plan-capacity
정보
이 기술은 predict_linear와 같은 성장 모델과 과거 메트릭을 사용하여 자원 수요를 예측합니다. 제약 조건을 식별하고, 여유 용량을 계산하며, 포화 상태를 방지하기 위한 확장 조치를 권장합니다. 트래픽 급증이나 출시 전, 또는 사용률이 상승하는 분기별 검토 시에 활용하세요.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/plan-capacityClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Plan Capacity
Forecast resource needs, prevent saturation via data-driven capacity planning.
Use When
- Before seasonal traffic spikes (holidays, sales)
- New feature launches
- Quarterly capacity reviews
- Resource util trends up
- Before budget cycles
In
- Required: Historical metrics (CPU, mem, disk, net, req/s)
- Required: Time range for trend (min 4 weeks)
- Optional: Business growth projections (user growth, launches)
- Optional: Budget constraints
Do
Step 1: Collect Historical Metrics
Query Prometheus for key resources:
# CPU usage trend over 8 weeks
avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m])) by (instance)
# Memory usage trend
avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes - node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) by (instance)
# Disk usage growth
avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes - node_filesystem_free_bytes) by (instance, device)
# Request rate growth
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m])) by (service)
# Database connection pool usage
avg(db_connection_pool_used / db_connection_pool_max) by (instance)
Export → analyze:
# Export 8 weeks of CPU data
curl -G 'http://prometheus:9090/api/v1/query_range' \
--data-urlencode 'query=avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m])) by (instance)' \
--data-urlencode 'start=2024-12-15T00:00:00Z' \
--data-urlencode 'end=2025-02-09T00:00:00Z' \
--data-urlencode 'step=1h' | jq '.data.result' > cpu_8weeks.json
→ Clean time series per resource, no big gaps.
If err: missing data → forecast accuracy down. Check metric retention + scrape intervals.
Step 2: Calc Growth w/ predict_linear
Prometheus predict_linear() → forecast saturation:
# Predict when CPU will hit 80% (4 weeks ahead)
predict_linear(
avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))[8w:],
4*7*24*3600 # 4 weeks in seconds
) > 0.80
# Predict disk full date (8 weeks ahead)
predict_linear(
avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes - node_filesystem_free_bytes)[8w:],
8*7*24*3600
) > 0.95 * avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes)
# Predict memory pressure (2 weeks ahead)
predict_linear(
avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes - node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes)[8w:],
2*7*24*3600
) / avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes) > 0.90
# Predict request rate capacity breach (4 weeks ahead)
predict_linear(
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))[8w:],
4*7*24*3600
) > 10000 # known capacity limit
Forecast dashboard:
{
"dashboard": {
"title": "Capacity Forecast",
"panels": [
{
"title": "CPU Saturation Forecast (4 weeks)",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "predict_linear(avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!=\"idle\"}[5m]))[8w:], 4*7*24*3600)",
"legendFormat": "Predicted CPU"
},
{
"expr": "0.80",
"legendFormat": "Target Threshold (80%)"
}
]
},
{
"title": "Disk Full Date",
"targets": [
{
"expr": "(avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes) - predict_linear(avg(node_filesystem_free_bytes)[8w:], 8*7*24*3600)) / avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes)",
"legendFormat": "Predicted Usage %"
}
]
}
]
}
}
→ Clear viz → when resources breach thresholds.
If err: predictions wrong (negative, wild swings) → check:
- Insufficient history (need 4+ weeks)
- Step spikes (deploys, migrations) distorting trend
- Seasonal patterns not in linear model
Step 3: Calc Current Headroom
Safety margin before saturation:
# CPU headroom (percentage remaining before 80% threshold)
(0.80 - avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))) / 0.80 * 100
# Memory headroom (bytes remaining before 90% usage)
avg(node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) - (avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes) * 0.10)
# Request rate headroom (requests/sec before saturation)
10000 - sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
# Time until saturation (weeks until CPU hits 80%)
(0.80 - avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))) /
deriv(avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))[8w:]) /
(7*24*3600)
Headroom summary report:
cat > capacity_headroom.md <<'EOF'
# Capacity Headroom Report (2025-02-09)
## Current Utilization
- **CPU**: 45% average (target: <80%)
- **Memory**: 62% (target: <90%)
- **Disk**: 71% (target: <95%)
- **Request Rate**: 4,200 req/s (capacity: 10,000)
## Headroom Analysis
- **CPU**: 35% headroom → ~12 weeks until saturation
- **Memory**: 28% headroom → ~16 weeks until saturation
- **Disk**: 24% headroom → ~8 weeks until full
- **Request Rate**: 5,800 req/s headroom → ~20 weeks until capacity
## Priority Actions
1. **Disk**: Implement log rotation or expand volume within 4 weeks
2. **CPU**: Plan horizontal scaling in next quarter
3. **Memory**: Monitor but no immediate action needed
EOF
→ Quantified headroom per resource w/ time-to-saturation.
If err: headroom already negative → reactive mode. Immediate scaling needed.
Step 4: Model Growth Scenarios
Factor in business projections:
# Example Python script for scenario modeling
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
# Load historical data
df = pd.read_json('cpu_8weeks.json')
# Calculate weekly growth rate
growth_rate_weekly = df['value'].pct_change(periods=7).mean()
# Scenario 1: Current trend
weeks_ahead = 12
current_trend = df['value'].iloc[-1] * (1 + growth_rate_weekly) ** weeks_ahead
# Scenario 2: 2x user growth (marketing campaign)
accelerated_trend = df['value'].iloc[-1] * (1 + growth_rate_weekly * 2) ** weeks_ahead
# Scenario 3: New feature launch (+30% baseline)
feature_launch = (df['value'].iloc[-1] * 1.30) * (1 + growth_rate_weekly) ** weeks_ahead
print(f"Current Trend (12 weeks): {current_trend:.1%} CPU")
print(f"2x Growth Scenario: {accelerated_trend:.1%} CPU")
print(f"Feature Launch Scenario: {feature_launch:.1%} CPU")
print(f"Threshold: 80%")
→ Multiple scenarios → impact of business changes on capacity.
If err: scenarios exceed capacity → prioritize scaling before event.
Step 5: Generate Scaling Recommendations
Actionable recs:
## Capacity Scaling Plan
### Immediate Actions (Next 4 Weeks)
1. **Disk Expansion** [Priority: HIGH]
- Current: 500GB, 71% used
- Projected full date: 2025-04-01 (8 weeks)
- Action: Expand to 1TB by 2025-03-15
- Cost: $50/month additional
- Justification: 5 weeks lead time needed
2. **Log Rotation Policy** [Priority: MEDIUM]
- Current: Logs retained 90 days
- Action: Reduce to 30 days, archive to S3
- Savings: ~150GB disk space
- Cost: $5/month S3 storage
### Near-Term Actions (Next Quarter)
3. **Horizontal Scaling - API Tier** [Priority: MEDIUM]
- Current: 4 instances, 45% CPU
- Projected: 65% CPU by 2025-05-01
- Action: Add 2 instances (to 6 total)
- Cost: $400/month
- Trigger: When CPU avg exceeds 60% for 7 days
4. **Database Connection Pool** [Priority: LOW]
- Current: 50 max connections, 40% used
- Projected: 55% by Q3
- Action: Increase to 75 in Q2
- Cost: None (configuration change)
### Long-Term Planning (Next 6 Months)
5. **Migration to Auto-Scaling** [Priority: MEDIUM]
- Current: Manual scaling
- Action: Implement Kubernetes HPA (Horizontal Pod Autoscaler)
- Timeline: Q3 2025
- Benefit: Automatic response to load spikes
→ Prioritized list w/ costs, timelines, trigger conditions.
If err: recs rejected on cost → revisit thresholds or accept risk.
Step 6: Set Up Capacity Alerts
Alerts on low headroom:
# capacity_alerts.yml
groups:
- name: capacity
interval: 1h
rules:
- alert: CPUCapacityLow
expr: |
(0.80 - avg(rate(node_cpu_seconds_total{mode!="idle"}[5m]))) / 0.80 < 0.20
for: 24h
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "CPU headroom below 20%"
description: "Current CPU headroom: {{ $value | humanizePercentage }}. Scaling needed within 4 weeks."
- alert: DiskFillForecast
expr: |
predict_linear(avg(node_filesystem_free_bytes)[8w:], 4*7*24*3600) < 0.10 * avg(node_filesystem_size_bytes)
for: 1h
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "Disk projected to fill within 4 weeks"
description: "Expand disk volume soon."
- alert: MemoryCapacityLow
expr: |
avg(node_memory_MemAvailable_bytes) < 0.15 * avg(node_memory_MemTotal_bytes)
for: 6h
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "Memory headroom below 15%"
→ Alerts fire before saturation → time to scale proactively.
If err: alerts fire too often (alert fatigue) or too late (reactive) → tune thresholds.
Check
- Historical metrics ≥ 8 weeks
-
predict_linear()returns sensible forecasts (no negatives) - Headroom calc'd for all critical resources
- Scenarios include business projections
- Scaling recs have costs + timelines
- Capacity alerts configured + tested
- Report reviewed w/ eng leadership + finance
Traps
- Insufficient history: Linear predictions need 4+ weeks. Less → unreliable.
- Ignore step changes: Deploys, migrations, launches → spikes distort trends. Filter or annotate.
- Linear assumption: Not all growth linear. Exponential (viral) needs other models.
- Forget lead time: Cloud provision fast, but procurement, budgets, migrations take weeks. Plan early.
- No budget alignment: Planning w/o budget buy-in → last-min scramble. Involve finance early.
→
setup-prometheus-monitoring— collect metrics used for capacity planningbuild-grafana-dashboards— viz forecasts + headroomoptimize-cloud-costs— balance capacity vs cost
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
executing-plans
디자인executing-plans 스킬은 검토 체크포인트가 포함된 통제된 배치로 실행할 완전한 구현 계획이 있을 때 사용합니다. 이 스킬은 계획을 불러와 비판적으로 검토한 후, 소규모 배치(기본값 3개 작업)로 작업을 실행하면서 각 배치 사이에 진행 상황을 아키텍트 검토를 위해 보고합니다. 이를 통해 내재된 품질 관리 체크포인트를 갖춘 체계적인 구현이 보장됩니다.
requesting-code-review
디자인이 스킬은 코드 변경 사항을 요구 사항에 따라 분석하기 위해 코드 리뷰어 하위 에이전트를 호출합니다. 작업 완료 후, 주요 기능 구현 후, 또는 메인 브랜치에 병합하기 전에 사용해야 합니다. 이 리뷰는 현재 구현체와 원래 계획을 비교하여 문제를 조기에 발견하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
connect-mcp-server
디자인이 스킬은 개발자들이 HTTP, stdio 또는 SSE 전송 방식을 통해 MCP 서버를 Claude Code에 연결하는 포괄적인 가이드를 제공합니다. GitHub, Notion 및 사용자 정의 API와 같은 외부 서비스를 통합하기 위한 설치, 구성, 인증 및 보안을 다룹니다. MCP 통합 설정, 외부 도구 구성 또는 Claude의 모델 컨텍스트 프로토콜 작업 시 활용하세요.
web-cli-teleport
디자인이 스킬은 작업 분석을 기반으로 개발자가 Claude Code 웹 인터페이스와 CLI 인터페이스 중 선택할 수 있도록 돕고, 두 환경 간 원활한 세션 텔레포트를 가능하게 합니다. 웹, CLI 또는 모바일 환경 전환 시 세션 상태와 컨텍스트를 관리하여 워크플로를 최적화합니다. 다양한 단계에서 서로 다른 도구가 필요한 복잡한 프로젝트에 사용하세요.
