MCP HubMCP Hub
Retour aux compétences

foundation-meeting-agenda

product-on-purpose
Mis à jour 2 days ago
7 vues
238
33
238
Voir sur GitHub
Designaidesign

À propos

Cette compétence génère des ordres du jour structurés et limités dans le temps pour dix types de réunions courantes, des points quotidiens aux briefings exécutifs. Elle produit à la fois un résumé partageable pour les canaux de communication et un agenda détaillé avec les responsables des sujets, le travail préparatoire et la logistique. Les développeurs peuvent l'utiliser pour créer rapidement des cadres de réunion professionnels qui clarifient les objectifs et les responsabilités des participants.

Installation rapide

Claude Code

Recommandé
Principal
npx skills add product-on-purpose/pm-skills -a claude-code
Commande PluginAlternatif
/plugin add https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills
Git CloneAlternatif
git clone https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/foundation-meeting-agenda

Copiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence

Documentation

<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->

Meeting Agenda

A meeting agenda is the attendee-facing structural document that sets expectations before a meeting. It answers "what will we discuss, who owns each topic, how will we spend the time, and what does done look like?" Distinct from a meeting brief, which is the user's private strategic prep; the agenda is shared with participants and focused on structure and flow.

This skill belongs to the Meeting Skills Family. It conforms to the Meeting Skills Family Contract, which defines shared frontmatter, file naming, the go-mode behavioral pattern, and universal output requirements across all meeting skills.

When to Use

  • Running or chairing a cross-functional working session, project kickoff, stakeholder review, or decision meeting
  • Any meeting with more than three attendees or more than thirty minutes
  • Recurring meeting where a rolling structure (1-on-1, team sync) needs fresh framing each time
  • Mid-initiative alignment moment where explicit desired outcomes prevent drift

When NOT to Use

  • The user's preparation is private and tactical (positioning, stakeholder reads, asks). Use /meeting-brief instead.
  • The meeting has already happened. Use /meeting-recap for post-meeting summarization.
  • The user wants to communicate outcomes to non-attendees. Use /stakeholder-update after the meeting.

Zero-friction execution

Per the family contract, this skill never blocks on interrogation. Default flow:

  1. Read all provided inputs (topic, any referenced files, attendee list, constraints)
  2. Run inference on missing values (meeting type from topic keywords, duration default, objective from topic phrasing, attendee roles from context)
  3. Present a brief inference summary and accept one-word go or corrections
  4. Produce the agenda

If invoked with --go, skip the inference summary and produce output directly using defaults (duration 30 min, meeting type other, and so on). If the user provides all values upfront, no checkpoint appears.

Blocking questions are used only when inference confidence is actively low on a load-bearing input and no reasonable default exists. This should be rare.

Anti-meeting check

This skill opens with an explicit question: "Does this need to be a meeting, or could it be handled async?"

v1.1.0: the check now requires a positive synchronous-value statement. The meeting passes the check only when at least one of these is named:

  • Tradeoff to discuss. multiple options, uncertain preference
  • Conflict to resolve. named stakeholders disagreeing
  • Co-creation. shared whiteboarding or document-writing in the meeting
  • Relationship-building. first-time stakeholder meeting, mutual calibration
  • Blocker escalation. time-sensitive unblocking

If none apply, the skill recommends the async alternative (written update, doc review, Slack poll) and produces a short one-page "how to handle this async" framing instead of an agenda.

The v1.0.0 version of this check ("single-owner decision with no tradeoffs", "pure information broadcast", "status-only sync with >5 people") was bypassed too easily. users would stay at five attendees or add "decision" to the topic. The stricter v1.1.0 biases toward async; users can still override.

This check is shared with /meeting-brief and not run by the post-meeting skills (recap, synthesize, stakeholder-update).

Instructions

When asked to create a meeting agenda, follow these steps:

  1. Run anti-meeting check Apply the trigger patterns above. If the user's objective matches, propose the async alternative and ask for override. Only proceed to step 2 on explicit override.

  2. Parse and load inputs Read the topic or purpose. Load all @file references provided. Extract any attendee list, time constraints, or linked documents.

  3. Infer missing values Apply these inference rules:

    ValueInferred fromDefault
    Meeting typeTopic keywords, attendee seniority mixother (low confidence)
    DurationExplicit in topic doc (rare); meeting-type-specific default when type is inferred at medium+ confidencev1.1.0: type-specific (see family contract). 30 min only for other, 1-on-1, exec-briefing, customer-call. Kickoff = 60, working-session = 60, decision-making = 45, etc.
    ObjectiveTopic phrasingInfer; surface in summary
    Attendee RACISeniority, topic ownership cuesFlag all inferences
    Desired outcomesObjective plus meeting type heuristicsOffer strawman

    Load-bearing inference gates (v1.1.0): when attendee RACI or desired outcomes are inferred below-high confidence, flag in the go-mode summary with . See family contract "Zero-friction execution" section.

  4. Present go-mode inference summary Show the inferred values with confidence markers. Accept go to proceed, or corrections to revise. Re-run inference after any correction and present the summary again.

  5. Design the time-boxed topic list Apply the meeting-type variant (see below). Size topic times so their sum equals the meeting duration. If the topic list overflows the available time, flag it explicitly and ask for reconciliation (do not silently trim).

    Each topic must have:

    • Type tag: Discussion | Decision | Information | Working
    • Owner (name or team)
    • Goal (what done looks like)
    • Time allocation
    • Pre-read link if any
  6. Specify attendee prep List required prep with links and estimated prep time. Add recommended context for attendees who want deeper background. Add "come ready to" expectations that force clarity on what each attendee contributes.

  7. Add parking lot and logistics placeholders Parking lot is a placeholder for off-topic items raised during the meeting. Logistics covers join link, materials needed, recording ownership.

  8. Render the TEMPLATE.md with filled values Remove all guidance blockquotes from the final artifact.

  9. Validate output

    • Frontmatter shape conforms to the family contract's universal base fields plus agenda-specific fields (meeting_duration_minutes, desired_outcomes)
    • Sum of topic times equals meeting duration (+/- 2 min tolerance)
    • At least one desired outcome is listed
    • Anti-meeting check result is recorded in Generation context

Meeting-type variants

Applied in step 5. Each variant reshapes the topic list to match the meeting's purpose.

  • 1-on-1: Rolling structure. Last time's items, this time's topics, growth or development, blockers. Default 30 min.
  • standup: Status round-robin, escalations, decisions needed. Default 15 min.
  • planning: Commitments focus, capacity check, dependencies. Default 60 min.
  • review: Presentation-first, heavy pre-read, explicit feedback-capture mechanism. Default 60 min.
  • decision-making: Options upfront, decision criteria, explicit decision ask. Pre-read with proposal required. Default 45 min.
  • brainstorm: Minimal agenda, generative prompts, no decision pressure. Default 45 min.
  • stakeholder-review: TL;DR first, business-impact framing, explicit asks upfront. Default 45 min.
  • project-kickoff: Scope, roles, success criteria, risks, communication plan. Default 60 min.
  • working-session: Minimal agenda, pre-work required, explicit deliverable. Default 60 to 90 min.
  • exec-briefing: TL;DR first, supporting detail after. Default 30 min.
  • other: Generic topic structure, default 30 min.

Quality checklist

Before delivering the agenda, verify:

  • Anti-meeting check was applied and recorded
  • Meeting type is set (or explicitly other with low-confidence flag)
  • Duration is set (default 30 min if not provided, flagged as default)
  • Desired outcomes are concrete and verifiable (not "discuss X" but "decide whether to ship X")
  • Every topic has type tag, owner, goal, time
  • Topic times sum to meeting duration
  • Pre-read prep time is listed (attendees skip prep when duration is not stated)
  • Logistics section has join link and materials references
  • Shareable summary is 5-6 lines, Slack-paste-ready
  • Sources and References section includes Generation context with defaults applied and inferences made

See also

Dépôt GitHub

product-on-purpose/pm-skills
Chemin: skills/foundation-meeting-agenda
0
agent-skillsai-skillsclaude-codeclaude-desktopdesign-sprintfoundation-sprint

Compétences associées

executing-plans

Design

Utilisez la compétence executing-plans lorsque vous disposez d'un plan de mise en œuvre complet à exécuter par lots contrôlés avec des points de contrôle de revue. Elle charge et examine le plan de manière critique, puis exécute les tâches par petits lots (3 tâches par défaut) tout en rapportant la progression entre chaque lot pour une revue par l'architecte. Cela garantit une mise en œuvre systématique avec des points de contrôle de qualité intégrés.

Voir la compétence

requesting-code-review

Design

Cette compétence délègue un sous-agent réviseur de code pour analyser les modifications apportées au code par rapport aux exigences avant de poursuivre. Elle doit être utilisée après avoir terminé des tâches, implémenté des fonctionnalités majeures, ou avant une fusion vers la branche principale. La revue aide à détecter précocement les problèmes en comparant l'implémentation actuelle avec le plan initial.

Voir la compétence

connect-mcp-server

Design

Cette compétence fournit un guide complet permettant aux développeurs de connecter des serveurs MCP à Claude Code via les transports HTTP, stdio ou SSE. Elle couvre l'installation, la configuration, l'authentification et la sécurité pour intégrer des services externes tels que GitHub, Notion et des API personnalisées. Utilisez-la lors de la configuration d'intégrations MCP, de la configuration d'outils externes ou du travail avec le Protocole de Contexte de Modèle de Claude.

Voir la compétence

web-cli-teleport

Design

Cette compétence aide les développeurs à choisir entre les interfaces Web et CLI de Claude Code en fonction de l'analyse des tâches, puis permet une téléportation transparente des sessions entre ces environnements. Elle optimise le flux de travail en gérant l'état et le contexte de la session lors du passage entre le web, la CLI ou le mobile. Utilisez-la pour des projets complexes nécessitant différents outils à diverses étapes.

Voir la compétence