analyze-generative-diffusion-model
О программе
Этот навык анализирует предварительно обученные генеративные диффузионные модели, такие как Stable Diffusion, вычисляя метрики качества (FID, CLIP score), визуализируя карты внимания и исследуя латентные пространства. Используйте его для оценки качества выходных данных модели, сравнения графиков шума или анализа паттернов перекрёстного внимания при генерации с текстовыми условиями. Он предназначен для разработчиков, выполняющих расширенную оценку и инспекцию моделей.
Быстрая установка
Claude Code
Рекомендуетсяnpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/analyze-generative-diffusion-modelСкопируйте и вставьте эту команду в Claude Code для установки этого навыка
Документация
Analyze Generative Diffusion Model
Evaluate pre-trained generative diffusion via quant metrics, noise schedule inspect, cross-attention maps, latent probe → behavior, failure diagnosis, fine-tune decisions.
Use When
- Eval pre-trained generative diffusion out quality, standard metrics
- Compute FID, IS, CLIP, precision/recall for generated sets
- Inspect + compare noise schedules (linear, cosine, learned) via SNR curves
- Extract cross-attention maps → text-to-image token-region
- Interpolate latent codes or discover semantic directions
- Detect OOD in for diffusion pipeline
In
- Required: Pre-trained model ID or checkpoint path (e.g.,
stabilityai/stable-diffusion-2-1) - Required: Mode — one+:
metrics,schedule,attention,latent - Required: Reference dataset (real images or name)
- Optional: Text prompts for attention (default: model-appropriate test prompts)
- Optional: N samples for metrics (default: 10000)
- Optional: Device (default:
cudaif avail, elsecpu)
Do
Step 1: Quant Evaluation
Standard generative quality metrics vs reference dataset.
- Setup eval pipeline:
import torch
from diffusers import StableDiffusionPipeline
from torchmetrics.image.fid import FrechetInceptionDistance
from torchmetrics.image.inception import InceptionScore
device = "cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu"
pipe = StableDiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained(
"stabilityai/stable-diffusion-2-1", torch_dtype=torch.float16
).to(device)
fid = FrechetInceptionDistance(feature=2048, normalize=True).to(device)
inception = InceptionScore(normalize=True).to(device)
- Feed real images:
from torch.utils.data import DataLoader
for batch in DataLoader(real_dataset, batch_size=64):
imgs = (batch * 255).byte().to(device)
fid.update(imgs, real=True)
- Generate + accumulate fake stats:
prompts = load_evaluation_prompts("prompts.txt") # one prompt per line
n_generated = 0
while n_generated < 10000:
prompt_batch = prompts[n_generated:n_generated + 8]
images = pipe(prompt_batch, num_inference_steps=50).images
tensors = torch.stack([to_tensor(img) for img in images]).to(device)
byte_imgs = (tensors * 255).byte()
fid.update(byte_imgs, real=False)
inception.update(byte_imgs)
n_generated += len(images)
- CLIP score → text-image align:
from torchmetrics.multimodal.clip_score import CLIPScore
clip_metric = CLIPScore(model_name_or_path="openai/clip-vit-large-patch14").to(device)
for prompt, image_tensor in zip(sampled_prompts, sampled_tensors):
clip_metric.update(image_tensor.unsqueeze(0), [prompt])
print(f"FID: {fid.compute():.2f}")
print(f"IS: {inception.compute()[0]:.2f} +/- {inception.compute()[1]:.2f}")
print(f"CLIP: {clip_metric.compute():.2f}")
- Precision + recall → mode coverage:
from torchmetrics.image import FrechetInceptionDistance
# Precision: fraction of generated images near real manifold
# Recall: fraction of real images near generated manifold
# Use improved precision/recall (Kynkaanniemi et al., 2019) via
# feature embeddings from the Inception network
→ FID <30 for well-trained SD on benchmarks. IS >50 on ImageNet prompts. CLIP >25 for text-conditioned. Precision + recall both >0.6.
If err: FID >100 → verify real + generated same res + normalization. CLIP low but FID OK → model generates plausible no-prompt-match → check text encoder. ≥10K samples for stable FID.
Step 2: Noise Schedule Inspect
Visualize + compare forward + reverse schedules.
- Extract schedule params:
scheduler = pipe.scheduler
betas = torch.tensor(scheduler.betas) if hasattr(scheduler, 'betas') else None
alphas_cumprod = torch.tensor(scheduler.alphas_cumprod)
timesteps = torch.arange(len(alphas_cumprod))
- SNR curve:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
snr = alphas_cumprod / (1 - alphas_cumprod)
log_snr = torch.log(snr)
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(18, 5))
axes[0].plot(timesteps.numpy(), alphas_cumprod.numpy())
axes[0].set_xlabel("Timestep"); axes[0].set_ylabel("alpha_cumprod")
axes[0].set_title("Cumulative Signal Retention")
axes[1].plot(timesteps.numpy(), log_snr.numpy())
axes[1].set_xlabel("Timestep"); axes[1].set_ylabel("log(SNR)")
axes[1].set_title("Log Signal-to-Noise Ratio")
if betas is not None:
axes[2].plot(timesteps.numpy(), betas.numpy())
axes[2].set_xlabel("Timestep"); axes[2].set_ylabel("beta")
axes[2].set_title("Beta Schedule")
fig.tight_layout()
fig.savefig("noise_schedule.png", dpi=150)
- Compare schedule types:
from diffusers import DDPMScheduler
schedules = {
"linear": DDPMScheduler(beta_schedule="linear", num_train_timesteps=1000),
"cosine": DDPMScheduler(beta_schedule="squaredcos_cap_v2", num_train_timesteps=1000),
}
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 6))
for name, sched in schedules.items():
ac = torch.tensor(sched.alphas_cumprod)
snr = torch.log(ac / (1 - ac))
ax.plot(snr.numpy(), label=name)
ax.set_xlabel("Timestep"); ax.set_ylabel("log(SNR)")
ax.set_title("Schedule Comparison"); ax.legend()
fig.savefig("schedule_comparison.png", dpi=150)
→ Cosine → more gradual SNR decrease in mid-timesteps vs linear. Log-SNR span ~+10 (clean) to -10 (pure noise). Learned schedules monotonic decreasing.
If err: alphas_cumprod non-monotonic → misconfig. Constant → scheduler not init w/ model config. Custom schedulers → verify set_timesteps() called.
Step 3: Attention Map Analysis
Extract + visualize cross-attention from text-conditioned.
- Register attention hooks on U-Net cross-attention layers:
attention_maps = {}
def hook_fn(name):
def fn(module, input, output):
# Cross-attention: Q from image, K/V from text
if hasattr(module, 'processor'):
attention_maps[name] = output.detach().cpu()
return fn
for name, module in pipe.unet.named_modules():
if 'attn2' in name and hasattr(module, 'processor'):
module.register_forward_hook(hook_fn(name))
- Run inference + collect attention at specific timesteps:
prompt = "a red car parked next to a blue house"
timestep_attention = {}
# Custom callback to capture attention at specific timesteps
def callback_fn(pipe, step_index, timestep, callback_kwargs):
if step_index in [5, 15, 30, 45]:
timestep_attention[int(timestep)] = {
k: v.clone() for k, v in attention_maps.items()
}
return callback_kwargs
output = pipe(prompt, num_inference_steps=50, callback_on_step_end=callback_fn)
- Visualize token-region:
tokenizer = pipe.tokenizer
tokens = tokenizer.encode(prompt)
token_strings = [tokenizer.decode([t]) for t in tokens]
# Select a mid-resolution attention layer
layer_key = [k for k in attention_maps if 'mid' in k or 'up.1' in k][0]
attn = attention_maps[layer_key] # shape: (batch, heads, hw, seq_len)
attn_avg = attn.mean(dim=1) # average across heads
res = int(attn_avg.shape[1] ** 0.5)
attn_map = attn_avg[0].reshape(res, res, -1)
fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, min(len(token_strings), 6), figsize=(18, 6))
for idx, token in enumerate(token_strings[:6]):
for row, (ts, ts_attn) in enumerate(list(timestep_attention.items())[:2]):
a = ts_attn[layer_key].mean(dim=1)[0]
a_res = int(a.shape[0] ** 0.5)
axes[row, idx].imshow(a[:, idx].reshape(a_res, a_res), cmap="hot")
axes[row, idx].set_title(f"t={ts}: '{token}'")
axes[row, idx].axis("off")
fig.suptitle("Cross-Attention Maps by Token and Timestep")
fig.tight_layout()
fig.savefig("attention_maps.png", dpi=150)
→ Content tokens ("car", "house") → localized spatial regions. Style/color ("red", "blue") → regions overlapping w/ object. Early (high noise) diffuse; later sharp + localized.
If err: All uniform → hook capturing self-attention not cross → verify layer has attn2 (cross) not attn1 (self). Wrong dims → check out tensor indexing matches head count + spatial res.
Step 4: Latent Space Probe
Structure via interpolation + direction discovery.
- Encode refs into latent space:
from diffusers import AutoencoderKL
from PIL import Image
import torchvision.transforms as T
vae = pipe.vae
transform = T.Compose([T.Resize(512), T.CenterCrop(512), T.ToTensor(),
T.Normalize([0.5], [0.5])])
def encode_image(image_path):
img = transform(Image.open(image_path).convert("RGB")).unsqueeze(0).to(device)
with torch.no_grad():
latent = vae.encode(img.half()).latent_dist.sample() * vae.config.scaling_factor
return latent
z1 = encode_image("image_a.png")
z2 = encode_image("image_b.png")
- Spherical linear interpolation (slerp):
def slerp(z1, z2, alpha):
"""Spherical linear interpolation between two latent codes."""
z1_flat = z1.flatten()
z2_flat = z2.flatten()
omega = torch.acos(torch.clamp(
torch.dot(z1_flat, z2_flat) / (z1_flat.norm() * z2_flat.norm()), -1, 1
))
if omega.abs() < 1e-6:
return (1 - alpha) * z1 + alpha * z2
return (torch.sin((1 - alpha) * omega) * z1 + torch.sin(alpha * omega) * z2) / torch.sin(omega)
alphas = torch.linspace(0, 1, 8)
interpolated = [slerp(z1, z2, a.item()) for a in alphas]
decoded = []
for z in interpolated:
with torch.no_grad():
img = vae.decode(z / vae.config.scaling_factor).sample
decoded.append(img.cpu())
- Discover semantic directions via prompt-pair diffs:
def get_text_embedding(prompt):
tokens = pipe.tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt", padding="max_length",
max_length=77, truncation=True).input_ids.to(device)
with torch.no_grad():
emb = pipe.text_encoder(tokens).last_hidden_state
return emb
pos_emb = get_text_embedding("a happy person smiling")
neg_emb = get_text_embedding("a sad person frowning")
direction = pos_emb - neg_emb # semantic direction in text embedding space
- Detect OOD latents:
# Compute latent space statistics from a reference set
ref_latents = torch.stack([encode_image(p) for p in reference_paths])
ref_mean = ref_latents.mean(dim=0)
ref_std = ref_latents.std(dim=0)
def ood_score(z):
"""Mahalanobis-like OOD score (higher = more unusual)."""
deviation = ((z - ref_mean) / (ref_std + 1e-6)).flatten()
return deviation.norm().item()
test_z = encode_image("test_image.png")
score = ood_score(test_z)
print(f"OOD score: {score:.2f} (reference mean: {np.mean([ood_score(r) for r in ref_latents]):.2f})")
→ Interpolated images smooth semantic transitions no artifacts. Semantic directions → consistent attribute changes across diverse latents. In-dist OOD scores cluster tight; outliers score much higher.
If err: Blurry/incoherent midpoints → slerp not linear — linear traverses low-density regions in high-dim latents. Semantic directions no effect → increase magnitude or verify same text encoder as training.
Check
- FID ≥10K generated + matching real sample count
- CLIP computed w/ same CLIP model as training (if applicable)
- Noise schedule viz shows monotonic decreasing alphas_cumprod
- Log-SNR spans ~+10 to -10 across timestep range
- Attention maps resolve per-token spatial at mid-res layers
- Attention sharpens early (diffuse) → late (localized)
- Latent interpolations smooth no sudden jumps/artifacts
- OOD baseline ≥100 ref samples
Traps
- FID mismatched res: Real + generated must be same res pre-Inception. Resize both identically or FID inflated.
- Forget normalize for torchmetrics:
FrechetInceptionDistance(normalize=True)→ [0,1] float.normalize=False→ [0,255] uint8. Mix → meaningless FID. - Hook self-attention not cross:
attn1= self (image-to-image). Useattn2cross (text-to-image). Confuse → uninformative uniform. - Linear interp high dims: Linear between 2 high-dim Gaussians passes low-density shell. Always slerp in diffusion latents.
- Ignore VAE scaling factor: SD latents scaled by
vae.config.scaling_factorpost-encode. Forget → garbled decode. - Too few samples precision/recall: <5K samples/set → unreliable. ≥10K for stable.
→
implement-diffusion-network— build diffusion models this skill evalsanalyze-diffusion-dynamics— math foundations of inspected noise procsfit-drift-diffusion-model— different diffusion family, same SDE foundations
GitHub репозиторий
Frequently asked questions
What is the analyze-generative-diffusion-model skill?
analyze-generative-diffusion-model is a Claude Skill by pjt222. Skills package instructions and resources that Claude loads on demand, so Claude can perform analyze-generative-diffusion-model-related tasks without extra prompting.
How do I install analyze-generative-diffusion-model?
Use the install commands on this page: add analyze-generative-diffusion-model to Claude Code as a plugin, or clone its repository into your skills directory, then restart Claude so it picks up the skill.
What category does analyze-generative-diffusion-model belong to?
analyze-generative-diffusion-model is in the Meta category, tagged ai and design.
Is analyze-generative-diffusion-model free to use?
Yes. analyze-generative-diffusion-model is listed on AIMCP and free to install. It runs inside Claude, so no separate service account is required to use the skill itself.
Похожие навыки
Этот навык предоставляет проверенную в продакшене настройку для Content Collections — TypeScript-ориентированного инструмента, который преобразует файлы Markdown/MDX в типобезопасные коллекции данных с валидацией Zod. Используйте его при создании блогов, сайтов документации или контентных приложений на Vite + React для обеспечения типобезопасности и автоматической проверки содержимого. Он охватывает всё: от настройки плагина Vite и компиляции MDX до оптимизации развертывания и валидации схем.
Этот навык позволяет разработчикам создавать приложения на платформе прогнозных рынков Polymarket, включая интеграцию с API для торговли и получения рыночных данных. Он также обеспечивает потоковую передачу данных в реальном времени через WebSocket для отслеживания текущих сделок и рыночной активности. Используйте его для реализации торговых стратегий или создания инструментов, обрабатывающих обновления рынка в реальном времени.
Этот навык помогает разработчикам создавать плагины OpenCode, которые подключаются к более чем 25 типам событий, таким как команды, файлы и операции LSP. Он предоставляет структуру плагина, спецификации API событий и шаблоны реализации для модулей на JavaScript/TypeScript. Используйте его, когда вам нужно перехватывать, отслеживать или расширять жизненный цикл ассистента OpenCode AI с помощью пользовательской событийно-ориентированной логики.
SGLang — это высокопроизводительный фреймворк для обслуживания больших языковых моделей (LLM), специализирующийся на быстрой структурированной генерации JSON, regex и рабочих процессов агентов с использованием кэширования префиксов RadixAttention. Он обеспечивает значительно более высокую скорость вывода, особенно для задач с повторяющимися префиксами, что делает его идеальным для сложных структурированных результатов и многократных диалогов. Выбирайте SGLang вместо альтернатив, таких как vLLM, когда вам требуется ограниченное декодирование или вы создаете приложения с интенсивным совместным использованием префиксов.
