MCP HubMCP Hub
스킬 목록으로 돌아가기

deal-risk-scoring

guia-matthieu
업데이트됨 2 days ago
6 조회
111
20
111
GitHub에서 보기
기타general

정보

이 스킬은 위험에 처한 기회를 식별하기 위해 참여 신호, 이해관계자 매핑 및 진행 속도 분석을 활용해 거래 건전성을 분석합니다. 거래 검토, 파이프라인 정비, 코칭 또는 자원 우선순위 설정 시 사용하도록 설계되었습니다. 이 도구는 다중 접점, 경쟁 신호 및 타임라인 정렬을 평가함으로써 개발자들이 거래를 평가하는 데 도움을 줍니다.

빠른 설치

Claude Code

추천
기본
npx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code
플러그인 명령대체
/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
Git 클론대체
git clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/deal-risk-scoring

Claude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요

문서

Deal Risk Scoring

Evaluate individual deal health through multi-signal analysis to prioritize coaching, intervention, and resource allocation.

When to Use This Skill

  • Weekly deal reviews and pipeline scrubs
  • Before QBRs to identify problem deals
  • When deals stall or push close dates
  • Prioritizing manager coaching time
  • Allocating SE/executive resources

Methodology Foundation

Based on Gong's Deal Intelligence research and Winning by Design's Revenue Architecture, analyzing:

  • Engagement velocity (email, meeting frequency)
  • Stakeholder breadth (multi-threading)
  • Competitive signals
  • Timeline alignment
  • Champion strength

What Claude Does vs What You Decide

Claude DoesYou Decide
Scores deals on risk factorsWhich deals to save vs. let go
Identifies missing elementsResource allocation priorities
Suggests intervention actionsExecutive sponsor assignments
Tracks velocity trendsFinal stage/probability updates
Flags competitive threatsWin strategy adjustments

What This Skill Does

  1. Multi-signal analysis - Engagement, stakeholders, timeline, competition
  2. Risk scoring - Green/Yellow/Red health status with reasons
  3. Gap identification - Missing stakeholders, stalled stages, unclear next steps
  4. Action recommendations - Specific interventions to reduce risk
  5. Trend tracking - Velocity changes over time

How to Use

Assess the risk for this deal:

Deal: [Company Name]
Value: $X
Stage: [Current Stage]
Close Date: [Target Date]
Days in Stage: X

Recent Activity:
- [List emails, meetings, calls with dates]

Stakeholders:
- [Name, Title, Role in deal, Engagement level]

Competition: [Known competitors]
Champion: [Name and strength assessment]

Instructions

Step 1: Engagement Velocity Score (0-25 points)

CriteriaPoints
Meeting in last 7 days+10
Email response in last 3 days+5
Multiple contacts engaged+5
Prospect initiating contact+5
No activity 14+ days-15

Step 2: Stakeholder Coverage Score (0-25 points)

CriteriaPoints
Economic Buyer identified+10
Champion confirmed+10
Technical evaluator engaged+5
Only 1 contact-10
No C-level access-5

Step 3: Process Alignment Score (0-25 points)

CriteriaPoints
Clear next step scheduled+10
Mutual action plan agreed+10
Decision timeline confirmed+5
Close date pushed 2+ times-15
No defined process-10

Step 4: Competitive Position Score (0-25 points)

CriteriaPoints
No competition+15
Differentiation clear+10
Incumbent advantage-10
Price pressure-5
Unknown competitive status-5

Step 5: Calculate Total Risk Score

ScoreHealthAction
75-100🟢 GreenMonitor, standard process
50-74🟡 YellowIntervention needed
25-49🟠 OrangeEscalate, major action
0-24🔴 RedRescue or disqualify

Examples

Example 1: At-Risk Enterprise Deal

Input:

Deal: TechCorp Global
Value: $250K ARR
Stage: 3 - Proposal
Close Date: Feb 28 (pushed from Jan 31)
Days in Stage: 28

Recent Activity:
- Jan 15: Proposal sent to John (Dir of Ops)
- Jan 22: Follow-up email (no response)
- Jan 29: Called, voicemail
- Feb 5: Email asking for update (no response)

Stakeholders:
- John Smith, Director of Ops, Champion (was engaged)
- No other contacts

Competition: Competitor X mentioned in discovery
Champion: John - went silent

Output:

## Deal Risk Assessment: TechCorp Global

### Overall Score: 28/100 🔴 RED - HIGH RISK

### Score Breakdown

| Factor | Score | Issues |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Engagement | 0/25 | No response in 14+ days |
| Stakeholders | 5/25 | Single-threaded, no EB |
| Process | 5/25 | Pushed once, no clear next step |
| Competition | 18/25 | Competitor known but not blocking |
| **Total** | **28/100** | |

### Critical Risks

1. **🔴 Champion Gone Dark** - John hasn't responded in 14 days
   - Possible: Left company, lost internal support, chose competitor

2. **🔴 Single-Threaded** - No other relationships
   - If John is out, deal is dead

3. **🟠 No Economic Buyer** - Never met decision maker
   - John may not have authority to close

### Recommended Actions

**This Week:**
1. Research John on LinkedIn - still at company?
2. Find another contact via LinkedIn/referral
3. Send "breakup email" to force response
4. Check if Competitor X is in active eval

**If No Response by Friday:**
- Move to Stage 2 or Closed-Lost
- Free up forecast slot

### Red Flags to Watch
- If proposal was forwarded to competitor
- If budget was reallocated
- If project was deprioritized

### Save Probability: 25%
Without new contact access, this deal is likely lost.

Example 2: Healthy Deal Review

Input:

Deal: GrowthCo Inc
Value: $85K ARR
Stage: 4 - Negotiation
Close Date: Feb 15
Days in Stage: 7

Recent Activity:
- Feb 1: Demo to full team (8 attendees)
- Feb 3: Pricing discussion with CFO
- Feb 5: Legal reviewing MSA
- Feb 7: Call scheduled for Feb 10

Stakeholders:
- Maria Lopez, VP Sales (Champion, highly engaged)
- Tom Chen, CFO (Economic Buyer, positive)
- Legal team (reviewing contract)
- 8 end users attended demo

Competition: None identified
Champion: Maria - actively selling internally

Output:

## Deal Risk Assessment: GrowthCo Inc

### Overall Score: 88/100 🟢 GREEN - HEALTHY

### Score Breakdown

| Factor | Score | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Engagement | 25/25 | Daily activity, prospect-driven |
| Stakeholders | 23/25 | EB + Champion + Users confirmed |
| Process | 22/25 | Clear timeline, legal in motion |
| Competition | 18/25 | No competition identified |
| **Total** | **88/100** | |

### Strengths

1. **✅ Multi-threaded** - Champion, EB, and end users engaged
2. **✅ Process momentum** - Legal reviewing = serious intent
3. **✅ Executive access** - CFO in pricing discussions
4. **✅ Champion active** - Maria driving internally

### Minor Risks

1. **🟡 Legal review** - Could surface unexpected blockers
   - Mitigation: Pre-review common redlines

2. **🟡 No competition confirmed** - May be unknown
   - Mitigation: Ask directly in next call

### Recommended Actions

**Feb 10 Call Prep:**
1. Prepare redline responses for common legal issues
2. Confirm decision process post-legal
3. Ask: "Is anyone else in consideration?"
4. Get verbal commit from Maria

### Close Probability: 85%
Deal is on track. Focus on removing legal friction.

Skill Boundaries

What This Skill Does Well

  • Objective risk scoring from available data
  • Identifying gaps in deal coverage
  • Prioritizing which deals need attention
  • Suggesting specific interventions

What This Skill Cannot Do

  • Know information not provided (internal politics)
  • Predict competitor moves
  • Replace relationship judgment
  • Guarantee score accuracy with incomplete data

When to Escalate to Human

  • Strategic accounts requiring executive judgment
  • Deals involving partnerships or M&A
  • Unusual contract structures
  • Competitive intelligence gathering

Iteration Guide

Follow-up Prompts

  • "What's the single most important action for this deal?"
  • "Compare risk scores for my top 5 deals."
  • "What questions should I ask in the next meeting?"
  • "Draft a re-engagement email for the silent champion."

Refinement Cycle

  1. Initial assessment → Identify top risks
  2. Take action → Update activity log
  3. Re-score → Track improvement
  4. Weekly review → Trend analysis

Checklists & Templates

Deal Health Checklist

  • Champion identified and engaged this week
  • Economic Buyer met at least once
  • Next step scheduled within 7 days
  • Competition status known
  • Close date validated by prospect

Risk Score Template

## Deal: [Name] | Score: X/100 [Status Emoji]

### Quick Stats
- Value: $X | Stage: X | Days: X | Close: [Date]

### Scores
| Factor | Score | Key Issue |
|--------|-------|-----------|
| Engagement | /25 | |
| Stakeholders | /25 | |
| Process | /25 | |
| Competition | /25 | |

### Top 3 Actions
1.
2.
3.

References

  • Gong Deal Intelligence Research
  • Winning by Design Revenue Architecture
  • MEDDPICC Qualification Framework
  • Force Management Command of the Message

Related Skills

  • pipeline-forecasting - Aggregate deal health into forecast
  • lead-qualification-meddic - Deep qualification framework
  • account-health - Post-sale relationship scoring

Skill Metadata

  • Domain: RevOps
  • Complexity: Intermediate
  • Mode: centaur
  • Time to Value: 10 minutes per deal
  • Prerequisites: Deal details, activity history, stakeholder map

GitHub 저장소

guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills
경로: skills/revops/deal-risk-scoring
0
ai-skillsanthropicclaude-codeclaude-skillsmarketingmcp-server

연관 스킬

llamaguard

기타

LlamaGuard는 폭력 및 혐오 발언 등 6가지 안전 범주에서 LLM 입력과 출력을 조정하기 위한 Meta의 70-80억 파라미터 모델입니다. 94-95% 정확도를 제공하며 vLLM, Hugging Face 또는 Amazon SageMaker를 사용해 배포할 수 있습니다. 이 기술을 사용하여 AI 애플리케이션에 콘텐츠 필터링 및 안전 가드레일을 손쉽게 통합하세요.

스킬 보기

cost-optimization

기타

이 Claude Skill은 리소스 적정화, 태깅 전략, 지출 분석을 통해 개발자들이 클라우드 비용을 최적화할 수 있도록 지원합니다. AWS, Azure, GCP에서 클라우드 비용을 절감하고 비용 거버넌스를 구현하기 위한 프레임워크를 제공합니다. 인프라 비용을 분석하거나, 리소스를 적정화하거나, 예산 제약을 충족해야 할 때 사용하세요.

스킬 보기

quantizing-models-bitsandbytes

기타

이 스킬은 bitsandbytes를 사용하여 LLM을 8비트 또는 4비트 정밀도로 양자화하며, 최소한의 정확도 손실로 50-75%의 메모리 감소를 달성합니다. 제한된 GPU 메모리에서 더 큰 모델을 실행하거나 추론을 가속화하는 데 이상적이며, INT8, NF4, FP4와 같은 형식을 지원합니다. 이 스킬은 HuggingFace Transformers와 통합되어 QLoRA 학습 및 8비트 옵티마이저를 가능하게 합니다.

스킬 보기

dispatching-parallel-agents

기타

이 Claude Skill은 3개 이상의 독립적인 문제를 동시에 조사하고 해결하기 위해 다중 에이전트를 배치합니다. 공유 상태나 의존성 없이 해결 가능한 무관련 장애 시나리오에 맞게 설계되었습니다. 핵심 기능은 병렬 문제 해결로, 각 독립 문제 영역마다 하나의 에이전트를 할당하여 효율성을 극대화합니다.

스킬 보기