MCP HubMCP Hub
스킬 목록으로 돌아가기

seo-aeo-geo

rampstackco
업데이트됨 2 days ago
6 조회
239
27
239
GitHub에서 보기
기타aidesign

정보

이 스킬은 개발자가 AI 개요 및 답변 엔진과 같은 AI 기반 검색 환경에 맞게 콘텐츠와 사이트 구조를 최적화하도록 돕습니다. 대규모 언어 모델에 인용되도록 구현하고, llms.txt를 적용하며, 검색이 기존 링크 방식에서 AI 생성 답변으로 전환됨에 따라 SEO를 미래 대비할 수 있게 지원합니다. AEO, GEO, AI 검색 최적화와 같은 용어나 AI가 유기적 트래픽에 미치는 영향에 대한 우려를 다룰 때 발동됩니다.

빠른 설치

Claude Code

추천
기본
npx skills add rampstackco/claude-skills -a claude-code
플러그인 명령대체
/plugin add https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skills
Git 클론대체
git clone https://github.com/rampstackco/claude-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/seo-aeo-geo

Claude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요

문서

AEO and GEO

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) and Generative Engine Optimization (GEO). Make content discoverable, extractable, and citable by AI search experiences.

This skill encodes principles. AI search products evolve fast. The principles age slower than the products.


When to use

  • Optimizing content for AI overviews and generative answer engines
  • Building or updating llms.txt
  • Structuring content so AI assistants can extract and cite it correctly
  • Future-proofing a site as search shifts from blue links to AI answers
  • Auditing whether existing content is AI-friendly
  • Adding signals that help AI assistants identify the site as a trustworthy source

When NOT to use

  • Traditional on-page or technical SEO (use seo-onpage or seo-technical)
  • Keyword research (use seo-keyword)
  • Off-page authority and link building (use seo-offpage)

This skill stacks on top of those. Strong AEO/GEO requires strong fundamental SEO underneath.


Required inputs

  • The site or page to optimize
  • The topic area or query types AI should cite the site for
  • Access to inspect rendered HTML and structured data

The framework: 5 layers

AI search visibility comes from five stacked layers. Each layer compounds.

1. Extractable content structure

AI systems extract facts and pull citations from content. Make extraction easy.

  • Direct answers. Open major sections with a definitive 1 to 3 sentence answer to the question that section addresses. AI extracts the first answer it sees.
  • Question-headers. Use H2s and H3s phrased as questions when natural. Mirrors how people prompt AI.
  • Atomic facts. When stating a fact, state it once, clearly, with the supporting context next to it. AI struggles when claims are spread across paragraphs.
  • Tables and lists. AI parses these reliably. Use them for comparisons, specs, steps, and data.
  • Definitions early. When introducing a concept, define it inline. Do not assume the reader (or AI) saw a definition three pages ago.
  • Numbered steps. For procedural content, number every step. Avoid prose disguised as instructions.

2. Citation worthiness

AI cites sources it considers authoritative. Earn that consideration.

  • Original data. Surveys, studies, proprietary research, internal benchmarks. AI prefers primary sources over restatements.
  • Specific numbers. "Roughly 40 percent" beats "many." Specific stats with sources beat round-number generalizations.
  • Named experts. Author bios with credentials, links to professional profiles, schema-marked-up Person entities.
  • Date stamps. Publication date AND last-updated date, both visible AND in schema. AI heavily weights recency for time-sensitive queries.
  • Methodology disclosure. When stating a finding, briefly note how it was reached. AI rewards transparency.
  • Citations of other sources. Linking to authoritative sources you used builds reciprocal credibility.

3. Structured data depth

Schema is how you speak machine-readable language. AI assistants parse it heavily.

  • Schema.org types appropriate to content (Article, FAQPage, HowTo, Recipe, Product, Organization, Person, LocalBusiness, etc.)
  • Required AND recommended properties filled in (most sites only fill required, leaving signal on the table)
  • Person schema for authors, with sameAs links to verifiable profiles
  • Organization schema on the homepage with logo, contact, social links
  • FAQPage schema for content with genuine question-answer pairs
  • HowTo schema for procedural content
  • BreadcrumbList schema site-wide
  • Validates in Schema.org Validator AND Rich Results Test (some properties differ)

4. AI-readable accessibility

Beyond traditional SEO, AI tools need access patterns of their own.

  • llms.txt at the site root. A markdown file at /llms.txt describing the site's content, key URLs, and what topics the site covers. See references/llms-txt-guide.md.
  • llms-full.txt (optional) - a complete content dump for AI training and context, if the site permits it.
  • robots.txt allowing AI crawlers. Decide explicitly which AI crawlers to allow (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, PerplexityBot, etc.) or disallow. Do not block by default if visibility matters.
  • Clean HTML semantics. Semantic tags (article, section, nav, main) help AI parse structure.
  • Avoid client-side-only rendering for critical content. Many AI crawlers render less reliably than Googlebot.

5. Real-world entity signals

AI builds knowledge graphs and prefers entities with multiple consistent signals.

  • Wikipedia entry if the brand or person qualifies for notability (do not force this; it requires genuine notability)
  • Wikidata entry for the entity, with consistent properties
  • Consistent NAP (Name, Address, Phone) across all citations
  • Brand mentions across multiple authoritative sources. AI cross-references entity claims across the open web.
  • Social profile schema linking owned profiles via sameAs properties
  • Reviews and reputation signals. Aggregate ratings on Google Business, Trustpilot, industry-specific review sites where applicable

Workflow

  1. Audit current state. Run the 5-layer framework against the existing site. Score each.
  2. Identify the priority queries. What questions should AI cite this site for? List 10 to 20.
  3. Test current AI visibility. Query each of the major AI products (those relevant to the audience) with the priority questions. Note which sources they cite.
  4. Identify gaps. Is the site cited? On which queries? Why does it lose to the cited sources?
  5. Layer-by-layer plan.
    • Fix extractable structure on top 20 priority pages
    • Add citation-worthy signals (original data, expert authorship, methodology)
    • Deepen schema implementation
    • Build/update llms.txt
    • Strengthen entity signals
  6. Implement and re-test. AI products update frequently. Re-test priority queries quarterly.

Failure patterns

  • Treating AEO/GEO as separate from SEO. Strong fundamental SEO is a prerequisite. AI cites pages, not magic.
  • Stuffing FAQ schema on pages that have no genuine FAQs. Search engines and AI alike penalize manufactured FAQ blocks.
  • Hiding key content behind heavy JavaScript. AI crawlers render less reliably. Server-render or pre-render critical content.
  • Optimizing for one AI product only. Different products use different ranking and citation logic. Optimize for the principles, not for one product's quirks.
  • Ignoring entity strength. Content alone, with no real-world entity signals, will not get cited reliably for branded or expertise-related queries.
  • Treating llms.txt as a magic bullet. It helps, but it is one of many signals.
  • Static optimization. AI products evolve faster than search algorithms historically did. Re-audit at least quarterly.

Output format

Default output is a markdown plan at aeo-geo-strategy.md. Structure:

  1. Current AI visibility audit (which queries cite the site, which do not)
  2. 5-layer scorecard
  3. Priority queries (the 10 to 20 the site should be cited for)
  4. Layer-by-layer remediation plan
  5. Implementation roadmap
  6. Re-test schedule (quarterly)

Reference files

GitHub 저장소

rampstackco/claude-skills
경로: skills/seo-aeo-geo
0
agent-skillsai-agentsanthropicclaudeclaude-aiclaude-code

연관 스킬

seo-onpage

기타

이 스킬은 개별 웹 페이지에 대한 포괄적인 온페이지 SEO 감사 및 최적화를 수행합니다. 제목 태그, 메타 설명, 헤더, 콘텐츠, 링크, 이미지, URL, 스키마 마크업 등 여덟 가지 핵심 요소를 분석하고 개선합니다. 검색 성능 향상을 위해 단일 페이지의 감사, 최적화 또는 SEO 친화적인 카피 작성이 필요할 때 사용하세요.

스킬 보기

seo-technical

기타

이 스킬은 크롤링 가능성, 색인 생성 가능성, 사이트 구조, 페이지 경험, 구조화된 데이터를 종합적으로 분석하는 기술적 SEO 감사를 수행합니다. 사이트맵, Core Web Vitals, 리디렉션과 같은 특정 용어에 반응하며, 트래픽 감소나 색인 생성 문제와 같은 이슈가 있을 때도 활성화됩니다. 사이트 전반의 다양한 검색 성능 관련 문제를 진단하고 해결하는 데 활용하세요.

스킬 보기

seo-keyword

기타

이 스킬은 포괄적인 SEO 키워드 연구를 수행하여 검색 의도를 분석하고, 콘텐츠 기획을 위해 키워드를 주제별 그룹으로 클러스터링합니다. 난이도와 검색량 같은 지표를 바탕으로 순위 향상 기회를 파악하고 키워드 우선순위를 정하는 데 도움을 줍니다. 개발자는 이를 활용해 신규 또는 기존 사이트의 콘텐츠 전략을 수립하고, 주제를 매핑하며, 콘텐츠 공백을 채울 수 있습니다.

스킬 보기

seo-content-audit

기타

이 스킬은 웹사이트 콘텐츠 라이브러리를 감사하여 각 콘텐츠를 '유지/업데이트/통합/리디렉션/삭제' 프레임워크로 체계적으로 평가하고 분류합니다. 콘텐츠 부패 해결, 키워드 캐니벌라이제이션 해소, 페이지 정리, 또는 사이트 전체 트래픽 감소 대응과 같은 SEO 작업에서 실행됩니다. 개발자는 이를 통해 콘텐츠 목록을 작성하고, 성과를 점수화하며, 실행 가능한 콘텐츠 관리 결정을 생성할 수 있습니다.

스킬 보기