setup-gxp-r-project
О программе
Этот навык создает структуру R-проекта, соответствующую правилам GxP, таким как 21 CFR Часть 11, автоматизируя настройку для валидированных сред, квалификационных документов и электронных записей. Используйте его при запуске проектов анализа в R в регулируемых фармацевтических или биотехнологических средах, чтобы обеспечить готовность к аудиту. Он охватывает требования для клинических испытаний, регуляторных подач и управления изменениями.
Быстрая установка
Claude Code
Рекомендуетсяnpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/setup-gxp-r-projectСкопируйте и вставьте эту команду в Claude Code для установки этого навыка
Документация
Set Up GxP R Project
Make R project structure that meets GxP regulatory requirements for validated computing.
When Use
- Start R analysis project in regulated env (pharma, biotech, medical devices)
- Set up R for clinical trial analysis
- Make validated computing env for regulatory submissions
- Implement 21 CFR Part 11 or EU Annex 11 requirements
Inputs
- Required: Project scope + regulatory framework (FDA, EMA, both)
- Required: R version + package versions to validate
- Required: Validation strategy (risk-based)
- Optional: Existing SOPs for computerized systems
- Optional: QMS integration requirements
Steps
Step 1: Create Validated Project Structure
gxp-project/
├── R/ # Analysis scripts
│ ├── 01_data_import.R
│ ├── 02_data_processing.R
│ └── 03_analysis.R
├── validation/ # Validation documentation
│ ├── validation_plan.md # VP: scope, strategy, roles
│ ├── risk_assessment.md # Risk categorization
│ ├── iq/ # Installation Qualification
│ │ ├── iq_protocol.md
│ │ └── iq_report.md
│ ├── oq/ # Operational Qualification
│ │ ├── oq_protocol.md
│ │ └── oq_report.md
│ ├── pq/ # Performance Qualification
│ │ ├── pq_protocol.md
│ │ └── pq_report.md
│ └── traceability_matrix.md # Requirements to tests mapping
├── tests/ # Automated test suite
│ ├── testthat.R
│ └── testthat/
│ ├── test-data_import.R
│ └── test-analysis.R
├── data/ # Input data (controlled)
│ ├── raw/ # Immutable raw data
│ └── derived/ # Processed datasets
├── output/ # Analysis outputs
├── docs/ # Supporting documentation
│ ├── sop_references.md # Links to relevant SOPs
│ └── change_log.md # Manual change documentation
├── renv.lock # Locked dependencies
├── DESCRIPTION # Project metadata
├── .Rprofile # Session configuration
└── CLAUDE.md # AI assistant instructions
Got: Complete dir structure exists with R/, validation/ (including iq/, oq/, pq/ subdirs), tests/testthat/, data/raw/, data/derived/, output/, docs/ dirs.
If fail: Dirs missing? Create with mkdir -p. Verify in correct project root. For existing projects, create only missing dirs rather than overwriting.
Step 2: Create Validation Plan
Create validation/validation_plan.md.
# Validation Plan
## 1. Purpose
This plan defines the validation strategy for [Project Name] using R [version].
## 2. Scope
- R version: 4.5.0
- Packages: [list with versions]
- Analysis: [description]
- Regulatory framework: 21 CFR Part 11 / EU Annex 11
## 3. Risk Assessment Approach
Using GAMP 5 risk-based categories:
- Category 3: Non-configured products (R base)
- Category 4: Configured products (R packages with default settings)
- Category 5: Custom applications (custom R scripts)
## 4. Validation Activities
| Activity | Category 3 | Category 4 | Category 5 |
|----------|-----------|-----------|-----------|
| IQ | Required | Required | Required |
| OQ | Reduced | Standard | Enhanced |
| PQ | N/A | Standard | Enhanced |
## 5. Roles and Responsibilities
- Validation Lead: [Name]
- Developer: [Name]
- QA Reviewer: [Name]
- Approver: [Name]
## 6. Acceptance Criteria
All tests must pass with documented evidence.
Got: validation/validation_plan.md complete with scope, GAMP 5 risk categories, validation activities matrix, roles + responsibilities, acceptance criteria. Plan references specific R version + regulatory framework.
If fail: Regulatory framework unclear? Consult org's QA dept for applicable SOPs. Do not proceed with validation activities until plan reviewed + approved.
Step 3: Lock Dependencies with renv
# Initialize renv with exact versions
renv::init()
# Install specific validated versions
renv::install("[email protected]")
renv::install("[email protected]")
# Snapshot
renv::snapshot()
renv.lock file serves as controlled package inventory.
Got: renv.lock exists with exact version numbers for all required packages. renv::status() reports no issues. Every package version pinned (e.g., [email protected]), not floating.
If fail: renv::install() fails for specific version? Check version exists on CRAN archives. Use renv::install("package@version", repos = "https://packagemanager.posit.co/cran/latest") for archived versions.
Step 4: Implement Version Control
git init
git add .
git commit -m "Initial validated project structure"
# Use signed commits for traceability
git config user.signingkey YOUR_GPG_KEY
git config commit.gpgsign true
Got: Project under git version control with signed commits enabled. Initial commit contains validated project structure + renv.lock.
If fail: GPG signing fails? Verify GPG key configured with gpg --list-secret-keys. For envs without GPG, document deviation, use unsigned commits with manual audit trail entries in docs/change_log.md.
Step 5: Create IQ Protocol
validation/iq/iq_protocol.md.
# Installation Qualification Protocol
## Objective
Verify that R and required packages are correctly installed.
## Test Cases
### IQ-001: R Version Verification
- **Requirement**: R 4.5.0 installed
- **Procedure**: Execute `R.version.string`
- **Expected:** "R version 4.5.0 (date)"
- **Result**: [ PASS / FAIL ]
### IQ-002: Package Installation Verification
- **Requirement**: All packages in renv.lock installed
- **Procedure**: Execute `renv::status()`
- **Expected:** "No issues found"
- **Result**: [ PASS / FAIL ]
### IQ-003: Package Version Verification
- **Procedure**: Execute `installed.packages()[, c("Package", "Version")]`
- **Expected:** Versions match renv.lock exactly
- **Result**: [ PASS / FAIL ]
Got: validation/iq/iq_protocol.md contains test cases for R version verification, package install verification, package version verification, each with clear expected results + pass/fail fields.
If fail: IQ protocol template does not match org SOP requirements? Adapt format while keeping required fields (requirement, procedure, expected, actual, pass/fail). Consult QA for approved templates.
Step 6: Write Automated OQ/PQ Tests
# tests/testthat/test-analysis.R
test_that("primary analysis produces validated results", {
# Known input -> known output (double programming validation)
test_data <- read.csv(test_path("fixtures", "validation_dataset.csv"))
result <- primary_analysis(test_data)
# Compare against independently calculated expected values
expect_equal(result$estimate, 2.345, tolerance = 1e-3)
expect_equal(result$p_value, 0.012, tolerance = 1e-3)
expect_equal(result$ci_lower, 1.234, tolerance = 1e-3)
})
Got: Automated test files in tests/testthat/ covering OQ (operational verification of each function) + PQ (end-to-end validation against independent reference values). Tests use explicit numeric tolerances.
If fail: Reference values not yet available from independent calc (e.g., SAS)? Create placeholder tests with skip("Awaiting independent reference values"), document in traceability matrix.
Step 7: Create Traceability Matrix
# Traceability Matrix
| Req ID | Requirement | Test ID | Test Description | Status |
|--------|-------------|---------|------------------|--------|
| REQ-001 | Import CSV data correctly | OQ-001 | Verify data dimensions and types | PASS |
| REQ-002 | Calculate primary endpoint | PQ-001 | Compare against reference results | PASS |
| REQ-003 | Generate report output | PQ-002 | Verify report contains all sections | PASS |
Got: validation/traceability_matrix.md links every requirement to at least one test case, every test linked to a requirement. No orphaned requirements or tests.
If fail: Requirements untested? Create test cases or document risk-based justification for exclusion. Tests with no linked requirement? Either link to existing requirement or remove as out-of-scope.
Checks
- Project structure follows documented template
- renv.lock contains all deps with exact versions
- Validation plan complete + approved
- IQ protocol executes successfully
- OQ test cases cover all configured functionality
- PQ tests validate against independently computed results
- Traceability matrix links requirements to tests
- Change control process documented
Pitfalls
- Use
install.packages()without version pinning: Always use renv with locked versions - Missing audit trail: Every change must be documented. Use git signed commits.
- Over-validating: Apply risk-based approach. Not every CRAN package needs Category 5 validation.
- Forget system-level qualification: OS + R installation need IQ too
- No independent verification: PQ should compare against results computed independently (SAS, manual calc)
See Also
write-validation-documentation- detailed validation document creationimplement-audit-trail- electronic records + audit trailsvalidate-statistical-output- double programming + output validationmanage-renv-dependencies- dep locking for validated envs
GitHub репозиторий
Frequently asked questions
What is the setup-gxp-r-project skill?
setup-gxp-r-project is a Claude Skill by pjt222. Skills package instructions and resources that Claude loads on demand, so Claude can perform setup-gxp-r-project-related tasks without extra prompting.
How do I install setup-gxp-r-project?
Use the install commands on this page: add setup-gxp-r-project to Claude Code as a plugin, or clone its repository into your skills directory, then restart Claude so it picks up the skill.
What category does setup-gxp-r-project belong to?
setup-gxp-r-project is in the Meta category, tagged word and design.
Is setup-gxp-r-project free to use?
Yes. setup-gxp-r-project is listed on AIMCP and free to install. It runs inside Claude, so no separate service account is required to use the skill itself.
Похожие навыки
Этот навык предоставляет проверенную в продакшене настройку для Content Collections — TypeScript-ориентированного инструмента, который преобразует файлы Markdown/MDX в типобезопасные коллекции данных с валидацией Zod. Используйте его при создании блогов, сайтов документации или контентных приложений на Vite + React для обеспечения типобезопасности и автоматической проверки содержимого. Он охватывает всё: от настройки плагина Vite и компиляции MDX до оптимизации развертывания и валидации схем.
Этот навык позволяет разработчикам создавать приложения на платформе прогнозных рынков Polymarket, включая интеграцию с API для торговли и получения рыночных данных. Он также обеспечивает потоковую передачу данных в реальном времени через WebSocket для отслеживания текущих сделок и рыночной активности. Используйте его для реализации торговых стратегий или создания инструментов, обрабатывающих обновления рынка в реальном времени.
Этот навык помогает разработчикам создавать плагины OpenCode, которые подключаются к более чем 25 типам событий, таким как команды, файлы и операции LSP. Он предоставляет структуру плагина, спецификации API событий и шаблоны реализации для модулей на JavaScript/TypeScript. Используйте его, когда вам нужно перехватывать, отслеживать или расширять жизненный цикл ассистента OpenCode AI с помощью пользовательской событийно-ориентированной логики.
SGLang — это высокопроизводительный фреймворк для обслуживания больших языковых моделей (LLM), специализирующийся на быстрой структурированной генерации JSON, regex и рабочих процессов агентов с использованием кэширования префиксов RadixAttention. Он обеспечивает значительно более высокую скорость вывода, особенно для задач с повторяющимися префиксами, что делает его идеальным для сложных структурированных результатов и многократных диалогов. Выбирайте SGLang вместо альтернатив, таких как vLLM, когда вам требуется ограниченное декодирование или вы создаете приложения с интенсивным совместным использованием префиксов.
