customer-journey-mapping-workshop
정보
이 스킬은 사용자를 맞춤형으로 안내하여 페르소나, 단계, 행동, 감정을 정의하는 과정을 통해 상세한 고객 여정 지도를 작성하는 대화형 워크숍을 운영합니다. 개발자와 제품 팀이 종단 간 경험을 시각화하여 문제점과 개선 기회를 식별할 수 있도록 돕습니다. 가정된 해결책으로 바로 넘어가지 않고 실제 고객 문제에 팀을 집중시키기 위해 활용하세요.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skillsgit clone https://github.com/deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills.git ~/.claude/skills/customer-journey-mapping-workshopClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Purpose
Guide product managers through creating a customer journey map by asking adaptive questions about the actor (persona), scenario/goal, journey phases, actions/emotions, and opportunities for improvement. Use this to visualize the end-to-end customer experience, identify pain points, and create a shared mental model across teams—avoiding surface-level feature lists and ensuring discovery work focuses on real customer problems, not assumed solutions.
This is not a feature roadmap—it's a discovery and alignment tool that uncovers where the experience breaks down and where improvements will have the greatest impact.
Key Concepts
What is a Customer Journey Map?
A journey map (NNGroup) visualizes "the process that a person goes through in order to accomplish a goal." It compiles user actions into a timeline, enriched with thoughts and emotions to create a narrative, then condenses and polishes into a visual artifact.
Five Key Components (NNGroup Framework)
- Actor — A specific persona or user whose perspective anchors the map
- Scenario + Expectations — The situational context and associated goals
- Journey Phases — High-level stages organizing the experience (e.g., discover, try, buy, use, seek support)
- Actions, Mindsets, and Emotions — User behaviors, thoughts, and emotional responses throughout phases
- Opportunities — Insights identifying where experience can improve
Journey Map Structure
Actor: [Persona Name]
Scenario: [Goal/Context]
Phase 1: Discover → Phase 2: Try → Phase 3: Buy → Phase 4: Use → Phase 5: Support
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Actions: Actions: Actions: Actions: Actions:
Thoughts: Thoughts: Thoughts: Thoughts: Thoughts:
Emotions: 😊😐😞 Emotions: Emotions: Emotions: Emotions:
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
Opportunities: Opportunities: Opportunities: Opportunities: Opportunities:
Why This Works
- Forces conversation: Teams align on shared understanding of customer experience
- Reveals pain points: Emotions + actions highlight where experience breaks down
- Prioritizes improvements: Opportunities ranked by impact guide roadmap decisions
- Human-centered: Focuses on customer perspective, not internal processes
Anti-Patterns (What This Is NOT)
- Not a service blueprint: Journey maps focus on customer perspective; service blueprints map internal operations
- Not a user story map: Journey maps support discovery; user story maps facilitate implementation planning
- Not an experience map: Journey maps target specific users and products; experience maps explore broader human behaviors
When to Use This
- Starting customer discovery (understanding current experience)
- Identifying pain points for retention/engagement initiatives
- Aligning cross-functional teams on customer perspective
- Prioritizing which problems to solve first
When NOT to Use This
- When you already understand the customer journey deeply
- For technical refactoring (no customer-facing journey)
- As a substitute for user research (maps require research input)
Facilitation Source of Truth
Use workshop-facilitation as the default interaction protocol for this skill.
It defines:
- session heads-up + entry mode (Guided, Context dump, Best guess)
- one-question turns with plain-language prompts
- progress labels (for example, Context Qx/8 and Scoring Qx/5)
- interruption handling and pause/resume behavior
- numbered recommendations at decision points
- quick-select numbered response options for regular questions (include
Other (specify)when useful)
This file defines the domain-specific assessment content. If there is a conflict, follow this file's domain logic.
Application
This interactive skill asks up to 5 adaptive questions, offering 3-4 enumerated options at each step.
Interaction pattern: Pair with skills/workshop-facilitation/SKILL.md when you want a one-step-at-a-time flow with numbered recommendations at decision points and quick-select options for regular questions. If the user asks for a single-shot output, skip the multi-turn facilitation.
Step 0: Gather Context (Before Questions)
Agent suggests:
Before we create your journey map, let's gather context:
Customer Research:
- User interviews, discovery notes, support tickets
- Churn reasons, exit surveys, NPS feedback
- Analytics data (drop-off points, feature usage)
- Personas or proto-personas
Product Context:
- Website copy, product descriptions, positioning
- Competitor journey maps or reviews (G2, Capterra)
- Existing journey documentation (if any)
You can paste this content directly, or describe the customer experience briefly.
Question 1: Identify Actor (Persona)
Agent asks: "Who is the actor for this journey map? (Which persona or user segment?)"
Offer 4 enumerated options:
- Primary persona — "Your main target customer (e.g., 'small business owner')" (Most common starting point)
- Secondary persona — "A secondary user segment with different needs (e.g., 'enterprise admin' vs. 'end user')" (Use if primary persona already mapped)
- High-churn persona — "User segment with highest churn rate (e.g., 'trial users who don't convert')" (Good for retention initiatives)
- Newly discovered persona — "Emerging user segment from recent research (e.g., 'remote teams' post-COVID)" (Good for market expansion)
Or describe your specific persona.
Adaptation: Use personas from context (proto-personas, JTBD research, etc.)
User response: [Selection or custom]
Question 2: Define Scenario + Goal
Agent asks: "What's the scenario and goal for this journey? (What is the actor trying to accomplish?)"
Offer 4 enumerated options:
- First-time use — "New user onboarding, from discovery to activation" (Common for SaaS, apps)
- Core workflow — "Recurring task the user does regularly (e.g., 'create invoice,' 'run report')" (Common for established products)
- Problem resolution — "User encounters issue and seeks help (e.g., 'forgot password,' 'billing question')" (Good for support/retention)
- Upgrade/expansion — "Free user considering paid plan, or existing customer expanding usage" (Good for growth initiatives)
Or describe your specific scenario.
User response: [Selection or custom]
Agent extracts:
- Actor: [Persona from Q1]
- Scenario: [Context from Q2]
- Goal: [What actor is trying to accomplish]
Question 3: Identify Journey Phases
Agent says: "Let's break the journey into high-level phases (typically 4-6 phases from start to end)."
Agent generates 4-6 journey phases based on scenario (Q2).
Example (if Scenario = "First-time use"):
Journey Phases (left to right):
1. Discover — User learns about product
2. Evaluate — User researches, compares alternatives
3. Try — User signs up, starts onboarding
4. Activate — User reaches "aha moment," experiences value
5. Use — User integrates product into workflow
6. Expand — User considers upgrading or inviting team
Agent asks: "Do these phases capture the full journey? Should we add, remove, or rename phases?"
User response: [Approve or modify]
Question 4: Map Actions, Thoughts, Emotions per Phase
Agent says: "Now let's map what the actor does, thinks, and feels in each phase."
Agent generates 3-5 actions, thoughts, and emotions per phase based on context (Step 0) and scenario (Q2).
Example (for Phase 3: "Try — User signs up, starts onboarding"):
Phase 3: Try (Onboarding)
Actions:
- Signs up with email
- Receives welcome email
- Logs in for the first time
- Sees empty dashboard
- Searches for "getting started" guide
Thoughts:
- "This looks promising, but I'm not sure where to start"
- "Do I need to watch a tutorial video?"
- "What's the first step?"
Emotions:
- Curious but uncertain 🤔
- Slightly frustrated (no clear next step) 😕
- Hopeful it will get easier 🙂
Pain Points:
- No onboarding checklist or guided tour
- Empty state doesn't suggest next action
- Too many options in navigation (overwhelming)
Agent repeats for all journey phases, showing full map.
Agent asks: "Does this capture the customer experience accurately? Should we adjust actions, thoughts, or emotions?"
User response: [Approve or modify]
Question 5: Identify Opportunities (Pain Points to Address)
Agent says: "Based on the journey map, let's identify opportunities for improvement—ranked by impact."
Agent generates 5-7 opportunities (pain points with highest emotional intensity or drop-off rates).
Example:
# Opportunities (Ranked by Impact)
## 1. Onboarding lacks guided first steps (Phase 3: Try)
**Pain Point:** Users see empty dashboard, don't know what to do first
**Evidence:** 60% of signups don't complete first action within 24 hours
**Opportunity:** Add interactive onboarding checklist ("Create your first project," "Invite a teammate")
**Impact:** HIGH — Directly affects activation rate
---
## 2. Pricing page is confusing (Phase 2: Evaluate)
**Pain Point:** Users don't understand which plan fits their needs
**Evidence:** High bounce rate on pricing page (70% leave without signing up)
**Opportunity:** Add plan comparison tool or "Which plan is right for me?" quiz
**Impact:** HIGH — Directly affects trial conversion
---
## 3. Support is hard to find (Phase 5: Use)
**Pain Point:** Users encounter issues, struggle to find help
**Evidence:** Support tickets often say "I couldn't find an answer in docs"
**Opportunity:** Add in-app help widget, contextual tooltips
**Impact:** MEDIUM — Affects retention, but fewer users hit this phase
---
## 4. Email confirmations lack context (Phase 1: Discover)
**Pain Point:** Marketing emails don't explain value clearly
**Evidence:** Low click-through rate on email campaigns (5% vs. industry avg 15%)
**Opportunity:** Rewrite emails with customer language, clear CTAs
**Impact:** MEDIUM — Affects top-of-funnel awareness
---
## 5. Upgrade prompts feel pushy (Phase 6: Expand)
**Pain Point:** Users perceive upgrade prompts as sales-y, not helpful
**Evidence:** Negative sentiment in NPS comments ("too many upgrade popups")
**Opportunity:** Show upgrade value contextually (when user hits free plan limit)
**Impact:** LOW — Affects smaller user subset
Agent asks: "Do these opportunities align with your priorities? Which should we focus on first?"
User response: [Selection or custom]
Output: Customer Journey Map + Opportunity List
After completing the flow, the agent outputs:
# Customer Journey Map: [Scenario from Q2]
**Actor:** [Persona from Q1]
**Scenario:** [Context from Q2]
**Goal:** [What actor is trying to accomplish]
**Date:** [Today's date]
---
## Journey Phases
[Phase 1] → [Phase 2] → [Phase 3] → [Phase 4] → [Phase 5] → [Phase 6]
---
## Full Journey Map
### Phase 1: [Name]
**Actions:**
- [Action 1]
- [Action 2]
- [Action 3]
**Thoughts:**
- "[Quote 1]"
- "[Quote 2]"
**Emotions:**
- [Emotion 1] 😊
- [Emotion 2] 😐
**Pain Points:**
- [Pain point 1]
- [Pain point 2]
---
### Phase 2: [Name]
[...repeat structure for all phases...]
---
## Opportunities (Prioritized)
### Opportunity 1: [Name] (HIGH IMPACT)
**Phase:** [Journey phase]
**Pain Point:** [Description]
**Evidence:** [Data/research]
**Proposed Solution:** [How to address]
**Impact:** HIGH — [Rationale]
---
### Opportunity 2: [Name] (HIGH IMPACT)
**Phase:** [Journey phase]
**Pain Point:** [Description]
**Evidence:** [Data/research]
**Proposed Solution:** [How to address]
**Impact:** HIGH — [Rationale]
---
[...continue for all opportunities...]
---
## Next Steps
1. **Validate opportunities:** Use `discovery-interview-prep.md` to test hypotheses with customers
2. **Prioritize fixes:** Use `prioritization-advisor.md` to choose which opportunities to tackle first
3. **Create problem statements:** Use `problem-statement.md` to frame top opportunities
4. **Build experiments:** Use `opportunity-solution-tree.md` to design solutions and POCs
---
**Ready to start addressing opportunities? Let me know if you'd like to refine the map or dive into a specific pain point.**
Examples
Example 1: Good Journey Map (SaaS Onboarding)
Q1 Response: "Primary persona — Small business owner"
Q2 Response: "First-time use — New user onboarding, from discovery to activation"
Q3 - Phases Generated:
Discover → Evaluate → Try → Activate → Use → Expand
Q4 - Phase 3 (Try) Mapped:
Actions:
- Signs up via Google SSO
- Receives welcome email
- Logs in, sees empty dashboard
- Clicks "Help" button, watches 5-min tutorial
- Attempts to create first project, gets stuck on form
Thoughts:
- "This looks easy enough"
- "Wait, what's a 'workspace' vs. 'project'?"
- "Do I need to fill out all these fields?"
Emotions:
- Excited initially 😊
- Confused by terminology 😕
- Frustrated by unclear form 😞
Pain Points:
- No guided onboarding checklist
- Terminology not explained (workspace vs. project)
- Form has too many required fields upfront
Q5 - Opportunities Identified:
- Add onboarding checklist (HIGH — affects activation)
- Simplify terminology (MEDIUM — affects understanding)
- Reduce required form fields (MEDIUM — affects completion rate)
Why this works:
- Emotions + actions reveal pain points clearly
- Opportunities tied to specific phases
- Evidence from research (drop-off data, support tickets)
Example 2: Bad Journey Map (Too Generic)
Phase: "Use Product"
Actions:
- Uses product
- Does tasks
Thoughts:
- "This is good"
Emotions:
- Happy 😊
Why this fails:
- No specificity (what tasks? which features?)
- No pain points identified (everything is "good")
- Can't extract actionable opportunities
Fix:
- Get specific: "User creates invoice → sends to client → tracks payment status"
- Include real customer quotes: "I wish I could bulk-send invoices"
- Show emotional highs AND lows (not just happy)
Common Pitfalls
Pitfall 1: Mapping Internal Process, Not Customer Experience
Symptom: Journey phases = "Lead generated → Qualified → Demo scheduled → Deal closed"
Consequence: Focuses on sales process, not customer perspective
Fix: Map from customer POV: "Discovers problem → Researches solutions → Tries product → Adopts"
Pitfall 2: No Emotions or Pain Points
Symptom: Journey map lists actions only, no thoughts/emotions
Consequence: Misses the point—can't identify where experience breaks down
Fix: Add customer quotes, emotional states (frustrated, delighted, confused)
Pitfall 3: Too Many Personas in One Map
Symptom: Trying to map "all users" in a single journey
Consequence: Loses focus, becomes generic
Fix: One map per persona. If multiple personas, create separate maps.
Pitfall 4: Opportunities Aren't Prioritized
Symptom: List 20 opportunities with no ranking
Consequence: Team paralyzed, doesn't know where to start
Fix: Rank by impact (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) based on evidence and emotional intensity
Pitfall 5: Map Created in Isolation
Symptom: PM creates journey map alone, doesn't involve team
Consequence: No shared mental model, map doesn't drive decisions
Fix: Facilitate workshop with cross-functional team (PM, design, engineering, support)
References
Related Skills
customer-journey-map.md— Component skill with journey map templateproto-persona.md— Defines actor for journey mappingproblem-statement.md— Converts opportunities into problem statementsdiscovery-interview-prep.md— Gathers research input for mappingopportunity-solution-tree.md— Designs solutions for journey opportunities
External Frameworks
- Nielsen Norman Group, "Journey Mapping 101" (2016) — Definitive guide to journey mapping
- Adaptive Path, "Guide to Experience Mapping" (2013) — Experience vs. journey maps
Dean's Work
- [If Dean has journey mapping resources, link here]
Skill type: Interactive
Suggested filename: customer-journey-mapping-workshop.md
Suggested placement: /skills/interactive/
Dependencies: Uses customer-journey-map.md, proto-persona.md, problem-statement.md, jobs-to-be-done.md
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
llamaguard
기타LlamaGuard는 폭력 및 혐오 발언 등 6가지 안전 범주에서 LLM 입력과 출력을 조정하기 위한 Meta의 70-80억 파라미터 모델입니다. 94-95% 정확도를 제공하며 vLLM, Hugging Face 또는 Amazon SageMaker를 사용해 배포할 수 있습니다. 이 기술을 사용하여 AI 애플리케이션에 콘텐츠 필터링 및 안전 가드레일을 손쉽게 통합하세요.
cost-optimization
기타이 Claude Skill은 리소스 적정화, 태깅 전략, 지출 분석을 통해 개발자들이 클라우드 비용을 최적화할 수 있도록 지원합니다. AWS, Azure, GCP에서 클라우드 비용을 절감하고 비용 거버넌스를 구현하기 위한 프레임워크를 제공합니다. 인프라 비용을 분석하거나, 리소스를 적정화하거나, 예산 제약을 충족해야 할 때 사용하세요.
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
기타이 스킬은 bitsandbytes를 사용하여 LLM을 8비트 또는 4비트 정밀도로 양자화하며, 최소한의 정확도 손실로 50-75%의 메모리 감소를 달성합니다. 제한된 GPU 메모리에서 더 큰 모델을 실행하거나 추론을 가속화하는 데 이상적이며, INT8, NF4, FP4와 같은 형식을 지원합니다. 이 스킬은 HuggingFace Transformers와 통합되어 QLoRA 학습 및 8비트 옵티마이저를 가능하게 합니다.
dispatching-parallel-agents
기타이 Claude Skill은 3개 이상의 독립적인 문제를 동시에 조사하고 해결하기 위해 다중 에이전트를 배치합니다. 공유 상태나 의존성 없이 해결 가능한 무관련 장애 시나리오에 맞게 설계되었습니다. 핵심 기능은 병렬 문제 해결로, 각 독립 문제 영역마다 하나의 에이전트를 할당하여 효율성을 극대화합니다.
