generate-status-report
정보
이 스킬은 차터와 백로그 같은 기존 산출물을 분석하여 지표를 계산하고 장애 요소를 식별함으로써 포괄적인 프로젝트 현황 보고서를 생성합니다. 일정, 범위, 예산, 품질에 대한 RAG 지표를 사용하여 진행 상황을 요약합니다. 스프린트 종료 시, 거버넌스 회의 전, 또는 새로운 위험이 발생하여 이해관계자에게 업데이트를 제공해야 할 때 사용하세요.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/generate-status-reportClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Generate a Project Status Report
Make periodic status report. Analyze project artifacts, compute progress metrics, summarize accomplishments, blockers, upcoming work with RAG (Red/Amber/Green) health indicators.
When Use
- End of sprint or reporting period (weekly, biweekly, monthly)
- Stakeholder asks for project health update
- Before steering committee or governance meetings
- Project health indicators change (new blocker or risk)
- Periodic checkpoint vs charter milestones
Inputs
- Required: Reporting period (start + end date)
- Required: At least one project artifact (BACKLOG.md, SPRINT-PLAN.md, WBS.md, PROJECT-CHARTER.md)
- Optional: Previous status reports (trend comparison)
- Optional: Budget or resource tracking data
- Optional: Risk register updates
Steps
Step 1: Read Existing Artifacts
Scan project directory for PM artifacts:
- PROJECT-CHARTER.md — milestones, success criteria
- BACKLOG.md — item counts by status, burn-down data
- SPRINT-PLAN.md — sprint goal, committed items, task completion
- WBS.md — work package completion percentages
- Previous STATUS-REPORT-*.md files — trend data
Read available files. Not all will exist — adapt report to available data.
Got: At least one artifact read successful, key metrics extracted.
If fail: No artifacts exist? Report can't be generated. Create charter or backlog first with draft-project-charter or manage-backlog.
Step 2: Compute Progress Metrics
Compute metrics from available data:
Agile metrics (from BACKLOG.md / SPRINT-PLAN.md):
- Velocity: story points done this sprint
- Sprint completion: items done / items committed
- Backlog burn-down: total remaining points vs previous period
- Cycle time: average days from In Progress to Done
Classic metrics (from WBS.md):
- % complete: work packages done / total
- Schedule variance: planned milestone dates vs actual
- Effort variance: estimated effort vs actual
## Metrics
| Metric | Value | Previous | Trend |
|--------|-------|----------|-------|
| Velocity | [N] pts | [N] pts | ↑/↓/→ |
| Sprint Completion | [N]% | [N]% | ↑/↓/→ |
| Backlog Remaining | [N] pts | [N] pts | ↓ (good) |
| Schedule Variance | [+/-N days] | [+/-N days] | |
Got: 3-5 metrics computed with previous period comparison.
If fail: No historical data (first report)? Skip Previous + Trend columns. Data incomplete → note gaps in report footer with actions to establish tracking.
Step 3: Find Blockers, Risks, Issues
List active blockers + risks:
## Blockers & Risks
| ID | Type | Description | Severity | Owner | Status | Action Required |
|----|------|------------|----------|-------|--------|----------------|
| R-001 | Risk | [Description] | High | [Name] | Open | [Action] |
| B-001 | Blocker | [Description] | Critical | [Name] | Active | [Action by date] |
| I-001 | Issue | [Description] | Medium | [Name] | Investigating | [Action] |
Cross-reference vs charter risk register. Flag new risks not previously identified.
Got: All active blockers + top risks documented with owners + actions.
If fail: No blockers? State "No active blockers" — no empty section. Blocker without owner? Escalate to project manager.
Step 4: Summarize Accomplishments + Next Period Plan
Write two sections:
## Accomplishments (This Period)
- [Completed item/milestone with evidence]
- [Completed item/milestone with evidence]
- [Completed item/milestone with evidence]
## Planned (Next Period)
- [Planned item/milestone with target]
- [Planned item/milestone with target]
- [Planned item/milestone with target]
Got: 3-5 accomplishments with concrete evidence, 3-5 planned items for next period.
If fail: No accomplishments? Report reason (blocked, re-planning, team unavailable). Next period plan unclear → list "Planning session scheduled for [date]" as primary.
Step 5: Assign RAG + Write Report
Assess project health across four dimensions:
| Dimension | Green | Amber | Red |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule | On track or ahead | 1-2 weeks behind | >2 weeks behind or milestone missed |
| Scope | No uncontrolled changes | Minor scope adjustments | Scope creep affecting deliverables |
| Budget | Within 5% of plan | 5-15% over plan | >15% over plan or untracked |
| Quality | Tests pass, criteria met | Minor quality issues | Critical defects or acceptance failures |
Write complete report:
# Status Report: [Project Name]
## Report Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
## Reporting Period: [Start] to [End]
## Document ID: SR-[PROJECT]-[YYYY-MM-DD]
### Overall Health
| Dimension | Status | Notes |
|-----------|--------|-------|
| Schedule | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
| Scope | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
| Budget | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
| Quality | 🟢/🟡/🔴 | [One-line explanation] |
### Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences: overall status, key achievement, biggest risk]
### Metrics
[From Step 2]
### Accomplishments
[From Step 4]
### Blockers & Risks
[From Step 3]
### Planned Next Period
[From Step 4]
### Decisions Needed
- [Decision 1 — needed by date, from whom]
---
*Report prepared by: [Name/Agent]*
Save as STATUS-REPORT-[YYYY-MM-DD].md.
Got: Complete status report saved with RAG indicators, metrics, narrative.
If fail: Data insufficient for RAG assessment? Use ⚪ (Grey) = "insufficient data", list what data needs collecting for next report.
Checks
- Status report file created with date-stamped filename
- RAG indicators assigned for all four dimensions with justification
- At least 3 metrics computed from project artifacts
- Blockers section present (even if "No active blockers")
- Accomplishments listed with evidence
- Next period plan included
- Executive summary 2-3 sentences, not paragraph
- Every blocker + risk has owner + action with deadline
Pitfalls
- Report without data: Status reports must be evidence-based. Every claim references artifact or metric.
- All green always: Persistent green RAG without evidence = not honest. Challenge green assessments.
- Blocker without owner: Every blocker needs owner + action. Unowned blockers don't resolve.
- Metric without context: "Velocity = 18" means nothing without comparison. Always include previous period or target.
- Too long: Status report scannable in 2 min. Keep to 1-2 pages.
- Missing decisions section: Project needs stakeholder decisions? Make explicit with deadlines.
- Stale data: Outdated artifacts → misleading reports. Verify artifact dates match reporting period.
- Missing trend data: First-time reports can't show trends, but subsequent reports must compare.
See Also
draft-project-charter— charter provides milestones + success criteria for status trackingmanage-backlog— backlog metrics feed status reportplan-sprint— sprint results provide velocity + completion datacreate-work-breakdown-structure— WBS completion drives classic progress metricsconduct-retrospective— status report data feeds retrospective
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
content-collections
메타이 스킬은 콘텐츠 콜렉션(Content Collections)을 위한 프로덕션 검증된 설정을 제공합니다. 콘텐츠 콜렉션은 Markdown/MDX 파일을 Zod 검증이 포함된 타입 안전한 데이터 콜렉션으로 변환해주는 TypeScript 최우선 도구입니다. 블로그, 문서 사이트 또는 콘텐츠 중심의 Vite + React 애플리케이션을 구축할 때 타입 안전성과 자동 콘텐츠 검증을 보장하기 위해 사용하세요. Vite 플러그인 구성과 MDX 컴파일부터 배포 최적화 및 스키마 검증에 이르기까지 모든 것을 다룹니다.
polymarket
메타이 스킬은 개발자들이 Polymarket 예측 시장 플랫폼을 활용한 애플리케이션을 구축할 수 있도록 지원하며, 거래 및 시장 데이터를 위한 API 통합 기능을 포함합니다. 또한 WebSocket을 통한 실시간 데이터 스트리밍을 제공하여 실시간 거래와 시장 활동을 모니터링할 수 있습니다. 이를 통해 거래 전략을 구현하거나 실시간 시장 업데이트를 처리하는 도구를 생성하는 데 활용할 수 있습니다.
creating-opencode-plugins
메타이 스킬은 개발자들이 명령어, 파일, LSP 작업 등 25개 이상의 이벤트 유형에 연결되는 OpenCode 플러그인을 만들 수 있도록 돕습니다. JavaScript/TypeScript 모듈을 위한 플러그인 구조, 이벤트 API 명세, 구현 패턴을 제공합니다. OpenCode AI 어시스턴트의 라이프사이클을 사용자 정의 이벤트 기반 로직으로 가로채거나, 모니터링하거나, 확장해야 할 때 사용하세요.
sglang
메타SGLang은 RadixAttention 프리픽스 캐싱을 활용하여 JSON, 정규식, 에이전트 워크플로우를 위한 고속 구조화 생성에 특화된 고성능 LLM 서빙 프레임워크입니다. 특히 반복되는 프리픽스가 있는 작업에서 상당히 빠른 추론 속도를 제공하여 복잡한 구조화 출력 및 다중 턴 대화에 이상적입니다. 제약 디코딩이 필요하거나 광범위한 프리픽스 공유가 있는 애플리케이션을 구축할 때는 vLLM과 같은 대안보다 SGLang을 선택하십시오.
