MCP HubMCP Hub
SKILL·7B7B98

form-strategy

rampstackco
업데이트됨 25 days ago
3 조회
953
132
953
GitHub에서 보기
메타design

정보

이 스킬은 개발자가 웹 폼을 설계하고 검토하여 전환율을 극대화하고, 강력한 검증을 구현하며, 스팸을 효과적으로 방지하는 데 도움을 줍니다. 다양한 폼 유형에 대한 전략, 로직 계획, 도구 선택 방법을 제공합니다. 폼 완료율이 낮거나 스팸 양이 많을 때, 또는 폼 설계 및 통합 단계에서 활용하세요.

빠른 설치

Claude Code

추천
기본
npx skills add rampstackco/claude-skills -a claude-code
플러그인 명령대체
/plugin add https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skills
Git 클론대체
git clone https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/form-strategy

Claude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요

문서

Form Strategy

Forms are where intent becomes action. Design them well or lose conversions, frustrate users, and drown in spam. Stack-agnostic.


When to use

  • Designing or redesigning a form
  • Conversion is dropping on a key form
  • Spam volume is overwhelming the inbox or database
  • Auditing forms across a site
  • Planning validation logic
  • Choosing form tooling (form service, custom build, no-code)
  • Integrating forms with CRM, email, or other downstream systems
  • Multi-step form decisions

When NOT to use

  • Generic conversion optimization (use cro-optimization)
  • The copy on the form (use landing-page-copy)
  • Backend handling beyond form-specific concerns (use frontend-component-build, code-review-web)
  • General accessibility (use accessibility-audit)

Required inputs

  • The form's purpose (what action, what outcome)
  • Current form (URL, screenshot, or fields)
  • Current performance (completion rate, spam rate, conversion to next step)
  • Downstream system (where submissions go: CRM, email, database, support tool)
  • Business context (volume, urgency of leads, cost of false vs missed signups)

The framework: 5 dimensions

Every form decision falls into one of these dimensions.

Dimension 1: Field strategy

The biggest lever. Every additional field reduces conversion.

Questions to ask for each field:

  • Is this required to deliver value to the user?
  • Is this required to deliver value to the business?
  • Can it be inferred from another source (email domain, behavior, context)?
  • Can it be asked later (after first contact, on second visit, on settings page)?

Default rule: ask for the minimum to make the next step happen. Everything else later.

For a B2B contact form: name and email get you started. Phone, company size, role are nice-to-haves that often hurt conversion more than they help qualification.

For a checkout: country, postal code, address, name, payment. Anything else (referral source, marketing opt-in, account creation) is optional or moved to post-purchase.

Dimension 2: Field design

How each field looks and behaves.

  • Labels above inputs beat placeholders. Placeholder labels disappear when typing.
  • Inline labels (floating labels) work for very compact forms.
  • Single column for almost every form. Eyes flow vertically.
  • Logical grouping with visible spacing. Don't put unrelated fields next to each other.
  • Right input type: email for emails, tel for phone, number for numbers, date for dates. Mobile keyboards adapt.
  • Autocomplete attributes: autocomplete="email", autocomplete="given-name", etc. Browsers and password managers fill them in.
  • Sensible defaults for fields where one applies (country pre-selected by IP, etc.). Don't default to anything that would mislead if wrong.

Dimension 3: Validation

Tell users what's wrong, when, and how to fix it.

  • Validate on blur, not on every keystroke. Inline errors that appear as someone types are jarring.
  • Re-validate on submit (catch fields the user skipped).
  • Specific messages: "Email must include @" beats "Invalid email."
  • Position errors next to the field they refer to.
  • Don't submit a form when there are errors. Highlight the first errored field. Scroll to it.
  • Validate server-side too. Client validation is UX. Server validation is correctness.

For format-flexible fields (phone numbers, postal codes), validate liberally. Reject only what's clearly wrong, not what's "non-standard." Many phone formats exist.

Dimension 4: Spam defense

Public forms attract spam. Plan for it from day one.

Layered defense:

  1. Honeypot field. A hidden field that humans don't fill in but bots do. If it's filled, reject silently. Free, low-friction, surprisingly effective for low-effort spam.
  2. Time-based detection. Reject submissions completed in under 2-3 seconds (bots) or after very long delays (suspicious sessions).
  3. Rate limiting. Reject if the same IP submits too many times.
  4. CAPTCHA as a last resort. Modern invisible CAPTCHAs (hCaptcha, reCAPTCHA v3, Turnstile) are low-friction. Old image CAPTCHAs are conversion-killers.
  5. Behavioral signals. Did the cursor move? Was there scroll? Modern services track this.
  6. Content filtering. Reject obvious spam content (links, foreign-language content if your audience is local, common spam words).
  7. Server-side review. A queue rather than direct delivery to inboxes for high-spam-target forms.

For most contact forms: honeypot + time check + Turnstile (or similar) is sufficient.

Dimension 5: Submission flow

What happens after submit.

  • Inline success message for short forms. Don't redirect just to confirm.
  • Confirmation page for high-value submissions (to provide next steps, set expectations).
  • Email confirmation for signups, purchases, RSVPs. Always.
  • Save data on errors so the user doesn't re-enter everything.
  • Optimistic UI (show success before the server confirms) for low-stakes forms; risky for high-stakes.

For multi-step forms:

  • Show progress (3 of 5)
  • Save state between steps (in case of refresh or navigation)
  • Allow back navigation without losing data
  • Validate per step, not just at the end

Workflow

Step 1: Audit current state

For each form on the site:

  • What's its purpose?
  • Number of fields, required vs optional
  • Current completion rate
  • Current spam rate
  • Validation rules
  • What happens after submit
  • Where the data goes downstream

Step 2: Define success per form

Different forms have different success metrics:

  • Lead form: qualified leads (defined by sales)
  • Newsletter: confirmed subscriptions (after double opt-in)
  • Contact: substantive replies (not just submissions)
  • Checkout: successful payments

Track the metric that matters, not just submissions.

Step 3: Cut fields ruthlessly

Apply the field strategy filter. For each field, answer:

  • Required to deliver value? Keep.
  • Nice to have? Move to optional or later.
  • Used for routing or qualification? Often can be inferred.

A 7-field form becomes a 3-field form. Conversion rises.

Step 4: Set up spam defense

Before launching a public form:

  • Add a honeypot field
  • Add time-based detection
  • Add rate limiting
  • Add a modern CAPTCHA if the form is high-traffic or high-spam

After launch, monitor. Tune layers based on what's actually getting through.

Step 5: Improve validation

Walk through each field:

  • Is validation specific?
  • Does it run at the right time (blur or submit, not on keystroke)?
  • Are error messages actionable?
  • Is server-side validation matching client-side?

Step 6: Verify accessibility

Critical baseline:

  • Every input has an associated label (visually visible or aria-label)
  • Errors are associated with inputs (aria-describedby, aria-invalid)
  • Focus order matches visual order
  • Color isn't the only way to indicate errors
  • Form is fully keyboard-navigable

See accessibility-audit for the full WCAG audit.

Step 7: Test downstream

Submit the form. Verify:

  • Data lands where it should
  • Required fields are populated correctly
  • Spam defenses are working (test with a script)
  • The user gets the confirmation they expect
  • Internal notification is timely

Forms break silently when downstream systems change. Test after any integration update.

Step 8: Monitor

  • Completion rate over time
  • Spam rate over time
  • Errors per submission (high errors = bad UX)
  • Drop-off field (where do people abandon?)

Failure patterns

Too many fields. Most B2B contact forms have 3x more fields than they need. Cut.

Validation that fires while typing. Annoying. Causes errors before the user has finished.

Generic error messages. "Invalid input." Where? Why? Be specific.

Required fields not marked. Users discover they're required only after submission fails. Mark required (or, for short forms, mark optional).

Autocomplete disabled. "For security." It's almost never a security improvement and always a UX cost. Leave autocomplete on.

Tab order is broken. Tab key skips fields or jumps backward. Set tabindex only when necessary; use natural DOM order.

Submit button below the fold. Especially on mobile. Users don't see it.

No save on error. User submits, has one error, returns to the form, all fields empty. Nightmare. Save the state.

Captcha as the only spam defense. Captchas are friction. Layered defense beats brute-force friction.

Captcha visible by default. Modern CAPTCHAs (Turnstile, reCAPTCHA v3) are invisible most of the time and only escalate when needed. Use those.

Newsletter signup that's actually a marketing list. Honor opt-in scope. If the user signed up for product updates, don't add them to the marketing newsletter.

Confirmation page that's a dead end. "Thanks for submitting" with no next step. What now? Provide an action (read related content, return to homepage, follow on social).

No double opt-in for marketing email. Bots and typos pollute the list. See email-deliverability for why this matters.

Email field accepting name@ as valid. Browser spec validation is loose. Validate against an actual format.

Custom date pickers worse than native. The native <input type="date"> is now good on most platforms. Don't reinvent unless you have a specific reason.

Forms that lose state on refresh. For long forms, save to localStorage and restore on load.


Output format

A form audit document includes:

  • Form inventory: every form on the site
  • Per-form review: purpose, fields, performance
  • Recommendations: field cuts, validation improvements, spam defense, design changes
  • Spam defense plan: layers per form
  • Accessibility status: WCAG compliance per form
  • Downstream integration map: where each form's data goes
  • Monitoring plan: what's tracked

If required data is unavailable

This skill's output depends on data, measurements, or tool results it cannot generate on its own. When a required input, tool, or data source is unavailable or unverifiable, the sanctioned output is the deliverable with the gap stated: what was needed, what was actually obtained or verified, and which parts of the output are affected. Fabricating, estimating, or interpolating a required number to complete the deliverable is never sanctioned. A stated gap is a complete answer.


Reference files

  • references/form-anatomy-checklist.md: A field-by-field, behavior-by-behavior checklist for auditing or designing a form, covering structure, accessibility, validation, and spam defense.

GitHub 저장소

rampstackco/claude-skills
경로: dist/codex/.agents/skills/form-strategy
0
agent-skillsai-agentsanthropicclaudeclaude-aiclaude-code
FAQ

자주 묻는 질문

form-strategy Skill이란 무엇인가요?

form-strategy은(는) rampstackco이(가) 만든 Claude Skill입니다. Skill은 Claude가 필요할 때 불러오는 지침과 리소스를 묶어 추가 프롬프트 없이 form-strategy 관련 작업을 수행할 수 있게 합니다.

form-strategy은(는) 어떻게 설치하나요?

이 페이지의 설치 명령을 사용하세요. form-strategy을(를) Claude Code 플러그인으로 추가하거나 저장소를 skills 디렉터리에 복제한 다음 Claude를 다시 시작해 Skill을 불러옵니다.

form-strategy은(는) 어떤 카테고리에 속하나요?

form-strategy은(는) 메타 카테고리에 속합니다.

form-strategy은(는) 무료로 사용할 수 있나요?

네. form-strategy은(는) AIMCP에 등록되어 있으며 무료로 설치할 수 있습니다.

연관 스킬

content-collections
메타

이 스킬은 콘텐츠 콜렉션(Content Collections)을 위한 프로덕션 검증된 설정을 제공합니다. 콘텐츠 콜렉션은 Markdown/MDX 파일을 Zod 검증이 포함된 타입 안전한 데이터 콜렉션으로 변환해주는 TypeScript 최우선 도구입니다. 블로그, 문서 사이트 또는 콘텐츠 중심의 Vite + React 애플리케이션을 구축할 때 타입 안전성과 자동 콘텐츠 검증을 보장하기 위해 사용하세요. Vite 플러그인 구성과 MDX 컴파일부터 배포 최적화 및 스키마 검증에 이르기까지 모든 것을 다룹니다.

스킬 보기
polymarket
메타

이 스킬은 개발자들이 Polymarket 예측 시장 플랫폼을 활용한 애플리케이션을 구축할 수 있도록 지원하며, 거래 및 시장 데이터를 위한 API 통합 기능을 포함합니다. 또한 WebSocket을 통한 실시간 데이터 스트리밍을 제공하여 실시간 거래와 시장 활동을 모니터링할 수 있습니다. 이를 통해 거래 전략을 구현하거나 실시간 시장 업데이트를 처리하는 도구를 생성하는 데 활용할 수 있습니다.

스킬 보기
creating-opencode-plugins
메타

이 스킬은 개발자들이 명령어, 파일, LSP 작업 등 25개 이상의 이벤트 유형에 연결되는 OpenCode 플러그인을 만들 수 있도록 돕습니다. JavaScript/TypeScript 모듈을 위한 플러그인 구조, 이벤트 API 명세, 구현 패턴을 제공합니다. OpenCode AI 어시스턴트의 라이프사이클을 사용자 정의 이벤트 기반 로직으로 가로채거나, 모니터링하거나, 확장해야 할 때 사용하세요.

스킬 보기
sglang
메타

SGLang은 RadixAttention 프리픽스 캐싱을 활용하여 JSON, 정규식, 에이전트 워크플로우를 위한 고속 구조화 생성에 특화된 고성능 LLM 서빙 프레임워크입니다. 특히 반복되는 프리픽스가 있는 작업에서 상당히 빠른 추론 속도를 제공하여 복잡한 구조화 출력 및 다중 턴 대화에 이상적입니다. 제약 디코딩이 필요하거나 광범위한 프리픽스 공유가 있는 애플리케이션을 구축할 때는 vLLM과 같은 대안보다 SGLang을 선택하십시오.

스킬 보기