Ontology Term Resolution

When to use

Any time an ontology identifier is about to be written down or trusted: annotating a metadata column, filling a submission template, auditing a table someone else produced, or checking whether an ID in an old file is still current.

The rule

Never write an ontology ID from memory, and never accept one without checking it.

Ontology IDs are memorable in form and arbitrary in detail. A plausible-looking UBERON:0002108 is a real term (small intestine) that is not the liver, and nothing downstream will catch the substitution — the ID is well-formed, the ontology is right, and the metadata is silently wrong. Reviewers cannot spot it either, which is why these errors persist into published datasets.

Every ID this skill emits comes from a live OLS lookup. Every ID it is handed gets verified.

Two directions

Both take single values or files, emit TSV or JSON, and need no packages beyond the standard library.

Resolve text to terms

cd skills/ontology-term-resolution/scripts

# one string, constrained to the ontology that should define it
python3 resolve_terms.py "liver" --ontology uberon

query   rank  curie           label  ontology  match_type   strategy  defining_ontology
liver   1     UBERON:0002107  liver  uberon    exact_label  exact     true

# a column of tissue names; anything not an exact hit is reported, not guessed
python3 resolve_terms.py --input tissues.txt --ontology uberon \
    --exact-only --format tsv -o resolved.tsv

# accept fuzzy fallbacks, then review the partial hits by hand
python3 resolve_terms.py "left ventrical of heart" --ontology uberon --top 3

The search escalates exact (label and synonym) → token → fulltext and stops at the first strategy that returns anything, reporting which one fired. --exact-only disables the ladder. --branch UBERON:0000465 restricts candidates to descendants of a term.

Read match_type before using a result. exact_label and exact_synonym are safe; partial means OLS returned its best guess for a string that does not exist as written, and needs a human decision. unresolved is a legitimate output — see references/curation-rules.md for the normalisations worth retrying first.

Validate existing IDs

python3 validate_terms.py UBERON:0002107 EFO:0001067 UBERON:9999999

id              status     actual_label                  ontology  replacement     detail
UBERON:0002107  ok         liver                         uberon
EFO:0001067     obsolete   obsolete_parasitic infection  efo       MONDO:0005135   obsolete; replaced by MONDO:0005135
UBERON:9999999  not_found                                                          no such term in the ontology this prefix names

Exit code is 1 if anything failed, 0 otherwise, 2 on usage or network trouble — so it works as a CI gate on a metadata file:

# id + label columns; catches IDs that exist but are labelled as something else
python3 validate_terms.py --input metadata.tsv --strict

# a tissue column must hold UBERON anatomical entities and nothing else
python3 validate_terms.py --input tissue_ids.tsv \
    --branch UBERON:0000465 --expect-ontology uberon

--strict promotes warnings to failures.

API behaviour that will mislead you

These are verified against the live service and are the reason this skill ships scripts rather than a recipe. Full detail in references/ols4-api.md.

Choosing the ontology

MONDO for disease, HP for phenotype, UBERON for tissue, CL for cell type, EFO for assay, ChEBI for compounds, NCBITaxon for organism, PATO for sex and for normal. Prefix-to-OLS-id mappings (HP is served as hp, Orphanet as ordo), branch roots for --branch, and the overlapping-ontology judgement calls are in references/ontology-registry.md.

Reporting results

Give the ID and the label, and say how each was matched. A table of bare IDs cannot be reviewed. State unresolved terms explicitly rather than filling them with the nearest hit.

References

• references/ols4-api.md — endpoints, parameters, response fields, and every verified trap.
• references/ontology-registry.md — prefix/ontology-id table, branch roots, which ontology owns which concept.
• references/curation-rules.md — candidate-selection procedure, normalisations to retry, auditing an existing table, obsolete terms, cross-ontology mapping.