evolve-skill
정보
`evolve-skill` 스킬은 기존 스킬을 업데이트하여, 내용을 그 자리에서 개선하거나 더 고급의 변형을 생성합니다. 요구사항 수집부터 변경 사항 적용, 버전 메타데이터 업데이트, 그리고 상호 참조 동기화에 이르는 전체 과정을 처리합니다. 스킬의 단계가 구식이 되었거나, 피드백에서 결함이 발견되었을 때, 혹은 복잡성 업그레이드가 필요할 때 사용하세요.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/evolve-skillClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Evolve an Existing Skill
Improve, extend, or create an advanced variant of a skill that was originally authored with create-skill. This procedure covers the maintenance side of the skill lifecycle: assessing gaps, applying targeted improvements, bumping versions, and keeping the registry and cross-references in sync.
When to Use
- A skill's procedure steps are outdated or incomplete after tooling changes
- User feedback reveals missing pitfalls, unclear steps, or weak validation
- A skill needs to grow from basic to intermediate (or intermediate to advanced)
- An advanced variant is needed alongside the original (e.g.,
create-r-packageandcreate-r-package-advanced) - Related skills were added or removed and cross-references are stale
Inputs
- Required: Path to the existing SKILL.md to evolve
- Required: Evolution trigger (feedback, tooling change, complexity upgrade, new related skills, discovered pitfalls)
- Optional: Target complexity level if changing (basic, intermediate, advanced)
- Optional: Whether to create an advanced variant instead of refining in-place (default: refine in-place)
Procedure
Step 1: Assess the Current Skill
Read the existing SKILL.md and evaluate each section against the quality checklist:
| Section | What to Check | Common Issues |
|---|---|---|
| Frontmatter | All required fields present, description < 1024 chars | Missing tags, stale version |
| When to Use | 3-5 concrete trigger conditions | Vague or overlapping triggers |
| Inputs | Required vs optional clearly separated | Missing defaults for optional inputs |
| Procedure | Each step has code + Expected + On failure | Missing On failure blocks, pseudocode instead of real commands |
| Validation | Each item is binary pass/fail | Subjective criteria ("code is clean") |
| Common Pitfalls | 3-6 with cause and avoidance | Too generic ("be careful") |
| Related Skills | 2-5 valid skill references | Stale references to renamed/removed skills |
# Read the skill
cat skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
# Check frontmatter parses
head -20 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
# Verify related skills still exist
grep -oP '`[\w-]+`' skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md | sort -u
Got: A list of specific gaps, weaknesses, or improvement opportunities.
If fail: If the SKILL.md doesn't exist or has no frontmatter, this skill doesn't apply — use create-skill instead to author it from scratch.
Step 2: Gather Evolution Requirements
Identify and categorize what triggered the evolution:
| Trigger | Example | Typical Scope |
|---|---|---|
| User feedback | "Step 3 is unclear" | Refinement |
| Tooling change | New API version, deprecated command | Refinement |
| Discovered pitfall | Common failure not documented | Refinement |
| Complexity upgrade | Skill is too shallow for real use | Refinement or variant |
| New related skills | Adjacent skill was added | Refinement (cross-refs) |
| Advanced use case | Power users need deeper coverage | Variant |
Document the specific changes needed before editing. List each change with its target section.
Got: A concrete list of changes (e.g., "Add On failure to Step 4", "Add new Step 6 for edge case X", "Update Related Skills to include new-skill").
If fail: If the changes are unclear, consult the user for clarification before proceeding. Vague evolution goals produce vague improvements.
Step 3: Choose Evolution Scope
Use this decision matrix to determine whether to refine in-place or create a variant:
| Criteria | Refinement (in-place) | Advanced Variant (new skill) |
|---|---|---|
| Skill ID | Unchanged | New ID: <skill>-advanced |
| File path | Same SKILL.md | New directory |
| Version bump | Patch or minor | Starts at 1.0 |
| Complexity | May increase | Higher than original |
| Registry | No new entry | New entry added |
| Symlinks | No change | New symlinks needed |
| Original skill | Modified directly | Left intact, gains cross-reference |
Refinement: Choose when improving quality, fixing gaps, or adding modest new content. The skill keeps its identity.
Variant: Choose when the evolved version would double the length, change the target audience, or require substantially different inputs. The original stays as-is for simpler use cases.
Got: A clear decision — refinement or variant — with rationale.
If fail: If unsure, default to refinement. You can always extract a variant later; it's harder to merge one back.
Step 4: Apply Content Changes
For Refinements
Edit the existing SKILL.md directly:
# Open for editing
# Add/revise procedure steps
# Strengthen Expected/On failure pairs
# Add tables or examples
# Update When to Use triggers
# Revise Inputs if scope changed
Follow these editing rules:
- Preserve all existing sections — add content, don't remove sections
- Keep step numbering sequential after insertions
- Every new or modified step must have both Expected and On failure
- New pitfalls go at the end of the Common Pitfalls section
- New related skills go at the end of the Related Skills section
For Variants
# Create the variant directory
mkdir -p skills/<skill-name>-advanced/
# Copy the original as a starting point
cp skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md skills/<skill-name>-advanced/SKILL.md
# Edit the variant:
# - Change `name` to `<skill-name>-advanced`
# - Update `description` to reflect the advanced scope
# - Raise `complexity` (e.g., intermediate → advanced)
# - Reset `version` to "1.0"
# - Add/expand procedure steps for the advanced use case
# - Reference the original in Related Skills as a prerequisite
Got: The SKILL.md (refined or new variant) passes the assessment checklist from Step 1.
If fail: If a step edit breaks the document structure, use git diff to review changes and revert partial edits with git checkout -- <file>.
Step 4.5: Sync Translated Variants
Required when translations exist. This step applies to both human authors and AI agents following this procedure. Do not skip — stale
source_commitvalues causenpm run validate:translationsto report false staleness warnings across all locales.
Check whether translations exist for the evolved skill and update them to reflect the new source state:
# Check for existing translations
ls i18n/*/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md 2>/dev/null
If translations exist
- Get the current source commit hash:
SOURCE_COMMIT=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
- Update
source_commitin each translated file's frontmatter:
for locale_file in i18n/*/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md; do
sed -i "s/^source_commit: .*/source_commit: $SOURCE_COMMIT/" "$locale_file"
done
- Flag files for re-translation by including affected locales in the commit message:
evolve(<skill-name>): <description of changes>
Translations flagged for re-sync: de, zh-CN, ja, es
Changed sections: <list sections that changed>
- Regenerate translation status files:
npm run translation:status
If no translations exist
No action needed. Proceed to Step 5.
For variants
Defer translation of new variants until the variant stabilizes (1-2 versions). Translating a v1.0 variant that may change substantially by v1.2 wastes effort. Add translations after the variant has been refined at least once.
Got: All translated files have source_commit updated to the current commit. The commit message notes which locales need re-translation and which sections changed. npm run translation:status exits 0.
If fail: If sed fails to match the frontmatter field, the translated file may have non-standard formatting. Open it manually and verify it has source_commit in its YAML frontmatter. If the field is missing, the file was not scaffolded correctly — re-scaffold with npm run translate:scaffold.
Step 5: Update Version and Metadata
Bump the version field in frontmatter following semver conventions:
| Change Type | Version Bump | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Typo fix, wording clarification | Patch: 1.0 → 1.1 | Fixed unclear sentence in Step 3 |
| New step, new pitfall, new table | Minor: 1.0 → 2.0 | Added Step 7 for edge case handling |
| Restructured procedure, changed inputs | Major: 1.0 → 2.0 | Reorganized from 5 to 8 steps |
Also update:
complexityif the scope expanded (e.g., basic → intermediate)tagsif the coverage area changeddescriptionif the skill's scope is materially different
Got: Frontmatter version reflects the magnitude of changes. New variants start at "1.0".
If fail: If you forget to bump the version, the next evolution will have no way to distinguish the current state from the previous one. Always bump before committing.
Step 6: Update Registry and Cross-References
For Refinements
No registry changes are needed (path unchanged). Update cross-references only if Related Skills changed in other skills:
# Check if any skill references the evolved skill
grep -r "<skill-name>" skills/*/SKILL.md
For Variants
Add the new skill to skills/_registry.yml:
- id: <skill-name>-advanced
path: <skill-name>-advanced/SKILL.md
complexity: advanced
language: multi
description: One-line description of the advanced variant
Then:
- Increment
total_skillsat the top of the registry - Add Related Skills cross-reference in the original skill pointing to the variant
- Add Related Skills cross-reference in the variant pointing to the original
- Create symlinks for slash command discovery:
# Project-level
ln -s ../../skills/<skill-name>-advanced .claude/skills/<skill-name>-advanced
# Global
ln -s /mnt/d/dev/p/agent-almanac/skills/<skill-name>-advanced ~/.claude/skills/<skill-name>-advanced
Got: Registry total_skills matches find skills -name SKILL.md | wc -l. Cross-references are bidirectional.
If fail: If the registry count is wrong, run find skills -name SKILL.md | wc -l to get the true count and correct the registry. For broken symlinks, use readlink -f to debug resolution.
Step 7: Validate the Evolved Skill
Run the full validation checklist:
- SKILL.md exists at the expected path
- YAML frontmatter parses without errors
-
versionwas bumped (refinement) or set to "1.0" (variant) - All sections present: When to Use, Inputs, Procedure, Validation, Common Pitfalls, Related Skills
- Every procedure step has Expected and On failure blocks
- Related Skills reference valid, existing skill names
- Registry entry exists with correct path (variants only)
-
total_skillscount matches actual skill count on disk - Symlinks resolve correctly (variants only)
-
git diffshows no accidental deletions from the original content - For refinements with translations:
source_commitupdated or translations flagged for re-sync
# Verify frontmatter
head -20 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md
# Count skills on disk vs registry
find skills -name SKILL.md | wc -l
grep total_skills skills/_registry.yml
# Check symlinks (for variants)
ls -la .claude/skills/<skill-name>-advanced
readlink -f .claude/skills/<skill-name>-advanced/SKILL.md
# Review all changes
git diff
Got: All checklist items pass. The evolved skill is ready to commit.
If fail: Address each failing item individually. The most common post-evolution issue is a stale total_skills count — always verify it last.
Validation
- SKILL.md exists and has valid YAML frontmatter
-
versionfield reflects the changes made - All procedure steps have Expected and On failure blocks
- Related Skills references are valid (no broken cross-references)
- Registry
total_skillsmatches actual count on disk - For variants: new entry in
_registry.ymlwith correct path - For variants: symlinks created at
.claude/skills/and~/.claude/skills/ -
git diffconfirms no accidental content removal - For refinements with translations:
source_commitupdated or translations flagged for re-sync
Pitfalls
- Forgetting to bump version: Without version bumps, there's no way to track what changed or when. Always update
versionin frontmatter before committing. - Accidental content deletion: When restructuring steps, it's easy to drop an On failure block or a table row. Always review
git diffbefore committing. - Stale cross-references: When creating a variant, both the original and the variant need to reference each other. One-directional references leave the graph incomplete.
- Registry count drift: After creating a variant, the
total_skillscount must be incremented. Forgetting this causes validation failures in other skills that check the registry. - Stale translations after evolution: With 1,288 translation files in the repo, every skill evolution triggers staleness in up to 4 locale files. Always check for existing translations with
ls i18n/*/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.mdand updatesource_commitin each translated file's frontmatter, or flag them for re-translation in the commit message. Skipping this causesnpm run validate:translationsto report stale warnings. - Scope creep during refinement: A refinement that doubles the skill's length should probably be a variant instead. If you're adding more than 3 new procedure steps, reconsider the scope decision from Step 3.
- Avoid
git mvon NTFS-mounted paths (WSL): On/mnt/paths,git mvfor directories can create broken permissions (d?????????). Usemkdir -p+ copy files +git rmthe old path instead. See the environment guide troubleshooting section.
Related Skills
create-skill— foundation for authoring new skills; evolve-skill assumes this was followed originallycommit-changes— commit the evolved skill with a descriptive messageconfigure-git-repository— version-controlled skill changessecurity-audit-codebase— review evolved skills for accidentally included secrets
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
content-collections
메타이 스킬은 콘텐츠 콜렉션(Content Collections)을 위한 프로덕션 검증된 설정을 제공합니다. 콘텐츠 콜렉션은 Markdown/MDX 파일을 Zod 검증이 포함된 타입 안전한 데이터 콜렉션으로 변환해주는 TypeScript 최우선 도구입니다. 블로그, 문서 사이트 또는 콘텐츠 중심의 Vite + React 애플리케이션을 구축할 때 타입 안전성과 자동 콘텐츠 검증을 보장하기 위해 사용하세요. Vite 플러그인 구성과 MDX 컴파일부터 배포 최적화 및 스키마 검증에 이르기까지 모든 것을 다룹니다.
polymarket
메타이 스킬은 개발자들이 Polymarket 예측 시장 플랫폼을 활용한 애플리케이션을 구축할 수 있도록 지원하며, 거래 및 시장 데이터를 위한 API 통합 기능을 포함합니다. 또한 WebSocket을 통한 실시간 데이터 스트리밍을 제공하여 실시간 거래와 시장 활동을 모니터링할 수 있습니다. 이를 통해 거래 전략을 구현하거나 실시간 시장 업데이트를 처리하는 도구를 생성하는 데 활용할 수 있습니다.
creating-opencode-plugins
메타이 스킬은 개발자들이 명령어, 파일, LSP 작업 등 25개 이상의 이벤트 유형에 연결되는 OpenCode 플러그인을 만들 수 있도록 돕습니다. JavaScript/TypeScript 모듈을 위한 플러그인 구조, 이벤트 API 명세, 구현 패턴을 제공합니다. OpenCode AI 어시스턴트의 라이프사이클을 사용자 정의 이벤트 기반 로직으로 가로채거나, 모니터링하거나, 확장해야 할 때 사용하세요.
sglang
메타SGLang은 RadixAttention 프리픽스 캐싱을 활용하여 JSON, 정규식, 에이전트 워크플로우를 위한 고속 구조화 생성에 특화된 고성능 LLM 서빙 프레임워크입니다. 특히 반복되는 프리픽스가 있는 작업에서 상당히 빠른 추론 속도를 제공하여 복잡한 구조화 출력 및 다중 턴 대화에 이상적입니다. 제약 디코딩이 필요하거나 광범위한 프리픽스 공유가 있는 애플리케이션을 구축할 때는 vLLM과 같은 대안보다 SGLang을 선택하십시오.
