pymc
정보
이 스킬은 PyMC를 활용한 베이지안 모델링과 확률적 프로그래밍을 가능하게 하며, 개발자가 계층적 모델을 구축하고 NUTS를 사용한 MCMC 샘플링을 수행할 수 있도록 합니다. 변분 추론, LOO/WAIC를 통한 모델 비교, 모델 검증을 위한 사후 예측 검증을 지원합니다. 베이지안 회귀 분석, 시계열 분석을 구현하거나 샘플링 수렴 진단 도구가 필요할 때 사용하세요.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skillsgit clone https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/pymcClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
PyMC Bayesian Modeling
Overview
PyMC is a Python library for Bayesian modeling and probabilistic programming. Build, fit, validate, and compare Bayesian models using PyMC's modern API (version 5.x+), including hierarchical models, MCMC sampling (NUTS), variational inference, and model comparison (LOO, WAIC).
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Building Bayesian models (linear/logistic regression, hierarchical models, time series, etc.)
- Performing MCMC sampling or variational inference
- Conducting prior/posterior predictive checks
- Diagnosing sampling issues (divergences, convergence, ESS)
- Comparing multiple models using information criteria (LOO, WAIC)
- Implementing uncertainty quantification through Bayesian methods
- Working with hierarchical/multilevel data structures
- Handling missing data or measurement error in a principled way
Standard Bayesian Workflow
Follow this workflow for building and validating Bayesian models:
1. Data Preparation
import pymc as pm
import arviz as az
import numpy as np
# Load and prepare data
X = ... # Predictors
y = ... # Outcomes
# Standardize predictors for better sampling
X_mean = X.mean(axis=0)
X_std = X.std(axis=0)
X_scaled = (X - X_mean) / X_std
Key practices:
- Standardize continuous predictors (improves sampling efficiency)
- Center outcomes when possible
- Handle missing data explicitly (treat as parameters)
- Use named dimensions with
coordsfor clarity
2. Model Building
coords = {
'predictors': ['var1', 'var2', 'var3'],
'obs_id': np.arange(len(y))
}
with pm.Model(coords=coords) as model:
# Priors
alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=1)
beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='predictors')
sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
# Linear predictor
mu = alpha + pm.math.dot(X_scaled, beta)
# Likelihood
y_obs = pm.Normal('y_obs', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y, dims='obs_id')
Key practices:
- Use weakly informative priors (not flat priors)
- Use
HalfNormalorExponentialfor scale parameters - Use named dimensions (
dims) instead ofshapewhen possible - Use
pm.Data()for values that will be updated for predictions
3. Prior Predictive Check
Always validate priors before fitting:
with model:
prior_pred = pm.sample_prior_predictive(samples=1000, random_seed=42)
# Visualize
az.plot_ppc(prior_pred, group='prior')
Check:
- Do prior predictions span reasonable values?
- Are extreme values plausible given domain knowledge?
- If priors generate implausible data, adjust and re-check
4. Fit Model
with model:
# Optional: Quick exploration with ADVI
# approx = pm.fit(n=20000)
# Full MCMC inference
idata = pm.sample(
draws=2000,
tune=1000,
chains=4,
target_accept=0.9,
random_seed=42,
idata_kwargs={'log_likelihood': True} # For model comparison
)
Key parameters:
draws=2000: Number of samples per chaintune=1000: Warmup samples (discarded)chains=4: Run 4 chains for convergence checkingtarget_accept=0.9: Higher for difficult posteriors (0.95-0.99)- Include
log_likelihood=Truefor model comparison
5. Check Diagnostics
Use the diagnostic script:
from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics
results = check_diagnostics(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'])
Check:
- R-hat < 1.01: Chains have converged
- ESS > 400: Sufficient effective samples
- No divergences: NUTS sampled successfully
- Trace plots: Chains should mix well (fuzzy caterpillar)
If issues arise:
- Divergences → Increase
target_accept=0.95, use non-centered parameterization - Low ESS → Sample more draws, reparameterize to reduce correlation
- High R-hat → Run longer, check for multimodality
6. Posterior Predictive Check
Validate model fit:
with model:
pm.sample_posterior_predictive(idata, extend_inferencedata=True, random_seed=42)
# Visualize
az.plot_ppc(idata)
Check:
- Do posterior predictions capture observed data patterns?
- Are systematic deviations evident (model misspecification)?
- Consider alternative models if fit is poor
7. Analyze Results
# Summary statistics
print(az.summary(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma']))
# Posterior distributions
az.plot_posterior(idata, var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'])
# Coefficient estimates
az.plot_forest(idata, var_names=['beta'], combined=True)
8. Make Predictions
X_new = ... # New predictor values
X_new_scaled = (X_new - X_mean) / X_std
with model:
pm.set_data({'X_scaled': X_new_scaled})
post_pred = pm.sample_posterior_predictive(
idata.posterior,
var_names=['y_obs'],
random_seed=42
)
# Extract prediction intervals
y_pred_mean = post_pred.posterior_predictive['y_obs'].mean(dim=['chain', 'draw'])
y_pred_hdi = az.hdi(post_pred.posterior_predictive, var_names=['y_obs'])
Common Model Patterns
Linear Regression
For continuous outcomes with linear relationships:
with pm.Model() as linear_model:
alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)
sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
mu = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
y = pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y_obs)
Use template: assets/linear_regression_template.py
Logistic Regression
For binary outcomes:
with pm.Model() as logistic_model:
alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)
logit_p = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
y = pm.Bernoulli('y', logit_p=logit_p, observed=y_obs)
Hierarchical Models
For grouped data (use non-centered parameterization):
with pm.Model(coords={'groups': group_names}) as hierarchical_model:
# Hyperpriors
mu_alpha = pm.Normal('mu_alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
sigma_alpha = pm.HalfNormal('sigma_alpha', sigma=1)
# Group-level (non-centered)
alpha_offset = pm.Normal('alpha_offset', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='groups')
alpha = pm.Deterministic('alpha', mu_alpha + sigma_alpha * alpha_offset, dims='groups')
# Observation-level
mu = alpha[group_idx]
sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
y = pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma, observed=y_obs)
Use template: assets/hierarchical_model_template.py
Critical: Always use non-centered parameterization for hierarchical models to avoid divergences.
Poisson Regression
For count data:
with pm.Model() as poisson_model:
alpha = pm.Normal('alpha', mu=0, sigma=10)
beta = pm.Normal('beta', mu=0, sigma=10, shape=n_predictors)
log_lambda = alpha + pm.math.dot(X, beta)
y = pm.Poisson('y', mu=pm.math.exp(log_lambda), observed=y_obs)
For overdispersed counts, use NegativeBinomial instead.
Time Series
For autoregressive processes:
with pm.Model() as ar_model:
sigma = pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)
rho = pm.Normal('rho', mu=0, sigma=0.5, shape=ar_order)
init_dist = pm.Normal.dist(mu=0, sigma=sigma)
y = pm.AR('y', rho=rho, sigma=sigma, init_dist=init_dist, observed=y_obs)
Model Comparison
Comparing Models
Use LOO or WAIC for model comparison:
from scripts.model_comparison import compare_models, check_loo_reliability
# Fit models with log_likelihood
models = {
'Model1': idata1,
'Model2': idata2,
'Model3': idata3
}
# Compare using LOO
comparison = compare_models(models, ic='loo')
# Check reliability
check_loo_reliability(models)
Interpretation:
- Δloo < 2: Models are similar, choose simpler model
- 2 < Δloo < 4: Weak evidence for better model
- 4 < Δloo < 10: Moderate evidence
- Δloo > 10: Strong evidence for better model
Check Pareto-k values:
- k < 0.7: LOO reliable
- k > 0.7: Consider WAIC or k-fold CV
Model Averaging
When models are similar, average predictions:
from scripts.model_comparison import model_averaging
averaged_pred, weights = model_averaging(models, var_name='y_obs')
Distribution Selection Guide
For Priors
Scale parameters (σ, τ):
pm.HalfNormal('sigma', sigma=1)- Default choicepm.Exponential('sigma', lam=1)- Alternativepm.Gamma('sigma', alpha=2, beta=1)- More informative
Unbounded parameters:
pm.Normal('theta', mu=0, sigma=1)- For standardized datapm.StudentT('theta', nu=3, mu=0, sigma=1)- Robust to outliers
Positive parameters:
pm.LogNormal('theta', mu=0, sigma=1)pm.Gamma('theta', alpha=2, beta=1)
Probabilities:
pm.Beta('p', alpha=2, beta=2)- Weakly informativepm.Uniform('p', lower=0, upper=1)- Non-informative (use sparingly)
Correlation matrices:
pm.LKJCorr('corr', n=n_vars, eta=2)- eta=1 uniform, eta>1 prefers identity
For Likelihoods
Continuous outcomes:
pm.Normal('y', mu=mu, sigma=sigma)- Default for continuous datapm.StudentT('y', nu=nu, mu=mu, sigma=sigma)- Robust to outliers
Count data:
pm.Poisson('y', mu=lambda)- Equidispersed countspm.NegativeBinomial('y', mu=mu, alpha=alpha)- Overdispersed countspm.ZeroInflatedPoisson('y', psi=psi, mu=mu)- Excess zeros
Binary outcomes:
pm.Bernoulli('y', p=p)orpm.Bernoulli('y', logit_p=logit_p)
Categorical outcomes:
pm.Categorical('y', p=probs)
See: references/distributions.md for comprehensive distribution reference
Sampling and Inference
MCMC with NUTS
Default and recommended for most models:
idata = pm.sample(
draws=2000,
tune=1000,
chains=4,
target_accept=0.9,
random_seed=42
)
Adjust when needed:
- Divergences →
target_accept=0.95or higher - Slow sampling → Use ADVI for initialization
- Discrete parameters → Use
pm.Metropolis()for discrete vars
Variational Inference
Fast approximation for exploration or initialization:
with model:
approx = pm.fit(n=20000, method='advi')
# Use for initialization
start = approx.sample(return_inferencedata=False)[0]
idata = pm.sample(start=start)
Trade-offs:
- Much faster than MCMC
- Approximate (may underestimate uncertainty)
- Good for large models or quick exploration
See: references/sampling_inference.md for detailed sampling guide
Diagnostic Scripts
Comprehensive Diagnostics
from scripts.model_diagnostics import create_diagnostic_report
create_diagnostic_report(
idata,
var_names=['alpha', 'beta', 'sigma'],
output_dir='diagnostics/'
)
Creates:
- Trace plots
- Rank plots (mixing check)
- Autocorrelation plots
- Energy plots
- ESS evolution
- Summary statistics CSV
Quick Diagnostic Check
from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics
results = check_diagnostics(idata)
Checks R-hat, ESS, divergences, and tree depth.
Common Issues and Solutions
Divergences
Symptom: idata.sample_stats.diverging.sum() > 0
Solutions:
- Increase
target_accept=0.95or0.99 - Use non-centered parameterization (hierarchical models)
- Add stronger priors to constrain parameters
- Check for model misspecification
Low Effective Sample Size
Symptom: ESS < 400
Solutions:
- Sample more draws:
draws=5000 - Reparameterize to reduce posterior correlation
- Use QR decomposition for regression with correlated predictors
High R-hat
Symptom: R-hat > 1.01
Solutions:
- Run longer chains:
tune=2000, draws=5000 - Check for multimodality
- Improve initialization with ADVI
Slow Sampling
Solutions:
- Use ADVI initialization
- Reduce model complexity
- Increase parallelization:
cores=8, chains=8 - Use variational inference if appropriate
Best Practices
Model Building
- Always standardize predictors for better sampling
- Use weakly informative priors (not flat)
- Use named dimensions (
dims) for clarity - Non-centered parameterization for hierarchical models
- Check prior predictive before fitting
Sampling
- Run multiple chains (at least 4) for convergence
- Use
target_accept=0.9as baseline (higher if needed) - Include
log_likelihood=Truefor model comparison - Set random seed for reproducibility
Validation
- Check diagnostics before interpretation (R-hat, ESS, divergences)
- Posterior predictive check for model validation
- Compare multiple models when appropriate
- Report uncertainty (HDI intervals, not just point estimates)
Workflow
- Start simple, add complexity gradually
- Prior predictive check → Fit → Diagnostics → Posterior predictive check
- Iterate on model specification based on checks
- Document assumptions and prior choices
Resources
This skill includes:
References (references/)
-
distributions.md: Comprehensive catalog of PyMC distributions organized by category (continuous, discrete, multivariate, mixture, time series). Use when selecting priors or likelihoods. -
sampling_inference.md: Detailed guide to sampling algorithms (NUTS, Metropolis, SMC), variational inference (ADVI, SVGD), and handling sampling issues. Use when encountering convergence problems or choosing inference methods. -
workflows.md: Complete workflow examples and code patterns for common model types, data preparation, prior selection, and model validation. Use as a cookbook for standard Bayesian analyses.
Scripts (scripts/)
-
model_diagnostics.py: Automated diagnostic checking and report generation. Functions:check_diagnostics()for quick checks,create_diagnostic_report()for comprehensive analysis with plots. -
model_comparison.py: Model comparison utilities using LOO/WAIC. Functions:compare_models(),check_loo_reliability(),model_averaging().
Templates (assets/)
-
linear_regression_template.py: Complete template for Bayesian linear regression with full workflow (data prep, prior checks, fitting, diagnostics, predictions). -
hierarchical_model_template.py: Complete template for hierarchical/multilevel models with non-centered parameterization and group-level analysis.
Quick Reference
Model Building
with pm.Model(coords={'var': names}) as model:
# Priors
param = pm.Normal('param', mu=0, sigma=1, dims='var')
# Likelihood
y = pm.Normal('y', mu=..., sigma=..., observed=data)
Sampling
idata = pm.sample(draws=2000, tune=1000, chains=4, target_accept=0.9)
Diagnostics
from scripts.model_diagnostics import check_diagnostics
check_diagnostics(idata)
Model Comparison
from scripts.model_comparison import compare_models
compare_models({'m1': idata1, 'm2': idata2}, ic='loo')
Predictions
with model:
pm.set_data({'X': X_new})
pred = pm.sample_posterior_predictive(idata.posterior)
Additional Notes
- PyMC integrates with ArviZ for visualization and diagnostics
- Use
pm.model_to_graphviz(model)to visualize model structure - Save results with
idata.to_netcdf('results.nc') - Load with
az.from_netcdf('results.nc') - For very large models, consider minibatch ADVI or data subsampling
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
content-collections
메타이 스킬은 콘텐츠 콜렉션(Content Collections)을 위한 프로덕션 검증된 설정을 제공합니다. 콘텐츠 콜렉션은 Markdown/MDX 파일을 Zod 검증이 포함된 타입 안전한 데이터 콜렉션으로 변환해주는 TypeScript 최우선 도구입니다. 블로그, 문서 사이트 또는 콘텐츠 중심의 Vite + React 애플리케이션을 구축할 때 타입 안전성과 자동 콘텐츠 검증을 보장하기 위해 사용하세요. Vite 플러그인 구성과 MDX 컴파일부터 배포 최적화 및 스키마 검증에 이르기까지 모든 것을 다룹니다.
polymarket
메타이 스킬은 개발자들이 Polymarket 예측 시장 플랫폼을 활용한 애플리케이션을 구축할 수 있도록 지원하며, 거래 및 시장 데이터를 위한 API 통합 기능을 포함합니다. 또한 WebSocket을 통한 실시간 데이터 스트리밍을 제공하여 실시간 거래와 시장 활동을 모니터링할 수 있습니다. 이를 통해 거래 전략을 구현하거나 실시간 시장 업데이트를 처리하는 도구를 생성하는 데 활용할 수 있습니다.
creating-opencode-plugins
메타이 스킬은 개발자들이 명령어, 파일, LSP 작업 등 25개 이상의 이벤트 유형에 연결되는 OpenCode 플러그인을 만들 수 있도록 돕습니다. JavaScript/TypeScript 모듈을 위한 플러그인 구조, 이벤트 API 명세, 구현 패턴을 제공합니다. OpenCode AI 어시스턴트의 라이프사이클을 사용자 정의 이벤트 기반 로직으로 가로채거나, 모니터링하거나, 확장해야 할 때 사용하세요.
sglang
메타SGLang은 RadixAttention 프리픽스 캐싱을 활용하여 JSON, 정규식, 에이전트 워크플로우를 위한 고속 구조화 생성에 특화된 고성능 LLM 서빙 프레임워크입니다. 특히 반복되는 프리픽스가 있는 작업에서 상당히 빠른 추론 속도를 제공하여 복잡한 구조화 출력 및 다중 턴 대화에 이상적입니다. 제약 디코딩이 필요하거나 광범위한 프리픽스 공유가 있는 애플리케이션을 구축할 때는 vLLM과 같은 대안보다 SGLang을 선택하십시오.
