MCP HubMCP Hub
Retour aux compétences

review-skill-format

pjt222
Mis à jour 2 days ago
8 vues
17
2
17
Voir sur GitHub
Métaaidesign

À propos

Cette compétence valide les fichiers SKILL.md selon le standard agentskills.io en vérifiant le frontmatter YAML, les sections obligatoires et la conformité du format. Utilisez-la pour examiner des compétences nouvelles ou modifiées avant fusion, pour auditer des lots de compétences d'un domaine, ou pour valider des soumissions de pull requests. Elle effectue des vérifications automatisées sur la structure, les limites de lignes et la synchronisation avec le registre.

Installation rapide

Claude Code

Recommandé
Principal
npx skills add pjt222/agent-almanac -a claude-code
Commande PluginAlternatif
/plugin add https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac
Git CloneAlternatif
git clone https://github.com/pjt222/agent-almanac.git ~/.claude/skills/review-skill-format

Copiez et collez cette commande dans Claude Code pour installer cette compétence

Documentation

Review Skill Format

Validate a SKILL.md file against the agentskills.io open standard. This skill checks YAML frontmatter completeness, required section presence, procedure step format (Expected/On failure blocks), line count limits, and registry synchronization. Use this before merging any new or modified skill.

When to Use

  • A new skill has been authored and needs format validation before merge
  • An existing skill has been modified and needs re-validation
  • Performing a batch audit of all skills in a domain
  • Verifying a skill created by the create-skill meta-skill
  • Reviewing a contributor's skill submission in a pull request

Inputs

  • Required: Path to the SKILL.md file (e.g., skills/setup-vault/SKILL.md)
  • Optional: Strictness level (lenient or strict, default: strict)
  • Optional: Whether to check registry sync (default: yes)

Procedure

Step 1: Verify File Exists and Read Content

Confirm the SKILL.md file exists at the expected path and read its full content.

# Verify file exists
test -f skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md && echo "EXISTS" || echo "MISSING"

# Count lines
wc -l < skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md

Got: File exists and content is readable. Line count is displayed.

If fail: If the file does not exist, check the path for typos. Verify the skill directory exists with ls skills/<skill-name>/. If the directory is missing, the skill has not been created yet — use create-skill first.

Step 2: Check YAML Frontmatter Fields

Parse the YAML frontmatter block (between --- delimiters) and verify all required and recommended fields are present.

Required fields:

  • name — matches directory name (kebab-case)
  • description — under 1024 characters, starts with a verb
  • license — typically MIT
  • allowed-tools — comma-separated or space-separated tool list

Recommended metadata fields:

  • metadata.author — author name
  • metadata.version — semantic version string
  • metadata.domain — one of the domains listed in skills/_registry.yml
  • metadata.complexity — one of: basic, intermediate, advanced
  • metadata.language — primary language or multi
  • metadata.tags — comma-separated, 3-6 tags, includes domain name
# Check required frontmatter fields exist
head -30 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md | grep -q '^name:' && echo "name: OK" || echo "name: MISSING"
head -30 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md | grep -q '^description:' && echo "description: OK" || echo "description: MISSING"
head -30 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md | grep -q '^license:' && echo "license: OK" || echo "license: MISSING"
head -30 skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md | grep -q '^allowed-tools:' && echo "allowed-tools: OK" || echo "allowed-tools: MISSING"

Got: All four required fields present. All six metadata fields present. name matches directory name. description is under 1024 characters.

If fail: Report each missing field as BLOCKING. If name does not match directory name, report as BLOCKING with the expected value. If description exceeds 1024 characters, report as SUGGEST with current length.

Step 3: Locale-Specific Validation (Translations Only)

If the frontmatter contains a locale field, the file is a translated SKILL.md. Perform these additional checks. If no locale field is present, skip this step.

  1. Translation frontmatter fields — Verify these five fields are present:

    • locale — target locale code (e.g., de, ja, zh-CN, es)
    • source_locale — origin locale (typically en)
    • source_commit — commit hash of the English source used for translation
    • translator — who or what produced the translation
    • translation_date — ISO 8601 date of translation
  2. Prose language scan — Sample 3-5 body paragraphs (outside code blocks, frontmatter, and headings). Verify the prose is written in the target locale, not English. Ignore: code blocks, inline code, tool names, field names, file paths, and English terms that have no standard translation in the target language.

  3. Code block identity check — Compare code blocks in the translated file against the English source at skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md. Code blocks must be identical (code is never translated). Flag any code block whose content differs from the English source.

# Check translation frontmatter fields
for field in "locale:" "source_locale:" "source_commit:" "translator:" "translation_date:"; do
  grep -q "^${field}\|^  ${field}" i18n/<locale>/skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md \
    && echo "$field OK" || echo "$field MISSING"
done

Got: All five translation fields present. Body paragraphs are in the target locale. Code blocks match the English source exactly.

If fail: Report missing translation fields as BLOCKING. If body paragraphs are in English despite a non-English locale, report as BLOCKING — the file has untranslated prose. If code blocks differ from the English source, report as BLOCKING — code must not be translated or modified.

Step 4: Check Required Sections

Verify all six required sections are present in the skill body (after frontmatter).

Required sections:

  1. ## When to Use
  2. ## Inputs
  3. ## Procedure (with ### Step N: sub-sections)
  4. ## Validation (may also appear as ## Validation Checklist)
  5. ## Pitfalls
  6. ## Related Skills
# Check each required section
for section in "## When to Use" "## Inputs" "## Procedure" "## Pitfalls" "## Related Skills"; do
  grep -q "$section" skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md && echo "$section: OK" || echo "$section: MISSING"
done

# Validation section may use either heading
grep -qE "## Validation( Checklist)?" skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md && echo "Validation: OK" || echo "Validation: MISSING"

Got: All six sections present. Procedure section contains at least one ### Step sub-heading.

If fail: Report each missing section as BLOCKING. A skill without all six sections is non-compliant with the agentskills.io standard. Provide the section template from the create-skill meta-skill.

Step 5: Check Procedure Step Format

Verify each procedure step follows the required pattern: numbered step title, context, code block(s), and Got:/If fail: blocks.

For each ### Step N: sub-section, check:

  1. The step has a descriptive title (not just "Step N")
  2. At least one code block or concrete instruction exists
  3. An **Got:** block is present
  4. An **If fail:** block is present

Got: Every procedure step has both Got: and If fail: blocks. Steps contain concrete code or instructions, not vague descriptions.

If fail: Report each step missing Expected/On failure as BLOCKING. If steps contain only vague instructions ("configure the system appropriately"), report as SUGGEST with a note to add concrete commands.

Step 6: Verify Line Count

Check that the SKILL.md is within the 500-line limit.

lines=$(wc -l < skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md)
[ "$lines" -le 500 ] && echo "OK ($lines lines)" || echo "OVER LIMIT ($lines lines > 500)"

Got: Line count is 500 or fewer.

If fail: If over 500 lines, report as BLOCKING. Recommend using the refactor-skill-structure skill to extract code blocks >15 lines to references/EXAMPLES.md. Typical reduction: 20-40% by extracting extended examples.

Step 7: Check Registry Synchronization

Verify the skill is listed in skills/_registry.yml under the correct domain with matching metadata.

Check:

  1. Skill id exists under the correct domain section
  2. path matches <skill-name>/SKILL.md
  3. complexity matches frontmatter
  4. description is present (may be abbreviated)
  5. total_skills count at the top of the registry matches actual skill count
# Check if skill is in registry
grep -q "id: <skill-name>" skills/_registry.yml && echo "Registry: FOUND" || echo "Registry: NOT FOUND"

# Check path
grep -A1 "id: <skill-name>" skills/_registry.yml | grep -q "path: <skill-name>/SKILL.md" && echo "Path: OK" || echo "Path: MISMATCH"

Got: Skill is listed in the registry under the correct domain with matching path and metadata. Total count is accurate.

If fail: If not found in registry, report as BLOCKING. Provide the registry entry template:

- id: skill-name
  path: skill-name/SKILL.md
  complexity: intermediate
  language: multi
  description: One-line description

Validation

  • SKILL.md file exists at the expected path
  • YAML frontmatter parses without errors
  • All four required frontmatter fields present (name, description, license, allowed-tools)
  • All six metadata fields present (author, version, domain, complexity, language, tags)
  • name field matches directory name
  • description is under 1024 characters
  • All six required sections present (When to Use, Inputs, Procedure, Validation, Common Pitfalls, Related Skills)
  • Every procedure step has Got: and If fail: blocks
  • Line count is 500 or fewer
  • Skill is listed in _registry.yml with correct domain, path, and metadata
  • total_skills count in registry is accurate
  • (Translations only) All five translation frontmatter fields present (locale, source_locale, source_commit, translator, translation_date)
  • (Translations only) Body paragraphs are in the target locale, not English
  • (Translations only) Code blocks are identical to the English source

Pitfalls

  • Checking frontmatter with regex only: YAML parsing can be subtle. A description: > multiline block looks different from description: "inline". Check both patterns when searching for fields.
  • Missing the Validation section variant: Some skills use ## Validation Checklist instead of ## Validation. Both are acceptable; check for either heading.
  • Forgetting registry total count: After adding a skill to the registry, the total_skills number at the top must also be incremented. This is a common miss in PRs.
  • Name vs. title confusion: The name field must be kebab-case matching the directory name. The # Title heading is human-readable and can differ (e.g., name: review-skill-format, title: # Review Skill Format).
  • Lenient mode skipping blockers: Even in lenient mode, missing required sections and frontmatter fields should still be flagged. Lenient mode only relaxes style and metadata recommendations.
  • Translated skills with English prose: A file with non-English frontmatter, non-English headings, and English body paragraphs passes all structural checks. Always verify body text language for translated skills — the locale field in frontmatter signals that prose must be in the target language, not English.

Related Skills

  • create-skill — The canonical format specification; use as the authoritative reference for what a valid SKILL.md looks like
  • update-skill-content — After format validation passes, use this to improve content quality
  • refactor-skill-structure — When a skill fails the line count check, use this to extract and reorganize
  • review-pull-request — When reviewing a PR that adds or modifies skills, combine PR review with format validation

Dépôt GitHub

pjt222/agent-almanac
Chemin: i18n/caveman-lite/skills/review-skill-format
0
agentsagentskillsai-assisted-developmentclaude-codeskillsteams

Compétences associées

content-collections

Méta

Cette compétence propose une configuration éprouvée en production pour Content Collections, un outil axé sur TypeScript qui transforme des fichiers Markdown/MDX en collections de données typées de manière sûre avec une validation Zod. Utilisez-la lors de la création de blogs, de sites de documentation ou d'applications Vite + React riches en contenu pour garantir la sécurité de typage et la validation automatique du contenu. Elle couvre tout, de la configuration du plugin Vite et de la compilation MDX à l'optimisation des déploiements et la validation des schémas.

Voir la compétence

polymarket

Méta

Cette compétence permet aux développeurs de créer des applications avec la plateforme de marchés prédictifs Polymarket, incluant l'intégration d'API pour le trading et les données de marché. Elle fournit également une diffusion de données en temps réel via WebSocket pour surveiller les transactions en direct et l'activité du marché. Utilisez-la pour mettre en œuvre des stratégies de trading ou pour créer des outils traitant les mises à jour de marché en direct.

Voir la compétence

creating-opencode-plugins

Méta

Cette compétence aide les développeurs à créer des plugins OpenCode qui s'interconnectent avec plus de 25 types d'événements tels que les commandes, les fichiers et les opérations LSP. Elle fournit la structure du plugin, les spécifications de l'API événementielle et les modèles d'implémentation pour les modules JavaScript/TypeScript. Utilisez-la lorsque vous avez besoin d'intercepter, de surveiller ou d'étendre le cycle de vie de l'assistant IA OpenCode avec une logique personnalisée pilotée par les événements.

Voir la compétence

sglang

Méta

SGLang est un framework de service LLM haute performance spécialisé dans la génération rapide et structurée pour les workflows JSON, regex et agentiques grâce à son cache de préfixe RadixAttention. Il offre une inférence nettement plus rapide, particulièrement pour les tâches avec des préfixes répétés, ce qui le rend idéal pour les sorties complexes et structurées ainsi que les conversations multi-tours. Choisissez SGLang plutôt que des alternatives comme vLLM lorsque vous avez besoin d'un décodage contraint ou que vous construisez des applications avec un partage étendu de préfixes.

Voir la compétence