MCP HubMCP Hub
스킬 목록으로 돌아가기

pymoo

K-Dense-AI
업데이트됨 Today
26,534
2,743
26,534
GitHub에서 보기
디자인aidesign

정보

pymoo 스킬은 상충되는 목표를 가진 공학 설계 문제의 파레토 최적 해를 찾기 위해 NSGA-II 및 MOEA/D와 같은 알고리즘을 사용하여 파이썬에서 다중 목표 최적화를 가능하게 합니다. 제약 조건 처리, 벤치마크 문제(ZDT, DTLZ), 그리고 사용자 정의 가능한 유전자 연산자를 제공합니다. 여러 경쟁 목표 간의 트레이드오프 분석이 필요한 최적화 문제를 해결해야 할 때 이 스킬을 사용하세요.

빠른 설치

Claude Code

추천
기본
npx skills add K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills -a claude-code
플러그인 명령대체
/plugin add https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills
Git 클론대체
git clone https://github.com/K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/pymoo

Claude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요

문서

Pymoo - Multi-Objective Optimization in Python

Overview

Pymoo is a comprehensive Python framework for optimization with emphasis on multi-objective problems. Solve single and multi-objective optimization using state-of-the-art algorithms (NSGA-II/III, MOEA/D, SPEA2), benchmark problems (ZDT, DTLZ), customizable genetic operators, and multi-criteria decision making methods. Excels at finding trade-off solutions (Pareto fronts) for problems with conflicting objectives. Current stable release: pymoo 0.6.1.6 (November 2025).

Installation

uv pip install pymoo

For reproducible environments, pin a version: uv pip install "pymoo==0.6.1.6".

Dependencies: NumPy (2.x compatible since 0.6.1.3), SciPy, matplotlib (visualization). Autograd is optional for gradient-based features (since 0.6.1.3).

Documentation: https://pymoo.org/ — LLM-friendly index: https://pymoo.org/llms.txt

When to Use This Skill

This skill should be used when:

  • Solving optimization problems with one or multiple objectives
  • Finding Pareto-optimal solutions and analyzing trade-offs
  • Implementing evolutionary algorithms (GA, DE, PSO, NSGA-II/III)
  • Working with constrained optimization problems
  • Benchmarking algorithms on standard test problems (ZDT, DTLZ, WFG)
  • Customizing genetic operators (crossover, mutation, selection)
  • Visualizing high-dimensional optimization results
  • Making decisions from multiple competing solutions
  • Handling binary, discrete, continuous, or mixed-variable problems

Core Concepts

The Unified Interface

Pymoo uses a consistent minimize() function for all optimization tasks:

from pymoo.optimize import minimize

result = minimize(
    problem,        # What to optimize
    algorithm,      # How to optimize
    termination,    # When to stop
    seed=1,
    verbose=True
)

Result object contains:

  • result.X: Decision variables of optimal solution(s)
  • result.F: Objective values of optimal solution(s)
  • result.G: Constraint violations (if constrained)
  • result.algorithm: Algorithm object with history

Problem Definition Styles

Pymoo supports three problem definition styles:

  • Problem: Vectorized — _evaluate receives a batch of solutions (matrix)
  • ElementwiseProblem: One solution per call — recommended for custom problems and parallel evaluation
  • FunctionalProblem: Define objectives and constraints as separate functions without subclassing

Problem Types

Single-objective: One objective to minimize/maximize Multi-objective: 2-3 conflicting objectives → Pareto front Many-objective: 4+ objectives → High-dimensional Pareto front Constrained: Objectives + inequality/equality constraints Mixed-variable: Continuous, integer, binary, and categorical variables in one problem Dynamic: Time-varying objectives or constraints

Quick Start Workflows

Workflow 1: Single-Objective Optimization

When: Optimizing one objective function

Steps:

  1. Define or select problem
  2. Choose single-objective algorithm (GA, DE, PSO, CMA-ES)
  3. Configure termination criteria
  4. Run optimization
  5. Extract best solution

Example:

from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.ga import GA
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize

# Built-in problem
problem = get_problem("rastrigin", n_var=10)

# Configure Genetic Algorithm
algorithm = GA(
    pop_size=100,
    eliminate_duplicates=True
)

# Optimize
result = minimize(
    problem,
    algorithm,
    ('n_gen', 200),
    seed=1,
    verbose=True
)

print(f"Best solution: {result.X}")
print(f"Best objective: {result.F[0]}")

See: scripts/single_objective_example.py for complete example

Workflow 2: Multi-Objective Optimization (2-3 objectives)

When: Optimizing 2-3 conflicting objectives, need Pareto front

Algorithm choice: NSGA-II (standard for bi/tri-objective)

Steps:

  1. Define multi-objective problem
  2. Configure NSGA-II
  3. Run optimization to obtain Pareto front
  4. Visualize trade-offs
  5. Apply decision making (optional)

Example:

from pymoo.algorithms.moo.nsga2 import NSGA2
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
from pymoo.visualization.scatter import Scatter

# Bi-objective benchmark problem
problem = get_problem("zdt1")

# NSGA-II algorithm
algorithm = NSGA2(pop_size=100)

# Optimize
result = minimize(problem, algorithm, ('n_gen', 200), seed=1)

# Visualize Pareto front
plot = Scatter()
plot.add(result.F, label="Obtained Front")
plot.add(problem.pareto_front(), label="True Front", alpha=0.3)
plot.show()

print(f"Found {len(result.F)} Pareto-optimal solutions")

See: scripts/multi_objective_example.py for complete example

Workflow 3: Many-Objective Optimization (4+ objectives)

When: Optimizing 4 or more objectives

Algorithm choice: NSGA-III (designed for many objectives)

Key difference: Must provide reference directions for population guidance

Steps:

  1. Define many-objective problem
  2. Generate reference directions
  3. Configure NSGA-III with reference directions
  4. Run optimization
  5. Visualize using Parallel Coordinate Plot

Example:

from pymoo.algorithms.moo.nsga3 import NSGA3
from pymoo.problems import get_problem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
from pymoo.util.ref_dirs import get_reference_directions
from pymoo.visualization.pcp import PCP

# Many-objective problem (5 objectives)
problem = get_problem("dtlz2", n_obj=5)

# Generate reference directions (required for NSGA-III)
ref_dirs = get_reference_directions("das-dennis", n_obj=5, n_partitions=12)

# Configure NSGA-III
algorithm = NSGA3(ref_dirs=ref_dirs)

# Optimize
result = minimize(problem, algorithm, ('n_gen', 300), seed=1)

# Visualize with Parallel Coordinates
plot = PCP(labels=[f"f{i+1}" for i in range(5)])
plot.add(result.F, alpha=0.3)
plot.show()

See: scripts/many_objective_example.py for complete example

Workflow 4: Custom Problem Definition

When: Solving domain-specific optimization problem

Steps:

  1. Extend ElementwiseProblem class
  2. Define __init__ with problem dimensions and bounds
  3. Implement _evaluate method for objectives (and constraints)
  4. Use with any algorithm

Unconstrained example:

from pymoo.core.problem import ElementwiseProblem
import numpy as np

class MyProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__(
            n_var=2,              # Number of variables
            n_obj=2,              # Number of objectives
            xl=np.array([0, 0]),  # Lower bounds
            xu=np.array([5, 5])   # Upper bounds
        )

    def _evaluate(self, x, out, *args, **kwargs):
        # Define objectives
        f1 = x[0]**2 + x[1]**2
        f2 = (x[0]-1)**2 + (x[1]-1)**2

        out["F"] = [f1, f2]

Constrained example:

class ConstrainedProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__(
            n_var=2,
            n_obj=2,
            n_ieq_constr=2,        # Inequality constraints
            n_eq_constr=1,         # Equality constraints
            xl=np.array([0, 0]),
            xu=np.array([5, 5])
        )

    def _evaluate(self, x, out, *args, **kwargs):
        # Objectives
        out["F"] = [f1, f2]

        # Inequality constraints (g <= 0)
        out["G"] = [g1, g2]

        # Equality constraints (h = 0)
        out["H"] = [h1]

Constraint formulation rules:

  • Inequality: Express as g(x) <= 0 (feasible when ≤ 0)
  • Equality: Express as h(x) = 0 (feasible when = 0)
  • Convert g(x) >= b to -(g(x) - b) <= 0

See: scripts/custom_problem_example.py for complete examples

Workflow 5: Constraint Handling

When: Problem has feasibility constraints

Approach options:

1. Feasibility First (Default - Recommended)

from pymoo.algorithms.moo.nsga2 import NSGA2

# Works automatically with constrained problems
algorithm = NSGA2(pop_size=100)
result = minimize(problem, algorithm, termination)

# Check feasibility
feasible = result.CV[:, 0] == 0  # CV = constraint violation
print(f"Feasible solutions: {np.sum(feasible)}")

2. Penalty Method

from pymoo.constraints.as_penalty import ConstraintsAsPenalty

# Wrap problem to convert constraints to penalties
problem_penalized = ConstraintsAsPenalty(problem, penalty=1e6)

3. Constraint as Objective

from pymoo.constraints.as_obj import ConstraintsAsObjective

# Treat constraint violation as additional objective
problem_with_cv = ConstraintsAsObjective(problem)

4. Specialized Algorithms

from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.sres import SRES

# SRES has built-in constraint handling
algorithm = SRES()

See: references/constraints_mcdm.md for comprehensive constraint handling guide

Workflow 6: Decision Making from Pareto Front

When: Have Pareto front, need to select preferred solution(s)

Steps:

  1. Run multi-objective optimization
  2. Normalize objectives to [0, 1]
  3. Define preference weights
  4. Apply MCDM method
  5. Visualize selected solution

Example using Pseudo-Weights:

from pymoo.mcdm.pseudo_weights import PseudoWeights
import numpy as np

# After obtaining result from multi-objective optimization
# Normalize objectives
F_norm = (result.F - result.F.min(axis=0)) / (result.F.max(axis=0) - result.F.min(axis=0))

# Define preferences (must sum to 1)
weights = np.array([0.3, 0.7])  # 30% f1, 70% f2

# Apply decision making
dm = PseudoWeights(weights)
selected_idx = dm.do(F_norm)

# Get selected solution
best_solution = result.X[selected_idx]
best_objectives = result.F[selected_idx]

print(f"Selected solution: {best_solution}")
print(f"Objective values: {best_objectives}")

Other MCDM methods:

  • Compromise Programming: Select closest to ideal point
  • Knee Point: Find balanced trade-off solutions
  • Hypervolume Contribution: Select most diverse subset

See:

  • scripts/decision_making_example.py for complete example
  • references/constraints_mcdm.md for detailed MCDM methods

Workflow 7: Visualization

Choose visualization based on number of objectives:

2 objectives: Scatter Plot

from pymoo.visualization.scatter import Scatter

plot = Scatter(title="Bi-objective Results")
plot.add(result.F, color="blue", alpha=0.7)
plot.show()

3 objectives: 3D Scatter

plot = Scatter(title="Tri-objective Results")
plot.add(result.F)  # Automatically renders in 3D
plot.show()

4+ objectives: Parallel Coordinate Plot

from pymoo.visualization.pcp import PCP

plot = PCP(
    labels=[f"f{i+1}" for i in range(n_obj)],
    normalize_each_axis=True
)
plot.add(result.F, alpha=0.3)
plot.show()

Solution comparison: Petal Diagram

from pymoo.visualization.petal import Petal

plot = Petal(
    bounds=[result.F.min(axis=0), result.F.max(axis=0)],
    labels=["Cost", "Weight", "Efficiency"]
)
plot.add(solution_A, label="Design A")
plot.add(solution_B, label="Design B")
plot.show()

See: references/visualization.md for all visualization types and usage

Workflow 8: Parallel Evaluation

When: Each _evaluate call is expensive (simulations, ML models, external solvers)

Approach: Pass an elementwise_runner to ElementwiseProblem using StarmapParallelization or JoblibParallelization.

Example (thread pool):

from multiprocessing.pool import ThreadPool
from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.ga import GA
from pymoo.core.problem import ElementwiseProblem
from pymoo.optimize import minimize
from pymoo.parallelization.starmap import StarmapParallelization

class MyProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
    def __init__(self, elementwise_runner=None, **kwargs):
        super().__init__(
            n_var=10, n_obj=1, xl=-5, xu=5,
            elementwise_runner=elementwise_runner, **kwargs,
        )

    def _evaluate(self, x, out, *args, **kwargs):
        out["F"] = (x ** 2).sum()  # Replace with expensive evaluation

pool = ThreadPool(4)
runner = StarmapParallelization(pool.starmap)
problem = MyProblem(elementwise_runner=runner)

result = minimize(problem, GA(), ("n_gen", 50), seed=1)
pool.close()

See: references/parallelization.md for process pools, joblib, and pickling notes

Workflow 9: Mixed-Variable Optimization

When: Decision variables include continuous, integer, binary, and/or categorical types

Approach: Define a vars dict with typed variables; use MixedVariableGA (SOO) or add MOO survival.

Example:

from pymoo.core.problem import ElementwiseProblem
from pymoo.core.variable import Real, Integer, Choice, Binary
from pymoo.core.mixed import MixedVariableGA
from pymoo.optimize import minimize

class MixedProblem(ElementwiseProblem):
    def __init__(self, **kwargs):
        vars = {
            "b": Binary(),
            "x": Choice(options=["nothing", "multiply"]),
            "y": Integer(bounds=(0, 2)),
            "z": Real(bounds=(0, 5)),
        }
        super().__init__(vars=vars, n_obj=1, **kwargs)

    def _evaluate(self, X, out, *args, **kwargs):
        b, x, z, y = X["b"], X["x"], X["z"], X["y"]
        f = z + y
        if b:
            f = 100 * f
        if x == "multiply":
            f = 10 * f
        out["F"] = f

algorithm = MixedVariableGA(pop_size=20)
result = minimize(MixedProblem(), algorithm, ("n_evals", 1000), seed=1)

For multi-objective mixed-variable problems, use MixedVariableGA(pop_size=20, survival=RankAndCrowdingSurvival()). For single-objective mixed search, pymoo also wraps Optuna via pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.optuna.Optuna.

See: references/algorithms.md for MixedVariableGA and Optuna details

Algorithm Selection Guide

Single-Objective Problems

AlgorithmBest ForKey Features
GAGeneral-purposeFlexible, customizable operators
DEContinuous optimizationGood global search
PSOSmooth landscapesFast convergence
CMA-ESDifficult/noisy problemsSelf-adapting

Multi-Objective Problems (2-3 objectives)

AlgorithmBest ForKey Features
NSGA-IIStandard benchmarkFast, reliable, well-tested
SPEA2Archive-based MOOStrength-based fitness, external archive
R-NSGA-IIPreference regionsReference point guidance
MOEA/DDecomposable problemsScalarization approach

Many-Objective Problems (4+ objectives)

AlgorithmBest ForKey Features
NSGA-III4-15 objectivesReference direction-based
RVEAAdaptive searchReference vector evolution
AGE-MOEAComplex landscapesAdaptive geometry

Constrained Problems

ApproachAlgorithmWhen to Use
Feasibility-firstAny algorithmLarge feasible region
SpecializedSRES, ISRESHeavy constraints
PenaltyGA + penaltyAlgorithm compatibility

See: references/algorithms.md for comprehensive algorithm reference

Benchmark Problems

Quick problem access:

from pymoo.problems import get_problem

# Single-objective
problem = get_problem("rastrigin", n_var=10)
problem = get_problem("rosenbrock", n_var=10)

# Multi-objective
problem = get_problem("zdt1")        # Convex front
problem = get_problem("zdt2")        # Non-convex front
problem = get_problem("zdt3")        # Disconnected front

# Many-objective
problem = get_problem("dtlz2", n_obj=5, n_var=12)
problem = get_problem("dtlz7", n_obj=4)

See: references/problems.md for complete test problem reference

Genetic Operator Customization

Standard operator configuration:

from pymoo.algorithms.soo.nonconvex.ga import GA
from pymoo.operators.crossover.sbx import SBX
from pymoo.operators.mutation.pm import PM

algorithm = GA(
    pop_size=100,
    crossover=SBX(prob=0.9, eta=15),
    mutation=PM(eta=20),
    eliminate_duplicates=True
)

Operator selection by variable type:

Continuous variables:

  • Crossover: SBX (Simulated Binary Crossover)
  • Mutation: PM (Polynomial Mutation)

Binary variables:

  • Crossover: TwoPointCrossover, UniformCrossover
  • Mutation: BitflipMutation

Permutations (TSP, scheduling):

  • Crossover: OrderCrossover (OX)
  • Mutation: InversionMutation

See: references/operators.md for comprehensive operator reference

Performance and Troubleshooting

Common issues and solutions:

Problem: Algorithm not converging

  • Increase population size
  • Increase number of generations
  • Check if problem is multimodal (try different algorithms)
  • Verify constraints are correctly formulated

Problem: Poor Pareto front distribution

  • For NSGA-III: Adjust reference directions
  • Increase population size
  • Check for duplicate elimination
  • Verify problem scaling

Problem: Few feasible solutions

  • Use constraint-as-objective approach
  • Apply repair operators
  • Try SRES/ISRES for constrained problems
  • Check constraint formulation (should be g <= 0)

Problem: High computational cost

  • Reduce population size
  • Decrease number of generations
  • Use simpler operators
  • Enable parallel evaluation via elementwise_runner (see Workflow 8)

Best practices:

  1. Normalize objectives when scales differ significantly
  2. Set random seed for reproducibility
  3. Save history to analyze convergence: save_history=True
  4. Visualize results to understand solution quality
  5. Compare with true Pareto front when available
  6. Use appropriate termination criteria (generations, evaluations, tolerance)
  7. Tune operator parameters for problem characteristics

Resources

This skill includes comprehensive reference documentation and executable examples:

references/

Detailed documentation for in-depth understanding:

  • algorithms.md: Complete algorithm reference with parameters, usage, and selection guidelines
  • problems.md: Benchmark test problems (ZDT, DTLZ, WFG) with characteristics
  • operators.md: Genetic operators (sampling, selection, crossover, mutation) with configuration
  • visualization.md: All visualization types with examples and selection guide
  • constraints_mcdm.md: Constraint handling techniques and multi-criteria decision making methods
  • parallelization.md: Parallel evaluation with StarmapParallelization and JoblibParallelization

Search patterns for references:

  • Algorithm details: grep -r "NSGA-II\|NSGA-III\|MOEA/D" references/
  • Constraint methods: grep -r "Feasibility First\|Penalty\|Repair" references/
  • Visualization types: grep -r "Scatter\|PCP\|Petal" references/

scripts/

Executable examples demonstrating common workflows:

  • single_objective_example.py: Basic single-objective optimization with GA
  • multi_objective_example.py: Multi-objective optimization with NSGA-II, visualization
  • many_objective_example.py: Many-objective optimization with NSGA-III, reference directions
  • custom_problem_example.py: Defining custom problems (constrained and unconstrained)
  • decision_making_example.py: Multi-criteria decision making with different preferences

Run examples:

python3 scripts/single_objective_example.py
python3 scripts/multi_objective_example.py
python3 scripts/many_objective_example.py
python3 scripts/custom_problem_example.py
python3 scripts/decision_making_example.py

Additional Notes

Common patterns:

  • Use ElementwiseProblem for custom problems (or FunctionalProblem for function-based definitions)
  • Use vars dict with typed variables for mixed-variable problems
  • Constraints formulated as g(x) <= 0 and h(x) = 0
  • Reference directions required for NSGA-III
  • Normalize objectives before MCDM
  • Use appropriate termination: ('n_gen', N) or get_termination("f_tol", tol=0.001)

GitHub 저장소

K-Dense-AI/claude-scientific-skills
경로: skills/pymoo
0
agent-skillsai-scientistbioinformaticschemoinformaticsclaudeclaude-skills

연관 스킬

executing-plans

디자인

executing-plans 스킬은 검토 체크포인트가 포함된 통제된 배치로 실행할 완전한 구현 계획이 있을 때 사용합니다. 이 스킬은 계획을 불러와 비판적으로 검토한 후, 소규모 배치(기본값 3개 작업)로 작업을 실행하면서 각 배치 사이에 진행 상황을 아키텍트 검토를 위해 보고합니다. 이를 통해 내재된 품질 관리 체크포인트를 갖춘 체계적인 구현이 보장됩니다.

스킬 보기

requesting-code-review

디자인

이 스킬은 코드 변경 사항을 요구 사항에 따라 분석하기 위해 코드 리뷰어 하위 에이전트를 호출합니다. 작업 완료 후, 주요 기능 구현 후, 또는 메인 브랜치에 병합하기 전에 사용해야 합니다. 이 리뷰는 현재 구현체와 원래 계획을 비교하여 문제를 조기에 발견하는 데 도움이 됩니다.

스킬 보기

connect-mcp-server

디자인

이 스킬은 개발자들이 HTTP, stdio 또는 SSE 전송 방식을 통해 MCP 서버를 Claude Code에 연결하는 포괄적인 가이드를 제공합니다. GitHub, Notion 및 사용자 정의 API와 같은 외부 서비스를 통합하기 위한 설치, 구성, 인증 및 보안을 다룹니다. MCP 통합 설정, 외부 도구 구성 또는 Claude의 모델 컨텍스트 프로토콜 작업 시 활용하세요.

스킬 보기

web-cli-teleport

디자인

이 스킬은 작업 분석을 기반으로 개발자가 Claude Code 웹 인터페이스와 CLI 인터페이스 중 선택할 수 있도록 돕고, 두 환경 간 원활한 세션 텔레포트를 가능하게 합니다. 웹, CLI 또는 모바일 환경 전환 시 세션 상태와 컨텍스트를 관리하여 워크플로를 최적화합니다. 다양한 단계에서 서로 다른 도구가 필요한 복잡한 프로젝트에 사용하세요.

스킬 보기