MCP HubMCP Hub
스킬 목록으로 돌아가기

decommission-validated-system

pjt222
업데이트됨 2 days ago
8 조회
17
2
17
GitHub에서 보기
테스팅worddata

정보

이 스킬은 규제 환경에서 검증된 전산 시스템의 폐기를 위한 구조화된 절차를 제공합니다. 데이터 보존 평가, 마이그레이션 검증, 아카이빙, 이해관계자 통지와 같은 중요한 규정 준수 작업을 처리합니다. 시스템 수명 종료, 지원 중단, 통합 또는 규제 변경으로 인해 시스템을 교체하거나 폐기할 때 사용하십시오.

빠른 설치

Claude Code

추천
기본
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
플러그인 명령대체
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git 클론대체
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/decommission-validated-system

Claude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요

문서

Decommission Validated System

Plan and execute controlled retirement of validated computerized system. Preserve data integrity and meet regulatory retention requirements.

When Use

  • Validated system being replaced by new system
  • System reaching end-of-life with no replacement (business process eliminated)
  • Vendor discontinues support for validated product
  • Consolidation of many systems into single platform
  • Regulatory or business changes make system obsolete

Inputs

  • Required: System to be decommissioned (name, version, validation status)
  • Required: Data retention requirements by regulation (21 CFR Part 11, GLP, GCP)
  • Required: Replacement system (if applicable) and migration scope
  • Optional: Current validation documentation package
  • Optional: Data volume and format inventory
  • Optional: Business owner and stakeholder list

Steps

Step 1: Assess Data Retention Requirements

Determine how long data must be retained and in what form:

# Data Retention Assessment
## Document ID: DRA-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Regulatory Retention Requirements
| Regulation | Data Type | Retention Period | Format Requirements |
|-----------|-----------|-----------------|-------------------|
| 21 CFR 211 (GMP) | Batch records, test results | 1 year past product expiry or 3 years after distribution | Readable, retrievable |
| 21 CFR 58 (GLP) | Study data and records | Duration of study + retention agreement | Original or certified copy |
| ICH E6 (GCP) | Clinical trial records | 2 years after last marketing approval or formal discontinuation | Accessible for inspection |
| 21 CFR Part 11 | Electronic records | Per predicate rule | Original format or validated migration |
| EU Annex 11 | Computerized system records | Per applicable GxP | Readable and available |
| Tax/financial | Financial records | 7-10 years (jurisdiction-dependent) | Readable |

### System Data Inventory
| Data Category | Volume | Format | Retention Required Until | Disposition |
|---------------|--------|--------|------------------------|-------------|
| [e.g., Batch records] | [e.g., 50,000 records] | [e.g., Database + PDF reports] | [Date] | Migrate / Archive / Destroy |
| [e.g., Audit trail] | [e.g., 2M entries] | [e.g., Database] | [Same as parent records] | Archive |
| [e.g., User data] | [e.g., 200 profiles] | [e.g., LDAP/Database] | [Employment + 2 years] | Anonymise and archive |

Got: Every data category has defined retention period, format requirement, planned disposition. If fail: Retention requirements unclear? Consult regulatory affairs and legal. Default to longest applicable retention period.

Step 2: Plan Data Migration (If Applicable)

If data migrating to replacement system:

# Data Migration Plan
## Document ID: DMP-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Migration Scope
| Source | Target | Data Category | Records | Migration Method |
|--------|--------|---------------|---------|-----------------|
| [Old system] | [New system] | [Category] | [Count] | ETL / Manual / API |

### Data Mapping
| Source Field | Source Format | Target Field | Target Format | Transformation |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|---------------|---------------|
| [e.g., test_result] | FLOAT(8,2) | [e.g., result_value] | DECIMAL(10,3) | Precision conversion |
| [e.g., operator_id] | VARCHAR(20) | [e.g., user_id] | UUID | Lookup table mapping |

### Validation Approach
| Check | Method | Acceptance Criteria |
|-------|--------|-------------------|
| Record count reconciliation | Source count vs target count | 100% match |
| Field-level comparison | Sample 5% of records, all fields | 100% match after transformation |
| Checksum verification | Hash source vs target for key fields | Checksums match |
| Business rule validation | Verify key calculations in target | Results match source |
| Audit trail continuity | Verify historical audit trail migrated | All entries present with original timestamps |

Got: Migration plan has mapping, transformation rules, validation checks proving data integrity maintained. If fail: Migration validation fails? Do not proceed to decommission. Fix migration issues and re-validate.

Step 3: Define Archival Strategy

For data that will be archived rather than migrated:

# Archival Strategy

### Archive Format
| Consideration | Decision | Rationale |
|--------------|----------|-----------|
| Format | [PDF/A, CSV, XML, database backup] | [Why this format survives the retention period] |
| Medium | [Network storage, cloud archive, tape, optical] | [Durability and accessibility] |
| Encryption | [Yes/No — method if yes] | [Security vs long-term accessibility trade-off] |
| Integrity verification | [SHA-256 checksums, periodic verification schedule] | [Prove archive is uncorrupted] |

### Archive Verification
- [ ] Archived data is readable without the source system
- [ ] All required data categories are included in the archive
- [ ] Checksums recorded at time of archival
- [ ] Archive can be searched and retrieved within [defined SLA, e.g., 5 business days]
- [ ] Periodic integrity checks scheduled (annually)

### Archive Access
| Role | Access Level | Authorisation |
|------|-------------|--------------|
| QA Director | Read access to all archived data | Standing authorisation |
| Regulatory Affairs | Read access for inspection support | Standing authorisation |
| System Owner (former) | Read access for business queries | Request-based |
| External auditors | Read access, supervised | Per audit plan |

Got: Archived data readable, searchable, verifiable without original system. If fail: Data cannot be read independently of source system? Archive not compliant. Consider exporting to open, standard format (PDF/A, CSV) before decommission.

Step 4: Execute Decommissioning

# Decommission Checklist
## Document ID: DC-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]

### Pre-Decommission
- [ ] All stakeholders notified of decommission date and data disposition
- [ ] Data migration completed and validated (if applicable)
- [ ] Data archive created and verified (if applicable)
- [ ] Final backup of complete system taken and stored separately
- [ ] All open change requests resolved or transferred
- [ ] All open CAPAs resolved or transferred to successor system
- [ ] All active users informed and redirected to replacement system (if applicable)

### Decommission Execution
- [ ] User access revoked for all accounts
- [ ] System removed from production environment
- [ ] Network connections disconnected
- [ ] Licenses returned or terminated
- [ ] System entry removed from active system inventory
- [ ] System moved to "Decommissioned" status in compliance architecture

### Post-Decommission
- [ ] Validation documentation archived (URS, VP, IQ/OQ/PQ, TM, VSR)
- [ ] SOPs retired or updated to remove references to decommissioned system
- [ ] Training records archived
- [ ] Change control records archived
- [ ] Audit trail archived
- [ ] Decommission report completed and approved

### Decommission Report
| Section | Content |
|---------|---------|
| System description | Name, version, purpose, GxP classification |
| Decommission rationale | Why the system is being retired |
| Data disposition summary | What data went where (migrated, archived, destroyed) |
| Validation evidence | Migration validation results, archive verification |
| Residual risk | Any ongoing data retention obligations |
| Approval | System owner, QA, IT signatures |

Got: Decommissioning controlled, documented, approved — not just "turn it off." If fail: Any checklist item cannot be completed? Document exception and get QA approval before proceeding.

Checks

  • Data retention requirements assessed for all data categories
  • Data migration validated with record counts, sampling, checksums (if applicable)
  • Archive created in format readable without source system
  • Archive integrity verified with checksums
  • All user access revoked
  • Validation documentation archived with defined retention period
  • SOPs updated to remove references to decommissioned system
  • Decommission report approved by system owner, QA, IT

Pitfalls

  • Premature decommission: Turning off system before data migration validated → permanent data loss risk. Complete all validation before pulling plug.
  • Unreadable archives: Storing data in proprietary format needing original system to read defeats purpose of archival. Use open formats.
  • Forgotten audit trails: Archiving data but not audit trail → data provenance cannot be shown. Always archive audit trails with their parent records.
  • Orphaned SOPs: SOPs still referencing decommissioned system confuse users and make compliance gaps. Update or retire all affected SOPs.
  • No periodic archive verification: Archives degrade. Without periodic integrity checks, data loss may go undetected until data is needed for inspection.

See Also

  • design-compliance-architecture — update system inventory and compliance architecture after decommission
  • manage-change-control — decommissioning is major change requiring change control
  • write-validation-documentation — migration validation follows same IQ/OQ methodology
  • write-standard-operating-procedure — retire or update SOPs referencing decommissioned system
  • prepare-inspection-readiness — archived data must stay accessible for regulatory inspections

GitHub 저장소

pjt222/agent-almanac
경로: i18n/caveman/skills/decommission-validated-system
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

연관 스킬

evaluating-llms-harness

테스팅

이 Claude Skill은 MMLU, GSM8K를 포함한 60개 이상의 표준화된 학술 과제에서 LLM 성능을 벤치마크하기 위해 lm-evaluation-harness를 실행합니다. 개발자들이 모델 품질을 비교하고, 학습 진행 상황을 추적하거나 학술 결과를 보고할 수 있도록 설계되었습니다. 이 도구는 HuggingFace와 vLLM 모델을 포함한 다양한 백엔드를 지원합니다.

스킬 보기

cloudflare-cron-triggers

테스팅

이 스킬은 cron 표현식을 사용하여 Worker를 스케줄링하기 위한 Cloudflare Cron Triggers 구현에 관한 포괄적인 지식을 제공합니다. 주기적 작업, 유지보수 작업, 자동화된 워크플로우 설정 방법을 다루며, 잘못된 cron 표현식이나 시간대 문제 같은 일반적인 이슈들을 해결하는 방법을 포함합니다. 개발자들은 이를 통해 스케줄된 핸들러 구성, cron 트리거 테스트, Workflows 및 Green Compute와의 연동 작업을 수행할 수 있습니다.

스킬 보기

webapp-testing

테스팅

이 Claude Skill은 Python 스크립트를 통해 로컬 웹 애플리케이션을 테스트하기 위한 Playwright 기반 툴킷을 제공합니다. 프론트엔드 검증, UI 디버깅, 스크린샷 캡처, 로그 확인 기능을 지원하며 서버 라이프사이클을 관리합니다. 브라우저 자동화 작업에 사용하되 컨텍스트 오염을 방지하기 위해 소스 코드를 읽지 않고 스크립트를 직접 실행하세요.

스킬 보기

finishing-a-development-branch

테스팅

이 스킬은 테스트 통과를 확인한 후 체계적인 통합 옵션을 제시하여 개발자가 완성된 작업을 마무리하도록 돕습니다. 구현이 완료된 후 머지, PR 생성, 브랜치 정리와 같은 워크플로우를 안내합니다. 코드가 준비되고 테스트가 완료되었을 때 개발 프로세스를 체계적으로 마무리하기 위해 사용하세요.

스킬 보기