analytics-strategy
정보
이 스킬은 개발자들이 이벤트 분류 체계, 핵심 성과 지표(KPI) 계층 구조, 대시보드 아키텍처를 포함한 포괄적인 분석 전략을 설계하도록 돕습니다. 추적 체계를 계획하거나 기존 측정 방식을 검토할 때, 혹은 GA4나 Mixpanel과 같은 도구를 설정할 때 활용할 수 있습니다. 데이터를 명확한 비즈니스 의사결정으로 전환하는 실행 가능한 측정 프레임워크를 구축하는 데 사용하세요.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add rampstackco/claude-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skillsgit clone https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/analytics-strategyClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Analytics Strategy
Design measurement frameworks that produce decisions, not just dashboards. Stack-agnostic. Tool-agnostic.
This skill is for measurement planning. For conversion optimization, use cro-optimization. For SEO measurement specifically, use seo-onpage and adjacent SEO skills.
When to use
- Setting up analytics on a new product or site
- Auditing existing analytics setup
- Designing dashboards for a team or business
- Defining KPIs and a north star metric
- Building event taxonomies for product analytics
- Designing attribution models for marketing
- Translating business questions into measurement plans
When NOT to use
- Conversion testing or optimization (use
cro-optimization) - SEO performance measurement (use SEO skills)
- Pure data infrastructure decisions (different domain)
Required inputs
- The business or product context (what does success look like)
- The audience for the analytics (who needs to make what decisions)
- The current measurement state (existing tools, tracking, gaps)
- The questions the team needs to answer
The framework: 4 layers
A complete measurement strategy covers all four. Each layer feeds the next.
1. North star and KPI hierarchy
The single metric that captures the most important outcome, plus the supporting metrics.
North star metric:
- One metric. Singular.
- Captures customer-perceived value.
- Leads to revenue, but isn't revenue itself (revenue is too far downstream).
- Examples: weekly active users, completed jobs, revenue-generating sessions, hours of value delivered.
Underneath the north star, the KPI hierarchy:
North star metric
├── Acquisition KPI (how new users enter)
├── Activation KPI (when new users get value)
├── Engagement KPI (how often users return)
├── Retention KPI (how many stick over time)
└── Monetization KPI (how value translates to revenue)
This is the "AARRR" or "pirate metrics" framework. It works because it covers the full lifecycle.
2. Event taxonomy
The vocabulary the product uses to describe what users do.
Event design principles:
- Verb + noun.
signed_up,created_project,completed_checkout. Past tense, snake_case. - One event per discrete action. Not "interacted_with_modal" - too vague. Specifically
opened_modal_X,closed_modal_X,confirmed_in_modal_X. - Properties capture context. Each event has properties (key-value pairs) for context.
signed_uphas properties likesignup_method,referrer,plan. - Standardize property names.
user_ideverywhere, notuserIdhere andidthere. - Document everything. A tracking plan that lives nowhere is a tracking plan no one follows.
Event coverage:
- All key user actions tracked
- All conversion points tracked
- All errors tracked
- All page views tracked (with consistent properties)
- All button clicks that matter (not all button clicks - that's noise)
Anti-patterns:
- 500+ events with no documentation
- Inconsistent naming (
buttonClicked,Button Clicked,clicked_button) - Property keys that vary across events
- Events fired client-side that should be server-side (and vice versa)
- PII in event properties (privacy issue and tooling issue)
3. Dashboards and reports
The interface between data and decisions.
Dashboard design principles:
- One audience per dashboard. Executive dashboard != product team dashboard. Different metrics, different cadence.
- One question per chart. A chart should answer one question, not three.
- Annotations matter. Note launches, experiments, holidays, outages. A spike means nothing without context.
- Context comparisons. "10,000 signups this month" - compared to what? Last month, last year, target?
- Lead with the action. What does this dashboard help someone decide?
Common dashboard types:
| Dashboard | Audience | Metrics | Cadence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Executive | Leadership | North star, top 3 KPIs, big-picture trends | Weekly review |
| Product | Product team | Funnel metrics, feature adoption, retention | Daily / weekly |
| Marketing | Marketing team | Acquisition by channel, CAC, attribution | Daily / weekly |
| Operations | Ops / on-call | Performance, errors, capacity | Real-time |
| Custom (per team) | Specific team | Their specific KPIs | Their cadence |
4. Attribution and segmentation
How to connect cause and effect.
Attribution models:
- First-touch. Credit the first interaction. Useful for awareness understanding.
- Last-touch. Credit the final interaction before conversion. Default in many tools, often misleading.
- Linear. Spread credit equally across touches. Avoids over-crediting any single channel.
- Time-decay. Recent touches get more credit. Reasonable middle ground.
- Position-based. First and last get more credit, middle touches less.
- Data-driven (algorithmic). Tools like Google Analytics 4 use ML. Black box but increasingly the default.
For most businesses: pick one primary attribution model, use multiple secondary models for validation.
Segmentation principles:
- Segment by what causes different behavior, not by what's easy to track
- Useful segments: source/channel, plan tier, geography, device, cohort (signup date)
- Less useful: demographic guesses without behavioral validation
The tracking plan document
Output of the analytics strategy. A living document.
Structure:
- Goals and KPIs. Business objectives, north star, KPI hierarchy.
- Event catalog. Every event, with properties, when fired, why tracked.
- User properties. Persistent attributes (plan, signup_date, role).
- Page taxonomy. Page categories, page properties.
- Naming conventions. Snake_case, verb_noun, etc.
- Implementation notes. Client-side vs server-side, SDK details, sampling.
- Privacy and compliance. PII rules, consent handling, data retention.
- Governance. Who can add events, review process, change log.
Workflow
- Define the questions. What does the team need to answer? Working backward from questions to metrics works better than starting from metrics.
- Define the north star. One metric. Tested against the criteria above.
- Build the KPI hierarchy. Acquisition, activation, engagement, retention, monetization.
- Audit existing tracking. What's there? What's broken? What's missing?
- Design the event taxonomy. Cover the user journey. Document everything.
- Implement with care. Test each event. Verify properties. Catch issues in staging.
- Build dashboards. One per audience. Lead with action.
- Establish review cadence. Weekly business review, monthly KPI review, quarterly strategy review.
- Govern. Who adds events, who reviews, how changes propagate.
Failure patterns
- Tracking everything. Noise overwhelms signal.
- Tracking nothing strategic. Page views and that's it. Cannot answer real questions.
- No documentation. Tracking plan lives in someone's head.
- Inconsistent naming. Same concept, three names. Reports become detective work.
- Events fired but never reviewed. Tracking debt accumulates.
- Dashboards no one looks at. Built for vanity, not decisions.
- Single attribution model treated as truth. All models lie. Some lie usefully.
- PII in events. Compliance and tooling problems.
- Client-side only. Critical business events should be server-side too. Ad blockers, network issues, edge cases lose client-side events.
- No connection to business outcomes. Metrics exist in a silo, never connected to revenue, retention, or strategic decisions.
Output format
Default output: a markdown tracking plan at analytics-tracking-plan.md plus a dashboard inventory.
Tracking plan structure:
# Tracking Plan
## North star metric
[Definition, calculation, target]
## KPI hierarchy
[Each KPI with definition, calculation, owner]
## Event catalog
| Event | When fired | Properties | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| user_signed_up | After successful signup form submit | source, plan, referrer | Marketing | Live |
| project_created | When user clicks Create Project | project_type, template_used | Product | Live |
| ... | | | | |
## User properties
[List with definitions]
## Naming conventions
[Rules]
## Privacy and compliance
[Rules]
## Governance
[Process]
Reference files
references/event-taxonomy-template.md- Starter event catalog with patterns for common product types.
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
cro-optimization
기타이 Claude Skill은 가설 기반 A/B 테스트를 위한 종단 간 전환율 최적화 지침을 제공합니다. 개발자가 퍼널을 감사하고, 테스트 가설을 생성하며, 실험을 설계하고, 통계적 엄격성으로 결과를 분석할 수 있도록 지원합니다. 전환 흐름을 최적화하거나, 모호한 테스트 데이터를 해석하거나, 처음부터 테스트 프로그램을 구조화해야 할 때 사용하세요.
analytics-strategy
기타이 스킬은 개발자들이 이벤트 분류 체계, 핵심 성과 지표(KPI) 계층 구조, 대시보드 아키텍처를 포함한 포괄적인 분석 전략을 설계하도록 돕습니다. 추적 체계를 계획하거나, 기존 측정 방식을 검토하거나, 데이터 기반 의사결정이 필요할 때 활성화됩니다. GA4부터 Mixpanel에 이르기까지 다양한 도구에 적용 가능한 분석 구현 프레임워크를 제공합니다.
cro-optimization
기타이 Claude Skill은 퍼널 감사와 가설 생성부터 테스트 설계와 통계 분석에 이르기까지 종단간 전환율 최적화 가이드를 제공합니다. A/B 테스트 실행, 모호한 결과 해석, 최적화 작업 체계화가 필요한 개발자를 위해 설계되었습니다. 이 기술은 스택에 구애받지 않으며 체계적인 감사 → 가설 수립 → 테스트 → 의사결정 워크플로우를 따릅니다.
content-collections
메타이 스킬은 콘텐츠 콜렉션(Content Collections)을 위한 프로덕션 검증된 설정을 제공합니다. 콘텐츠 콜렉션은 Markdown/MDX 파일을 Zod 검증이 포함된 타입 안전한 데이터 콜렉션으로 변환해주는 TypeScript 최우선 도구입니다. 블로그, 문서 사이트 또는 콘텐츠 중심의 Vite + React 애플리케이션을 구축할 때 타입 안전성과 자동 콘텐츠 검증을 보장하기 위해 사용하세요. Vite 플러그인 구성과 MDX 컴파일부터 배포 최적화 및 스키마 검증에 이르기까지 모든 것을 다룹니다.
