MCP HubMCP Hub
스킬 목록으로 돌아가기

write-incident-runbook

pjt222
업데이트됨 Yesterday
4 조회
17
2
17
GitHub에서 보기
메타wordai

정보

이 Claude Skill은 구조화된 인시던트 실행 매뉴얼을 생성하여 진단 단계, 해결 절차, 에스컬레이션 경로를 표준화합니다. 반복적인 경고에 대한 절차를 문서화하고, 평균 해결 시간(MTTR)을 단축하며, 교육 자료를 만드는 데 사용됩니다. 이 스킬은 온콜 로테이션 전반의 인시던트 처리 능력을 향상시키기 위한 실행 가능한 가이드를 제공합니다.

빠른 설치

Claude Code

추천
기본
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
플러그인 명령대체
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git 클론대체
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/write-incident-runbook

Claude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요

문서

Write Incident Runbook

Create actionable runbooks guiding responders through incident diagnosis and resolution.

When Use

  • Documenting response procedures for recurring alerts or incidents
  • Standardizing incident response across on-call rotation members
  • Reducing mean time to resolution (MTTR) with clear diagnostic steps
  • Creating training materials for new team members on incident handling
  • Establishing escalation paths and communication protocols
  • Migrating tribal knowledge to written documentation
  • Linking alerts to resolution procedures (alert annotations)

Inputs

  • Required: Incident or alert name/description
  • Required: Historical incident data and resolution patterns
  • Optional: Diagnostic queries (Prometheus, logs, traces)
  • Optional: Escalation contacts and communication channels
  • Optional: Previous incident post-mortems

Steps

Step 1: Choose Runbook Template Structure

See Extended Examples for complete template files.

Select appropriate template based on incident type and complexity.

Basic runbook template structure:

# [Alert/Incident Name] Runbook
## Overview | Severity | Symptoms
## Diagnostic Steps | Resolution Steps
## Escalation | Communication | Prevention | Related

Advanced SRE runbook template (excerpt):

# [Service Name] - [Incident Type] Runbook

## Metadata
- Service, Owner, Severity, On-Call, Last Updated

## Diagnostic Phase
### Quick Health Check (< 5 min): Dashboard, error rate, deployments
### Detailed Investigation (5-20 min): Metrics, logs, traces, failure patterns
# ... (see EXAMPLES.md for complete template)

Key template components:

  • Metadata: Service ownership, severity, on-call rotation
  • Diagnostic Phase: Quick checks → detailed investigation → failure patterns
  • Resolution Phase: Immediate mitigation → root cause fix → verification
  • Escalation: Criteria and contact paths
  • Communication: Internal/external templates
  • Prevention: Short/long-term actions

Got: Template selected matches incident complexity. Sections appropriate for service type.

If err:

  • Start with basic template, iterate based on incident patterns
  • Review industry examples (Google SRE books, vendor runbooks)
  • Adapt template based on team feedback after first use

Step 2: Document Diagnostic Procedures

See Extended Examples for complete diagnostic queries and decision trees.

Create step-by-step investigation procedures with specific queries.

Six-step diagnostic checklist:

  1. Verify Service Health: Health endpoint checks and uptime metrics

    curl -I https://api.example.com/health  # Expected: HTTP 200 OK
    
    up{job="api-service"}  # Expected: 1 for all instances
    
  2. Check Error Rate: Current error percentage and breakdown by endpoint

    sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m]))
    / sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) * 100  # Expected: < 1%
    
  3. Analyze Logs: Recent errors and top error messages from Loki

    {job="api-service"} |= "error" | json | level="error"
    
  4. Check Resource Utilization: CPU, memory, connection pool status

    avg(rate(container_cpu_usage_seconds_total{pod=~"api-service.*"}[5m])) * 100
    # Expected: < 70%
    
  5. Review Recent Changes: Deployments, git commits, infrastructure changes

  6. Examine Dependencies: Downstream service health, database/API latency

Failure pattern decision tree (excerpt):

  • Service down? → Check all pods/instances
  • Error rate elevated? → Check specific error types (5xx, gateway, database, timeouts)
  • When did it start? → After deployment (rollback), gradual (resource leak), sudden (traffic/dependency)

Got: Diagnostic procedures specific. Include expected vs actual values. Guide responder through investigation.

If err:

  • Test queries in actual monitoring system before documenting
  • Include screenshots of dashboards for visual reference
  • Add "Common mistakes" section for frequently missed steps
  • Iterate based on feedback from incident responders

Step 3: Define Resolution Procedures

See Extended Examples for all 5 resolution options with full commands and rollback procedures.

Document step-by-step remediation with rollback options.

Five resolution options (brief summary):

  1. Rollback Deployment (fastest): For post-deployment errors

    kubectl rollout undo deployment/api-service
    

    Verify → Monitor → Confirm resolution (error rate < 1%, latency normal, no alerts)

  2. Scale Up Resources: For high CPU/memory, connection pool exhaustion

    kubectl scale deployment/api-service --replicas=$((current * 3/2))
    
  3. Restart Service: For memory leaks, stuck connections, cache corruption

    kubectl rollout restart deployment/api-service
    
  4. Feature Flag / Circuit Breaker: For specific feature errors or external dependency failures

    kubectl set env deployment/api-service FEATURE_NAME=false
    
  5. Database Remediation: For database connections, slow queries, pool exhaustion

    -- Kill long-running queries, restart connection pool, increase pool size
    

Universal verification checklist:

  • Error rate < 1%
  • Latency P99 < threshold
  • Throughput at baseline
  • Resource usage healthy (CPU < 70%, Memory < 80%)
  • Dependencies healthy
  • User-facing tests pass
  • No active alerts

Rollback procedure: Resolution worsens situation? → pause/cancel → revert → reassess

Got: Resolution steps clear. Include verification checks. Provide rollback options for each action.

If err:

  • Add more granular steps for complex procedures
  • Include screenshots or diagrams for multi-step processes
  • Document command outputs (expected vs actual)
  • Create separate runbook for complex resolution procedures

Step 4: Establish Escalation Paths

See Extended Examples for full escalation levels and contact directory template.

Define when and how to escalate incidents.

When to escalate immediately:

  • Customer-facing outage > 15 minutes
  • SLO error budget > 10% depleted
  • Data loss/corruption or security breach suspected
  • Unable to identify root cause within 20 minutes
  • Mitigation attempts fail or worsen situation

Five escalation levels:

  1. Primary On-Call (5 min response): Deploy fixes, rollback, scale (up to 30 min solo)
  2. Secondary On-Call (auto after 15 min): Additional investigation support
  3. Team Lead (architectural decisions): Database changes, vendor escalation, incidents > 1 hour
  4. Incident Commander (cross-team coord): Multiple teams, customer comms, incidents > 2 hours
  5. Executive (C-level): Major impact (>50% users), SLA breach, media/PR, outages > 4 hours

Escalation process:

  1. Notify target with: current status, impact, actions taken, help needed, dashboard link
  2. Handoff if needed: share timeline, actions, access. Remain available
  3. Don't go silent: update every 15 min, ask questions, provide feedback

Contact directory: Maintain table with role, Slack, phone, PagerDuty for:

  • Platform/Database/Security/Network teams
  • Incident Commander
  • External vendors (AWS, database vendor, CDN provider)

Got: Clear criteria for escalation. Contact information readily accessible. Escalation paths aligned with organizational structure.

If err:

  • Validate contact information current (test quarterly)
  • Add decision tree for when to escalate
  • Include examples of escalation messages
  • Document response time expectations for each level

Step 5: Create Communication Templates

See Extended Examples for all internal and external templates with full formatting.

Provide pre-written messages for incident updates.

Internal templates (Slack #incident-response):

  1. Initial Declaration:

    🚨 INCIDENT: [Title] | Severity: [Critical/High/Medium]
    Impact: [users/services] | Owner: @username | Dashboard: [link]
    Quick Summary: [1-2 sentences] | Next update: 15 min
    
  2. Progress Update (every 15-30 min):

    📊 UPDATE #N | Status: [Investigating/Mitigating/Monitoring]
    Actions: [what we tried and outcomes]
    Theory: [what we think is happening]
    Next: [planned actions]
    
  3. Mitigation Complete:

    ✅ MITIGATION | Metrics: Error [before→after], Latency [before→after]
    Root Cause: [brief or "investigating"] | Monitoring 30min before resolved
    
  4. Resolution:

    🎉 RESOLVED | Duration: [time] | Root Cause + Impact + Follow-up actions
    
  5. False Alarm: No impact, no follow-up needed

External templates (status page):

  • Initial: Investigating, started time, next update in 15 min
  • Progress: Identified cause (customer-friendly), implementing fix, estimated resolution
  • Resolution: Resolved time, root cause (simple), duration, prevention measures

Customer email template: Timeline, impact description, resolution, prevention, compensation (if applicable)

Got: Templates save time during incidents. Ensure consistent communication. Reduce cognitive load on responders.

If err:

  • Customize templates to match company communication style
  • Pre-fill templates with common incident types
  • Create Slack workflow/bot to populate templates automatically
  • Review templates during incident retrospectives

Step 6: Link Runbook to Monitoring

See Extended Examples for complete Prometheus alert configuration and Grafana dashboard JSON.

Integrate runbook with alerts and dashboards.

Add runbook links to Prometheus alerts:

- alert: HighErrorRate
  annotations:
    runbook_url: "https://wiki.example.com/runbooks/high-error-rate"
    dashboard_url: "https://grafana.example.com/d/service-overview"
    incident_channel: "#incident-platform"

Embed quick diagnostic links in runbook:

  • Service Overview Dashboard
  • Error Rate Last 1h (Prometheus direct link)
  • Recent Error Logs (Loki/Grafana Explore)
  • Recent Deployments (GitHub/CI)
  • PagerDuty Incidents

Create Grafana dashboard panel with runbook links (markdown panel listing all incident runbooks with on-call and escalation info)

Got: Responders can access runbooks directly from alerts or dashboards. Diagnostic queries pre-filled. One-click access to relevant tools.

If err:

  • Verify runbook URLs accessible without VPN/login
  • Use URL shorteners for complex Grafana/Prometheus links
  • Test links quarterly to ensure they don't break
  • Create browser bookmarks for frequently used runbooks

Check

  • Runbook follows consistent template structure
  • Diagnostic procedures include specific queries and expected values
  • Resolution steps actionable with clear commands
  • Escalation criteria and contacts current
  • Communication templates provided for internal and external audiences
  • Runbook linked from monitoring alerts and dashboards
  • Runbook tested during incident simulation or actual incident
  • Feedback from responders incorporated into runbook
  • Revision history tracked with dates and authors
  • Runbook accessible without authentication (or cached offline)

Pitfalls

  • Too generic: Runbooks with vague steps like "check the logs" without specific queries not actionable. Be specific.
  • Outdated information: Runbooks referencing old systems or commands become useless. Review quarterly.
  • No verification steps: Resolution without verification leads to false positives. Always include "how to confirm it's fixed."
  • Missing rollback procedures: Every action should have rollback plan. Don't trap responders in worse state.
  • Assume knowledge: Runbooks for experts only exclude junior engineers. Write for least experienced person on rotation.
  • No ownership: Runbooks without owners become stale. Assign team/person responsible for updates.
  • Hidden behind auth: Runbooks inaccessible during VPN/SSO issues useless during crisis. Cache copies or use public wiki.

See Also

  • configure-alerting-rules - Link runbooks to alert annotations for immediate access during incidents
  • build-grafana-dashboards - Embed runbook links in dashboards and diagnostic panels
  • setup-prometheus-monitoring - Include diagnostic queries from Prometheus in runbook procedures
  • define-slo-sli-sla - Reference SLO impact in incident severity classification

GitHub 저장소

pjt222/agent-almanac
경로: i18n/caveman/skills/write-incident-runbook
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

연관 스킬

content-collections

메타

이 스킬은 콘텐츠 콜렉션(Content Collections)을 위한 프로덕션 검증된 설정을 제공합니다. 콘텐츠 콜렉션은 Markdown/MDX 파일을 Zod 검증이 포함된 타입 안전한 데이터 콜렉션으로 변환해주는 TypeScript 최우선 도구입니다. 블로그, 문서 사이트 또는 콘텐츠 중심의 Vite + React 애플리케이션을 구축할 때 타입 안전성과 자동 콘텐츠 검증을 보장하기 위해 사용하세요. Vite 플러그인 구성과 MDX 컴파일부터 배포 최적화 및 스키마 검증에 이르기까지 모든 것을 다룹니다.

스킬 보기

polymarket

메타

이 스킬은 개발자들이 Polymarket 예측 시장 플랫폼을 활용한 애플리케이션을 구축할 수 있도록 지원하며, 거래 및 시장 데이터를 위한 API 통합 기능을 포함합니다. 또한 WebSocket을 통한 실시간 데이터 스트리밍을 제공하여 실시간 거래와 시장 활동을 모니터링할 수 있습니다. 이를 통해 거래 전략을 구현하거나 실시간 시장 업데이트를 처리하는 도구를 생성하는 데 활용할 수 있습니다.

스킬 보기

creating-opencode-plugins

메타

이 스킬은 개발자들이 명령어, 파일, LSP 작업 등 25개 이상의 이벤트 유형에 연결되는 OpenCode 플러그인을 만들 수 있도록 돕습니다. JavaScript/TypeScript 모듈을 위한 플러그인 구조, 이벤트 API 명세, 구현 패턴을 제공합니다. OpenCode AI 어시스턴트의 라이프사이클을 사용자 정의 이벤트 기반 로직으로 가로채거나, 모니터링하거나, 확장해야 할 때 사용하세요.

스킬 보기

sglang

메타

SGLang은 RadixAttention 프리픽스 캐싱을 활용하여 JSON, 정규식, 에이전트 워크플로우를 위한 고속 구조화 생성에 특화된 고성능 LLM 서빙 프레임워크입니다. 특히 반복되는 프리픽스가 있는 작업에서 상당히 빠른 추론 속도를 제공하여 복잡한 구조화 출력 및 다중 턴 대화에 이상적입니다. 제약 디코딩이 필요하거나 광범위한 프리픽스 공유가 있는 애플리케이션을 구축할 때는 vLLM과 같은 대안보다 SGLang을 선택하십시오.

스킬 보기