MCP HubMCP Hub
스킬 목록으로 돌아가기

design-logic-circuit

pjt222
업데이트됨 2 days ago
5 조회
17
2
17
GitHub에서 보기
메타design

정보

이 스킬은 부울 함수나 진리표로부터 게이트 수준 조합 논리 회로를 설계합니다. 기본 게이트와 가산기, 멀티플렉서 같은 표준 블록을 사용하여 회로를 구현하며, 설계를 NAND/NOR 범용 게이트로 변환할 수 있습니다. 철저한 시뮬레이션을 통해 하드웨어로 구현 가능한 논리 네트워크를 생성하고 검증하는 데 활용하세요.

빠른 설치

Claude Code

추천
기본
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
플러그인 명령대체
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git 클론대체
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/design-logic-circuit

Claude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요

문서

Design Logic Circuit

Translate functional specification into combinational logic circuit by defining inputs and outputs, deriving minimal Boolean expression, mapping to gate-level schematic, optionally converting to universal gate basis (NAND-only or NOR-only), verifying correctness through exhaustive simulation against original truth table.

When Use

  • Do Boolean function as physical or simulated gate network
  • Design standard combinational building blocks (adders, multiplexers, decoders, comparators)
  • Convert arbitrary gate network to NAND-only or NOR-only form for manufacturing constraints
  • Teach or review digital logic design from specification to schematic
  • Prep combinational datapath components needed by build-sequential-circuit or simulate-cpu-architecture

Inputs

  • Required: Functional specification -- one of: truth table, Boolean expression, verbal description of input/output behavior, or standard block name (e.g., "4-bit ripple-carry adder")
  • Required: Target gate library -- unrestricted (AND/OR/NOT), NAND-only, NOR-only, or specific standard cell library
  • Optional: Optimization goal -- minimize gate count, minimize propagation delay (critical path), or minimize fan-out
  • Optional: Maximum fan-in constraint (e.g., 2-input gates only)
  • Optional: Don't-care conditions for inputs that will never occur

Steps

Step 1: Specify Circuit Function

Define circuit's interface and behavior completely before any synthesis:

  1. Input signals: List all input signals with names, bit widths, valid ranges. For multi-bit inputs, specify bit ordering (MSB-first or LSB-first).
  2. Output signals: List all output signals with names and bit widths.
  3. Truth table: Write complete truth table mapping every input combination to corresponding outputs. For circuits with many inputs, express function algebraically or as set of minterms/maxterms instead.
  4. Don't-care conditions: Identify input combinations that cannot occur in practice (e.g., BCD inputs 1010-1111) and mark as don't-cares.
  5. Timing requirements: Note any propagation delay constraints. Combinational circuits have no clock -- timing here refers to worst-case gate delay through critical path.
## Circuit Specification
- **Name**: [descriptive name]
- **Inputs**: [list with bit widths]
- **Outputs**: [list with bit widths]
- **Function**: [verbal description]
- **Truth table or minterm list**: [table or Sigma notation]
- **Don't-care set**: [d(...) or "none"]

Got: Complete, unambiguous specification where every legal input combination maps to exactly one output value.

If fail: If specification ambiguous (e.g., missing cases, conflicting outputs for same input), request clarification. Do not assume don't-care for unspecified inputs unless explicitly told to.

Step 2: Derive Minimal Boolean Expression

Obtain simplest expression for each output using evaluate-boolean-expression skill:

  1. Single-output functions: For each output bit, apply evaluate-boolean-expression to get minimal SOP (or POS, depending on which yields fewer gates).
  2. Multi-output optimization: If multiple outputs share common sub-expressions, identify shared product terms that can be factored out. Reduces total gate count at expense of slightly more complex routing.
  3. XOR detection: Scan for XOR/XNOR patterns in truth table (checkerboard patterns in K-map). XOR gates expensive in NAND/NOR-only implementations but efficient in standard libraries.
  4. Record expressions: Document minimal expression for each output. Note literal count and number of product/sum terms.
## Minimal Expressions
| Output | Minimal SOP | Literals | Terms |
|--------|-------------|----------|-------|
| F1     | [expression] | [count] | [count] |
| F2     | [expression] | [count] | [count] |
- **Shared sub-expressions**: [list, if any]

Got: Minimal Boolean expression for each output. Shared sub-expressions identified for multi-output circuits.

If fail: If expressions appear non-minimal (more literals than expected for function's complexity), re-run K-map or Quine-McCluskey step from evaluate-boolean-expression. For functions with more than 6 variables, use Espresso or similar heuristic minimizer.

Step 3: Map to Gate-Level Schematic

Convert Boolean expressions into network of logic gates:

  1. Direct mapping (SOP): Each product term becomes multi-input AND gate. Sum of products becomes OR gate fed by AND gates. Each complemented variable requires NOT gate (or use NAND/NOR to absorb inversions).
  2. Gate assignment: For each gate, record:
    • Gate type (AND, OR, NOT, XOR, NAND, NOR)
    • Input signals (by name or from output of another gate)
    • Output signal name
    • Fan-in (number of inputs)
  3. Fan-in decomposition: If gate exceeds maximum fan-in constraint, decompose into tree of smaller gates. For example, 4-input AND with 2-input constraint becomes two 2-input ANDs feeding third 2-input AND.
  4. Schematic notation: Draw circuit using text-based notation or describe netlist in structured format.
## Gate-Level Netlist
| Gate ID | Type | Inputs       | Output | Fan-in |
|---------|------|-------------|--------|--------|
| G1      | NOT  | A           | A'     | 1      |
| G2      | AND  | A', B       | w1     | 2      |
| G3      | AND  | A, C        | w2     | 2      |
| G4      | OR   | w1, w2      | F      | 2      |

- **Total gates**: [count]
- **Critical path depth**: [number of gate levels from input to output]

Got: Complete gate-level netlist where every output can be traced back to primary inputs through chain of gates. No floating (unconnected) inputs or outputs.

If fail: If netlist has dangling wires or feedback loops (invalid in combinational circuits), recheck mapping. Every signal must have exactly one driver. Every gate input must connect to either primary input or another gate's output.

Step 4: Convert to Universal Gate Basis (Optional)

Transform circuit to use only NAND gates or only NOR gates:

  1. NAND-only conversion:
    • Replace each AND gate with NAND followed by NOT (NAND with tied inputs).
    • Replace each OR gate using De Morgan: A + B = ((A')*(B'))' = NAND(A', B'), so use NOTs on inputs then NAND.
    • Replace each NOT gate with NAND gate with both inputs tied together: A' = NAND(A, A).
    • Bubble pushing: Simplify by canceling adjacent inversions. Two NOTs in series cancel. NAND feeding NOT is equivalent to AND.
  2. NOR-only conversion:
    • Replace each OR gate with NOR followed by NOT.
    • Replace each AND gate using De Morgan: A * B = ((A')+(B'))' = NOR(A', B').
    • Replace each NOT gate with NOR(A, A).
    • Apply bubble pushing to cancel inversions.
  3. Gate count comparison: Record gate count before and after conversion. NAND-only and NOR-only implementations typically use more gates but simplify manufacturing (single gate type on chip).
## Universal Gate Conversion
- **Target basis**: [NAND-only / NOR-only]
- **Gates before conversion**: [count]
- **Gates after conversion**: [count]
- **Gates after bubble-push optimization**: [count]
- **Conversion netlist**: [updated table]

Got: Functionally equivalent circuit using only target gate type. Redundant inversions eliminated via bubble pushing.

If fail: If converted circuit has more inversions than expected, re-examine bubble-pushing step. Common mistake: forgetting NAND and NOR are self-dual under complementation -- applying De Morgan consistently from outputs back to inputs avoids this.

Step 5: Verify via Exhaustive Simulation

Confirm circuit produces correct outputs for every possible input:

  1. Simulation approach: For circuits with up to 16 inputs (65,536 combinations), simulate every input exhaustively. For larger circuits, use targeted test vectors covering corner cases, boundary conditions, random samples.
  2. Propagate values: For each input combination, propagate signal values gate by gate from inputs to outputs, respecting topological order (no gate evaluated before its inputs are ready).
  3. Compare against specification: Check each output against truth table or expected function from Step 1. Don't-care outputs may be either 0 or 1.
  4. Record results: Log any mismatches with failing input combination and expected versus actual output.
  5. Timing analysis (optional): Count gate levels on longest path from any input to any output. Multiply by per-gate delay to estimate worst-case propagation delay.
## Simulation Results
- **Total test vectors**: [count]
- **Vectors passed**: [count]
- **Vectors failed**: [count, with details if any]
- **Critical path**: [gate sequence, e.g., G1 -> G3 -> G7 -> G9]
- **Critical path depth**: [N gate levels]
- **Estimated worst-case delay**: [N * gate_delay]

Got: All test vectors pass. Circuit functionally correct. Critical path depth documented.

If fail: If any vector fails, trace signal path for that input combination gate by gate to find first gate producing incorrect output. Common causes: wire connected to wrong gate input, missing inversion, or error in NAND/NOR conversion.

Checks

  • All inputs and outputs named and bit widths specified
  • Truth table or minterm list covers all legal input combinations
  • Boolean expressions minimal (verified via K-map or Quine-McCluskey)
  • Every gate in netlist has all inputs connected and exactly one output
  • No combinational feedback loops in circuit
  • Fan-in constraints respected (all gates within maximum fan-in)
  • NAND/NOR conversion (if performed) preserves functional equivalence
  • Bubble pushing applied to eliminate redundant inversions
  • Exhaustive simulation passes for all non-don't-care input combinations
  • Critical path depth documented

Pitfalls

  • Combinational feedback loops: Accidentally connecting gate's output back to own input chain creates sequential element (latch), not combinational circuit. If state needed, use build-sequential-circuit skill instead.
  • Forgetting inversions in NAND/NOR conversion: Most common conversion error: dropping NOT gate during De Morgan transformation. Always apply bubble pushing systematically from outputs to inputs, not ad hoc.
  • Exceeding fan-in without decomposition: 5-input AND gate not available in 2-input library. Decompose into balanced tree to minimize propagation delay, not linear chain.
  • Ignoring don't-cares: Failing to exploit don't-care conditions during minimization leaves circuit larger than necessary. Always include don't-cares when available.
  • Confusing gate delay with wire delay: In introductory design, gate delay dominates. In real VLSI, wire delay (interconnect capacitance) can exceed gate delay. Note this limitation when estimating timing.
  • Multi-output hazards: When multiple outputs share gates, changing one output's logic can inadvertently affect shared sub-expression. Verify all outputs after any modification, not just one being changed.

See Also

  • evaluate-boolean-expression -- derive minimal Boolean expression used as input to this skill
  • build-sequential-circuit -- add state elements (flip-flops) to create sequential circuits
  • simulate-cpu-architecture -- use combinational blocks (ALU, mux, decoder) as datapath components

GitHub 저장소

pjt222/agent-almanac
경로: i18n/caveman/skills/design-logic-circuit
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

연관 스킬

content-collections

메타

이 스킬은 콘텐츠 콜렉션(Content Collections)을 위한 프로덕션 검증된 설정을 제공합니다. 콘텐츠 콜렉션은 Markdown/MDX 파일을 Zod 검증이 포함된 타입 안전한 데이터 콜렉션으로 변환해주는 TypeScript 최우선 도구입니다. 블로그, 문서 사이트 또는 콘텐츠 중심의 Vite + React 애플리케이션을 구축할 때 타입 안전성과 자동 콘텐츠 검증을 보장하기 위해 사용하세요. Vite 플러그인 구성과 MDX 컴파일부터 배포 최적화 및 스키마 검증에 이르기까지 모든 것을 다룹니다.

스킬 보기

polymarket

메타

이 스킬은 개발자들이 Polymarket 예측 시장 플랫폼을 활용한 애플리케이션을 구축할 수 있도록 지원하며, 거래 및 시장 데이터를 위한 API 통합 기능을 포함합니다. 또한 WebSocket을 통한 실시간 데이터 스트리밍을 제공하여 실시간 거래와 시장 활동을 모니터링할 수 있습니다. 이를 통해 거래 전략을 구현하거나 실시간 시장 업데이트를 처리하는 도구를 생성하는 데 활용할 수 있습니다.

스킬 보기

creating-opencode-plugins

메타

이 스킬은 개발자들이 명령어, 파일, LSP 작업 등 25개 이상의 이벤트 유형에 연결되는 OpenCode 플러그인을 만들 수 있도록 돕습니다. JavaScript/TypeScript 모듈을 위한 플러그인 구조, 이벤트 API 명세, 구현 패턴을 제공합니다. OpenCode AI 어시스턴트의 라이프사이클을 사용자 정의 이벤트 기반 로직으로 가로채거나, 모니터링하거나, 확장해야 할 때 사용하세요.

스킬 보기

sglang

메타

SGLang은 RadixAttention 프리픽스 캐싱을 활용하여 JSON, 정규식, 에이전트 워크플로우를 위한 고속 구조화 생성에 특화된 고성능 LLM 서빙 프레임워크입니다. 특히 반복되는 프리픽스가 있는 작업에서 상당히 빠른 추론 속도를 제공하여 복잡한 구조화 출력 및 다중 턴 대화에 이상적입니다. 제약 디코딩이 필요하거나 광범위한 프리픽스 공유가 있는 애플리케이션을 구축할 때는 vLLM과 같은 대안보다 SGLang을 선택하십시오.

스킬 보기