crisis-detector
정보
이 스킬은 패턴 인식과 위험 평가를 통해 잠재적인 PR 위기의 조기 경고 신호를 개발자가 식별하도록 돕습니다. 조기 경고 시스템 구축, 위기 발생 가능성 평가, 에스컬레이션 기준 수립에 유용합니다. 이 도구는 확립된 위기 관리 프레임워크를 기반으로 신호를 모니터링하고 에스컬레이션 트리거를 평가합니다.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skillsgit clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/crisis-detectorClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Crisis Detector
Identify early warning signs of potential crises before they escalate through pattern recognition, signal monitoring, and risk assessment.
When to Use This Skill
- Setting up early warning systems
- Assessing crisis probability
- Training teams on signals
- Building escalation criteria
- Post-crisis prevention planning
Methodology Foundation
Based on Institute for Crisis Management research and Burson crisis frameworks, combining:
- Signal identification
- Pattern recognition
- Risk assessment matrices
- Escalation protocols
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Identifies warning signals | Risk tolerance |
| Assesses crisis probability | Response resources |
| Creates detection criteria | Escalation authority |
| Designs monitoring systems | Communication strategy |
| Suggests response triggers | Final action calls |
Instructions
Step 1: Map Crisis Types
Crisis Categories:
| Category | Examples | Warning Time |
|---|---|---|
| Operational | Outage, product failure | Hours to days |
| Reputational | Executive scandal, viral complaint | Minutes to hours |
| Legal/Regulatory | Lawsuit, investigation | Days to weeks |
| Financial | Earnings miss, fraud | Hours to days |
| Human | Workplace incident, harassment | Hours to days |
| External | Natural disaster, market crash | Variable |
Step 2: Identify Early Signals
Signal Types:
| Signal Type | Examples | Monitoring |
|---|---|---|
| Internal | Employee complaints, support tickets | HR, Support data |
| Customer | Review patterns, churn spikes | CX metrics |
| Social | Mention volume, sentiment shift | Social tools |
| Media | Press inquiries, journalist interest | PR inbox |
| Regulatory | Compliance notices, audit findings | Legal |
| Financial | Payment disputes, refund requests | Finance |
Step 3: Build Detection Matrix
Signal Strength Assessment:
| Signal | Weak | Moderate | Strong | Critical |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volume spike | +25% | +50% | +100% | +300% |
| Sentiment shift | -10% | -20% | -30% | -50% |
| Media inquiries | 1 | 2-3 | 4-5 | 6+ |
| Support tickets | +10% | +25% | +50% | +100% |
| Social influencer | 10K | 50K | 100K | 500K+ |
Step 4: Create Escalation Triggers
Trigger Framework:
| Level | Signals Present | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Watch | 1 moderate signal | Monitor closely |
| Alert | 2+ moderate or 1 strong | Notify team |
| Warning | Multiple strong signals | Assemble team |
| Crisis | Any critical signal | Activate protocol |
Step 5: Document and Improve
Post-Detection Review:
- How early did we detect?
- What signals did we miss?
- How accurate was assessment?
- What should we add to monitoring?
Examples
Example 1: Crisis Detection System Design
Input:
Design a crisis detection system for:
- E-commerce company (clothing)
- 500K customers
- Active on Instagram, TikTok, Twitter
- Past issue: Shipping delays during holiday
Output:
## Crisis Detection System: E-Commerce Fashion
### Crisis Risk Map
| Crisis Type | Probability | Impact | Priority |
|-------------|-------------|--------|----------|
| Shipping delays | High | High | P1 |
| Product quality issue | Medium | High | P1 |
| Social media backlash | Medium | High | P1 |
| Data breach | Low | Critical | P1 |
| Influencer controversy | Medium | Medium | P2 |
| Supply chain disruption | Medium | High | P2 |
| Payment fraud | Low | Medium | P3 |
---
### Early Warning Signals
#### P1: Shipping Delays
**Leading Indicators (3-5 days before crisis):**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Carrier delay reports | Logistics API | >10% delayed |
| Warehouse backlog | WMS data | >24hr processing |
| Weather events | News/weather | Storm in hub |
| "Where's my order" tickets | Support | +50% daily |
**Lagging Indicators (crisis starting):**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Social mentions | Social listening | "shipping" +100% |
| Review mentions | Trustpilot/G2 | Shipping 3/5 stars |
| Refund requests | Payment system | +30% |
| Chargeback rate | Payment processor | >1% |
---
#### P1: Product Quality Issue
**Leading Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Return rate spike | Returns data | >10% on SKU |
| Quality complaints | Support tickets | 3+ same issue |
| Photo complaints | Social | "damaged", "wrong color" |
| Batch-specific issues | QC data | Same lot number |
**Lagging Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Viral unboxing | TikTok/Instagram | >10K views negative |
| Review bomb | Product pages | Multiple 1-stars |
| Media inquiry | PR inbox | Journalist question |
---
#### P1: Social Media Backlash
**Leading Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Sentiment shift | Social tools | -20% in 24hr |
| Controversial post | Your social | Negative comments >10% |
| Influencer complaint | Social | >50K follower post |
| Screenshot spreading | Twitter/Reddit | Same image 5+ times |
**Lagging Indicators:**
| Signal | Source | Threshold |
|--------|--------|-----------|
| Viral negative | Any platform | >50K engagements |
| Hashtag trending | Twitter | Brand + negative |
| Media pickup | News sites | Article published |
| Competitor amplification | Social | Competitor sharing |
---
### Detection Dashboard
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ CRISIS DETECTION DASHBOARD 🟢 NORMAL │ ├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ │ │ SHIPPING STATUS 🟢 Normal │ │ ├─ Carrier delays: 3% (threshold: 10%) │ │ ├─ Backlog: 4 hours (threshold: 24hr) │ │ └─ "Where's my order": 45 (baseline: 50) │ │ │ │ PRODUCT QUALITY 🟢 Normal │ │ ├─ Return rate: 5.2% (threshold: 10%) │ │ ├─ Quality tickets: 2 (threshold: 3+ same) │ │ └─ Photo complaints: 1 (threshold: 5) │ │ │ │ SOCIAL SENTIMENT 🟡 Watch │ │ ├─ Sentiment: -15% (threshold: -20%) │ │ ├─ Volume: +40% (threshold: +50%) │ │ └─ Influencer: None flagged │ │ │ │ SECURITY 🟢 Normal │ │ ├─ Login anomalies: Normal │ │ └─ Payment fraud: 0.3% │ │ │ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
---
### Escalation Matrix
| Level | Criteria | Notification | Response |
|-------|----------|--------------|----------|
| 🟢 Normal | All metrics in range | None | Standard ops |
| 🟡 Watch | 1 metric at threshold | Slack alert | Increased monitoring |
| 🟠 Alert | 2+ metrics or 1 exceeded | Team notification | Standby team |
| 🔴 Crisis | Critical threshold breached | All-hands alert | Activate protocol |
---
### Alert Routing
| Signal Type | Primary | Backup | Escalation |
|-------------|---------|--------|------------|
| Shipping | Operations | COO | CEO |
| Product quality | Product | VP Ops | CEO |
| Social media | Marketing | CMO | CEO |
| Security | IT | CTO | CEO + Legal |
| Legal/PR | Legal | CEO | Board |
---
### Holiday Season Adjustments
During high-volume periods (Nov 15 - Dec 31):
| Metric | Normal Threshold | Holiday Threshold |
|--------|------------------|-------------------|
| Carrier delays | 10% | 15% |
| Support volume | +50% | +100% |
| Social volume | +50% | +75% |
| Response time | 4 hours | 8 hours |
**Rationale:** Higher baseline expected; adjust to avoid false alerts
while maintaining genuine crisis detection.
Example 2: Real-Time Crisis Assessment
Input:
Assess this situation:
- Support tickets up 80% in 2 hours
- Twitter mentions up 150%
- Hashtag #[Brand]Scam trending locally
- 3 refund requests mentioning "charged twice"
- No known system issues
Output:
## Crisis Assessment: Potential Payment Issue
### Alert Level: 🔴 CRISIS
---
### Signal Analysis
| Signal | Value | Normal | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|--------|
| Support spike | +80% | <25% | CRITICAL |
| Social spike | +150% | <50% | CRITICAL |
| Trending hashtag | Yes | No | CRITICAL |
| Duplicate charge reports | 3 | 0 | CONCERNING |
---
### Probable Cause
**Most likely: Payment processing error**
Evidence:
1. Multiple "charged twice" complaints
2. No known system issues rules out outage
3. Sudden spike suggests batch problem
4. #Scam hashtag = customers think fraud
---
### Immediate Actions
| Priority | Action | Owner | Timeline |
|----------|--------|-------|----------|
| 1 | Check payment processor logs | Engineering | NOW |
| 2 | Identify affected transactions | Finance | 30 min |
| 3 | Prepare holding statement | Comms | 15 min |
| 4 | Alert customer service team | CX Lead | NOW |
| 5 | Monitor hashtag spread | Social | Ongoing |
---
### Holding Statement (Draft)
We're aware some customers may have experienced duplicate charges. Our team is investigating urgently. If you've been affected, please DM us or email [support] - we'll make this right immediately.
Updates to follow shortly.
---
### Escalation Path
**Now:** CTO + CFO + CMO notified
**+30 min:** CEO briefing if not resolved
**+1 hour:** External statement if ongoing
---
### Crisis Trajectory
**If unaddressed (next 2-4 hours):**
- Hashtag goes national
- Media inquiries begin
- Trust pilot review bomb
- Social influencers amplify
**If addressed quickly (next 1-2 hours):**
- Contain to affected customers
- Flip narrative to "responsive company"
- Prevent media escalation
- Build goodwill through fast resolution
---
### Resolution Checklist
- [ ] Root cause identified
- [ ] Affected customers identified
- [ ] Refunds initiated
- [ ] Proactive communication sent
- [ ] Social response deployed
- [ ] Hashtag monitoring active
- [ ] Post-incident review scheduled
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Identifying early warning signals
- Creating detection frameworks
- Assessing crisis probability
- Designing escalation systems
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Access your actual systems
- Monitor in real-time
- Make response decisions
- Know your specific thresholds
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts:
- "Design detection for [specific crisis type]"
- "Create escalation protocol for [scenario]"
- "What signals should we add for [risk]?"
- "How do we prevent [past crisis] from recurring?"
References
- Institute for Crisis Management
- Burson Crisis Playbook
- Harvard Business Review Crisis Research
- Edelman Trust Barometer
Related Skills
social-listening- Monitoring systemsresponse-coordinator- Crisis responsereputation-recovery- Post-crisis rebuild
Skill Metadata
- Domain: Crisis
- Complexity: Intermediate-Advanced
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 2-4 hours for system design
- Prerequisites: Access to metrics, stakeholder alignment
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
llamaguard
기타LlamaGuard는 폭력 및 혐오 발언 등 6가지 안전 범주에서 LLM 입력과 출력을 조정하기 위한 Meta의 70-80억 파라미터 모델입니다. 94-95% 정확도를 제공하며 vLLM, Hugging Face 또는 Amazon SageMaker를 사용해 배포할 수 있습니다. 이 기술을 사용하여 AI 애플리케이션에 콘텐츠 필터링 및 안전 가드레일을 손쉽게 통합하세요.
cost-optimization
기타이 Claude Skill은 리소스 적정화, 태깅 전략, 지출 분석을 통해 개발자들이 클라우드 비용을 최적화할 수 있도록 지원합니다. AWS, Azure, GCP에서 클라우드 비용을 절감하고 비용 거버넌스를 구현하기 위한 프레임워크를 제공합니다. 인프라 비용을 분석하거나, 리소스를 적정화하거나, 예산 제약을 충족해야 할 때 사용하세요.
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
기타이 스킬은 bitsandbytes를 사용하여 LLM을 8비트 또는 4비트 정밀도로 양자화하며, 최소한의 정확도 손실로 50-75%의 메모리 감소를 달성합니다. 제한된 GPU 메모리에서 더 큰 모델을 실행하거나 추론을 가속화하는 데 이상적이며, INT8, NF4, FP4와 같은 형식을 지원합니다. 이 스킬은 HuggingFace Transformers와 통합되어 QLoRA 학습 및 8비트 옵티마이저를 가능하게 합니다.
dispatching-parallel-agents
기타이 Claude Skill은 3개 이상의 독립적인 문제를 동시에 조사하고 해결하기 위해 다중 에이전트를 배치합니다. 공유 상태나 의존성 없이 해결 가능한 무관련 장애 시나리오에 맞게 설계되었습니다. 핵심 기능은 병렬 문제 해결로, 각 독립 문제 영역마다 하나의 에이전트를 할당하여 효율성을 극대화합니다.
