality factor:
- Ohmic loss per volume: p_loss = sigma |E|^2 / 2 (conductor)
- Cavity Q-factor: Q = omega * (stored energy) / (power dissipated per cycle)
- Bandwidth of resonances: Delta_omega = omega / Q
## Derived Quantities
- **Poynting vector**: S = [expression], <S> = [time-averaged]
- **Energy density**: u = [expression]
- **Radiation pressure**: P_rad = [value]
- **Wave impedance**: eta = [value]
- **Reflection/transmission**: r = [value], t = [value]
- **Q-factor** (if resonant): Q = [value]
Got: All derived quantities with right units. Energy conservation verified via Poynting's theorem. Magnitudes physically reasonable.
If fail: Poynting's theorem won't balance (du/dt + div(S) != -J . E)? Inconsistency E + B solutions. Re-verify both fields satisfy all four Maxwell. Common error: E + B from different approximations not mutually consistent.
Step 5: Verify Against Known Limits
Check solution reduces correctly in limits:
-
Static limit (omega -> 0): Solution → electrostatic or magnetostatic:
- E satisfies Coulomb or Laplace/Poisson
- B satisfies Biot-Savart or Ampere (no displacement current)
- Displacement current vanishes: mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt -> 0
-
Plane wave limit: Source-free unbounded medium → plane waves, v = 1/sqrt(mu epsilon), correct polarization.
-
Perfect conductor limit (sigma -> infinity):
- Skin depth delta -> 0 (no penetration)
- Tangential E -> 0 at surface
- Reflection r -> -1 (perfect reflection phase inversion)
-
Vacuum limit (epsilon_r = 1, mu_r = 1): Material-dependent → vacuum values. Wave speed = c. Impedance = eta_0 ~ 377 Ohms.
-
Energy conservation check: Integrate Poynting's theorem over closed volume. Rate of change of total field energy + power flowing out = negative of power from currents inside. Any imbalance = error.
## Limiting Case Verification
| Limit | Condition | Expected | Obtained | Match |
|-------|-----------|----------|----------|-------|
| Static | omega -> 0 | Coulomb / Biot-Savart | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Plane wave | unbounded medium | v = c/n, eta = eta_0/n | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Perfect conductor | sigma -> inf | delta -> 0, r -> -1 | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Vacuum | epsilon_r = mu_r = 1 | c, eta_0 | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Energy conservation | Poynting's theorem | balanced | [check] | [Yes/No] |
Got: All limits produce correct known results. Energy conservation satisfied to numerical precision.
If fail: Failed limit = definite error. Static limit fail → source terms or boundary. Plane wave limit fail → wave equation derivation. Energy conservation fail → inconsistency E + B. Trace failure to step, fix before accepting.
Checks
- All four Maxwell equations stated + relevant subset identified
- Displacement current included or explicitly justified negligible
- Boundary conditions applied at every material interface
- Symmetry shrinks PDE dimension
- Wave equation (or Laplace/Poisson) correctly derived
- Field solutions satisfy all four Maxwell on back-sub
- Poynting vector + energy density with right units (W/m^2 + J/m^3)
- Poynting's theorem (energy conservation) verified
- Wave impedance + reflection/transmission coefficients reasonable
- Static limit reproduces Coulomb + Biot-Savart
- Plane wave limit gives v = 1/sqrt(mu epsilon) + orthogonal E, B, k
- Solution complete enough for reproduction
Pitfalls
- Dropping displacement current: Original Ampere (curl B = mu_0 J), divergence gives div(J) = 0, contradicts charge conservation when rho changes in time. Term mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt fixes, essential for wave propagation. Never drop without verifying dE/dt negligible vs J/epsilon_0.
- Inconsistent E + B solutions: Solving E + B independent (E from Gauss, B from Ampere) without verifying Faraday + Gauss for B → fields not mutually consistent. Always verify all four.
- Wrong boundary normal direction: Convention n_hat x (H_1 - H_2) = K_f needs n_hat from medium 2 into 1. Reversed → flips surface current sign.
- Confusing D, E, B, H in materials: Vacuum: D = epsilon_0 E + B = mu_0 H. Linear media: D = epsilon E + B = mu H. Maxwell in matter use D + H for free source, E + B for force law. Mixing → factor of epsilon_r or mu_r errors.
- Phase velocity vs group velocity: Wave speed v = omega/k = phase velocity. Energy + info propagate at group velocity v_g = d(omega)/dk. Dispersive media differ, phase for energy transport → wrong.
- Forgetting radiation condition: Scattering + radiation in unbounded domain → solution must satisfy Sommerfeld radiation condition (outgoing waves at infinity). Without it → not unique, may include unphysical incoming waves.
See Also
analyze-magnetic-field-- compute static B-fields = magnetostatic limit of Maxwellsolve-electromagnetic-induction-- apply Faraday to induction geometries + RL circuitsformulate-quantum-problem-- quantize EM field for quantum optics + QEDderive-theoretical-result-- rigorous derivation of wave equations, Green's functions, dispersionanalyze-diffusion-dynamics-- diffusion equations from Maxwell in conducting media (skin effect)
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
llamaguard
기타LlamaGuard는 폭력 및 혐오 발언 등 6가지 안전 범주에서 LLM 입력과 출력을 조정하기 위한 Meta의 70-80억 파라미터 모델입니다. 94-95% 정확도를 제공하며 vLLM, Hugging Face 또는 Amazon SageMaker를 사용해 배포할 수 있습니다. 이 기술을 사용하여 AI 애플리케이션에 콘텐츠 필터링 및 안전 가드레일을 손쉽게 통합하세요.
cost-optimization
기타이 Claude Skill은 리소스 적정화, 태깅 전략, 지출 분석을 통해 개발자들이 클라우드 비용을 최적화할 수 있도록 지원합니다. AWS, Azure, GCP에서 클라우드 비용을 절감하고 비용 거버넌스를 구현하기 위한 프레임워크를 제공합니다. 인프라 비용을 분석하거나, 리소스를 적정화하거나, 예산 제약을 충족해야 할 때 사용하세요.
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
기타이 스킬은 bitsandbytes를 사용하여 LLM을 8비트 또는 4비트 정밀도로 양자화하며, 최소한의 정확도 손실로 50-75%의 메모리 감소를 달성합니다. 제한된 GPU 메모리에서 더 큰 모델을 실행하거나 추론을 가속화하는 데 이상적이며, INT8, NF4, FP4와 같은 형식을 지원합니다. 이 스킬은 HuggingFace Transformers와 통합되어 QLoRA 학습 및 8비트 옵티마이저를 가능하게 합니다.
dispatching-parallel-agents
기타이 Claude Skill은 3개 이상의 독립적인 문제를 동시에 조사하고 해결하기 위해 다중 에이전트를 배치합니다. 공유 상태나 의존성 없이 해결 가능한 무관련 장애 시나리오에 맞게 설계되었습니다. 핵심 기능은 병렬 문제 해결로, 각 독립 문제 영역마다 하나의 에이전트를 할당하여 효율성을 극대화합니다.
