suede-marketing-loops
정보
이 스킬은 광고 피로도 모니터링이나 콘텐츠 리프레시와 같은 작업을 위해 정의된 트리거, 실행 주기, 검토 지점을 갖춘 구조화된 반복 마케팅 워크플로를 설계합니다. 이는 일회성 아이디어나 실시간 자동화가 아닌, 반복 가능한 운영 루프를 생성하기 위해 특화되어 있습니다. 명확한 입력값, 결정 규칙, 측정 가능한 산출물이 있는 제한된 프로세스가 필요할 때 사용하십시오.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skillsgit clone https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/suede-marketing-loopsClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Suede Marketing Loops
Suede turns repeatable marketing work into bounded loops with a defined trigger, cadence, input contract, self-check, durable state, human checkpoint, and stopping condition. A loop may watch SEO opportunities, ad fatigue, or churn signals, but it never earns permission to publish, spend, or mutate production merely because it runs on a schedule.
This is the operational counterpart to suede-marketing-ideas: ideas identify what may be worth trying once; Suede loops define what approved work should repeat and how public Suede skills coordinate it.
How to Use This Skill
Check for product marketing context first: if .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for what's missing.
Then:
- Clarify the job. What outcome should this loop protect or grow? (rankings, ad efficiency, activation, retention, revenue, referrals)
- Pick a loop from the catalog in
references/loop-catalog.md— or adapt the closest one. - Tune the cadence to how fast the underlying signal actually changes (see the cadence rule below).
- Confirm the human checkpoint. Decide what the loop does autonomously vs. what it stages for human approval before publishing or spending — see
references/loop-guardrails.md. - Schedule it (see "Scheduling a loop" below).
Building more than one loop, or a whole marketing operating system? See references/loop-orchestration.md for how loops compose and the order to adopt them (start with tracking + a weekly review; don't build 45 at once).
Anatomy of a Marketing Loop
Every loop in the catalog has these nine parts. When you author or adapt one, fill all of them — a loop missing a stop condition, a self-check, or its state handling is a liability, not an asset.
| Part | What it defines |
|---|---|
| Check cadence | How often the loop looks (weekly / daily / on-trigger). Match it to signal speed. |
| Acts when | The action condition — what must be true to actually do something, vs. just check and skip. Most runs of a good loop are "checked, nothing to do." |
| Purpose | The one outcome this loop exists to move. |
| Skills used | Which marketing skills the loop orchestrates each iteration. |
| Loop body | The ordered steps run each iteration. |
| Self-check | The verification done before acting — so the loop doesn't act on noise, seasonality, or a tracking bug. |
| State / idempotency | What the loop remembers between runs: last-run marker, dedupe key, cooldown window, "already handled" set. Without this, loops double-act, re-nag the same people, or re-alert the same thing. Non-negotiable for anything scheduled — see references/loop-state.md for where state lives and the idempotency patterns. |
| Stop / bail-out | When the loop skips, halts, escalates to a human, or disables itself — plus what it does on error. Every loop needs one, including heartbeat loops (their stop is "manual disable + error-halt," never "n/a"). |
| Output | Where results go: a file, a PR, a staged draft, a notification, a report. |
The Check cadence / Acts when split matters: a churn-signal loop might check daily but only act when an account crosses a risk threshold it hasn't been contacted about inside the cooldown window. Conflating the two produces loops that either miss the window or spam.
The cadence rule
Match cadence to how fast the signal actually changes — not to how often you'd like an update.
| Signal | Realistic cadence | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Rankings, backlinks, domain authority | Weekly | Move slowly; daily checks are noise |
| Ad creative fatigue, CPA drift | Every 2–3 days | Meta/Google feedback loops are days, not hours |
| Activation / onboarding funnel | Weekly | Needs enough signups to be significant |
| Churn signals | Daily or on-trigger | Early intervention window is short |
| Content / copy decay | Monthly | Traffic erosion is gradual |
| Competitor changes | Weekly | Pricing/positioning shifts are infrequent but matter |
| Social listening / mentions | Daily | Engagement windows close fast |
Over-frequent loops are the most common failure mode: they generate busywork, burn budget, and train you to ignore the output.
When NOT to loop
Not everything should be automated on a cadence. Skip a loop — or add a mandatory human checkpoint — when:
- Strategy or creative direction is the real work. Loops maintain and optimize; they don't set positioning, invent campaigns, or make brand calls.
- The action publishes or spends without review. Auto-drafting an ad, email, or post is fine. Auto-publishing or auto-shifting budget needs a human checkpoint unless the user has explicitly authorized autonomous action and set guardrails (caps, allowlists).
- The signal is too sparse to be significant. A weekly conversion-rate loop on 40 visitors/week is measuring noise.
- It's a vanity loop. If nobody acts on the output, delete the loop. A loop that emails a dashboard nobody reads is worse than nothing.
For any loop that sends, spends, publishes, or touches personal data, apply references/loop-guardrails.md — the two-tier action model (autonomous-safe vs. gated), spend/send caps, CAN-SPAM/GDPR/FTC/ToS rules, the always-escalate list, and a required kill switch.
Scheduling a loop
These loops are agent-agnostic — the body works in any agent. The scheduling depends on your environment:
- Scheduling-capable environment — discover the installed scheduler, automation connector, or native scheduling primitives first and read their current instructions. Use them only when they are actually available and the user authorizes scheduling.
- Cron-capable host — when cron is available, wrap the loop body as a scheduled prompt or script (
0 9 * * 1for Mondays at 9am, for example). - Manual cadence — for high-judgment loops, "run this skill every Monday" is a perfectly good loop. The value is the repeatable body, not the automation.
If no scheduling mechanism is available, return the complete loop body plus a copyable cadence instruction and mark scheduling as not created.
Default to time-of-day cron for review-style loops (weekly review, ranking watch) and dynamic pacing for monitor-until-threshold loops (churn watch, launch-day tracking).
The Catalog
references/loop-catalog.md holds the full library — 45 marketing loops with thorough funnel coverage: SEO & Content, Paid, Earned/Social/Partnerships, Activation, Retention, Revenue, Referral & Advocacy, and Ongoing Ops. Each is a complete, adaptable spec. Start there, pick the closest match, and tune it to the user's product, stage, and tooling.
Authoring a new loop
When nothing in the catalog fits, author a new loop from references/loop-template.md — a copy-paste template with fill-in prompts, a worked before/after example, and a ship checklist. Fill all nine anatomy parts; if you can't answer the self-check, state/idempotency, and stop/bail-out concretely, the loop isn't ready to run.
Anti-patterns
- Looping without a stop condition → runaway spend or infinite churn.
- Same cadence for every loop → most run too often and get ignored.
- No self-check → the loop acts on noise, seasonality, or a tracking bug.
- No human checkpoint on spend/publish actions.
- Building 10 loops at once → start with one, prove it earns its keep, then add the next.
Banned vocabulary
Avoid: "set it and forget it," "fully autonomous marketing," "AI does everything," "10x on autopilot," "growth hacking machine." Loops are disciplined systems with checkpoints, not magic. Describe them honestly.
Boundaries
- Do not create, enable, schedule, or modify a recurring automation without explicit authorization.
- Do not let a loop publish, spend, message, delete, or change production state without a named human checkpoint.
- Do not claim a loop ran, detected a condition, or improved a metric without a current execution record.
- Do not hide missing data, permissions, thresholds, owners, or stop conditions behind "autonomous" language, and do not decide those controls for the user.
Routing
- Use
suede-marketing-ideasfor one-off tactics andsuede-ab-testingfor experimentation. - Use
suede-analyticsfor measurement inputs. - Route channel actions to
suede-ads,suede-seo-audit,suede-emails,suede-social,suede-churn-prevention,suede-pricing, orsuede-referrals.
GitHub 저장소
자주 묻는 질문
suede-marketing-loops Skill이란 무엇인가요?
suede-marketing-loops은(는) JasonColapietro이(가) 만든 Claude Skill입니다. Skill은 Claude가 필요할 때 불러오는 지침과 리소스를 묶어 추가 프롬프트 없이 suede-marketing-loops 관련 작업을 수행할 수 있게 합니다.
suede-marketing-loops은(는) 어떻게 설치하나요?
이 페이지의 설치 명령을 사용하세요. suede-marketing-loops을(를) Claude Code 플러그인으로 추가하거나 저장소를 skills 디렉터리에 복제한 다음 Claude를 다시 시작해 Skill을 불러옵니다.
suede-marketing-loops은(는) 어떤 카테고리에 속하나요?
suede-marketing-loops은(는) 메타 카테고리에 속합니다.
suede-marketing-loops은(는) 무료로 사용할 수 있나요?
네. suede-marketing-loops은(는) AIMCP에 등록되어 있으며 무료로 설치할 수 있습니다.
연관 스킬
이 스킬은 콘텐츠 콜렉션(Content Collections)을 위한 프로덕션 검증된 설정을 제공합니다. 콘텐츠 콜렉션은 Markdown/MDX 파일을 Zod 검증이 포함된 타입 안전한 데이터 콜렉션으로 변환해주는 TypeScript 최우선 도구입니다. 블로그, 문서 사이트 또는 콘텐츠 중심의 Vite + React 애플리케이션을 구축할 때 타입 안전성과 자동 콘텐츠 검증을 보장하기 위해 사용하세요. Vite 플러그인 구성과 MDX 컴파일부터 배포 최적화 및 스키마 검증에 이르기까지 모든 것을 다룹니다.
이 스킬은 개발자들이 Polymarket 예측 시장 플랫폼을 활용한 애플리케이션을 구축할 수 있도록 지원하며, 거래 및 시장 데이터를 위한 API 통합 기능을 포함합니다. 또한 WebSocket을 통한 실시간 데이터 스트리밍을 제공하여 실시간 거래와 시장 활동을 모니터링할 수 있습니다. 이를 통해 거래 전략을 구현하거나 실시간 시장 업데이트를 처리하는 도구를 생성하는 데 활용할 수 있습니다.
이 스킬은 개발자들이 명령어, 파일, LSP 작업 등 25개 이상의 이벤트 유형에 연결되는 OpenCode 플러그인을 만들 수 있도록 돕습니다. JavaScript/TypeScript 모듈을 위한 플러그인 구조, 이벤트 API 명세, 구현 패턴을 제공합니다. OpenCode AI 어시스턴트의 라이프사이클을 사용자 정의 이벤트 기반 로직으로 가로채거나, 모니터링하거나, 확장해야 할 때 사용하세요.
SGLang은 RadixAttention 프리픽스 캐싱을 활용하여 JSON, 정규식, 에이전트 워크플로우를 위한 고속 구조화 생성에 특화된 고성능 LLM 서빙 프레임워크입니다. 특히 반복되는 프리픽스가 있는 작업에서 상당히 빠른 추론 속도를 제공하여 복잡한 구조화 출력 및 다중 턴 대화에 이상적입니다. 제약 디코딩이 필요하거나 광범위한 프리픽스 공유가 있는 애플리케이션을 구축할 때는 vLLM과 같은 대안보다 SGLang을 선택하십시오.
