patent-reviewer

RobThePCGuy

Updated Today

40 views

Designaidesign

About

This skill provides automated review of utility patent applications against USPTO MPEP guidelines, enabling developers to check compliance and analyze claims, specifications, and formalities. It integrates with patent databases and USPTO regulations for comprehensive patent analysis and drafting assistance. Use it when building patent-related applications that require USPTO compliance checking or patent creation workflows.

Documentation

Patent Creator Skill

Comprehensive patent creation system with USPTO MPEP, prior art databases, and USPTO API for complete patent application analysis.

When to Use

Review patent applications for USPTO compliance, analyze claims/specifications/formalities, integrate prior art, get USPTO guidance, assist with patent drafting.

Quick Review Commands

/full-review              # Complete parallel review
/review-claims            # 35 USC 112b compliance
/review-specification     # 35 USC 112a compliance
/review-formalities       # MPEP 608 compliance
/create-patent            # New patent application

Available MCP Tools

MPEP & Regulations

search_mpep - Search MPEP, 35 USC, 37 CFR
get_mpep_section - Get complete MPEP section by number

Patent Search

search_patents_bigquery - Search 76M+ patents
get_patent_bigquery - Get full patent details
search_patents_by_cpc_bigquery - Search by CPC classification

Patent Analysis

review_patent_claims - Analyze claims for 35 USC 112(b)
review_specification - Check specification support (112a)
check_formalities - Verify MPEP 608 compliance

Diagram Generation

render_diagram - Create diagrams from DOT code
create_flowchart - Generate patent-style flowcharts
create_block_diagram - Create system block diagrams
add_diagram_references - Add reference numbers

Review Workflows

Complete Patent Creation Review (/full-review)

Runs all analyzers in parallel for comprehensive analysis:

Output:

All compliance issues across components
Severity ratings (critical/important/minor)
Specific MPEP citations
Actionable fix recommendations
Prioritized remediation plan

Claims-Only Review (/review-claims)

35 USC 112(b) Compliance:

Antecedent basis
Definiteness
Claim structure
Subjective terms
Means-plus-function compliance

Specification Review (/review-specification)

35 USC 112(a) Requirements:

Written description
Enablement
Best mode
Claim support

Formalities Check (/review-formalities)

MPEP 608 Compliance:

Abstract (50-150 words)
Title (<=500 characters)
Drawing references
Required sections

Patent Creation Workflow (/create-patent)

Complete 6-phase patent drafting (55-80 minutes):

Discovery (10-15 min) - Gather invention details
Technology Analysis (5 min) - Assess patentability (101, 102, 103)
Specification Drafting (15-20 min) - Background, summary, detailed description
Claims Drafting (10-15 min) - Independent + dependent claims
Diagrams & Abstract (10-15 min) - Block diagrams, flowcharts, abstract
Automatic Validation (5-10 min) - Runs /full-review, provides fixes

Output: USPTO-ready filing package with diagrams

MPEP Research

# General search
search_mpep("claim definiteness 112(b)", top_k=5)

# Filtered by source
search_mpep("enablement", source_filter="35_USC")
search_mpep("abstract", source_filter="MPEP")

# Get specific section
get_mpep_section("2173")  # Claim definiteness

Common MPEP Sections

Section	Topic
608	Formalities (abstract, title, drawings)
2100	Patentability requirements
2163	Guidelines for 35 USC 112(a)
2173	Claim definiteness (35 USC 112(b))

Prior Art Integration

# BigQuery search (76M+ patents)
search_patents_bigquery(
    query="neural network training",
    country="US",
    start_year=2020,
    limit=20
)

# CPC classification search
search_patents_by_cpc_bigquery(cpc_code="G06N3", limit=50)

Integrate findings:

Cite in Background section
Emphasize distinctions in Summary
Explain advantages in Detailed Description
Draft claims to avoid/distinguish
List in IDS

Best Practices

Before Review:

Prepare complete application
Run /full-review
Address critical issues first

During Review:

Focus on critical issues (antecedent basis, claim support, definiteness)
Use MPEP citations
Iterate until compliant

After Review:

Document compliance
Final /full-review validation
Prepare filing package

Common Review Findings

Critical (Must Fix):

Missing antecedent basis
Claim elements unsupported
Abstract exceeds 150 words
Indefinite language

Important (Should Fix):

Subjective terms without criteria
Weak enablement
Inconsistent terminology

Minor (Optional):

Add example embodiments
Strengthen best mode
Improve claim scope

Quick Reference

Key Compliance Checks

Requirement	Citation	Tool
Antecedent basis	35 USC 112(b)	review_patent_claims
Written description	35 USC 112(a)	review_specification
Enablement	35 USC 112(a)	review_specification
Abstract length	MPEP 608.01(b)	check_formalities
Title format	MPEP 606	check_formalities

Quick Install

/plugin add https://github.com/RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator/tree/main/patent-reviewer

Copy and paste this command in Claude Code to install this skill

GitHub 仓库

RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator

Path: skills/patent-reviewer

bigqueryclaude-codeclaude-code-pluginfaissmcp-servermpep

Related Skills

sglang

evaluating-llms-harness

Testing

This Claude Skill runs the lm-evaluation-harness to benchmark LLMs across 60+ standardized academic tasks like MMLU and GSM8K. It's designed for developers to compare model quality, track training progress, or report academic results. The tool supports various backends including HuggingFace and vLLM models.

View skill

llamaguard

Other

LlamaGuard is Meta's 7-8B parameter model for moderating LLM inputs and outputs across six safety categories like violence and hate speech. It offers 94-95% accuracy and can be deployed using vLLM, Hugging Face, or Amazon SageMaker. Use this skill to easily integrate content filtering and safety guardrails into your AI applications.