listen-guidance
О программе
Навык `listen-guidance` обучает пользователей техникам активного слушания, включая формирование восприимчивого настроя, практику перефразирования для проверки понимания и использование уточняющих вопросов. Он предназначен для разработчиков, чтобы интегрировать его в случаях, когда пользователям необходимо улучшить коммуникацию, подготовиться к сложным разговорам или устранить частые недопонимания. Навык фокусируется на том, чтобы направлять практику и внедрение этих методов в ежедневное общение.
Быстрая установка
Claude Code
Рекомендуетсяnpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/listen-guidanceСкопируйте и вставьте эту команду в Claude Code для установки этого навыка
Документация
Listen (Guidance)
Guide person in developing + practicing active listening. AI coaches comm — prepare receptive mindset, practice full-presence attending, develop reflective paraphrasing, use clarifying qs effectively, synthesize understanding, integrate into daily comm.
Use When
- Improve comm in relationships, teams, professional settings
- Keeps misunderstanding / feels misunderstood
- Prep difficult conversation (feedback, conflict, negotiation)
- Leadership role wants to listen more effectively to team
- Talks > listens, wants to change pattern
- After
meditate-guidancecultivates presence → direct toward others
In
- Req: Goal (improve general comm, prep specific conversation, pro skill)
- Opt: Ctx (workplace, personal relationship, team dynamics)
- Opt: Known challenges (interrupt, mind wandering, emotional reactivity, advice-giving)
- Opt: Specific conversation prepping
- Opt: Feedback received about listening
Do
Step 1: Prepare — Receptive Mindset
Before skills → help understand + enter receptive state.
- Hear vs listen: "Hearing passive — sounds enter. Listening active — receive, process, understand"
- ID their habits: "When someone talks, what is mind usually doing?"
- Common patterns to surface:
- Planning response while other still talking
- Judging (agree/disagree) vs understanding
- Problem-solving — jump to solutions before speaker finished
- Relating — connecting everything to own experience
- Filtering — hearing only parts that interest / confirm view
- Set intention: "For this session, will focus on..."
- Brief centering: 3 slow breaths, release agenda of needing to say something
→ Person ID'd ≥1 habitual pattern to change + clear intention for practice. Calm + present, not performance-anxious.
If err: Can't ID pattern → may be unconscious → suggest notice body when someone talking (tension, restlessness, urge to speak). Self-conscious → normalize: "Everyone has these — noticing is first step to choice."
Step 2: Attend — Full Presence
Guide thru giving full attention to speaker.
- Physical: eye contact (comfortable, not staring), body orientation, open posture, stillness
- Mental: suspend internal monologue, notice drift, gently return
- Setup exercise: "I speak 2 min. Your job: only listen — no responding, note-taking, just receiving"
- AI speaks moderately complex topic 2 min
- After ask: "What noticed about attention? Where went?"
- Repeat if helpful, topic triggering ID'd pattern (something they'd want to fix, judge, relate to)
→ Person experiences diff between habitual + intentional listening. Notices drift + practices return. Even brief full presence valuable.
If err: "Was listening whole time" → ask specific content qs — inability to recall = inattention felt like attention. Can't stop internal monologue → focus on speaker's breath rhythm / pace as anchor — occupies analytical mind while keeping attention on speaker.
Step 3: Reflect — Paraphrasing
Teach mirror understanding back.
- Purpose: "Paraphrasing shows speaker heard + lets correct misunderstandings"
- Form: "What I hear you saying is..." / "Sounds like..." / "If I understand correctly..."
- Emphasize: paraphrase meaning not words — own words to show understood idea
- Practice: AI makes statement, person paraphrases
- Simple: factual w/ clear content
- Complex: emotional content, mixed signals, implicit meaning
- Feedback per: "Captured main idea. Might include feeling behind..."
Paraphrase Quality Ladder:
┌──────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Level │ Example │
├──────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Parrot │ "You said you're frustrated with the project" │
│ (repeating) │ → Too literal, doesn't show understanding │
├──────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Content │ "The project isn't going the way you expected" │
│ (facts) │ → Captures meaning, misses feeling │
├──────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Feeling │ "You're feeling stuck because the project keeps │
│ (emotion) │ hitting obstacles" │
│ │ → Captures both content and emotion │
├──────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Meaning │ "This matters to you because you put real effort in, │
│ (full) │ and the obstacles feel like they're dismissing that" │
│ │ → Captures content, emotion, and deeper meaning │
└──────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
→ Person paraphrases content consistently + reaches feeling ≥1. Experiences how paraphrasing changes dynamic — "speaker" (AI) feels heard.
If err: Too literal (parrot) → encourage: "Try completely diff words w/ same meaning." Jumps to interpretation vs reflection → redirect: "Before interpreting, mirror what said." Awkward → acknowledge unnatural at first, natural w/ practice.
Step 4: Explore — Clarifying Qs
Teach deepen understanding thru placed qs.
- Distinguish types:
- Open: "What was that like for you?" (invites exploration)
- Clarifying: "When you say X, do you mean A or B?" (resolves ambiguity)
- Deepening: "What about that matters most to you?" (goes below surface)
- Leading: "Don't you think you should...?" (avoid — advice, not listening)
- Practice: AI makes complex statement, person asks one clarifying q
- Evaluate: opened conversation or narrowed?
- "Tell me more" technique: sometimes best q = invitation to continue
- Practice waiting after q — silence gives speaker space to think
→ Person asks ≥1 open + ≥1 clarifying q naturally. Experiences good qs deepen understanding > statements.
If err: All leading (disguised advice) → name gently: "Suggestion in q form. Ask what they think first." Too many qs (interrogation) → teach rhythm: listen, paraphrase, one q, listen again.
Step 5: Synthesize — Summarize
Pull together everything heard → coherent summary.
- After longer exercise (AI 3-4 min narrative w/ multi threads):
- Ask summary: "Main things person communicated?"
- Check all layers: facts, feelings, underlying needs?
- Unsaid: "Anything notable by absence?"
- Priority: "What seemed most important to speaker?"
- Practice format: "What I'm taking away is... Is that right?"
→ Person synthesizes multi-threaded msg → coherent summary capturing priorities + feelings, not just facts.
If err: Fact-only → prompt: "What feeling during this?" Misses major thread → point out + discuss why missed (reveals filter). Adds not said → distinguish heard vs inferred.
Step 6: Integrate — Apply Real Comm
Transfer practice → real-world ctx.
- Connect skills to their situation: "In upcoming conversation w/ X, here's paraphrasing..."
- ID one skill most helpful: "For team meetings, attending most impactful"
- Set practice goal: "This week, paraphrase ≥1 each conversation"
- Common real-world obstacles:
- Time pressure: "Even 10-sec paraphrase saves time preventing misunderstanding"
- Group: "Summarize someone's point before adding yours"
- Emotional: "High emotions → listening > solutions"
- Specific conversation prep → role-play w/ new skills
- Ask feedback: "What from today's practice feels most useful?"
- Remind: "Listening = practice, not performance — improves w/ each conversation"
→ Person has ≥1 concrete actionable listening practice for real life. Understands listening develops thru use, not technique to deploy perfectly.
If err: Skills feel artificial → acknowledge + emphasize: "Goal ≠ follow script — become genuinely curious about other's experience. Techniques get you there; curiosity takes over." Anxious about specific conversation → shift focus from technique to intention: "Your intention = understand, not win / fix."
Check
- Person ID'd ≥1 habitual listening pattern
- Full-presence attending practiced w/ reflection
- Paraphrasing practiced at content level or above
- ≥1 clarifying (non-leading) q asked during practice
- Multi-threaded msg synthesized → coherent summary
- Skills connected to real-world ctx w/ concrete practice goal
- Coaching warm + non-judgmental throughout
Traps
- Performative listening: Focused on "looking like listening" vs actually listening → counterproductive. Redirect to genuine curiosity.
- Overcorrecting: Every technique every conversation → exhausting + artificial. One skill at a time.
- Neglect self-listening: Listening to others requires awareness of own state. Flooded w/ emotion → can't listen → guide self-regulation first.
- Confuse listening w/ agreeing: Paraphrasing ≠ endorsing. Make explicit for conflict situations.
- Treat silence as failure: Comfortable silence after finish = respect, not inattention. Help tolerate pause.
- Coach as lecturer: Ironic — AI coaches listening while doing all talking. Person practices > receives instruction.
→
listen— AI self-directed variant → deep receptive attention to user intentlearn-guidance— learning + listening share foundation of receptive attentionteach-guidance— effective teaching requires listening to learnermeditate-guidance— cultivate presence underpinning attentive listeningheal-guidance— healing conversations require deepest listening
GitHub репозиторий
Похожие навыки
executing-plans
ДизайнИспользуйте навык executing-plans, когда у вас есть полный план реализации для выполнения контролируемыми партиями с контрольными точками проверки. Он загружает и критически анализирует план, затем выполняет задачи небольшими партиями (по умолчанию 3 задачи), сообщая о прогрессе между каждой партией для проверки архитектором. Это обеспечивает систематическую реализацию со встроенными контрольными точками проверки качества.
requesting-code-review
ДизайнЭтот навык запускает суб-агента для ревью кода, который анализирует изменения в коде на соответствие требованиям перед дальнейшими действиями. Его следует использовать после завершения задач, реализации крупных функций или перед слиянием с основной веткой. Ревью помогает выявить проблемы на ранней стадии, сравнивая текущую реализацию с исходным планом.
connect-mcp-server
ДизайнЭтот навык предоставляет разработчикам подробное руководство по подключению серверов MCP к Claude Code с использованием транспортов HTTP, stdio или SSE. Он охватывает установку, конфигурацию, аутентификацию и безопасность для интеграции внешних сервисов, таких как GitHub, Notion и пользовательские API. Используйте его при настройке интеграций MCP, конфигурации внешних инструментов или работе с Model Context Protocol от Claude.
web-cli-teleport
ДизайнЭтот навык помогает разработчикам выбирать между веб-интерфейсом Claude Code и CLI на основе анализа задачи, а также обеспечивает бесшовное перемещение сессий между этими средами. Он оптимизирует рабочий процесс, управляя состоянием и контекстом сессии при переключении между веб-интерфейсом, CLI или мобильным приложением. Используйте его для сложных проектов, требующих различных инструментов на разных этапах работы.
