design-on-call-rotation
À propos
Cette compétence aide les développeurs à concevoir des rotations de garde durables en créant des plannings équilibrés, des politiques d'escalade claires et des procédures de passation efficaces. Elle est utilisée lors de la mise en place ou de l'extension d'une couverture de garde, pour lutter contre l'épuisement professionnel, ou pour améliorer la réponse aux incidents après en avoir identifié les problèmes.
Installation rapide
Claude Code
Recommandénpx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanacgit clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/design-on-call-rotationCopiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence
Documentation
Design On-Call Rotation
Create a sustainable on-call schedule that balances coverage with engineer well-being.
When to Use
- Setting up on-call for the first time
- Scaling team from 2-3 to 5+ engineers
- Addressing on-call burnout or alert fatigue
- Improving incident response times
- After post-mortem identifies handoff issues
Inputs
- Required: Team size and time zones
- Required: Service SLA requirements (response time, coverage hours)
- Optional: Historical incident volume and timing
- Optional: Budget for on-call compensation
- Optional: Existing on-call tool (PagerDuty, Opsgenie)
Procedure
Step 1: Define Rotation Schedule
Choose rotation length based on team size:
## Rotation Models
### Weekly Rotation (5+ person team)
- **Length**: 7 days (Monday 09:00 to Monday 09:00)
- **Pros**: Predictable, easy to plan around
- **Cons**: Whole week disrupted if alerts are frequent
### 12-Hour Split (3-4 person team)
- **Day shift**: 08:00-20:00 local time
- **Night shift**: 20:00-08:00 local time
- **Pros**: Shared burden, night coverage paid differently
- **Cons**: More handoffs, coordination needed
### Follow-the-Sun (Global team)
- **APAC**: 00:00-08:00 UTC
- **EMEA**: 08:00-16:00 UTC
- **Americas**: 16:00-00:00 UTC
- **Pros**: No night shifts, timezone-aligned
- **Cons**: Requires distributed team
### Two-Tier (Senior/Junior split)
- **Primary**: Junior engineers (first responder)
- **Secondary**: Senior engineers (escalation)
- **Pros**: Training opportunity, lighter senior load
- **Cons**: Risk of junior burnout
Example schedule for 5-person team:
Week 1: Alice (Primary), Bob (Secondary)
Week 2: Charlie (Primary), Diana (Secondary)
Week 3: Eve (Primary), Alice (Secondary)
Week 4: Bob (Primary), Charlie (Secondary)
Week 5: Diana (Primary), Eve (Secondary)
Got: Schedule that rotates fairly and provides 24/7 coverage.
If fail: If coverage gaps exist, add more engineers or reduce SLA to business hours only.
Step 2: Configure Escalation Policy
Set up tiered escalation in PagerDuty/Opsgenie:
# PagerDuty escalation policy (YAML representation)
escalation_policy:
name: "Production Services"
repeat_enabled: true
num_loops: 3
escalation_rules:
- id: primary
escalation_delay_in_minutes: 0
targets:
- type: schedule
id: primary_on_call_schedule
- id: secondary
escalation_delay_in_minutes: 15
targets:
- type: schedule
id: secondary_on_call_schedule
- id: manager
escalation_delay_in_minutes: 30
targets:
- type: user
id: engineering_manager
Create escalation flowchart:
Alert Fires
↓
Primary On-Call Paged
↓
Wait 15 minutes (no ack)
↓
Secondary On-Call Paged
↓
Wait 15 minutes (no ack)
↓
Manager Paged
↓
Repeat cycle (max 3 times)
Got: Clear escalation path with reasonable delays.
If fail: If escalations fire too often, shorten ack windows or check alert quality.
Step 3: Define Handoff Procedure
Create a structured handoff checklist:
## On-Call Handoff Checklist
### Outgoing On-Call
- [ ] Update incident log with any ongoing issues
- [ ] Document any workarounds or known issues
- [ ] Share any alerts that are "noisy but safe to ignore" temporarily
- [ ] Note any upcoming deploys or maintenance windows
- [ ] Provide context on any flapping alerts
### Incoming On-Call
- [ ] Review incident log from previous shift
- [ ] Check for any ongoing incidents
- [ ] Verify PagerDuty/Opsgenie has correct contact info
- [ ] Test alert delivery (send test page to yourself)
- [ ] Review recent deploys and release notes
- [ ] Check capacity metrics for any concerning trends
### Handoff Meeting (15 min)
- Review any incidents from past week
- Discuss any changes to systems or runbooks
- Questions and clarifications
Automate handoff reminders:
# Slack reminder script
curl -X POST https://slack.com/api/chat.postMessage \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $SLACK_BOT_TOKEN" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"channel": "#on-call",
"text": "On-call handoff in 1 hour. Outgoing: @alice, Incoming: @bob. Please use the handoff checklist: https://wiki.company.com/oncall-handoff"
}'
Got: Smooth knowledge transfer, no information loss between shifts.
If fail: If incidents recur because incoming engineer didn't know about workarounds, make handoff mandatory.
Step 4: Implement Fatigue Management
Set rules to prevent burnout:
## Fatigue Prevention Rules
### Alert Volume Limits
- **Threshold**: Max 5 pages per night (22:00-06:00)
- **Action**: If exceeded, trigger incident review next day
- **Goal**: Reduce noisy alerts that disrupt sleep
### Time Off After Major Incident
- **Rule**: If on-call handles P1 incident >2 hours overnight, they get comp time
- **Amount**: Equal to incident duration (e.g., 3-hour incident = 3 hours off)
- **Scheduling**: Must be taken within 2 weeks
### Maximum Consecutive Weeks
- **Limit**: No more than 2 consecutive weeks on-call
- **Reason**: Prevents exhaustion from extended coverage
### Minimum Rest Between Rotations
- **Cooldown**: At least 2 weeks between primary rotations
- **Exception**: Emergency coverage (requires manager approval)
### Vacation Protection
- **Rule**: No on-call during scheduled vacation
- **Process**: Mark as "Out of Office" in PagerDuty 2 weeks in advance
- **Swap**: Coordinate swap with team, update schedule
Track alert fatigue metrics:
# Alerts per on-call engineer per week
count(ALERTS{alertstate="firing"}) by (oncall_engineer)
# Nighttime pages (22:00-06:00 local)
count(ALERTS{alertstate="firing", hour_of_day>=22 or hour_of_day<6})
# Time to acknowledge (should be <5 min during business hours)
histogram_quantile(0.95, rate(alert_ack_duration_seconds_bucket[7d]))
Got: On-call load is sustainable, engineers not chronically exhausted.
If fail: If burnout occurs despite rules, reduce alert volume or hire more engineers.
Step 5: Document Runbooks and Escalation Contacts
Create an on-call reference guide:
# On-Call Quick Reference
## Emergency Contacts
- **Engineering Manager**: Alice Smith, +1-555-0100
- **CTO**: Bob Johnson, +1-555-0200
- **Security Team**: [email protected], +1-555-0300
- **Cloud Provider Support**: AWS Support Case Portal
## Common Runbooks
- [Database Connection Pool Exhaustion](https://wiki/runbook-db-pool)
- [High API Latency](https://wiki/runbook-api-latency)
- [Disk Space Full](https://wiki/runbook-disk-full)
- [SSL Certificate Expiration](https://wiki/runbook-ssl-renewal)
## Access & Credentials
- **Production AWS**: SSO via company.okta.com
- **Kubernetes**: `kubectl --context production`
- **Database**: Read-only access via Bastion host
- **Secrets**: 1Password vault "On-Call Production"
## Escalation Decision Tree
- **P1 (Service Down)**: Immediate response, escalate to manager after 30min
- **P2 (Degraded)**: Response within 15min, escalate if not resolved in 1 hour
- **P3 (Warning)**: Acknowledge, resolve during business hours
- **Security Incident**: Immediately escalate to Security Team, don't investigate alone
Got: On-call engineer can find any needed information in <2 minutes.
If fail: If engineers repeatedly ask "where is X?", centralize documentation.
Step 6: Schedule Regular On-Call Retrospectives
Review on-call experience monthly:
## On-Call Retrospective Agenda (Monthly)
### Metrics Review (15 min)
- Total alerts: [X] (target: <50/week)
- Nighttime pages: [Y] (target: <5/week)
- Mean time to acknowledge: [Z] (target: <5 min)
- Incidents by severity: P1: [A], P2: [B], P3: [C]
### Qualitative Feedback (20 min)
- What was the most challenging incident?
- Which alerts were noisy/low-value?
- Were runbooks helpful? Which need updates?
- Any gaps in monitoring or alerting?
### Action Items (10 min)
- Fix noisy alerts identified
- Update runbooks that were incomplete
- Adjust rotation schedule if needed
- Plan alert tuning work
### Recognition (5 min)
- Shout-outs for excellent incident response
- Share learnings from interesting incidents
Track improvement over time:
# Generate monthly on-call report
cat > oncall_report_2025-02.md <<EOF
# On-Call Report: February 2025
## Key Metrics
- **Total Alerts**: 38 (down from 52 in January)
- **Nighttime Pages**: 4 (within target)
- **P1 Incidents**: 1 (database outage, 45min MTTR)
- **P2 Incidents**: 3 (all resolved <1 hour)
## Improvements Made
- Tuned CPU alert threshold (reduced false positives by 40%)
- Added runbook for Redis cache failures
- Implemented log rotation (prevented disk full alerts)
## Upcoming Changes
- Migrate to follow-the-sun rotation (Q2)
- Add Slack alert integration (in progress)
EOF
Got: On-call experience improves month-over-month, alert volume decreases.
If fail: If metrics don't improve, escalate to leadership. May need to pause feature work to fix operational issues.
Validation
- Rotation schedule covers all required hours (24/7 or business hours)
- Escalation policy tested (send test alerts)
- Handoff procedure documented and shared with team
- Fatigue management rules codified
- On-call reference guide complete and accessible
- Monthly retrospectives scheduled
- On-call compensation approved (if applicable)
Pitfalls
- Too few engineers: 3 or fewer means on-call every 2-3 weeks, unsustainable. Minimum 5 for weekly rotation.
- No escalation delays: Immediate manager escalation wastes senior time. Give primary 15 minutes to respond.
- Skipping handoffs: Lack of context transfer leads to repeated mistakes. Make handoffs mandatory.
- Ignoring alert fatigue: If engineers ignore alerts due to noise, critical issues get missed. Tune aggressively.
- No compensation: On-call without pay or time off breeds resentment. Budget for it.
Related Skills
configure-alerting-rules- reduce alert noise that causes fatiguewrite-incident-runbook- create runbooks referenced during on-call shifts
Dépôt GitHub
Compétences associées
executing-plans
DesignUtilisez la compétence executing-plans lorsque vous disposez d'un plan de mise en œuvre complet à exécuter par lots contrôlés avec des points de contrôle de revue. Elle charge et examine le plan de manière critique, puis exécute les tâches par petits lots (3 tâches par défaut) tout en rapportant la progression entre chaque lot pour une revue par l'architecte. Cela garantit une mise en œuvre systématique avec des points de contrôle de qualité intégrés.
requesting-code-review
DesignCette compétence délègue un sous-agent réviseur de code pour analyser les modifications apportées au code par rapport aux exigences avant de poursuivre. Elle doit être utilisée après avoir terminé des tâches, implémenté des fonctionnalités majeures, ou avant une fusion vers la branche principale. La revue aide à détecter précocement les problèmes en comparant l'implémentation actuelle avec le plan initial.
connect-mcp-server
DesignCette compétence fournit un guide complet permettant aux développeurs de connecter des serveurs MCP à Claude Code via les transports HTTP, stdio ou SSE. Elle couvre l'installation, la configuration, l'authentification et la sécurité pour intégrer des services externes tels que GitHub, Notion et des API personnalisées. Utilisez-la lors de la configuration d'intégrations MCP, de la configuration d'outils externes ou du travail avec le Protocole de Contexte de Modèle de Claude.
web-cli-teleport
DesignCette compétence aide les développeurs à choisir entre les interfaces Web et CLI de Claude Code en fonction de l'analyse des tâches, puis permet une téléportation transparente des sessions entre ces environnements. Elle optimise le flux de travail en gérant l'état et le contexte de la session lors du passage entre le web, la CLI ou le mobile. Utilisez-la pour des projets complexes nécessitant différents outils à diverses étapes.
