MCP HubMCP Hub
Вернуться к навыкам

formulate-maxwell-equations

pjt222
Обновлено Yesterday
3 просмотров
17
2
17
Посмотреть на GitHub
Другоеgeneral

О программе

Этот навык позволяет разработчикам работать с уравнениями Максвелла в интегральной и дифференциальной формах для анализа электромагнитных систем. Он предназначен для решения краевых задач, вывода волновых уравнений, вычисления переноса энергии через вектор Пойнтинга и работы с полями на границах раздела сред. Используйте его при переходе от электростатики к магнитостатике или при применении фундаментальных законов, таких как законы Гаусса, Фарадея и Ампера — Максвелла.

Быстрая установка

Claude Code

Рекомендуется
Основной
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Команда плагинаАльтернативный
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git клонированиеАльтернативный
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/formulate-maxwell-equations

Скопируйте и вставьте эту команду в Claude Code для установки этого навыка

Документация

Formulate Maxwell Equations

Crack EM stuff. State right Maxwell equations (integral or differential). Apply boundary + symmetry to shrink system. Solve PDEs for fields. Compute Poynting vector, radiation pressure, wave impedance. Verify against static + wave limits.

When Use

  • Boundary value problem for E + B fields, sources + material interfaces
  • Derive EM wave equation from first principles
  • Compute energy flow (Poynting vector) + momentum density of EM fields
  • Apply boundary conditions at media interfaces (dielectric, conductor, magnetic)
  • Analyze displacement current + role in Ampere-Maxwell
  • Connect static limits (Coulomb, Biot-Savart) to unified time-dependent framework

Inputs

  • Required: Physical setup (geometry, source charges + currents, material props)
  • Required: Quantity to solve (E, B, wave solution, energy flux, boundary field)
  • Optional: Symmetry (planar, cylindrical, spherical, none)
  • Optional: Time dependence (static, harmonic omega, general)
  • Optional: Boundary conditions at interfaces or conductor surfaces

Steps

Step 1: State Four Maxwell Equations + Pick Relevant Subset

Write full set, choose which constrain problem:

  1. Gauss for E: div(E) = rho / epsilon_0 (diff) or closed_surface_integral(E . dA) = Q_enc / epsilon_0 (int). E divergence to charge density. Use for E from charge with symmetry.

  2. Gauss for B: div(B) = 0 (diff) or closed_surface_integral(B . dA) = 0 (int). No magnetic monopoles. Every B line closed loop. Consistency check on B.

  3. Faraday: curl(E) = -dB/dt (diff) or contour_integral(E . dl) = -d(Phi_B)/dt (int). Changing B makes curling E. Induction + wave derivation.

  4. Ampere-Maxwell: curl(B) = mu_0 J + mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt (diff) or contour_integral(B . dl) = mu_0 I_enc + mu_0 epsilon_0 d(Phi_E)/dt (int). Current + changing E make curling B. Displacement current term mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt essential for wave + current continuity.

  5. Form pick: Differential for local fields, wave equations, PDEs. Integral for high-symmetry where field extracts direct.

  6. Active equations: Not all four independent every problem. Electrostatics (dB/dt = 0, J = 0) → only Gauss for E + curl(E) = 0 matter. Magnetostatics → Gauss for B + Ampere (no displacement current) enough.

## Maxwell Equations for This Problem
- **Form**: [differential / integral / both]
- **Active equations**: [list which of the four are non-trivial constraints]
- **Source terms**: rho = [charge density], J = [current density]
- **Time dependence**: [static / harmonic / general]
- **Displacement current**: [negligible / essential -- with justification]

Got: Four equations stated. Relevant subset identified with justification. Displacement current included or explicitly argued negligible.

If fail: Unclear if displacement current matters? Estimate |epsilon_0 dE/dt| / |J|. Ratio near 1 or bigger → keep displacement current. Vacuum no free charges → always essential for wave.

Step 2: Apply Boundary Conditions + Symmetry

Shrink system with material interfaces + geometric symmetry:

  1. Boundary at material interfaces: Medium 1 + 2, surface charge sigma_f + surface current K_f:

    • Normal E: epsilon_1 E_1n - epsilon_2 E_2n = sigma_f
    • Tangential E: E_1t = E_2t (continuous)
    • Normal B: B_1n = B_2n (continuous)
    • Tangential H: n_hat x (H_1 - H_2) = K_f (n_hat from 2 to 1)
  2. Conductor boundary: Perfect conductor surface:

    • E_tangential = 0 (inside E = 0)
    • B_normal = 0 (inside B = 0 for time-varying)
    • Surface charge: sigma = epsilon_0 E_normal
    • Surface current: K = (1/mu_0) n_hat x B
  3. Symmetry shrink: Use symmetries to cut independent variables:

    • Planar: fields depend one coord (z), PDEs → ODEs
    • Cylindrical: depend (rho, z) or rho only
    • Spherical: depend r only
    • Translational invariance: Fourier transform invariant direction
  4. Gauge choice (using potentials): Pick gauge for scalar phi + vector A:

    • Coulomb: div(A) = 0 (splits electrostatic + radiation)
    • Lorenz: div(A) + mu_0 epsilon_0 d(phi)/dt = 0 (Lorentz-covariant, decouples wave)
## Boundary Conditions and Symmetry
- **Interfaces**: [list with media properties on each side]
- **Boundary conditions applied**: [normal E, tangential E, normal B, tangential H]
- **Symmetry**: [planar / cylindrical / spherical / none]
- **Reduced coordinates**: [independent variables after symmetry reduction]
- **Gauge** (if using potentials): [Coulomb / Lorenz / other]

Got: Boundary conditions stated every interface. Symmetry cuts dimension. Problem ready for PDE solution.

If fail: Over-determined (more equations than unknowns)? Check field components match conditions. Under-determined? Missed condition — often tangential H or radiation at infinity.

Step 3: Solve PDEs

Solve Maxwell equations or derived forms for field quantities:

  1. Wave equation derive: Source-free, linear, homogeneous medium:

    • Curl of Faraday: curl(curl(E)) = -d/dt(curl(B))
    • Sub Ampere-Maxwell: curl(curl(E)) = -mu epsilon d^2E/dt^2
    • Vector identity: curl(curl(E)) = grad(div(E)) - nabla^2(E)
    • With div(E) = 0: nabla^2(E) = mu epsilon d^2E/dt^2
    • Wave speed: v = 1/sqrt(mu epsilon); vacuum c = 1/sqrt(mu_0 epsilon_0)
    • Same for B
  2. Plane wave solutions: Wave in z-direction:

    • E(z, t) = E_0 exp[i(kz - omega t)], k = omega/v = omega * sqrt(mu epsilon)
    • B = (1/v) k_hat x E (perpendicular E + propagation)
    • |B| = |E|/v
    • Polarization: linear, circular, elliptical by E_0 components
  3. Laplace + Poisson (static):

    • No time: nabla^2(phi) = -rho/epsilon_0 (Poisson) or nabla^2(phi) = 0 (Laplace)
    • Separation of variables in right coordinates
    • Match boundary to pin expansion coefficients
  4. Guided waves + cavities: Waveguides + resonant cavities:

    • Split into TE (transverse electric) + TM (transverse magnetic) modes
    • Apply conducting-wall boundary
    • Eigenvalue problem → allowed propagation constants + resonant frequencies
    • Cutoff: omega_c = v * pi * sqrt((m/a)^2 + (n/b)^2) for rectangular guide a x b
  5. Skin depth in conductors: Time-varying fields into conductor conductivity sigma_c:

    • delta = sqrt(2 / (omega mu sigma_c))
    • Fields decay exp(-z/delta)
    • 60 Hz copper: delta ~ 8.5 mm; 1 GHz: delta ~ 2 micrometers
## Field Solution
- **Equation solved**: [wave equation / Laplace / Poisson / eigenvalue]
- **Solution method**: [separation of variables / Fourier transform / Green's function / numerical]
- **Result**: E(r, t) = [expression], B(r, t) = [expression]
- **Dispersion relation**: omega(k) = [if wave solution]
- **Characteristic scales**: [wavelength, skin depth, decay length]

Got: Explicit field expressions satisfying Maxwell + all boundary. Dispersion relation or eigenvalue spectrum if applicable.

If fail: PDE won't separate in chosen coordinates? Try different system or numerical (finite difference, finite element). Solution fails a Maxwell equation on back-sub? Algebraic error — re-check curl + divergence.

Step 4: Compute Derived Quantities

Pull physical quantities from field solution:

  1. Poynting vector: S = (1/mu_0) E x B (instantaneous energy flux, W/m^2):

    • Plane waves: S = (1/mu_0) |E|^2 / v in propagation direction
    • Time-averaged: <S> = (1/2) Re(E x H*) for harmonic
    • Intensity: I = |<S>| (power per area)
  2. EM energy density:

    • u = (1/2)(epsilon_0 |E|^2 + |B|^2/mu_0) in vacuum
    • u = (1/2)(E . D + B . H) in linear media
    • Energy conservation: du/dt + div(S) = -J . E (Poynting's theorem)
  3. Radiation pressure: Plane wave on surface:

    • Perfect absorber: P_rad = I/c = <S>/c
    • Perfect reflector: P_rad = 2I/c = 2<S>/c
    • Momentum flux density of EM field
  4. Wave impedance:

    • Medium: eta = sqrt(mu/epsilon) = mu * v
    • Vacuum: eta_0 = sqrt(mu_0/epsilon_0) ~ 377 Ohms
    • E + H amplitudes: |E| = eta |H|
    • Reflection at normal: r = (eta_2 - eta_1)/(eta_2 + eta_1)
  5. Power dissipation + quality factor:

    • Ohmic loss per volume: p_loss = sigma |E|^2 / 2 (conductor)
    • Cavity Q-factor: Q = omega * (stored energy) / (power dissipated per cycle)
    • Bandwidth of resonances: Delta_omega = omega / Q
## Derived Quantities
- **Poynting vector**: S = [expression], <S> = [time-averaged]
- **Energy density**: u = [expression]
- **Radiation pressure**: P_rad = [value]
- **Wave impedance**: eta = [value]
- **Reflection/transmission**: r = [value], t = [value]
- **Q-factor** (if resonant): Q = [value]

Got: All derived quantities with right units. Energy conservation verified via Poynting's theorem. Magnitudes physically reasonable.

If fail: Poynting's theorem won't balance (du/dt + div(S) != -J . E)? Inconsistency E + B solutions. Re-verify both fields satisfy all four Maxwell. Common error: E + B from different approximations not mutually consistent.

Step 5: Verify Against Known Limits

Check solution reduces correctly in limits:

  1. Static limit (omega -> 0): Solution → electrostatic or magnetostatic:

    • E satisfies Coulomb or Laplace/Poisson
    • B satisfies Biot-Savart or Ampere (no displacement current)
    • Displacement current vanishes: mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt -> 0
  2. Plane wave limit: Source-free unbounded medium → plane waves, v = 1/sqrt(mu epsilon), correct polarization.

  3. Perfect conductor limit (sigma -> infinity):

    • Skin depth delta -> 0 (no penetration)
    • Tangential E -> 0 at surface
    • Reflection r -> -1 (perfect reflection phase inversion)
  4. Vacuum limit (epsilon_r = 1, mu_r = 1): Material-dependent → vacuum values. Wave speed = c. Impedance = eta_0 ~ 377 Ohms.

  5. Energy conservation check: Integrate Poynting's theorem over closed volume. Rate of change of total field energy + power flowing out = negative of power from currents inside. Any imbalance = error.

## Limiting Case Verification
| Limit | Condition | Expected | Obtained | Match |
|-------|-----------|----------|----------|-------|
| Static | omega -> 0 | Coulomb / Biot-Savart | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Plane wave | unbounded medium | v = c/n, eta = eta_0/n | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Perfect conductor | sigma -> inf | delta -> 0, r -> -1 | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Vacuum | epsilon_r = mu_r = 1 | c, eta_0 | [result] | [Yes/No] |
| Energy conservation | Poynting's theorem | balanced | [check] | [Yes/No] |

Got: All limits produce correct known results. Energy conservation satisfied to numerical precision.

If fail: Failed limit = definite error. Static limit fail → source terms or boundary. Plane wave limit fail → wave equation derivation. Energy conservation fail → inconsistency E + B. Trace failure to step, fix before accepting.

Checks

  • All four Maxwell equations stated + relevant subset identified
  • Displacement current included or explicitly justified negligible
  • Boundary conditions applied at every material interface
  • Symmetry shrinks PDE dimension
  • Wave equation (or Laplace/Poisson) correctly derived
  • Field solutions satisfy all four Maxwell on back-sub
  • Poynting vector + energy density with right units (W/m^2 + J/m^3)
  • Poynting's theorem (energy conservation) verified
  • Wave impedance + reflection/transmission coefficients reasonable
  • Static limit reproduces Coulomb + Biot-Savart
  • Plane wave limit gives v = 1/sqrt(mu epsilon) + orthogonal E, B, k
  • Solution complete enough for reproduction

Pitfalls

  • Dropping displacement current: Original Ampere (curl B = mu_0 J), divergence gives div(J) = 0, contradicts charge conservation when rho changes in time. Term mu_0 epsilon_0 dE/dt fixes, essential for wave propagation. Never drop without verifying dE/dt negligible vs J/epsilon_0.
  • Inconsistent E + B solutions: Solving E + B independent (E from Gauss, B from Ampere) without verifying Faraday + Gauss for B → fields not mutually consistent. Always verify all four.
  • Wrong boundary normal direction: Convention n_hat x (H_1 - H_2) = K_f needs n_hat from medium 2 into 1. Reversed → flips surface current sign.
  • Confusing D, E, B, H in materials: Vacuum: D = epsilon_0 E + B = mu_0 H. Linear media: D = epsilon E + B = mu H. Maxwell in matter use D + H for free source, E + B for force law. Mixing → factor of epsilon_r or mu_r errors.
  • Phase velocity vs group velocity: Wave speed v = omega/k = phase velocity. Energy + info propagate at group velocity v_g = d(omega)/dk. Dispersive media differ, phase for energy transport → wrong.
  • Forgetting radiation condition: Scattering + radiation in unbounded domain → solution must satisfy Sommerfeld radiation condition (outgoing waves at infinity). Without it → not unique, may include unphysical incoming waves.

See Also

  • analyze-magnetic-field -- compute static B-fields = magnetostatic limit of Maxwell
  • solve-electromagnetic-induction -- apply Faraday to induction geometries + RL circuits
  • formulate-quantum-problem -- quantize EM field for quantum optics + QED
  • derive-theoretical-result -- rigorous derivation of wave equations, Green's functions, dispersion
  • analyze-diffusion-dynamics -- diffusion equations from Maxwell in conducting media (skin effect)

GitHub репозиторий

pjt222/agent-almanac
Путь: i18n/caveman/skills/formulate-maxwell-equations
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Похожие навыки

llamaguard

Другое

LlamaGuard — это модель от Meta с 7–8 миллиардами параметров для модерации входных и выходных данных больших языковых моделей по шести категориям безопасности, таким как насилие и разжигание ненависти. Она обеспечивает точность 94–95% и может быть развернута с помощью vLLM, Hugging Face или Amazon SageMaker. Используйте этот навык, чтобы легко интегрировать фильтрацию контента и защитные механизмы в ваши ИИ-приложения.

Просмотреть навык

cost-optimization

Другое

Этот навык Claude помогает разработчикам оптимизировать облачные расходы за счет правильного подбора ресурсов, стратегий тегирования и анализа затрат. Он предоставляет framework для сокращения облачных расходов и внедрения управления затратами в AWS, Azure и GCP. Используйте его, когда вам нужно проанализировать расходы на инфраструктуру, оптимизировать ресурсы или уложиться в бюджетные ограничения.

Просмотреть навык

quantizing-models-bitsandbytes

Другое

Этот навык выполняет квантизацию LLM до 8-битной или 4-битной точности с использованием библиотеки bitsandbytes, обеспечивая сокращение использования памяти на 50-75% при минимальной потере точности. Он идеально подходит для запуска больших моделей при ограниченной памяти GPU или для ускорения вывода, поддерживая форматы INT8, NF4 и FP4. Навык интегрируется с HuggingFace Transformers и позволяет использовать обучение QLoRA и 8-битные оптимизаторы.

Просмотреть навык

dispatching-parallel-agents

Другое

Этот навык Claude распределяет нескольких агентов для исследования и устранения трёх и более независимых проблем параллельно. Он предназначен для сценариев с несвязанными сбоями, которые можно устранить без общего состояния или зависимостей. Ключевая возможность — параллельное решение проблем, где за каждую независимую предметную область назначается отдельный агент для максимальной эффективности.

Просмотреть навык