decommission-validated-system
О программе
Этот навык предоставляет структурированный процесс вывода из эксплуатации валидированной компьютеризированной системы в регулируемой среде. Он охватывает критически важные задачи соответствия требованиям, такие как оценка хранения данных, валидация миграции, архивирование и уведомление заинтересованных сторон. Используйте его при замене или выводе системы из-за окончания срока службы, прекращения поддержки, консолидации или изменений в регулирующих требованиях.
Быстрая установка
Claude Code
Рекомендуетсяnpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/decommission-validated-systemСкопируйте и вставьте эту команду в Claude Code для установки этого навыка
Документация
Decommission Validated System
Plan and execute controlled retirement of validated computerized system. Preserve data integrity and meet regulatory retention requirements.
When Use
- Validated system being replaced by new system
- System reaching end-of-life with no replacement (business process eliminated)
- Vendor discontinues support for validated product
- Consolidation of many systems into single platform
- Regulatory or business changes make system obsolete
Inputs
- Required: System to be decommissioned (name, version, validation status)
- Required: Data retention requirements by regulation (21 CFR Part 11, GLP, GCP)
- Required: Replacement system (if applicable) and migration scope
- Optional: Current validation documentation package
- Optional: Data volume and format inventory
- Optional: Business owner and stakeholder list
Steps
Step 1: Assess Data Retention Requirements
Determine how long data must be retained and in what form:
# Data Retention Assessment
## Document ID: DRA-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Regulatory Retention Requirements
| Regulation | Data Type | Retention Period | Format Requirements |
|-----------|-----------|-----------------|-------------------|
| 21 CFR 211 (GMP) | Batch records, test results | 1 year past product expiry or 3 years after distribution | Readable, retrievable |
| 21 CFR 58 (GLP) | Study data and records | Duration of study + retention agreement | Original or certified copy |
| ICH E6 (GCP) | Clinical trial records | 2 years after last marketing approval or formal discontinuation | Accessible for inspection |
| 21 CFR Part 11 | Electronic records | Per predicate rule | Original format or validated migration |
| EU Annex 11 | Computerized system records | Per applicable GxP | Readable and available |
| Tax/financial | Financial records | 7-10 years (jurisdiction-dependent) | Readable |
### System Data Inventory
| Data Category | Volume | Format | Retention Required Until | Disposition |
|---------------|--------|--------|------------------------|-------------|
| [e.g., Batch records] | [e.g., 50,000 records] | [e.g., Database + PDF reports] | [Date] | Migrate / Archive / Destroy |
| [e.g., Audit trail] | [e.g., 2M entries] | [e.g., Database] | [Same as parent records] | Archive |
| [e.g., User data] | [e.g., 200 profiles] | [e.g., LDAP/Database] | [Employment + 2 years] | Anonymise and archive |
Got: Every data category has defined retention period, format requirement, planned disposition. If fail: Retention requirements unclear? Consult regulatory affairs and legal. Default to longest applicable retention period.
Step 2: Plan Data Migration (If Applicable)
If data migrating to replacement system:
# Data Migration Plan
## Document ID: DMP-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Migration Scope
| Source | Target | Data Category | Records | Migration Method |
|--------|--------|---------------|---------|-----------------|
| [Old system] | [New system] | [Category] | [Count] | ETL / Manual / API |
### Data Mapping
| Source Field | Source Format | Target Field | Target Format | Transformation |
|-------------|-------------|-------------|---------------|---------------|
| [e.g., test_result] | FLOAT(8,2) | [e.g., result_value] | DECIMAL(10,3) | Precision conversion |
| [e.g., operator_id] | VARCHAR(20) | [e.g., user_id] | UUID | Lookup table mapping |
### Validation Approach
| Check | Method | Acceptance Criteria |
|-------|--------|-------------------|
| Record count reconciliation | Source count vs target count | 100% match |
| Field-level comparison | Sample 5% of records, all fields | 100% match after transformation |
| Checksum verification | Hash source vs target for key fields | Checksums match |
| Business rule validation | Verify key calculations in target | Results match source |
| Audit trail continuity | Verify historical audit trail migrated | All entries present with original timestamps |
Got: Migration plan has mapping, transformation rules, validation checks proving data integrity maintained. If fail: Migration validation fails? Do not proceed to decommission. Fix migration issues and re-validate.
Step 3: Define Archival Strategy
For data that will be archived rather than migrated:
# Archival Strategy
### Archive Format
| Consideration | Decision | Rationale |
|--------------|----------|-----------|
| Format | [PDF/A, CSV, XML, database backup] | [Why this format survives the retention period] |
| Medium | [Network storage, cloud archive, tape, optical] | [Durability and accessibility] |
| Encryption | [Yes/No — method if yes] | [Security vs long-term accessibility trade-off] |
| Integrity verification | [SHA-256 checksums, periodic verification schedule] | [Prove archive is uncorrupted] |
### Archive Verification
- [ ] Archived data is readable without the source system
- [ ] All required data categories are included in the archive
- [ ] Checksums recorded at time of archival
- [ ] Archive can be searched and retrieved within [defined SLA, e.g., 5 business days]
- [ ] Periodic integrity checks scheduled (annually)
### Archive Access
| Role | Access Level | Authorisation |
|------|-------------|--------------|
| QA Director | Read access to all archived data | Standing authorisation |
| Regulatory Affairs | Read access for inspection support | Standing authorisation |
| System Owner (former) | Read access for business queries | Request-based |
| External auditors | Read access, supervised | Per audit plan |
Got: Archived data readable, searchable, verifiable without original system. If fail: Data cannot be read independently of source system? Archive not compliant. Consider exporting to open, standard format (PDF/A, CSV) before decommission.
Step 4: Execute Decommissioning
# Decommission Checklist
## Document ID: DC-[SYS]-[YYYY]-[NNN]
### Pre-Decommission
- [ ] All stakeholders notified of decommission date and data disposition
- [ ] Data migration completed and validated (if applicable)
- [ ] Data archive created and verified (if applicable)
- [ ] Final backup of complete system taken and stored separately
- [ ] All open change requests resolved or transferred
- [ ] All open CAPAs resolved or transferred to successor system
- [ ] All active users informed and redirected to replacement system (if applicable)
### Decommission Execution
- [ ] User access revoked for all accounts
- [ ] System removed from production environment
- [ ] Network connections disconnected
- [ ] Licenses returned or terminated
- [ ] System entry removed from active system inventory
- [ ] System moved to "Decommissioned" status in compliance architecture
### Post-Decommission
- [ ] Validation documentation archived (URS, VP, IQ/OQ/PQ, TM, VSR)
- [ ] SOPs retired or updated to remove references to decommissioned system
- [ ] Training records archived
- [ ] Change control records archived
- [ ] Audit trail archived
- [ ] Decommission report completed and approved
### Decommission Report
| Section | Content |
|---------|---------|
| System description | Name, version, purpose, GxP classification |
| Decommission rationale | Why the system is being retired |
| Data disposition summary | What data went where (migrated, archived, destroyed) |
| Validation evidence | Migration validation results, archive verification |
| Residual risk | Any ongoing data retention obligations |
| Approval | System owner, QA, IT signatures |
Got: Decommissioning controlled, documented, approved — not just "turn it off." If fail: Any checklist item cannot be completed? Document exception and get QA approval before proceeding.
Checks
- Data retention requirements assessed for all data categories
- Data migration validated with record counts, sampling, checksums (if applicable)
- Archive created in format readable without source system
- Archive integrity verified with checksums
- All user access revoked
- Validation documentation archived with defined retention period
- SOPs updated to remove references to decommissioned system
- Decommission report approved by system owner, QA, IT
Pitfalls
- Premature decommission: Turning off system before data migration validated → permanent data loss risk. Complete all validation before pulling plug.
- Unreadable archives: Storing data in proprietary format needing original system to read defeats purpose of archival. Use open formats.
- Forgotten audit trails: Archiving data but not audit trail → data provenance cannot be shown. Always archive audit trails with their parent records.
- Orphaned SOPs: SOPs still referencing decommissioned system confuse users and make compliance gaps. Update or retire all affected SOPs.
- No periodic archive verification: Archives degrade. Without periodic integrity checks, data loss may go undetected until data is needed for inspection.
See Also
design-compliance-architecture— update system inventory and compliance architecture after decommissionmanage-change-control— decommissioning is major change requiring change controlwrite-validation-documentation— migration validation follows same IQ/OQ methodologywrite-standard-operating-procedure— retire or update SOPs referencing decommissioned systemprepare-inspection-readiness— archived data must stay accessible for regulatory inspections
GitHub репозиторий
Похожие навыки
evaluating-llms-harness
ТестированиеЭтот навык Claude запускает lm-evaluation-harness для тестирования LLM на более чем 60 стандартизированных академических задачах, таких как MMLU и GSM8K. Он предназначен для разработчиков, чтобы сравнивать качество моделей, отслеживать прогресс обучения или сообщать академические результаты. Инструмент поддерживает различные бэкенды, включая модели HuggingFace и vLLM.
cloudflare-cron-triggers
ТестированиеЭтот навык предоставляет обширные знания по реализации Cloudflare Cron Triggers для планирования запуска Workers с помощью cron-выражений. Он охватывает настройку периодических задач, заданий технического обслуживания и автоматизированных рабочих процессов, а также решение распространенных проблем, таких как неверные cron-выражения и ошибки часовых поясов. Разработчики могут использовать его для настройки планировщиков обработчиков, тестирования cron-триггеров и интеграции с Workflows и Green Compute.
webapp-testing
ТестированиеЭтот навык Claude предоставляет инструментарий на базе Playwright для тестирования локальных веб-приложений с помощью Python-скриптов. Он позволяет проводить проверку фронтенда, отладку интерфейса, создание скриншотов и просмотр логов, одновременно управляя жизненным циклом сервера. Используйте его для задач автоматизации браузера, но запускайте скрипты напрямую, вместо чтения их исходного кода, чтобы избежать загрязнения контекста.
finishing-a-development-branch
ТестированиеЭтот навык помогает разработчикам завершать готовую работу, проверяя прохождение тестов и предлагая структурированные варианты интеграции. Он направляет рабочий процесс по слиянию, созданию пул-реквестов или очистке веток после завершения реализации. Используйте его, когда ваш код готов и протестирован, чтобы систематически завершать процесс разработки.
