MCP HubMCP Hub
SKILL·52EEBF

suede-signup

JasonColapietro
Mis à jour 27 days ago
6 vues
129
9
129
Voir sur GitHub
Métadesign

À propos

La compétence `suede-signup` est destinée à optimiser les processus de création de compte, d'inscription et de démarrage d'essai en analysant et en réduisant les frictions. Elle se concentre sur des éléments tels que les champs de formulaire, le comportement mobile et la mesure de l'abandon, mais exclut explicitement l'activation post-inscription ou les formulaires de capture de prospects. Utilisez-la lors de l'audit ou de la refonte de la frontière de conversion initiale de l'inscription.

Installation rapide

Claude Code

Recommandé
Principal
npx skills add JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills -a claude-code
Commande PluginAlternatif
/plugin add https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills
Git CloneAlternatif
git clone https://github.com/JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills.git ~/.claude/skills/suede-signup

Copiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence

Documentation

Suede Signup Conversion

Suede Signup identifies measurable friction between intent and completed account creation, then turns it into accessible, security-preserving experiments. It optimizes only the registration boundary and hands post-account activation to the Suede onboarding lane.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before providing recommendations, understand:

  1. Flow Type

    • Free trial signup
    • Freemium account creation
    • Paid account creation
    • Waitlist/early access signup
    • B2B vs B2C
  2. Current State

    • How many steps/screens?
    • What fields are required?
    • What's the current completion rate?
    • Where do users drop off?
  3. Business Constraints

    • What data is genuinely needed at signup?
    • Are there compliance requirements?
    • What happens immediately after signup?

Core Principles

1. Minimize Required Fields

Every field reduces conversion. For each field, ask:

  • Do we absolutely need this before they can use the product?
  • Can we collect this later through progressive profiling?
  • Can we infer this from other data?

Typical field priority:

  • Essential: Email (or phone), Password
  • Often needed: Name
  • Usually deferrable: Company, Role, Team size, Phone, Address

2. Show Value Before Asking for Commitment

  • What can you show/give before requiring signup?
  • Can they experience the product before creating an account?
  • Reverse the order: value first, signup second

3. Reduce Perceived Effort

  • Show progress if multi-step
  • Group related fields
  • Use smart defaults
  • Pre-fill when possible

4. Remove Uncertainty

  • Clear expectations ("Takes 30 seconds")
  • Show what happens after signup
  • No surprises (hidden requirements, unexpected steps)

Field-by-Field Optimization

Email Field

  • Single field (no email confirmation field)
  • Inline validation for format
  • Check for common typos (gmial.com → gmail.com)
  • Clear error messages

Password Field

  • Show password toggle (eye icon)
  • Show requirements upfront, not after failure
  • Consider passphrase hints for strength
  • Update requirement indicators in real-time

Better password UX:

  • Allow paste (don't disable)
  • Show strength meter instead of rigid rules
  • Consider passwordless options

Name Field

  • Single "Full name" field vs. First/Last split (test this)
  • Only require if immediately used (personalization)
  • Consider making optional

Social Auth Options

  • Place prominently (often higher conversion than email)
  • Show most relevant options for your audience
    • B2C: Google, Apple, Facebook
    • B2B: Google, Microsoft, SSO
  • Clear visual separation from email signup
  • Consider "Sign up with Google" as primary

Phone Number

  • Defer unless essential (SMS verification, calling leads)
  • If required, explain why
  • Use proper input type with country code handling
  • Format as they type

Company/Organization

  • Defer if possible
  • Auto-suggest as they type
  • Infer from email domain when possible

Use Case / Role Questions

  • Defer to suede-onboarding if possible
  • If needed at signup, keep to one question
  • Use progressive disclosure (don't show all options at once)

Single-Step vs. Multi-Step

Single-Step Works When:

  • 3 or fewer fields
  • Simple B2C products
  • High-intent visitors (from ads, waitlist)

Multi-Step Works When:

  • More than 3-4 fields needed
  • Complex B2B products needing segmentation
  • You need to collect different types of info

Multi-Step Best Practices

  • Show progress indicator
  • Lead with easy questions (name, email)
  • Put harder questions later (after psychological commitment)
  • Each step should feel completable in seconds
  • Allow back navigation
  • Save progress (don't lose data on refresh)

Progressive commitment pattern:

  1. Email only (lowest barrier)
  2. Password + name
  3. Customization questions (optional)

Trust and Friction Reduction

At the Form Level

  • "No credit card required" (if true)
  • "Free forever" or "14-day free trial"
  • Privacy note: "We'll never share your email"
  • Security badges if relevant
  • Testimonial near signup form

Error Handling

  • Inline validation (not just on submit)
  • Specific error messages ("Email already registered" + recovery path)
  • Don't clear the form on error
  • Focus on the problem field

Microcopy

  • Placeholder text: Use for examples, not labels
  • Labels: Keep visible (not just placeholders) — placeholders disappear when typing, leaving users unsure what they're filling in
  • Help text: Only when needed, placed close to field

Mobile Signup Optimization

  • Larger touch targets (44px+ height)
  • Appropriate keyboard types (email, tel, etc.)
  • Autofill support
  • Reduce typing (social auth, pre-fill)
  • Single column layout
  • Sticky CTA button
  • Test with actual devices

Post-Submit Experience

Success State

  • Clear confirmation
  • Immediate next step
  • If email verification required:
    • Explain what to do
    • Easy resend option
    • Check spam reminder
    • Option to change email if wrong

Verification Flows

  • Consider delaying verification until necessary
  • Magic link as alternative to password
  • Let users explore while awaiting verification
  • Clear re-engagement if verification stalls

Measurement

Key Metrics

  • Form start rate (landed → started filling)
  • Form completion rate (started → submitted)
  • Field-level drop-off (which fields lose people)
  • Time to complete
  • Error rate by field
  • Mobile vs. desktop completion

What to Track

  • Each field interaction (focus, blur, error)
  • Step progression in multi-step
  • Social auth vs. email signup ratio
  • Time between steps

Output Format

Audit Findings

For each issue found:

  • Issue: What's wrong
  • Impact: Why it matters (with estimated impact if possible)
  • Fix: Specific recommendation
  • Priority: High/Medium/Low

Recommended Changes

Organized by:

  1. Quick wins (same-day fixes)
  2. High-impact changes (week-level effort)
  3. Test hypotheses (things to A/B test)

Form Redesign (if requested)

  • Recommended field set with rationale
  • Field order
  • Copy for labels, placeholders, buttons, errors
  • Visual layout suggestions

Common Signup Flow Patterns

B2B SaaS Trial

  1. Email + Password (or Google auth)
  2. Name + Company (optional: role)
  3. → Onboarding flow

B2C App

  1. Google/Apple auth OR Email
  2. → Product experience
  3. Profile completion later

Waitlist/Early Access

  1. Email only
  2. Optional: Role/use case question
  3. → Waitlist confirmation

E-commerce Account

  1. Guest checkout as default
  2. Account creation optional post-purchase
  3. OR Social auth with single click

Experiment Ideas

Form Design Experiments

Layout & Structure

  • Single-step vs. multi-step signup flow
  • Multi-step with progress bar vs. without
  • 1-column vs. 2-column field layout
  • Form embedded on page vs. separate signup page
  • Horizontal vs. vertical field alignment

Field Optimization

  • Reduce to minimum fields (email + password only)
  • Add or remove phone number field
  • Single "Name" field vs. "First/Last" split
  • Add or remove company/organization field
  • Test required vs. optional field balance

Authentication Options

  • Add SSO options (Google, Microsoft, GitHub, LinkedIn)
  • SSO prominent vs. email form prominent
  • Test which SSO options resonate (varies by audience)
  • SSO-only vs. SSO + email option

Visual Design

  • Test button colors and sizes for CTA prominence
  • Plain background vs. product-related visuals
  • Test form container styling (card vs. minimal)
  • Mobile-optimized layout testing

Copy & Messaging Experiments

Headlines & CTAs

  • Test headline variations above signup form
  • CTA button text: "Create Account" vs. "Start Free Trial" vs. "Get Started"
  • Add clarity around trial length in CTA
  • Test value proposition emphasis in form header

Microcopy

  • Field labels: minimal vs. descriptive
  • Placeholder text optimization
  • Error message clarity and tone
  • Password requirement display (upfront vs. on error)

Trust Elements

  • Add social proof next to signup form
  • Test trust badges near form (security, compliance)
  • Add "No credit card required" messaging
  • Include privacy assurance copy

Trial & Commitment Experiments

Free Trial Variations

  • Credit card required vs. not required for trial
  • Test trial length impact (7 vs. 14 vs. 30 days)
  • Freemium vs. free trial model
  • Trial with limited features vs. full access

Friction Points

  • Email verification required vs. delayed vs. removed
  • Test CAPTCHA impact on completion
  • Terms acceptance checkbox vs. implicit acceptance
  • Phone verification for high-value accounts

Post-Submit Experiments

  • Clear next steps messaging after signup
  • Instant product access vs. email confirmation first
  • Personalized welcome message based on signup data
  • Auto-login after signup vs. require login

Task-Specific Questions

  1. What's your current signup completion rate?
  2. Do you have field-level analytics on drop-off?
  3. What data is absolutely required before they can use the product?
  4. Are there compliance or verification requirements?
  5. What happens immediately after signup?

Boundaries

  • Do not deploy signup or authentication changes, remove security, consent, age, identity, or legal controls, or alter stored user data without owner review.
  • Do not use deceptive defaults, forced consent, hidden costs, or inaccessible friction reduction.
  • Do not claim conversion lift without a current baseline and completed experiment; keep personal data out of examples and diagnostic output.

Routing

  • Use suede-onboarding for activation after account creation.
  • Use suede-site-alchemy for lead-capture and non-account forms.
  • Use suede-ab-testing to design and evaluate signup experiments.
  • Use suede-analytics to instrument funnel stages and read outcomes.

Dépôt GitHub

JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills
Chemin: skills/suede-signup
0
agent-orchestrationagent-skillagent-skillsai-agentsai-codinganthropic
FAQ

Questions fréquentes

Qu’est-ce que le Skill suede-signup ?

suede-signup est un Skill Claude créé par JasonColapietro. Un Skill regroupe des instructions et des ressources que Claude charge à la demande pour effectuer des tâches liées à suede-signup sans consigne supplémentaire.

Comment installer suede-signup ?

Utilisez les commandes d’installation de cette page : ajoutez suede-signup à Claude Code comme plugin ou clonez son dépôt dans votre dossier skills, puis redémarrez Claude pour charger le Skill.

À quelle catégorie appartient suede-signup ?

suede-signup appartient à la catégorie Méta.

suede-signup est-il gratuit ?

Oui. suede-signup est référencé sur AIMCP et son installation est gratuite.

Compétences associées

content-collections
Méta

Cette compétence propose une configuration éprouvée en production pour Content Collections, un outil axé sur TypeScript qui transforme des fichiers Markdown/MDX en collections de données typées de manière sûre avec une validation Zod. Utilisez-la lors de la création de blogs, de sites de documentation ou d'applications Vite + React riches en contenu pour garantir la sécurité de typage et la validation automatique du contenu. Elle couvre tout, de la configuration du plugin Vite et de la compilation MDX à l'optimisation des déploiements et la validation des schémas.

Voir la compétence
polymarket
Méta

Cette compétence permet aux développeurs de créer des applications avec la plateforme de marchés prédictifs Polymarket, incluant l'intégration d'API pour le trading et les données de marché. Elle fournit également une diffusion de données en temps réel via WebSocket pour surveiller les transactions en direct et l'activité du marché. Utilisez-la pour mettre en œuvre des stratégies de trading ou pour créer des outils traitant les mises à jour de marché en direct.

Voir la compétence
creating-opencode-plugins
Méta

Cette compétence aide les développeurs à créer des plugins OpenCode qui s'interconnectent avec plus de 25 types d'événements tels que les commandes, les fichiers et les opérations LSP. Elle fournit la structure du plugin, les spécifications de l'API événementielle et les modèles d'implémentation pour les modules JavaScript/TypeScript. Utilisez-la lorsque vous avez besoin d'intercepter, de surveiller ou d'étendre le cycle de vie de l'assistant IA OpenCode avec une logique personnalisée pilotée par les événements.

Voir la compétence
sglang
Méta

SGLang est un framework de service LLM haute performance spécialisé dans la génération rapide et structurée pour les workflows JSON, regex et agentiques grâce à son cache de préfixe RadixAttention. Il offre une inférence nettement plus rapide, particulièrement pour les tâches avec des préfixes répétés, ce qui le rend idéal pour les sorties complexes et structurées ainsi que les conversations multi-tours. Choisissez SGLang plutôt que des alternatives comme vLLM lorsque vous avez besoin d'un décodage contraint ou que vous construisez des applications avec un partage étendu de préfixes.

Voir la compétence