design-training-program
정보
이 스킬은 규제 환경을 위한 포괄적인 GxP 교육 프로그램을 설계하며, 요구 분석, 커리큘럼 설계, 역량 평가를 다룹니다. 새로운 시스템 도입, 감사 결과, 또는 검사 준비와 같은 이벤트에 의해 트리거됩니다. 주요 산출물에는 역할 기반 교육 계획, 평가 기준, 그리고 규정 준수를 위한 재교육 트리거 정의가 포함됩니다.
빠른 설치
Claude Code
추천npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/design-training-programClaude Code에서 이 명령을 복사하여 붙여넣어 스킬을 설치하세요
문서
Design Training Program
Role-based GxP program → curriculum + competency + records for regulated envs.
Use When
- New validated sys → user training pre go-live
- Audit finds inadequate training / missing records
- Org change → new roles/responsibilities
- Periodic program review due
- Regulatory inspection prep → prove training adequacy
In
- Required: Systems + processes needing trained personnel
- Required: Role defs (admin, user, QA, mgmt)
- Required: Applicable regulatory reqs (GMP, GLP, GCP)
- Optional: Existing materials/curricula
- Optional: Competency gaps from audits/reviews
- Optional: Training mgmt sys capabilities
Do
Step 1: Training Needs Analysis
Per role: what need to know?
# Training Needs Analysis
## Document ID: TNA-[DEPT]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Role-Based Training Requirements
| Role | GxP Awareness | System Training | Data Integrity | SOP Training | Assessment Type |
|------|--------------|----------------|----------------|--------------|-----------------|
| System Administrator | Advanced | Advanced | Advanced | Admin SOPs | Written + Practical |
| End User | Basic | Intermediate | Intermediate | Operational SOPs | Written + Practical |
| QA Reviewer | Advanced | Basic (review focus) | Advanced | QA SOPs | Written |
| Management | Basic | Overview only | Intermediate | Governance SOPs | Written |
| IT Support | Basic | Infrastructure only | Basic | IT SOPs | Written |
### Training Gap Analysis
| Role | Current Competency | Required Competency | Gap | Priority |
|------|-------------------|---------------------|-----|----------|
| [Role] | [Current level] | [Required level] | [Gap description] | [H/M/L] |
→ Every role → defined training reqs linked to job + GxP duties. If err: roles unclear → RACI exercise first → set duties before training needs.
Step 2: Curriculum
Modules by topic:
# Training Curriculum
## Document ID: TC-[DEPT]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Module 1: GxP Regulatory Awareness
**Duration:** 2 hours | **Delivery:** Classroom / eLearning | **Audience:** All roles
**Content:**
1. Introduction to GxP regulations (GMP, GLP, GCP overview)
2. 21 CFR Part 11 and EU Annex 11 requirements for electronic records
3. Data integrity principles (ALCOA+)
4. Consequences of non-compliance (warning letters, consent decrees, product recalls)
5. Individual responsibilities and accountability
### Module 2: System-Specific Training — [System Name]
**Duration:** 4 hours | **Delivery:** Instructor-led with hands-on | **Audience:** Users, Admins
**Content:**
1. System purpose and GxP classification
2. Login, navigation, and role-based access
3. Core workflows (step-by-step for each user task)
4. Electronic signature procedures
5. Audit trail: how entries are created and what they mean
6. Error handling and deviation reporting
7. Data entry best practices
### Module 3: Data Integrity in Practice
**Duration:** 1.5 hours | **Delivery:** Workshop | **Audience:** Users, QA, Admins
**Content:**
1. ALCOA+ principles with system-specific examples
2. Common data integrity risks and how to avoid them
3. Recognising and reporting data integrity concerns
4. Audit trail review basics
5. Case studies: real-world data integrity failures and lessons learned
### Module 4: SOP Training — [SOP-ID]
**Duration:** 1 hour per SOP | **Delivery:** Read and sign / walkthrough | **Audience:** Per SOP scope
**Content:**
1. SOP purpose and scope
2. Step-by-step procedure walkthrough
3. Decision points and deviation handling
4. Forms and documentation requirements
5. Q&A and clarification
→ Each module: duration + delivery + audience + content. If err: content too broad for time → split or prereq chains.
Step 3: Competency Assessments
How competency measured per module:
# Competency Assessment Design
### Assessment Types
| Type | When to Use | Passing Score | Records |
|------|------------|---------------|---------|
| **Written test** | Knowledge assessment (regulations, principles) | 80% | Score sheet retained |
| **Practical demonstration** | Skill assessment (system operation) | All critical steps correct | Signed observation form |
| **Observed task** | On-the-job competency | Supervisor sign-off | Competency form |
### Sample Written Assessment — GxP Awareness (Module 1)
1. List the five ALCOA principles for data integrity. (5 points)
2. Under 21 CFR 11.50, what three elements must an electronic signature display? (3 points)
3. You discover that a colleague's data entry contains an error. Describe the correct procedure to correct it. (5 points)
4. True/False: A shared login account can be used if all users sign a logbook. (2 points — answer: False)
5. Describe one consequence of a data integrity failure for a pharmaceutical company. (5 points)
**Passing score:** 16/20 (80%)
**On failure:** Retraining required before re-assessment. Maximum 2 re-attempts.
### Practical Assessment Template
| Step | Task | Observed? | Performed Correctly? | Comments |
|------|------|-----------|---------------------|----------|
| 1 | Log in with personal credentials | Yes/No | Yes/No | |
| 2 | Navigate to [specific function] | Yes/No | Yes/No | |
| 3 | Enter test data correctly | Yes/No | Yes/No | |
| 4 | Apply electronic signature | Yes/No | Yes/No | |
| 5 | Locate and interpret audit trail | Yes/No | Yes/No | |
**Assessor:** _______ **Date:** _______ **Result:** Pass / Fail
→ Assessments test knowledge (why) + skill (how). If err: pass rates <70% → review materials for clarity first, not blame learners.
Step 4: Records + Retention
# Training Record Management
### Required Training Records
| Record | Format | Retention Period | Storage |
|--------|--------|-----------------|---------|
| Training matrix (who needs what) | Electronic | Current + 2 years superseded | Training management system |
| Individual training transcript | Electronic | Employment + 2 years | Training management system |
| Assessment results | Electronic or paper | Same as transcript | Training management system |
| Training materials (version used) | Electronic | Life of system + 1 year | Document management system |
| Trainer qualification records | Electronic | Employment + 2 years | HR system |
### Training Matrix Template
| Employee | Role | Module 1 | Module 2 | Module 3 | SOP-001 | SOP-002 | Status |
|----------|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|---------|--------|
| J. Smith | User | 2026-01-15 ✓ | 2026-01-16 ✓ | Due 2026-03-01 | 2026-01-20 ✓ | N/A | Partially trained |
| K. Jones | Admin | 2026-01-15 ✓ | 2026-01-17 ✓ | 2026-01-18 ✓ | 2026-01-20 ✓ | 2026-01-20 ✓ | Fully trained |
→ Records prove every GxP-performing person trained + assessed before activity. If err: records incomplete → retrospective gap assessment + immediate remediation training.
Step 5: Retraining Triggers
# Retraining Triggers
| Trigger | Scope | Timeline | Assessment Required? |
|---------|-------|----------|---------------------|
| SOP revision (minor) | Affected users — read and sign | Before new version effective | No — read and acknowledge |
| SOP revision (major) | Affected users — formal retraining | Before new version effective | Yes — written or practical |
| System upgrade | All users of affected functionality | Before production go-live | Yes — practical demonstration |
| Data integrity incident | Involved personnel + department | Within 30 days of investigation closure | Yes — written |
| Audit finding (training-related) | Per CAPA scope | Per CAPA timeline | Per CAPA requirements |
| Annual refresher | All GxP personnel | Annual from initial training date | No — refresher acknowledgement |
| Role change | Individual | Before assuming new responsibilities | Yes — per new role requirements |
| Extended absence (>6 months) | Returning individual | Before resuming GxP activities | Yes — practical assessment |
→ Triggers specific + measurable + timelined. If err: retraining not done by trigger deadline → individual must not perform GxP until done.
Step 6: Compile Program Doc
# Training Programme
## Document ID: TRAINING-PROGRAM-[DEPT]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### 1. Purpose and Scope
### 2. Training Needs Analysis [Step 1]
### 3. Curriculum [Step 2]
### 4. Competency Assessments [Step 3]
### 5. Training Records and Retention [Step 4]
### 6. Retraining Triggers [Step 5]
### 7. Programme Review
- Annual review of training effectiveness (pass rates, audit findings, incidents)
- Curriculum update when systems, SOPs, or regulations change
- Trainer qualification verification
### 8. Approval
| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
|------|------|-----------|------|
| Training Manager | | | |
| QA Director | | | |
| Department Head | | | |
→ Full program approved + effective before go-live / compliance deadline. If err: approval delayed → interim training measures + plan to formalize.
Check
- Needs analysis done for all GxP-touching roles
- Curriculum modules: duration + delivery + content outline
- Assessments per module + defined passing criteria
- Matrix tracks all personnel vs required training
- Retention meets regulatory reqs
- Retraining triggers: timelines + assessment reqs
- Program approved by QA + mgmt
Traps
- Training = read SOP: Read-and-sign OK for minor updates, NOT initial training. New users need instructor-led + hands-on.
- No assessment: Training w/o assessment can't prove learning. Regulators want competence evidence, not attendance.
- Trainer unqualified: Trainers must be demonstrably competent. "Train the trainer" records often requested in inspections.
- Stale matrix: Not updated on join/leave/role-change → compliance gaps. Integrate w/ HR.
- One-size-fits-all: Admins need deeper training than end users. Role-based avoids overwhelm + under-train.
→
write-standard-operating-procedure— SOPs drive content + retraining triggersdesign-compliance-architecture— IDs systems + roles needing trainingconduct-gxp-audit— audits often assess training adequacymanage-change-control— sys changes trigger retrainingprepare-inspection-readiness— records are primary inspection target
GitHub 저장소
연관 스킬
executing-plans
디자인executing-plans 스킬은 검토 체크포인트가 포함된 통제된 배치로 실행할 완전한 구현 계획이 있을 때 사용합니다. 이 스킬은 계획을 불러와 비판적으로 검토한 후, 소규모 배치(기본값 3개 작업)로 작업을 실행하면서 각 배치 사이에 진행 상황을 아키텍트 검토를 위해 보고합니다. 이를 통해 내재된 품질 관리 체크포인트를 갖춘 체계적인 구현이 보장됩니다.
requesting-code-review
디자인이 스킬은 코드 변경 사항을 요구 사항에 따라 분석하기 위해 코드 리뷰어 하위 에이전트를 호출합니다. 작업 완료 후, 주요 기능 구현 후, 또는 메인 브랜치에 병합하기 전에 사용해야 합니다. 이 리뷰는 현재 구현체와 원래 계획을 비교하여 문제를 조기에 발견하는 데 도움이 됩니다.
connect-mcp-server
디자인이 스킬은 개발자들이 HTTP, stdio 또는 SSE 전송 방식을 통해 MCP 서버를 Claude Code에 연결하는 포괄적인 가이드를 제공합니다. GitHub, Notion 및 사용자 정의 API와 같은 외부 서비스를 통합하기 위한 설치, 구성, 인증 및 보안을 다룹니다. MCP 통합 설정, 외부 도구 구성 또는 Claude의 모델 컨텍스트 프로토콜 작업 시 활용하세요.
web-cli-teleport
디자인이 스킬은 작업 분석을 기반으로 개발자가 Claude Code 웹 인터페이스와 CLI 인터페이스 중 선택할 수 있도록 돕고, 두 환경 간 원활한 세션 텔레포트를 가능하게 합니다. 웹, CLI 또는 모바일 환경 전환 시 세션 상태와 컨텍스트를 관리하여 워크플로를 최적화합니다. 다양한 단계에서 서로 다른 도구가 필요한 복잡한 프로젝트에 사용하세요.
