formulate-maxwell-equations
О программе
Этот навык позволяет разработчикам работать с уравнениями Максвелла в интегральной и дифференциальной формах для анализа электромагнитных систем. Он предназначен для решения краевых задач, вывода волновых уравнений, вычисления переноса энергии через вектор Пойнтинга и работы с полями на границах раздела сред. Используйте его при переходе от электростатики к магнитостатике или при применении фундаментальных законов, таких как законы Гаусса, Фарадея и Ампера — Максвелла.
Быстрая установка
Claude Code
Рекомендуетсяnpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/formulate-maxwell-equationsСкопируйте и вставьте эту команду в Claude Code для установки этого навыка
Документация
Formulate Maxwell Equations
Crack EM stuff. State right Maxwell equations (integral or differential). Apply boundary + symmetry to shrink system. Solve PDEs for fields. Compute Poynting vector, radiation pressure, wave impedance. Verify against static + wave limits.
When Use
- Boundary value problem for E + B fields, sources + material interfaces
- Derive EM wave equation from first principles
- Compute energy flow (Poynting vector) + momentum density of EM fields
- Apply boundary conditions at media interfaces (dielectric, conductor, magnetic)
- Analyze displacement current + role in Ampere-Maxwell
- Connect static limits (Coulomb, Biot-Savart) to unified time-dependent framework
Inputs
- Required: Physical setup (geometry, source charges + currents, material props)
- Required: Quantity to solve (E, B, wave solution, energy flux, boundary field)
- Optional: Symmetry (planar, cylindrical, spherical, none)
- Optional: Time dependence (static, harmonic omega, general)
- Optional: Boundary conditions at interfaces or conductor surfaces
Steps
Step 1: State Four Maxwell Equations + Pick Relevant Subset
Write full set, choose which constrain problem:
-
Gauss for E: div(E) = rho / epsilon_0 (diff) or closed_surface_integral(E . dA) = Q_enc / epsilon_0 (int). E divergence to charge density. Use for E from charge with symmetry.
-
Gauss for B: div(B) = 0 (diff) or closed_surface_integral(B . dA) = 0 (int). No magnetic monopoles. Every B line closed loop. Consistency check on B.
-
Faraday: curl(E) = -dB/dt (diff) or contour_integral(E . dl) = -d(Phi_B)/dt (int). Changing B makes curling E. Induction + wave derivation.
-
Ampere-Maxwell: curl(B) = mu_0 J + mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt (diff) or contour_integral(B . dl) = mu_0 I_enc + mu_0 epsilon_0 d(Phi_E)/dt (int). Current + changing E make curling B. Displacement current term mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt essential for wave + current continuity.
-
Form pick: Differential for local fields, wave equations, PDEs. Integral for high-symmetry where field extracts direct.
-
Active equations: Not all four independent every problem. Electrostatics (dB/dt = 0, J = 0) → only Gauss for E + curl(E) = 0 matter. Magnetostatics → Gauss for B + Ampere (no displacement current) enough.
## Maxwell Equations for This Problem
- **Form**: [differential / integral / both]
- **Active equations**: [list which of the four are non-trivial constraints]
- **Source terms**: rho = [charge density], J = [current density]
- **Time dependence**: [static / harmonic / general]
- **Displacement current**: [negligible / essential -- with justification]
Got: Four equations stated. Relevant subset identified with justification. Displacement current included or explicitly argued negligible.
If fail: Unclear if displacement current matters? Estimate |epsilon_0 dE/dt| / |J|. Ratio near 1 or bigger → keep displacement current. Vacuum no free charges → always essential for wave.
Step 2: Apply Boundary Conditions + Symmetry
Shrink system with material interfaces + geometric symmetry:
-
Boundary at material interfaces: Medium 1 + 2, surface charge sigma_f + surface current K_f:
- Normal E: epsilon_1 E_1n - epsilon_2 E_2n = sigma_f
- Tangential E: E_1t = E_2t (continuous)
- Normal B: B_1n = B_2n (continuous)
- Tangential H: n_hat x (H_1 - H_2) = K_f (n_hat from 2 to 1)
-
Conductor boundary: Perfect conductor surface:
- E_tangential = 0 (inside E = 0)
- B_normal = 0 (inside B = 0 for time-varying)
- Surface charge: sigma = epsilon_0 E_normal
- Surface current: K = (1/mu_0) n_hat x B
-
Symmetry shrink: Use symmetries to cut independent variables:
- Planar: fields depend one coord (z), PDEs → ODEs
- Cylindrical: depend (rho, z) or rho only
- Spherical: depend r only
- Translational invariance: Fourier transform invariant direction
-
Gauge choice (using potentials): Pick gauge for scalar phi + vector A:
- Coulomb: div(A) = 0 (splits electrostatic + radiation)
- Lorenz: div(A) + mu_0 epsilon_0 d(phi)/dt = 0 (Lorentz-covariant, decouples wave)
## Boundary Conditions and Symmetry
- **Interfaces**: [list with media properties on each side]
- **Boundary conditions applied**: [normal E, tangential E, normal B, tangential H]
- **Symmetry**: [planar / cylindrical / spherical / none]
- **Reduced coordinates**: [independent variables after symmetry reduction]
- **Gauge** (if using potentials): [Coulomb / Lorenz / other]
Got: Boundary conditions stated every interface. Symmetry cuts dimension. Problem ready for PDE solution.
If fail: Over-determined (more equations than unknowns)? Check field components match conditions. Under-determined? Missed condition — often tangential H or radiation at infinity.
Step 3: Solve PDEs
Solve Maxwell equations or derived forms for field quantities:
-
Wave equation derive: Source-free, linear, homogeneous medium:
- Curl of Faraday: curl(curl(E)) = -d/dt(curl(B))
- Sub Ampere-Maxwell: curl(curl(E)) = -mu epsilon d^2E/dt^2
- Vector identity: curl(curl(E)) = grad(div(E)) - nabla^2(E)
- With div(E) = 0: nabla^2(E) = mu epsilon d^2E/dt^2
- Wave speed: v = 1/sqrt(mu epsilon); vacuum c = 1/sqrt(mu_0 epsilon_0)
- Same for B
-
Plane wave solutions: Wave in z-direction:
- E(z, t) = E_0 exp[i(kz - omega t)], k = omega/v = omega * sqrt(mu epsilon)
- B = (1/v) k_hat x E (perpendicular E + propagation)
- |B| = |E|/v
- Polarization: linear, circular, elliptical by E_0 components
-
Laplace + Poisson (static):
- No time: nabla^2(phi) = -rho/epsilon_0 (Poisson) or nabla^2(phi) = 0 (Laplace)
- Separation of variables in right coordinates
- Match boundary to pin expansion coefficients
-
Guided waves + cavities: Waveguides + resonant cavities:
- Split into TE (transverse electric) + TM (transverse magnetic) modes
- Apply conducting-wall boundary
- Eigenvalue problem → allowed propagation constants + resonant frequencies
- Cutoff: omega_c = v * pi * sqrt((m/a)^2 + (n/b)^2) for rectangular guide a x b
-
Skin depth in conductors: Time-varying fields into conductor conductivity sigma_c:
- delta = sqrt(2 / (omega mu sigma_c))
- Fields decay exp(-z/delta)
- 60 Hz copper: delta ~ 8.5 mm; 1 GHz: delta ~ 2 micrometers
## Field Solution
- **Equation solved**: [wave equation / Laplace / Poisson / eigenvalue]
- **Solution method**: [separation of variables / Fourier transform / Green's function / numerical]
- **Result**: E(r, t) = [expression], B(r, t) = [expression]
- **Dispersion relation**: omega(k) = [if wave solution]
- **Characteristic scales**: [wavelength, skin depth, decay length]
Got: Explicit field expressions satisfying Maxwell + all boundary. Dispersion relation or eigenvalue spectrum if applicable.
If fail: PDE won't separate in chosen coordinates? Try different system or numerical (finite difference, finite element). Solution fails a Maxwell equation on back-sub? Algebraic error — re-check curl + divergence.
Step 4: Compute Derived Quantities
Pull physical quantities from field solution:
-
Poynting vector: S = (1/mu_0) E x B (instantaneous energy flux, W/m^2):
- Plane waves: S = (1/mu_0) |E|^2 / v in propagation direction
- Time-averaged: <S> = (1/2) Re(E x H*) for harmonic
- Intensity: I = |<S>| (power per area)
-
EM energy density:
- u = (1/2)(epsilon_0 |E|^2 + |B|^2/mu_0) in vacuum
- u = (1/2)(E . D + B . H) in linear media
- Energy conservation: du/dt + div(S) = -J . E (Poynting's theorem)
-
Radiation pressure: Plane wave on surface:
- Perfect absorber: P_rad = I/c = <S>/c
- Perfect reflector: P_rad = 2I/c = 2<S>/c
- Momentum flux density of EM field
-
Wave impedance:
- Medium: eta = sqrt(mu/epsilon) = mu * v
- Vacuum: eta_0 = sqrt(mu_0/epsilon_0) ~ 377 Ohms
- E + H amplitudes: |E| = eta |H|
- Reflection at normal: r = (eta_2 - eta_1)/(eta_2 + eta_1)
-
Power dissipation + quality factor:
- Ohmic loss per volume: p_loss = sigma |E|^2 / 2 (conductor)
- Cavity Q-factor: Q = omega * (stored energy) / (power dissipated per cycle)
- Bandwidth of resonances: Delta_omega = omega / Q
## Derived Quantities
- **Poynting vector**: S = [expression], <S> = [time-averaged]
- **Energy density**: u = [expression]
- **Radiation pressure**: P_rad = [value]
- **Wave impedance**: eta = [value]
- **Reflection/transmission**: r = [value], t = [value]
- **Q-factor** (if resonant): Q = [value]
Got: All derived quantities with right units. Energy conservation verified via Poynting's theorem. Magnitudes physically reasonable.
If fail: Poynting's theorem won't balance (du/dt + div(S) != -J . E)? Inconsistency E + B solutions. Re-verify both fields satisfy all four Maxwell. Common error: E + B from different approximations not mutually consistent.
Step 5: Verify Against Known Limits
Check solution reduces correctly in limits:
-
Static limit (omega -> 0): Solution → electrostatic or magnetostatic:
- E satisfies Coulomb or Laplace/Poisson
- B satisfies Biot-Savart or Ampere (no displacement current)
- Displacement current vanishes: mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt -> 0
-
Plane wave limit: Source-free unbounded medium → plane waves, v = 1/sqrt(mu epsilon), correct polarization.
-
Perfect conductor limit (sigma -> infinity):
- Skin depth delta -> 0 (no penetration)
- Tangential E -> 0 at surface
- Reflection r -> -1 (perfect reflection phase inversion)
-
Vacuum limit (epsilon_r = 1, mu_r = 1): Material-dependent → vacuum values. Wave speed = c. Impedance = eta_0 ~ 377 Ohms.
-
Energy conservation check: Integrate Poynting's theorem over closed volume. Rate of change of total field energy + power flowing out = negative of power from currents inside. Any imbalance = error.
## Limiting Case Verification
| Limit | Condition | Expected | Obtained | Match |
|-------|-----------|----------|----------|-------|
| Static | omega -> 0 | Coulomb / Biot-Savart | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Plane wave | unbounded medium | v = c/n, eta = eta_0/n | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Perfect conductor | sigma -> inf | delta -> 0, r -> -1 | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Vacuum | epsilon_r = mu_r = 1 | c, eta_0 | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Energy conservation | Poynting's theorem | balanced | [check] | [Yes/No] |
Got: All limits produce correct known results. Energy conservation satisfied to numerical precision.
If fail: Failed limit = definite error. Static limit fail → source terms or boundary. Plane wave limit fail → wave equation derivation. Energy conservation fail → inconsistency E + B. Trace failure to step, fix before accepting.
Checks
- All four Maxwell equations stated + relevant subset identified
- Displacement current included or explicitly justified negligible
- Boundary conditions applied at every material interface
- Symmetry shrinks PDE dimension
- Wave equation (or Laplace/Poisson) correctly derived
- Field solutions satisfy all four Maxwell on back-sub
- Poynting vector + energy density with right units (W/m^2 + J/m^3)
- Poynting's theorem (energy conservation) verified
- Wave impedance + reflection/transmission coefficients reasonable
- Static limit reproduces Coulomb + Biot-Savart
- Plane wave limit gives v = 1/sqrt(mu epsilon) + orthogonal E, B, k
- Solution complete enough for reproduction
Pitfalls
- Dropping displacement current: Original Ampere (curl B = mu_0 J), divergence gives div(J) = 0, contradicts charge conservation when rho changes in time. Term mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt fixes, essential for wave propagation. Never drop without verifying dE/dt negligible vs J/epsilon_0.
- Inconsistent E + B solutions: Solving E + B independent (E from Gauss, B from Ampere) without verifying Faraday + Gauss for B → fields not mutually consistent. Always verify all four.
- Wrong boundary normal direction: Convention n_hat x (H_1 - H_2) = K_f needs n_hat from medium 2 into 1. Reversed → flips surface current sign.
- Confusing D, E, B, H in materials: Vacuum: D = epsilon_0 E + B = mu_0 H. Linear media: D = epsilon E + B = mu H. Maxwell in matter use D + H for free source, E + B for force law. Mixing → factor of epsilon_r or mu_r errors.
- Phase velocity vs group velocity: Wave speed v = omega/k = phase velocity. Energy + info propagate at group velocity v_g = d(omega)/dk. Dispersive media differ, phase for energy transport → wrong.
- Forgetting radiation condition: Scattering + radiation in unbounded domain → solution must satisfy Sommerfeld radiation condition (outgoing waves at infinity). Without it → not unique, may include unphysical incoming waves.
See Also
analyze-magnetic-field-- compute static B-fields = magnetostatic limit of Maxwellsolve-electromagnetic-induction-- apply Faraday to induction geometries + RL circuitsformulate-quantum-problem-- quantize EM field for quantum optics + QEDderive-theoretical-result-- rigorous derivation of wave equations, Green's functions, dispersionanalyze-diffusion-dynamics-- diffusion equations from Maxwell in conducting media (skin effect)
GitHub репозиторий
Похожие навыки
llamaguard
ДругоеLlamaGuard — это модель от Meta с 7–8 миллиардами параметров для модерации входных и выходных данных больших языковых моделей по шести категориям безопасности, таким как насилие и разжигание ненависти. Она обеспечивает точность 94–95% и может быть развернута с помощью vLLM, Hugging Face или Amazon SageMaker. Используйте этот навык, чтобы легко интегрировать фильтрацию контента и защитные механизмы в ваши ИИ-приложения.
cost-optimization
ДругоеЭтот навык Claude помогает разработчикам оптимизировать облачные расходы за счет правильного подбора ресурсов, стратегий тегирования и анализа затрат. Он предоставляет framework для сокращения облачных расходов и внедрения управления затратами в AWS, Azure и GCP. Используйте его, когда вам нужно проанализировать расходы на инфраструктуру, оптимизировать ресурсы или уложиться в бюджетные ограничения.
quantizing-models-bitsandbytes
ДругоеЭтот навык выполняет квантизацию LLM до 8-битной или 4-битной точности с использованием библиотеки bitsandbytes, обеспечивая сокращение использования памяти на 50-75% при минимальной потере точности. Он идеально подходит для запуска больших моделей при ограниченной памяти GPU или для ускорения вывода, поддерживая форматы INT8, NF4 и FP4. Навык интегрируется с HuggingFace Transformers и позволяет использовать обучение QLoRA и 8-битные оптимизаторы.
dispatching-parallel-agents
ДругоеЭтот навык Claude распределяет нескольких агентов для исследования и устранения трёх и более независимых проблем параллельно. Он предназначен для сценариев с несвязанными сбоями, которые можно устранить без общего состояния или зависимостей. Ключевая возможность — параллельное решение проблем, где за каждую независимую предметную область назначается отдельный агент для максимальной эффективности.
