analyze-generative-diffusion-model
정보
이 스킬은 사전 학습된 생성형 확산 모델(Stable Diffusion 등)을 품질 지표(FID, CLIP 점수) 계산, 어텐션 맵 시각화, 잠재 공간 탐색을 통해 분석합니다. 모델 출력 품질 평가, 노이즈 스케줄 비교, 텍스트 조건 생성의 교차 어텐션 패턴 분석 등에 사용할 수 있습니다. 고급 모델 평가 및 검사를 수행하는 개발자를 위해 설계되었습니다.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/analyze-generative-diffusion-modelClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Analyze Generative Diffusion Model
Evaluate pre-trained generative diffusion via quant metrics, noise schedule inspect, cross-attention maps, latent probe → behavior, failure diagnosis, fine-tune decisions.
Use When
- Eval pre-trained generative diffusion out quality, standard metrics
- Compute FID, IS, CLIP, precision/recall for generated sets
- Inspect + compare noise schedules (linear, cosine, learned) via SNR curves
- Extract cross-attention maps → text-to-image token-region
- Interpolate latent codes or discover semantic directions
- Detect OOD in for diffusion pipeline
In
- Required: Pre-trained model ID or checkpoint path (e.g.,
stabilityai/stable-diffusion-2-1) - Required: Mode — one+:
metrics,schedule,attention,latent - Required: Reference dataset (real images or name)
- Optional: Text prompts for attention (default: model-appropriate test prompts)
- Optional: N samples for metrics (default: 10000)
- Optional: Device (default:
cudaif avail, elsecpu)
Do
Step 1: Quant Evaluation
Standard generative quality metrics vs reference dataset.
- Setup eval pipeline:
import torch
from diffusers import StableDiffusionPipeline
from torchmetrics.image.fid import FrechetInceptionDistance
from torchmetrics.image.inception import InceptionScore
device = "cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu"
pipe = StableDiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained(
"stabilityai/stable-diffusion-2-1", torch_dtype=torch.float16
).to(device)
fid = FrechetInceptionDistance(feature=2048, normalize=True).to(device)
inception = InceptionScore(normalize=True).to(device)
- Feed real images:
from torch.utils.data import DataLoader
for batch in DataLoader(real_dataset, batch_size=64):
imgs = (batch * 255).byte().to(device)
fid.update(imgs, real=True)
- Generate + accumulate fake stats:
prompts = load_evaluation_prompts("prompts.txt") # one prompt per line
n_generated = 0
while n_generated < 10000:
prompt_batch = prompts[n_generated:n_generated + 8]
images = pipe(prompt_batch, num_inference_steps=50).images
tensors = torch.stack([to_tensor(img) for img in images]).to(device)
byte_imgs = (tensors * 255).byte()
fid.update(byte_imgs, real=False)
inception.update(byte_imgs)
n_generated += len(images)
- CLIP score → text-image align:
from torchmetrics.multimodal.clip_score import CLIPScore
clip_metric = CLIPScore(model_name_or_path="openai/clip-vit-large-patch14").to(device)
for prompt, image_tensor in zip(sampled_prompts, sampled_tensors):
clip_metric.update(image_tensor.unsqueeze(0), [prompt])
print(f"FID: {fid.compute():.2f}")
print(f"IS: {inception.compute()[0]:.2f} +/- {inception.compute()[1]:.2f}")
print(f"CLIP: {clip_metric.compute():.2f}")
- Precision + recall → mode coverage:
from torchmetrics.image import FrechetInceptionDistance
# Precision: fraction of generated images near real manifold
# Recall: fraction of real images near generated manifold
# Use improved precision/recall (Kynkaanniemi et al., 2019) via
# feature embeddings from the Inception network
→ FID <30 for well-trained SD on benchmarks. IS >50 on ImageNet prompts. CLIP >25 for text-conditioned. Precision + recall both >0.6.
If err: FID >100 → verify real + generated same res + normalization. CLIP low but FID OK → model generates plausible no-prompt-match → check text encoder. ≥10K samples for stable FID.
Step 2: Noise Schedule Inspect
Visualize + compare forward + reverse schedules.
- Extract schedule params:
scheduler = pipe.scheduler
betas = torch.tensor(scheduler.betas) if hasattr(scheduler, 'betas') else None
alphas_cumprod = torch.tensor(scheduler.alphas_cumprod)
timesteps = torch.arange(len(alphas_cumprod))
- SNR curve:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
snr = alphas_cumprod / (1 - alphas_cumprod)
log_snr = torch.log(snr)
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(18, 5))
axes[0].plot(timesteps.numpy(), alphas_cumprod.numpy())
axes[0].set_xlabel("Timestep"); axes[0].set_ylabel("alpha_cumprod")
axes[0].set_title("Cumulative Signal Retention")
axes[1].plot(timesteps.numpy(), log_snr.numpy())
axes[1].set_xlabel("Timestep"); axes[1].set_ylabel("log(SNR)")
axes[1].set_title("Log Signal-to-Noise Ratio")
if betas is not None:
axes[2].plot(timesteps.numpy(), betas.numpy())
axes[2].set_xlabel("Timestep"); axes[2].set_ylabel("beta")
axes[2].set_title("Beta Schedule")
fig.tight_layout()
fig.savefig("noise_schedule.png", dpi=150)
- Compare schedule types:
from diffusers import DDPMScheduler
schedules = {
"linear": DDPMScheduler(beta_schedule="linear", num_train_timesteps=1000),
"cosine": DDPMScheduler(beta_schedule="squaredcos_cap_v2", num_train_timesteps=1000),
}
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 6))
for name, sched in schedules.items():
ac = torch.tensor(sched.alphas_cumprod)
snr = torch.log(ac / (1 - ac))
ax.plot(snr.numpy(), label=name)
ax.set_xlabel("Timestep"); ax.set_ylabel("log(SNR)")
ax.set_title("Schedule Comparison"); ax.legend()
fig.savefig("schedule_comparison.png", dpi=150)
→ Cosine → more gradual SNR decrease in mid-timesteps vs linear. Log-SNR span ~+10 (clean) to -10 (pure noise). Learned schedules monotonic decreasing.
If err: alphas_cumprod non-monotonic → misconfig. Constant → scheduler not init w/ model config. Custom schedulers → verify set_timesteps() called.
Step 3: Attention Map Analysis
Extract + visualize cross-attention from text-conditioned.
- Register attention hooks on U-Net cross-attention layers:
attention_maps = {}
def hook_fn(name):
def fn(module, input, output):
# Cross-attention: Q from image, K/V from text
if hasattr(module, 'processor'):
attention_maps[name] = output.detach().cpu()
return fn
for name, module in pipe.unet.named_modules():
if 'attn2' in name and hasattr(module, 'processor'):
module.register_forward_hook(hook_fn(name))
- Run inference + collect attention at specific timesteps:
prompt = "a red car parked next to a blue house"
timestep_attention = {}
# Custom callback to capture attention at specific timesteps
def callback_fn(pipe, step_index, timestep, callback_kwargs):
if step_index in [5, 15, 30, 45]:
timestep_attention[int(timestep)] = {
k: v.clone() for k, v in attention_maps.items()
}
return callback_kwargs
output = pipe(prompt, num_inference_steps=50, callback_on_step_end=callback_fn)
- Visualize token-region:
tokenizer = pipe.tokenizer
tokens = tokenizer.encode(prompt)
token_strings = [tokenizer.decode([t]) for t in tokens]
# Select a mid-resolution attention layer
layer_key = [k for k in attention_maps if 'mid' in k or 'up.1' in k][0]
attn = attention_maps[layer_key] # shape: (batch, heads, hw, seq_len)
attn_avg = attn.mean(dim=1) # average across heads
res = int(attn_avg.shape[1] ** 0.5)
attn_map = attn_avg[0].reshape(res, res, -1)
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, min(len(token_strings), 6), figsize=(18, 6))
for idx, token in enumerate(token_strings[:6]):
for row, (ts, ts_attn) in enumerate(list(timestep_attention.items())[:2]):
a = ts_attn[layer_key].mean(dim=1)[0]
a_res = int(a.shape[0] ** 0.5)
axes[row, idx].imshow(a[:, idx].reshape(a_res, a_res), cmap="hot")
axes[row, idx].set_title(f"t={ts}: '{token}'")
axes[row, idx].axis("off")
fig.suptitle("Cross-Attention Maps by Token and Timestep")
fig.tight_layout()
fig.savefig("attention_maps.png", dpi=150)
→ Content tokens ("car", "house") → localized spatial regions. Style/color ("red", "blue") → regions overlapping w/ object. Early (high noise) diffuse; later sharp + localized.
If err: All uniform → hook capturing self-attention not cross → verify layer has attn2 (cross) not attn1 (self). Wrong dims → check out tensor indexing matches head count + spatial res.
Step 4: Latent Space Probe
Structure via interpolation + direction discovery.
- Encode refs into latent space:
from diffusers import AutoencoderKL
from PIL import Image
import torchvision.transforms as T
vae = pipe.vae
transform = T.Compose([T.Resize(512), T.CenterCrop(512), T.ToTensor(),
T.Normalize([0.5], [0.5])])
def encode_image(image_path):
img = transform(Image.open(image_path).convert("RGB")).unsqueeze(0).to(device)
with torch.no_grad():
latent = vae.encode(img.half()).latent_dist.sample() * vae.config.scaling_factor
return latent
z1 = encode_image("image_a.png")
z2 = encode_image("image_b.png")
- Spherical linear interpolation (slerp):
def slerp(z1, z2, alpha):
"""Spherical linear interpolation between two latent codes."""
z1_flat = z1.flatten()
z2_flat = z2.flatten()
omega = torch.acos(torch.clamp(
torch.dot(z1_flat, z2_flat) / (z1_flat.norm() * z2_flat.norm()), -1, 1
))
if omega.abs() < 1e-6:
return (1 - alpha) * z1 + alpha * z2
return (torch.sin((1 - alpha) * omega) * z1 + torch.sin(alpha * omega) * z2) / torch.sin(omega)
alphas = torch.linspace(0, 1, 8)
interpolated = [slerp(z1, z2, a.item()) for a in alphas]
decoded = []
for z in interpolated:
with torch.no_grad():
img = vae.decode(z / vae.config.scaling_factor).sample
decoded.append(img.cpu())
- Discover semantic directions via prompt-pair diffs:
def get_text_embedding(prompt):
tokens = pipe.tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt", padding="max_length",
max_length=77, truncation=True).input_ids.to(device)
with torch.no_grad():
emb = pipe.text_encoder(tokens).last_hidden_state
return emb
pos_emb = get_text_embedding("a happy person smiling")
neg_emb = get_text_embedding("a sad person frowning")
direction = pos_emb - neg_emb # semantic direction in text embedding space
- Detect OOD latents:
# Compute latent space statistics from a reference set
ref_latents = torch.stack([encode_image(p) for p in reference_paths])
ref_mean = ref_latents.mean(dim=0)
ref_std = ref_latents.std(dim=0)
def ood_score(z):
"""Mahalanobis-like OOD score (higher = more unusual)."""
deviation = ((z - ref_mean) / (ref_std + 1e-6)).flatten()
return deviation.norm().item()
test_z = encode_image("test_image.png")
score = ood_score(test_z)
print(f"OOD score: {score:.2f} (reference mean: {np.mean([ood_score(r) for r in ref_latents]):.2f})")
→ Interpolated images smooth semantic transitions no artifacts. Semantic directions → consistent attribute changes across diverse latents. In-dist OOD scores cluster tight; outliers score much higher.
If err: Blurry/incoherent midpoints → slerp not linear — linear traverses low-density regions in high-dim latents. Semantic directions no effect → increase magnitude or verify same text encoder as training.
Check
- FID ≥10K generated + matching real sample count
- CLIP computed w/ same CLIP model as training (if applicable)
- Noise schedule viz shows monotonic decreasing alphas_cumprod
- Log-SNR spans ~+10 to -10 across timestep range
- Attention maps resolve per-token spatial at mid-res layers
- Attention sharpens early (diffuse) → late (localized)
- Latent interpolations smooth no sudden jumps/artifacts
- OOD baseline ≥100 ref samples
Traps
- FID mismatched res: Real + generated must be same res pre-Inception. Resize both identically or FID inflated.
- Forget normalize for torchmetrics:
FrechetInceptionDistance(normalize=True)→ [0,1] float.normalize=False→ [0,255] uint8. Mix → meaningless FID. - Hook self-attention not cross:
attn1= self (image-to-image). Useattn2cross (text-to-image). Confuse → uninformative uniform. - Linear interp high dims: Linear between 2 high-dim Gaussians passes low-density shell. Always slerp in diffusion latents.
- Ignore VAE scaling factor: SD latents scaled by
vae.config.scaling_factorpost-encode. Forget → garbled decode. - Too few samples precision/recall: <5K samples/set → unreliable. ≥10K for stable.
→
implement-diffusion-network— build diffusion models this skill evalsanalyze-diffusion-dynamics— math foundations of inspected noise procsfit-drift-diffusion-model— different diffusion family, same SDE foundations
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
content-collections
메타이 스킬은 콘텐츠 콜렉션(Content Collections)을 위한 프로덕션 검증된 설정을 제공합니다. 콘텐츠 콜렉션은 Markdown/MDX 파일을 Zod 검증이 포함된 타입 안전한 데이터 콜렉션으로 변환해주는 TypeScript 최우선 도구입니다. 블로그, 문서 사이트 또는 콘텐츠 중심의 Vite + React 애플리케이션을 구축할 때 타입 안전성과 자동 콘텐츠 검증을 보장하기 위해 사용하세요. Vite 플러그인 구성과 MDX 컴파일부터 배포 최적화 및 스키마 검증에 이르기까지 모든 것을 다룹니다.
polymarket
메타이 스킬은 개발자들이 Polymarket 예측 시장 플랫폼을 활용한 애플리케이션을 구축할 수 있도록 지원하며, 거래 및 시장 데이터를 위한 API 통합 기능을 포함합니다. 또한 WebSocket을 통한 실시간 데이터 스트리밍을 제공하여 실시간 거래와 시장 활동을 모니터링할 수 있습니다. 이를 통해 거래 전략을 구현하거나 실시간 시장 업데이트를 처리하는 도구를 생성하는 데 활용할 수 있습니다.
creating-opencode-plugins
메타이 스킬은 개발자들이 명령어, 파일, LSP 작업 등 25개 이상의 이벤트 유형에 연결되는 OpenCode 플러그인을 만들 수 있도록 돕습니다. JavaScript/TypeScript 모듈을 위한 플러그인 구조, 이벤트 API 명세, 구현 패턴을 제공합니다. OpenCode AI 어시스턴트의 라이프사이클을 사용자 정의 이벤트 기반 로직으로 가로채거나, 모니터링하거나, 확장해야 할 때 사용하세요.
sglang
메타SGLang은 RadixAttention 프리픽스 캐싱을 활용하여 JSON, 정규식, 에이전트 워크플로우를 위한 고속 구조화 생성에 특화된 고성능 LLM 서빙 프레임워크입니다. 특히 반복되는 프리픽스가 있는 작업에서 상당히 빠른 추론 속도를 제공하여 복잡한 구조화 출력 및 다중 턴 대화에 이상적입니다. 제약 디코딩이 필요하거나 광범위한 프리픽스 공유가 있는 애플리케이션을 구축할 때는 vLLM과 같은 대안보다 SGLang을 선택하십시오.
