contract-review
О программе
Этот навык систематически анализирует контракты для выявления рисков, невыгодных условий и возможностей для переговоров. Он предназначен для проверки соглашений с поставщиками, партнёрских договоров, трудовых контрактов и документов комплексной проверки. Инструмент помечает проблемные пункты на основе правовых рамок и матриц рисков, помогая разработчикам оценивать контракты перед подписанием.
Быстрая установка
Claude Code
Рекомендуетсяnpx skills add guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skillsgit clone https://github.com/guia-matthieu/clawfu-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/contract-reviewСкопируйте и вставьте эту команду в Claude Code для установки этого навыка
Документация
Contract Review
Systematically analyze contracts to identify risks, unfavorable clauses, and negotiation opportunities before signing.
When to Use This Skill
- Reviewing vendor/SaaS contracts
- Analyzing partnership agreements
- Evaluating client service agreements
- Reviewing employment contracts
- Due diligence on M&A documents
Methodology Foundation
Based on legal contract analysis frameworks combined with:
- Risk assessment matrices
- Common clause libraries
- Industry-standard benchmarks
- Negotiation leverage analysis
What Claude Does vs What You Decide
| Claude Does | You Decide |
|---|---|
| Identifies risky clauses | Risk tolerance level |
| Flags unusual terms | What to negotiate |
| Compares to standards | Final accept/reject |
| Suggests alternatives | Business trade-offs |
| Summarizes obligations | Legal counsel needs |
Instructions
Step 1: Contract Overview
Initial Assessment:
| Element | What to Capture |
|---|---|
| Parties | Who's bound |
| Type | Service, license, partnership |
| Term | Duration, renewal |
| Value | Total commitment |
| Jurisdiction | Governing law |
Step 2: Risk Categories
Clause Risk Matrix:
| Category | Low Risk | Medium Risk | High Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liability | Mutual caps | Uncapped | Unlimited indemnity |
| Term | Monthly | Annual | Multi-year auto-renew |
| Data | Standard DPA | Custom terms | Broad usage rights |
| IP | License only | Work for hire | Assignment |
| Termination | 30-day notice | For cause only | Penalties |
Step 3: Clause-by-Clause Analysis
Key Clauses to Review:
Payment Terms:
- Net terms (30/60/90)
- Late payment penalties
- Price escalation clauses
- Audit rights
Liability & Indemnification:
- Cap on liability (multiple of fees)
- Carve-outs (willful misconduct, IP)
- Indemnification scope
- Insurance requirements
Termination:
- For convenience vs. for cause
- Notice periods
- Transition assistance
- Data return/destruction
IP & Data:
- Ownership of deliverables
- License scope
- Data usage rights
- Confidentiality obligations
Step 4: Benchmarking
Industry Standards:
| Clause | Typical | Favorable | Unfavorable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liability cap | 12 mo fees | 24 mo fees | Uncapped |
| Payment | Net 30 | Net 45 | Net 15 |
| Termination | 30 days | 60 days | 90+ days |
| Auto-renewal | 30-day opt-out | 60-day opt-out | 90-day opt-out |
Step 5: Generate Recommendations
Output Structure:
- Executive summary (2-3 sentences)
- Risk rating (Low/Medium/High/Critical)
- Red flags (must address)
- Yellow flags (should negotiate)
- Green flags (acceptable)
- Recommended redlines
- Questions for counsel
Examples
Example 1: SaaS Vendor Contract Review
Input:
Review this SaaS contract summary:
- 3-year term with 90-day auto-renewal notice
- Unlimited liability for data breaches
- Vendor can change pricing with 30-day notice
- Data can be used for "service improvement"
- Termination only for material breach
Output:
## Contract Review: SaaS Vendor Agreement
### Risk Rating: HIGH
---
### Executive Summary
This contract heavily favors the vendor with limited termination rights, uncapped liability exposure for you, and one-sided price increase provisions. Recommend significant negotiation before signing.
---
### Red Flags (Must Address)
| Clause | Issue | Risk | Recommendation |
|--------|-------|------|----------------|
| **Auto-Renewal** | 90-day notice for 3-year contract | Lock-in risk | Reduce to 30-60 days |
| **Pricing** | Vendor can change with 30-day notice | Budget risk | Cap increases at 5%/year or CPI |
| **Termination** | Material breach only | Lock-in risk | Add termination for convenience with notice |
| **Liability** | Unlimited for data breaches | Financial risk | Cap at 24 months of fees |
---
### Yellow Flags (Should Negotiate)
| Clause | Issue | Recommendation |
|--------|-------|----------------|
| **Data Usage** | "Service improvement" is vague | Define scope, exclude training AI |
| **Term Length** | 3 years is long | Request 1-year with renewal option |
| **SLA** | None mentioned | Require 99.9% uptime with credits |
---
### Green Flags (Acceptable)
- Standard confidentiality provisions
- Reasonable IP license terms
- Clear support response times
---
### Recommended Redlines
**Priority 1 (Deal Breakers):**
Section 8.2: Change "90 days" to "30 days" Section 12.1: Add "and termination for convenience with 60 days written notice" Section 14.3: Add "not to exceed 24 months of fees paid under this Agreement"
**Priority 2 (Strongly Preferred):**
Section 5.1: Add "Price increases shall not exceed 5% annually" Section 9.4: Change "service improvement" to "providing and improving the Service for Customer"
---
### Questions for Legal Counsel
1. Is unlimited data breach liability acceptable given our cyber insurance coverage?
2. What's our exposure if we need to exit before term completion?
3. Are there regulatory implications for the data usage clause?
---
### Negotiation Leverage
**Your Position:** First-year customer, significant deal size
**Their Likely Flex:**
- Auto-renewal notice period
- Liability caps
- Pricing caps
**Their Likely Firm:**
- Base term length
- Core data usage rights
Example 2: Quick Risk Assessment
Input:
Quick review - key concerns only:
- Unlimited indemnification for IP claims
- 2x annual fees liability cap
- Net 45 payment terms
- 60-day termination notice
- Standard DPA included
Output:
## Quick Risk Assessment
### Overall: MEDIUM RISK
| Clause | Rating | Note |
|--------|--------|------|
| Indemnification | HIGH | Unlimited IP indemnity is risky |
| Liability Cap | GREEN | 2x is standard |
| Payment | GREEN | Net 45 is favorable |
| Termination | GREEN | 60 days is reasonable |
| Data Protection | GREEN | Standard DPA |
### Priority Action
**Address Indemnification:**
- Request mutual cap on IP indemnity
- Propose "lesser of [amount] or 12 months fees"
- Alternative: carve out for willful infringement only
**Everything Else:** Acceptable, proceed if IP indemnity resolved.
Skill Boundaries
What This Skill Does Well
- Identifying common risk patterns
- Comparing to industry benchmarks
- Structuring negotiation priorities
- Flagging unusual clauses
What This Skill Cannot Do
- Provide legal advice
- Know jurisdiction-specific requirements
- Assess strategic business importance
- Replace qualified legal counsel
When to Escalate to Human
- Contracts over $100K annual value
- Non-standard or heavily negotiated terms
- Any regulated industry requirements
- Indemnification or liability questions
Iteration Guide
Follow-up Prompts:
- "What's the worst-case scenario for the liability clause?"
- "Draft redline language for [specific clause]"
- "How does this compare to [competitor] contracts?"
- "What should we ask for in return if we accept [term]?"
References
- ACC (Association of Corporate Counsel) Contract Guidelines
- IACCM Contract Terms Benchmarking
- Tech Contract Negotiation Best Practices
- Standard SaaS Agreement Templates
Related Skills
rfp-response- Creating proposalsnda-generator- Confidentiality agreementsterms-analyzer- Terms of service review
Skill Metadata
- Domain: Legal
- Complexity: Intermediate
- Mode: centaur
- Time to Value: 30-60 min per contract
- Prerequisites: Contract access, business context
GitHub репозиторий
Похожие навыки
llamaguard
ДругоеLlamaGuard — это модель от Meta с 7–8 миллиардами параметров для модерации входных и выходных данных больших языковых моделей по шести категориям безопасности, таким как насилие и разжигание ненависти. Она обеспечивает точность 94–95% и может быть развернута с помощью vLLM, Hugging Face или Amazon SageMaker. Используйте этот навык, чтобы легко интегрировать фильтрацию контента и защитные механизмы в ваши ИИ-приложения.
cost-optimization
ДругоеЭтот навык Claude помогает разработчикам оптимизировать облачные расходы за счет правильного подбора ресурсов, стратегий тегирования и анализа затрат. Он предоставляет framework для сокращения облачных расходов и внедрения управления затратами в AWS, Azure и GCP. Используйте его, когда вам нужно проанализировать расходы на инфраструктуру, оптимизировать ресурсы или уложиться в бюджетные ограничения.
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
ДругоеЭтот навык выполняет квантизацию LLM до 8-битной или 4-битной точности с использованием библиотеки bitsandbytes, обеспечивая сокращение использования памяти на 50-75% при минимальной потере точности. Он идеально подходит для запуска больших моделей при ограниченной памяти GPU или для ускорения вывода, поддерживая форматы INT8, NF4 и FP4. Навык интегрируется с HuggingFace Transformers и позволяет использовать обучение QLoRA и 8-битные оптимизаторы.
dispatching-parallel-agents
ДругоеЭтот навык Claude распределяет нескольких агентов для исследования и устранения трёх и более независимых проблем параллельно. Он предназначен для сценариев с несвязанными сбоями, которые можно устранить без общего состояния или зависимостей. Ключевая возможность — параллельное решение проблем, где за каждую независимую предметную область назначается отдельный агент для максимальной эффективности.
