MCP HubMCP Hub
Retour aux compétences

plan-tour-route

pjt222
Mis à jour 2 days ago
3 vues
17
2
17
Voir sur GitHub
Métaapidata

À propos

Cette compétence planifie des itinéraires de tournée multi-étapes optimisés en utilisant les données OSM, avec un ordonnancement des points de passage via des algorithmes du plus proche voisin ou de voyageur de commerce, ainsi qu'une estimation des temps de trajet. Elle génère des itinéraires incluant la découverte de points d'intérêt le long du parcours, permettant des comparaisons pour la conduite, la marche ou les transports en commun. Utilisez-la lors de la création d'applications pour des road trips ou des visites pédestres nécessitant de minimiser le temps de déplacement entre plusieurs destinations.

Installation rapide

Claude Code

Recommandé
Principal
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Commande PluginAlternatif
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternatif
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/plan-tour-route

Copiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence

Documentation

Plan Tour Route

Plan and optimize multi-stop tour route. Time estimates, distance calculations, points of interest along the way.

When Use

  • Planning road trip or walking tour with multiple destinations
  • Optimizing visit order to minimize total travel time or distance
  • Discovering restaurants, viewpoints, cultural sites along route
  • Generating day-by-day itinerary with realistic time budgets
  • Comparing driving vs walking vs public transport options

Inputs

  • Required: List of waypoints (place names, addresses, coordinates)
  • Required: Travel mode (driving, walking, cycling, public transport)
  • Optional: Start and end points (if different from first/last waypoint)
  • Optional: Time constraints (departure time, must-arrive-by, opening hours)
  • Optional: POI categories to discover (food, viewpoints, museums, fuel)
  • Optional: Preferred route type (fastest, shortest, scenic)

Steps

Step 1: Define Waypoints

Collect and structure all stops tour must include.

Waypoint Schema:
┌──────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Field    │ Description                                │
├──────────┼────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ name     │ Human-readable label for the stop          │
│ address  │ Street address or place name               │
│ lat/lon  │ Coordinates (if known; otherwise geocode)  │
│ duration │ Time to spend at this stop (minutes)       │
│ priority │ Must-visit vs. nice-to-have                │
│ hours    │ Opening/closing times (if applicable)      │
│ notes    │ Parking, accessibility, booking required    │
└──────────┴────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Separate fixed-order waypoints (e.g. hotel at start and end) from reorderable waypoints.

Got: Structured list of all waypoints. Min: name and either address or coordinates per waypoint.

If fail: Waypoint ambiguous (e.g. "the castle")? Use WebSearch to resolve to specific location. Need coordinates but only name available? Defer to Step 2 for geocoding.

Step 2: Geocode and Validate

Convert all waypoints to latitude/longitude coordinates. Verify they are reachable.

Geocoding Sources (in preference order):
1. Nominatim (OpenStreetMap) - free, no key required
   https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search?q=QUERY&format=json

2. Overpass API - for POI-type queries
   https://overpass-api.de/api/interpreter

3. Manual coordinates from mapping services

For each waypoint:

  1. Query geocoding service with address or place name
  2. Verify returned coordinates are in expected region
  3. Check multiple results disambiguated (pick correct one)
  4. Store coordinates alongside original waypoint data

Got: Every waypoint has valid latitude/longitude coordinates. All points fall within plausible geographic region (no outliers on wrong continents).

If fail: Geocoding returns no results? Try alternative spellings, add region/country qualifiers, search for nearby landmarks. Waypoint in remote area with poor OSM coverage? Use WebSearch to find coordinates from travel blogs or tourism sites.

Step 3: Optimize Route Order

Determine visit sequence that minimizes total travel time or distance.

Optimization Strategies:
┌─────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Strategy            │ When to use                            │
├─────────────────────┼────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Fixed order         │ Stops must be visited in given sequence│
│ Nearest neighbor    │ Quick approximation for 5-15 stops     │
│ TSP solver          │ Optimal ordering for any number        │
│ Time-window aware   │ Stops have opening hours constraints   │
│ Cluster-then-route  │ Stops span multiple days/regions       │
└─────────────────────┴────────────────────────────────────────┘

For nearest-neighbor heuristic:

  1. Start at designated origin
  2. From current position, select unvisited waypoint closest by travel time
  3. Move to that waypoint, mark visited
  4. Repeat until all waypoints visited
  5. Return to designated end point (if round trip)

For multi-day tours, cluster waypoints by geographic proximity first, then optimize within each day.

Got: Ordered sequence of waypoints — route without excessive backtracking. Total distance within 20% of theoretical optimum for fewer than 10 stops.

If fail: Nearest-neighbor result has obvious backtracking (later stops closer to earlier ones)? Try reversing route or use 2-opt improvement: swap pairs of edges and keep swap if it shortens route. For time-window constraints, verify arrival times at each stop fall within opening hours.

Step 4: Calculate Times and Distances

Compute travel time and distance per leg of route.

Time Estimation Methods:
┌──────────────┬────────────┬────────────────────────────────┐
│ Mode         │ Avg Speed  │ Notes                          │
├──────────────┼────────────┼────────────────────────────────┤
│ Highway      │ 100 km/h   │ Varies by country/road type    │
│ Rural road   │ 60 km/h    │ Add 20% for winding roads      │
│ City driving │ 30 km/h    │ Add time for parking            │
│ Walking      │ 4.5 km/h   │ Flat terrain; reduce for hills │
│ Cycling      │ 15 km/h    │ Touring pace with luggage      │
│ Hiking       │ 3-4 km/h   │ Use Munter formula for accuracy│
└──────────────┴────────────┴────────────────────────────────┘

For each consecutive pair of waypoints:

  1. Compute straight-line (haversine) distance as baseline
  2. Apply detour factor (1.3 for roads, 1.4 for urban, 1.2 for highways)
  3. Estimate travel time from adjusted distance and mode speed
  4. Add buffer time: 10% for driving, 15% for public transport
  5. Sum leg times plus dwell times at each stop for total tour duration

Got: Time/distance matrix for all legs. Running cumulative time accounts for both travel and dwell time at each stop. Total tour duration realistic (doesn't exceed available daylight for walking tours).

If fail: Estimated times unrealistic (e.g. 2 hours for 10 km city drive)? Check if detour factor appropriate. For mountain roads, increase detour factor to 1.6-2.0. For public transport, use WebSearch to check actual timetables — don't estimate.

Step 5: Generate Itinerary with POIs

Compile optimized route into complete itinerary with discovered points of interest.

POI Discovery (Overpass API query pattern):
  [out:json];
  (
    node["tourism"="viewpoint"](around:RADIUS,LAT,LON);
    node["amenity"="restaurant"](around:RADIUS,LAT,LON);
    node["amenity"="cafe"](around:RADIUS,LAT,LON);
  );
  out body;

Recommended search radius:
- Along route corridor: 500 m for walking, 2 km for driving
- At waypoints: 1 km radius

Build itinerary document:

  1. Header with tour name, dates, total distance, total time
  2. For each day (if multi-day):
    • Day summary (start, end, total km, total hours)
    • For each leg: departure time, travel mode, distance, duration
    • For each stop: arrival time, dwell time, description, POIs nearby
  3. Logistics section: parking, fuel stops, rest areas, emergency contacts
  4. Map reference (link to route on OpenStreetMap or export as GPX)

Got: Complete, time-budgeted itinerary document with realistic schedules, POI suggestions at each stop, practical logistics info.

If fail: POI queries return too many results? Filter by rating or relevance. Itinerary exceeds available time? Mark lower-priority stops as optional or split into additional days. No POIs found in remote areas? Note this. Suggest traveler research locally on arrival.

Checks

  • All waypoints geocoded with valid coordinates
  • Route order minimizes backtracking (no obvious inefficiencies)
  • Travel times realistic for chosen mode
  • Dwell times at each stop accounted for
  • Total tour duration fits within available time window
  • POIs relevant and located near route
  • Opening hours of time-sensitive stops respected
  • Itinerary includes practical logistics (parking, fuel, rest stops)

Pitfalls

  • Ignore opening hours: Optimizing purely by distance can route to museum after it closes. Always check time-window constraints for attractions.
  • Underestimate urban travel: City driving and parking can double expected time. Add generous buffers for urban stops.
  • Over-pack itinerary: Filling every minute leaves no room for delays or spontaneous discoveries. Build in 30-60 minutes of slack per half-day.
  • Straight-line distance fallacy: Haversine distance severely underestimates actual road distance — especially in mountainous or coastal terrain. Always apply detour factor.
  • Forget return logistics: One-way routes need plans for returning rental cars, catching trains, arranging pickup.
  • Seasonal road closures: Mountain passes, ferries, scenic routes may be closed seasonally. Verify access dates before routing.

See Also

  • create-spatial-visualization — render planned route on interactive map
  • generate-tour-report — compile itinerary into formatted Quarto report
  • plan-hiking-tour — specialized planning for hiking segments within tour
  • assess-trail-conditions — check conditions for any walking/hiking legs

Dépôt GitHub

pjt222/agent-almanac
Chemin: i18n/caveman/skills/plan-tour-route
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Compétences associées

content-collections

Méta

Cette compétence propose une configuration éprouvée en production pour Content Collections, un outil axé sur TypeScript qui transforme des fichiers Markdown/MDX en collections de données typées de manière sûre avec une validation Zod. Utilisez-la lors de la création de blogs, de sites de documentation ou d'applications Vite + React riches en contenu pour garantir la sécurité de typage et la validation automatique du contenu. Elle couvre tout, de la configuration du plugin Vite et de la compilation MDX à l'optimisation des déploiements et la validation des schémas.

Voir la compétence

polymarket

Méta

Cette compétence permet aux développeurs de créer des applications avec la plateforme de marchés prédictifs Polymarket, incluant l'intégration d'API pour le trading et les données de marché. Elle fournit également une diffusion de données en temps réel via WebSocket pour surveiller les transactions en direct et l'activité du marché. Utilisez-la pour mettre en œuvre des stratégies de trading ou pour créer des outils traitant les mises à jour de marché en direct.

Voir la compétence

creating-opencode-plugins

Méta

Cette compétence aide les développeurs à créer des plugins OpenCode qui s'interconnectent avec plus de 25 types d'événements tels que les commandes, les fichiers et les opérations LSP. Elle fournit la structure du plugin, les spécifications de l'API événementielle et les modèles d'implémentation pour les modules JavaScript/TypeScript. Utilisez-la lorsque vous avez besoin d'intercepter, de surveiller ou d'étendre le cycle de vie de l'assistant IA OpenCode avec une logique personnalisée pilotée par les événements.

Voir la compétence

sglang

Méta

SGLang est un framework de service LLM haute performance spécialisé dans la génération rapide et structurée pour les workflows JSON, regex et agentiques grâce à son cache de préfixe RadixAttention. Il offre une inférence nettement plus rapide, particulièrement pour les tâches avec des préfixes répétés, ce qui le rend idéal pour les sorties complexes et structurées ainsi que les conversations multi-tours. Choisissez SGLang plutôt que des alternatives comme vLLM lorsque vous avez besoin d'un décodage contraint ou que vous construisez des applications avec un partage étendu de préfixes.

Voir la compétence