MCP HubMCP Hub
Вернуться к навыкам

rotate-scraping-proxies

pjt222
Обновлено Yesterday
1 просмотров
17
2
17
Посмотреть на GitHub
Разработкаaiapidata

О программе

Этот навык обеспечивает ротацию прокси для веб-скрапинга, когда клиентские методы скрытности недостаточны. Он позволяет разработчикам выбирать между пулами датацентровых, резидентных и мобильных прокси, одновременно управляя постоянством сессий, затратами и мониторингом работоспособности. Используйте его как эскалационный шаг для легитимных скрапинг-кампаний, которые сталкиваются с блокировкой, несмотря на соблюдение правил ограничения запросов и robots.txt.

Быстрая установка

Claude Code

Рекомендуется
Основной
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Команда плагинаАльтернативный
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git клонированиеАльтернативный
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/rotate-scraping-proxies

Скопируйте и вставьте эту команду в Claude Code для установки этого навыка

Документация

Rotate Scraping Proxies

Network-layer escalation for scraping when client-side stealth exhausted. Proxy rotation = last resort, not default. Expensive, ethically charged, easily misused. Skill teaches when not to use as much as how.

When Use

  • headless-web-scraping (Fetcher → StealthyFetcher → DynamicFetcher) tried, target still returns 403/429/geo-blocks
  • Rate limit ≥ 3s intervals, robots.txt permits path
  • User-Agent and TLS fingerprint realistic (not default python-requests)
  • Scraping legitimate: public data, no auth bypass, no paywall bypass, no personal data without legal basis
  • Can budget proxy traffic, accept ops complexity

Do not use when: public API exists (use it), ToS forbids automation, would bypass geo-licensing, goal = fraud/credential stuffing/sneaker bots/piracy.

Inputs

  • Required: Target URLs, legal basis for scraping
  • Required: Proxy pool credentials (env, never hard-code)
  • Required: Pool type — datacenter, residential, mobile
  • Optional: Geo targeting (country/region/city)
  • Optional: Rotation granularity — per-request (default) or sticky
  • Optional: Daily traffic/spend cap
  • Optional: Rate limit delay (default 1s, even with rotation)

Steps

Step 1: Pre-flight Legality and Ethics Check

Gate workflow on documented legal+ethical review. Skip = biggest source of harm.

# Inputs to confirm before writing any code:
# 1. Is the data public (no login required)?
# 2. Does robots.txt permit the path?
# 3. Does the site's ToS prohibit automated access? (read it)
# 4. Would the scraping process personal data? If yes, what is the legal basis?
# 5. Could this access circumvent geo-licensing, paywalls, or auth?
# 6. Is there a public API or data dump that would make scraping unnecessary?
# 7. Have you contacted the site owner if scope is large?

Got: Every question has defensible written answer. First "no" or "unknown" stops procedure.

If fail:

  • ToS forbids automation — stop; contact owner or use API/licensed dataset
  • Personal data, no legal basis — stop; engage privacy counsel
  • Bypass auth or geo-licensing — never proceed

Step 2: Choose Pool Type

Different pools = different cost, detectability, ethics. Pick cheapest tier that solves block.

Pool typeDetectabilityCostBest for
DatacenterHigh (easily blocked by Cloudflare/Akamai)$Sites with no real anti-bot, geo-shifting only
ResidentialLow (real ISP IPs)$$$Sites that block datacenter ASNs
MobileVery low (carrier-grade NAT, shared with thousands)$$$$Sites that even block residential (rare)

Ethical caveat for residential and mobile: route traffic through real consumer connections. Operator consent model varies — some pay users, some bundle exit-node consent into "free VPN" EULAs users do not read. Prefer providers with audited, opt-in consent. Would not be comfortable with stranger sending scraping traffic through your home router? Do not send yours through theirs.

Got: Documented choice with cheapest viable tier, brief note on why higher tiers rejected (or needed).

If fail:

  • Datacenter blocked, residential over budget — narrow scope (fewer URLs, slower) before upgrade tier
  • No provider with documented opt-in consent — reconsider whether scraping necessary

Step 3: Integrate Rotation with Scrapling

Wire proxy into scrapling fetchers. Read creds from env vars — never hard-code, never commit .env.

import os
import random
from scrapling import Fetcher, StealthyFetcher

# Pattern A: provider-managed rotating endpoint (one URL, provider rotates per request)
PROXY_URL = os.environ["SCRAPING_PROXY_URL"]  # http://user:[email protected]:7777

fetcher = StealthyFetcher()
fetcher.configure(
    headless=True,
    timeout=60,
    network_idle=True,
    proxy=PROXY_URL,
)

# Pattern B: explicit pool, rotate yourself
POOL = os.environ["SCRAPING_PROXY_POOL"].split(",")  # comma-separated URLs

def fetch_with_rotation(url):
    proxy = random.choice(POOL)
    fetcher = StealthyFetcher()
    fetcher.configure(headless=True, timeout=60, proxy=proxy)
    return fetcher.get(url)

Got: Requests succeed, egress IP varies between calls. Hit IP-echo (https://api.ipify.org) to confirm before real scrape.

If fail:

  • 407 Proxy Authentication Required — wrong creds or password URL-encoding broke (re-encode special chars)
  • Same IP every call — provider endpoint sticky by default; check docs for -rotating or per-request flag
  • Massive latency increase — expected; rotation adds 200–2000ms per request

Step 4: Sticky Sessions and Pool Health

Decide rotation granularity per workload, then keep pool healthy.

# Sticky session for stateful flows (login, multi-page checkout-like crawls)
# Most providers expose a session ID via the username:
#   user-session-abc123:[email protected]:7777
# All requests with the same session ID exit through the same IP for ~10 min.

# Per-request rotation for anonymous bulk scraping (default)

# Pool health check — call before bulk run
def check_pool(pool, sample_size=5):
    sample = random.sample(pool, min(sample_size, len(pool)))
    alive = []
    for proxy in sample:
        try:
            r = StealthyFetcher().configure(proxy=proxy, timeout=10).get(
                "https://api.ipify.org"
            )
            if r.status == 200:
                alive.append(proxy)
        except Exception:
            pass
    return alive

# Backoff on transient proxy failures
def fetch_with_backoff(url, max_attempts=3):
    for attempt in range(max_attempts):
        try:
            r = fetch_with_rotation(url)
            if r.status not in (407, 502, 503):
                return r
        except Exception:
            pass
        time.sleep(2 ** attempt)
    return None

Got: Stateful flows preserve cookies; bulk anonymous shows IP variance; dead proxies skipped not looped.

If fail:

  • Login breaks mid-flow — rotation inside session; switch to sticky-session creds
  • All proxies in sample fail health — pool exhausted or creds expired; rotate creds or contact provider

Step 5: Monitoring, Cost Control, Kill Switch

Proxy traffic = per-GB + per-request cost. Runaway scrapers = runaway invoices. Always include limits + abort.

import time

class ScrapeBudget:
    def __init__(self, max_requests, max_duration_seconds, max_failures):
        self.max_requests = max_requests
        self.max_duration = max_duration_seconds
        self.max_failures = max_failures
        self.requests = 0
        self.failures = 0
        self.start = time.monotonic()

    def allow(self):
        if self.requests >= self.max_requests:
            return False, "request cap reached"
        if time.monotonic() - self.start >= self.max_duration:
            return False, "time cap reached"
        if self.failures >= self.max_failures:
            return False, "failure cap reached (circuit breaker)"
        return True, None

    def record(self, success):
        self.requests += 1
        if not success:
            self.failures += 1

budget = ScrapeBudget(max_requests=1000, max_duration_seconds=3600, max_failures=20)

for url in target_urls:
    ok, reason = budget.allow()
    if not ok:
        print(f"Aborting: {reason}")
        break
    response = fetch_with_backoff(url)
    budget.record(success=response is not None)
    time.sleep(1)  # rate limiting still applies even with rotation

Got: Budget caps trigger before runaway cost. Logs show per-proxy success rate so bad egress IP can be identified, excluded.

If fail:

  • Failure rate climbs above 20% — pause; site detected rotation pattern (e.g. all IPs share subnet); switch pool type or stop
  • Cost-per-record exceeds expectations 5x — cache aggressive, dedupe URLs, batch where possible

Checks

  • Step 1 legality check documented in writing before code runs
  • No proxy creds, pool URLs, session IDs in tracked files (grep gateway., proxy=, provider hostname)
  • .env (or equiv) in .gitignore
  • Pool choice justified: cheapest viable tier, consent model verified for residential/mobile
  • IP variance confirmed against echo endpoint before real run
  • Stateful flows use sticky sessions; bulk anonymous use per-request
  • Budget caps (requests, duration, failures) wired and tested
  • Rate limit (≥1s) preserved — rotation not excuse to flood
  • robots.txt still respected — rotation does not override

Pitfalls

  • Rotate before stealth exhausted: site often does not need new IP — needs realistic User-Agent, TLS fingerprint, slower cadence. Try StealthyFetcher and rate limit first; rotation expensive, unethical to deploy unnecessarily.
  • Hard-coded creds: pasting proxy URL into source leaks to git, container images, stack traces. Read from env vars or secrets manager.
  • Rotate mid-session: per-request rotation breaks any flow with cookies, CSRF, cart state. Use sticky for stateful work.
  • Treat rotation as "ethical anonymity": rotation hides you, does not make harmful scraping ethical. ToS, copyright, privacy law, rate-limit ethics still apply.
  • Use residential for high-risk activity: credential stuffing, sneaker bots, geo-pirating streams, fraud — out of scope. Stop if your case looks like this.
  • Ignore robots.txt because "we have rotation now": rotation does not grant permission. Directive is directive.
  • No kill switch: unsupervised loop on metered pool = four-figure invoice overnight. Cap requests, duration, failures.
  • Residential pool with opaque consent: some providers source exit nodes from "free VPN" EULAs real users never read. Pay premium for audited, opt-in consent.

See Also

<!-- Keep under 500 lines. Extract large examples to references/EXAMPLES.md if needed. -->

GitHub репозиторий

pjt222/agent-almanac
Путь: i18n/caveman/skills/rotate-scraping-proxies
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Похожие навыки

qmd

Разработка

qmd — это локальный инструмент командной строки для поиска и индексирования, который позволяет разработчикам индексировать и осуществлять поиск по локальным файлам с использованием гибридного поиска, сочетающего BM25, векторные эмбеддинги и реранкинг. Он поддерживает как использование через командную строку, так и режим MCP (Model Context Protocol) для интеграции с Claude. Инструмент использует Ollama для создания эмбеддингов и хранит индексы локально, что делает его идеальным для поиска по документации или кодовой базе прямо из терминала.

Просмотреть навык

subagent-driven-development

Разработка

Этот навык выполняет планы реализации, создавая нового суб-агента для каждой независимой задачи, проводя проверку кода между задачами. Он позволяет быстро итерировать, сохраняя контроль качества через этот процесс ревью. Используйте его при работе в основном с независимыми задачами в рамках одной сессии, чтобы обеспечить непрерывный прогресс со встроенными проверками качества.

Просмотреть навык

mcporter

Разработка

Навык mcporter позволяет разработчикам управлять и вызывать серверы Model Context Protocol (MCP) напрямую из Claude. Он предоставляет команды для вывода списка доступных серверов, вызова их инструментов с аргументами, а также для обработки аутентификации и управления жизненным циклом демона. Используйте этот навык для интеграции и тестирования функциональности серверов MCP в вашем рабочем процессе разработки.

Просмотреть навык

adk-deployment-specialist

Разработка

Этот навык развертывает и оркестрирует агентов Vertex AI ADK с использованием протокола A2A, управляя обнаружением AgentCard, отправкой задач и поддерживая инструменты, такие как песочница для выполнения кода и Memory Bank. Он позволяет создавать мультиагентные системы с последовательными, параллельными или циклическими схемами оркестрации на Python, Java или Go. Используйте его, когда требуется развернуть агентов ADK или оркестрировать рабочие процессы агентов в Google Cloud.

Просмотреть навык