provider-resources
정보
이 스킬은 플러그인 프레임워크를 사용하여 Terraform Provider 리소스와 데이터 소스를 구현하는 방법을 개발자에게 안내합니다. CRUD 작업, 스키마 설계, 검증기, 가져오기 지원 및 최종 일관성 처리에 대해 다룹니다. 리소스를 추가하거나 수정할 때, API 개념을 리소스로 만들어야 할지 결정할 때, 또는 제출 전 구현을 검토할 때 사용하세요.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add hashicorp/agent-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/hashicorp/agent-skillsgit clone https://github.com/hashicorp/agent-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/provider-resourcesClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Terraform Provider Resources Implementation Guide
Overview
This guide covers developing Terraform Provider resources and data sources. Resources represent infrastructure objects that Terraform manages through Create, Read, Update, and Delete (CRUD) operations.
Use the Plugin Framework
for all net-new resources and data sources. Plugin SDKv2 is for maintaining
resources that already exist on it; do not write new code against it. A
provider can serve both during migration by muxing
(terraform-plugin-mux),
so adopting the Framework never requires a big-bang rewrite. To tell which
mode an existing provider is in, check go.mod: terraform-plugin-mux
present means it serves both SDKv2 and Framework code; only
terraform-plugin-sdk/v2 means SDKv2-only; only
terraform-plugin-framework means Framework-only. Be cautious about
migrating existing SDKv2 resources: the Framework distinguishes null from
zero values, so naive migrations change behavior for existing users (use the
provider-framework-migration skill, if available).
References (load when needed):
references/design-principles.md— what should (and should not) become a resource; data source semantics; relationship and async-task modelingreferences/retries-and-waiters.md— eventual consistency, retry patterns, and status/wait function structure
File Structure
Most providers keep every resource in a single package:
internal/provider/
├── provider.go # Provider schema + Configure
├── widget_resource.go # Resource implementation
├── widget_resource_test.go # Acceptance tests
├── widget_data_source.go # Data source (if applicable)
└── widget_data_source_test.go
Large multi-service providers (e.g. terraform-provider-aws) split into
internal/service/<service>/ packages instead, with an idiomatic file
taxonomy worth adopting once a package grows: consts.go, find.go
(finders), status.go (status functions), wait.go (waiters), sweep.go
(test sweepers), exports_test.go.
Documentation lives in docs/ and is generated with tfplugindocs:
docs/
├── resources/<name>.md # generated; optional <name>.md.tmpl template
└── data-sources/<name>.md
(Hand-written website/docs/r/*.html.markdown trees exist in some older,
large providers — follow the target repo's convention when editing one.)
Resource Structure
A Framework resource is a struct holding the API client, with interface assertions making the implemented behaviors explicit:
var (
_ resource.Resource = &widgetResource{}
_ resource.ResourceWithConfigure = &widgetResource{}
_ resource.ResourceWithImportState = &widgetResource{}
)
func NewWidgetResource() resource.Resource {
return &widgetResource{}
}
type widgetResource struct {
client *examplecloud.Client
}
func (r *widgetResource) Metadata(_ context.Context, req resource.MetadataRequest, resp *resource.MetadataResponse) {
resp.TypeName = req.ProviderTypeName + "_widget"
}
// Configure receives the client the provider built in its own Configure.
func (r *widgetResource) Configure(_ context.Context, req resource.ConfigureRequest, resp *resource.ConfigureResponse) {
if req.ProviderData == nil {
return // provider not yet configured (e.g. validation phase)
}
client, ok := req.ProviderData.(*examplecloud.Client)
if !ok {
resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
"Unexpected Resource Configure Type",
fmt.Sprintf("Expected *examplecloud.Client, got: %T.", req.ProviderData),
)
return
}
r.client = client
}
func (r *widgetResource) Schema(ctx context.Context, req resource.SchemaRequest, resp *resource.SchemaResponse) {
resp.Schema = schema.Schema{
Attributes: map[string]schema.Attribute{
"name": schema.StringAttribute{
Required: true,
PlanModifiers: []planmodifier.String{
stringplanmodifier.RequiresReplace(),
},
Validators: []validator.String{
stringvalidator.LengthBetween(1, 255),
},
},
"id": schema.StringAttribute{
Computed: true,
PlanModifiers: []planmodifier.String{
stringplanmodifier.UseStateForUnknown(),
},
},
},
}
}
How the provider's Configure produces that client — schema, credential
resolution, validation — is covered by the provider-configuration skill
(if available).
On id: SDKv2 required a magic id attribute; the Framework does not.
If the API has its own identifier, expose it under its real meaning and do
not add a second, redundant id. Only keep id when it is the API's
identifier (as above).
CRUD Operations
Create
func (r *widgetResource) Create(ctx context.Context, req resource.CreateRequest, resp *resource.CreateResponse) {
var data widgetResourceModel
resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.Plan.Get(ctx, &data)...)
if resp.Diagnostics.HasError() {
return
}
input := &examplecloud.CreateWidgetInput{
Name: data.Name.ValueStringPointer(),
}
output, err := r.client.CreateWidget(ctx, input)
if err != nil {
resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
"Error creating Widget",
fmt.Sprintf("creating Widget (%s): %s", data.Name.ValueString(), err),
)
return
}
data.ID = types.StringPointerValue(output.ID)
// For eventually consistent APIs, wait for the resource to be usable
// before returning — see references/retries-and-waiters.md.
resp.Diagnostics.Append(resp.State.Set(ctx, &data)...)
}
Read
Read must handle out-of-band deletion by removing the resource from state so the next plan recreates it, rather than erroring forever:
func (r *widgetResource) Read(ctx context.Context, req resource.ReadRequest, resp *resource.ReadResponse) {
var data widgetResourceModel
resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.State.Get(ctx, &data)...)
if resp.Diagnostics.HasError() {
return
}
output, err := findWidgetByID(ctx, r.client, data.ID.ValueString())
if isNotFound(err) {
tflog.Warn(ctx, "Widget not found, removing from state", map[string]any{"id": data.ID.ValueString()})
resp.State.RemoveResource(ctx)
return
}
if err != nil {
resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
"Error reading Widget",
fmt.Sprintf("reading Widget (%s): %s", data.ID.ValueString(), err),
)
return
}
data.Name = types.StringPointerValue(output.Name)
resp.Diagnostics.Append(resp.State.Set(ctx, &data)...)
}
Update
Only call the API for attributes that actually changed; compare plan against state:
func (r *widgetResource) Update(ctx context.Context, req resource.UpdateRequest, resp *resource.UpdateResponse) {
var plan, state widgetResourceModel
resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.Plan.Get(ctx, &plan)...)
resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.State.Get(ctx, &state)...)
if resp.Diagnostics.HasError() {
return
}
if !plan.Description.Equal(state.Description) {
input := &examplecloud.UpdateWidgetInput{
ID: plan.ID.ValueStringPointer(),
Description: plan.Description.ValueStringPointer(),
}
if _, err := r.client.UpdateWidget(ctx, input); err != nil {
resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
"Error updating Widget",
fmt.Sprintf("updating Widget (%s): %s", plan.ID.ValueString(), err),
)
return
}
}
resp.Diagnostics.Append(resp.State.Set(ctx, &plan)...)
}
Delete
Treat "already gone" as success — the desired end state is reached:
func (r *widgetResource) Delete(ctx context.Context, req resource.DeleteRequest, resp *resource.DeleteResponse) {
var data widgetResourceModel
resp.Diagnostics.Append(req.State.Get(ctx, &data)...)
if resp.Diagnostics.HasError() {
return
}
_, err := r.client.DeleteWidget(ctx, &examplecloud.DeleteWidgetInput{
ID: data.ID.ValueStringPointer(),
})
if isNotFound(err) {
return
}
if err != nil {
resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
"Error deleting Widget",
fmt.Sprintf("deleting Widget (%s): %s", data.ID.ValueString(), err),
)
return
}
}
Import
With ResourceWithImportState asserted, passthrough of the identifier is
one line:
func (r *widgetResource) ImportState(ctx context.Context, req resource.ImportStateRequest, resp *resource.ImportStateResponse) {
resource.ImportStatePassthroughID(ctx, path.Root("id"), req, resp)
}
For multi-part identifiers, parse a delimited import ID (commonly comma-separated) and set each attribute explicitly.
Resource Design Principles
Before implementing, check the shape of the thing being modeled (full
treatment in references/design-principles.md):
- A resource is the smallest useful building block; if the API offers CRUD for it, it likely deserves its own resource.
- A resource should talk to one API/service only — cross-service resources break permissions, auditing, and endpoint configuration.
- Data sources are read-only and side-effect free. A singular data source errors on zero or multiple matches; a plural data source (plural noun name) returns zero-or-more as a collection and errors on neither.
- Attached policies/rules, long-running task invocations, and versioned artifacts usually deserve their own resources rather than attributes on the parent.
- Start/stop or enable/disable state belongs as an attribute in the resource, not as a separate resource.
Schema Design
Attribute Types
| Terraform Type | Framework Type | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
string | schema.StringAttribute | Names, identifiers |
number | schema.Int64Attribute, schema.Float64Attribute | Counts, sizes |
bool | schema.BoolAttribute | Feature flags |
list | schema.ListAttribute | Ordered collections |
set | schema.SetAttribute | Unordered unique items |
map | schema.MapAttribute | Key-value pairs |
object | schema.SingleNestedAttribute | Complex nested config |
Give every attribute a MarkdownDescription — tfplugindocs publishes it,
and it is the primary user-facing documentation.
Plan Modifiers
// Force replacement when value changes
stringplanmodifier.RequiresReplace()
// Keep a known value during plan instead of (known after apply)
stringplanmodifier.UseStateForUnknown()
Validators
stringvalidator.LengthBetween(1, 255)
stringvalidator.RegexMatches(regexp.MustCompile(`^[a-z0-9-]+$`), "must be lowercase alphanumeric with hyphens")
stringvalidator.OneOf("small", "medium", "large")
int64validator.Between(1, 100)
listvalidator.SizeAtLeast(1)
Sensitive Attributes
"password": schema.StringAttribute{
Required: true,
Sensitive: true,
},
State Management
Finders
Centralize "get one thing or a typed not-found" in a finder so Read, Delete, waiters, and tests all share identical not-found semantics:
func findWidgetByID(ctx context.Context, client *examplecloud.Client, id string) (*examplecloud.Widget, error) {
output, err := client.GetWidget(ctx, &examplecloud.GetWidgetInput{ID: &id})
if err != nil {
var apiErr *examplecloud.NotFoundError
if errors.As(err, &apiErr) {
return nil, &retry.NotFoundError{LastError: err}
}
return nil, fmt.Errorf("getting Widget (%s): %w", id, err)
}
if output == nil || output.Widget == nil {
return nil, &retry.NotFoundError{Message: "empty result"}
}
return output.Widget, nil
}
func isNotFound(err error) bool {
var nfe *retry.NotFoundError
return errors.As(err, &nfe)
}
Waiting for Resource States
Many APIs return from Create/Delete before the resource is usable/gone. Use
retry.StateChangeConf (from
github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2/helper/retry — usable from
Framework providers), with a status function built on the finder and
timeouts in named constants:
stateConf := &retry.StateChangeConf{
Pending: []string{"CREATING", "PENDING"},
Target: []string{"ACTIVE"},
Refresh: statusWidget(ctx, r.client, id), // one poll of the finder: (obj, status, err)
Timeout: widgetCreatedTimeout,
}
outputRaw, err := stateConf.WaitForStateContext(ctx)
The full status/wait function pairs (create and delete waiters, failure-state
handling, post-create not-found retries, eventual-consistency patterns) are
in references/retries-and-waiters.md — read it whenever the API is
asynchronous or eventually consistent.
Testing
Every resource ships with, at minimum:
_basic— create with minimal config, assert attributes, then an import step (ImportState: true,ImportStateVerify: true)_disappears— delete the object out-of-band mid-test; the next plan must propose recreation, not error- Per-attribute tests — exercise updates for each non-trivial argument
Naming grammar: tests TestAcc{Resource}_{group?}_{description}, helpers
testAccCheck{Resource}Exists / testAccCheck{Resource}Destroy, config
functions testAcc{Resource}Config_{description}. Keep configs
self-contained, randomize real resource names, and never hardcode
environment-specific values (account IDs, zones, versions).
func TestAccWidget_basic(t *testing.T) {
rName := acctest.RandStringFromCharSet(10, acctest.CharSetAlphaNum)
resourceName := "examplecloud_widget.test"
resource.ParallelTest(t, resource.TestCase{
PreCheck: func() { testAccPreCheck(t) },
ProtoV6ProviderFactories: testAccProtoV6ProviderFactories,
CheckDestroy: testAccCheckWidgetDestroy,
Steps: []resource.TestStep{
{
Config: testAccWidgetConfig_basic(rName),
ConfigStateChecks: []statecheck.StateCheck{
statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName, tfjsonpath.New("name"), knownvalue.StringExact(rName)),
statecheck.ExpectKnownValue(resourceName, tfjsonpath.New("id"), knownvalue.NotNull()),
},
},
{
ResourceName: resourceName,
ImportState: true,
ImportStateVerify: true,
},
},
})
}
func testAccWidgetConfig_basic(rName string) string {
return fmt.Sprintf(`
resource "examplecloud_widget" "test" {
name = %[1]q
}
`, rName)
}
Use the provider-test-patterns skill (if available) for the full testing
treatment: config helper style (%[1]q indexed verbs), statecheck/plancheck,
CompareValue, custom StateCheck implementations for exists/disappears
helpers, sweepers, and ephemeral resource testing. Use the
run-acceptance-tests skill for executing and debugging test runs.
Error Handling
Match API errors by type, not message text, and wrap with context:
var notFound *examplecloud.NotFoundError
if errors.As(err, ¬Found) {
// resource doesn't exist
}
// Wrapping inside helpers: preserve the cause with %w
return fmt.Errorf("creating Widget (%s): %w", name, err)
Diagnostics follow a consistent grammar — summary names the operation and type, detail carries identifier and cause:
resp.Diagnostics.AddError(
"Error creating Widget",
fmt.Sprintf("creating Widget (%s): %s", name, err),
)
resp.Diagnostics.AddAttributeError(
path.Root("name"),
"Invalid name",
"Name must be lowercase alphanumeric",
)
Documentation
Write attribute MarkdownDescriptions first — they are the source of
truth. Then generate Registry documentation with tfplugindocs
(go generate ./... where wired up), adding docs/**/*.md.tmpl templates
only for prose and examples the generator cannot derive. Use the
provider-docs skill (if available) for the full documentation workflow and
Registry publication rules.
Pre-Submission Checklist
- Plugin Framework used (no new SDKv2 code)
- Resource has all CRUD operations implemented
- Read removes missing resources from state; Delete tolerates already-deleted
- No redundant
idattribute (real API identifier exposed instead) - Import implemented and covered by an
ImportStateVerifystep -
_basic,_disappears, and per-attribute tests present - Waiters used where the API is eventually consistent
- Error messages name the operation, type, and identifier
- Sensitive attributes marked; every attribute has a description
- Docs generated with
tfplugindocs - Changelog entry added, if the repo tracks release notes (check CONTRIBUTING)
References
GitHub 저장소
자주 묻는 질문
provider-resources Skill이란 무엇인가요?
provider-resources은(는) hashicorp이(가) 만든 Claude Skill입니다. Skill은 Claude가 필요할 때 불러오는 지침과 리소스를 묶어 추가 프롬프트 없이 provider-resources 관련 작업을 수행할 수 있게 합니다.
provider-resources은(는) 어떻게 설치하나요?
이 페이지의 설치 명령을 사용하세요. provider-resources을(를) Claude Code 플러그인으로 추가하거나 저장소를 skills 디렉터리에 복제한 다음 Claude를 다시 시작해 Skill을 불러옵니다.
provider-resources은(는) 어떤 카테고리에 속하나요?
provider-resources은(는) 테스팅 카테고리에 속합니다.
provider-resources은(는) 무료로 사용할 수 있나요?
네. provider-resources은(는) AIMCP에 등록되어 있으며 무료로 설치할 수 있습니다.
연관 스킬
이 Claude Skill은 MMLU, GSM8K를 포함한 60개 이상의 표준화된 학술 과제에서 LLM 성능을 벤치마크하기 위해 lm-evaluation-harness를 실행합니다. 개발자들이 모델 품질을 비교하고, 학습 진행 상황을 추적하거나 학술 결과를 보고할 수 있도록 설계되었습니다. 이 도구는 HuggingFace와 vLLM 모델을 포함한 다양한 백엔드를 지원합니다.
이 스킬은 cron 표현식을 사용하여 Worker를 스케줄링하기 위한 Cloudflare Cron Triggers 구현에 관한 포괄적인 지식을 제공합니다. 주기적 작업, 유지보수 작업, 자동화된 워크플로우 설정 방법을 다루며, 잘못된 cron 표현식이나 시간대 문제 같은 일반적인 이슈들을 해결하는 방법을 포함합니다. 개발자들은 이를 통해 스케줄된 핸들러 구성, cron 트리거 테스트, Workflows 및 Green Compute와의 연동 작업을 수행할 수 있습니다.
이 Claude Skill은 Python 스크립트를 통해 로컬 웹 애플리케이션을 테스트하기 위한 Playwright 기반 툴킷을 제공합니다. 프론트엔드 검증, UI 디버깅, 스크린샷 캡처, 로그 확인 기능을 지원하며 서버 라이프사이클을 관리합니다. 브라우저 자동화 작업에 사용하되 컨텍스트 오염을 방지하기 위해 소스 코드를 읽지 않고 스크립트를 직접 실행하세요.
이 스킬은 테스트 통과를 확인한 후 체계적인 통합 옵션을 제시하여 개발자가 완성된 작업을 마무리하도록 돕습니다. 구현이 완료된 후 머지, PR 생성, 브랜치 정리와 같은 워크플로우를 안내합니다. 코드가 준비되고 테스트가 완료되었을 때 개발 프로세스를 체계적으로 마무리하기 위해 사용하세요.
